Climate education in secondary science: comparison of model-based and non-model-based investigations of Earth’s climate

References

• Andersson, B., & Wallin, A. (2000). Students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect, the societal consequences of reducing CO2 emissions and the problem of ozone layer depletion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1096–1111. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1096::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya, D., & Maul, A. (2016). The building of knowledge, language, and decision-making about climate change science: A cross-national program for secondary students. International Journal of Science Education, 38(6), 885–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1170227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumfalk, B., Bhattacharya, D., Vo, T., Forbes, C.T., Zangori, L., & Schwarz, C. (2019). Impact of model-based curriculum and instruction on 3rd-grade students’ scientific explanations for the hydrosphere. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(5), 570–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Gotwals, A. W., & Long, T. M. (2020). Assessing students’ approaches to modelling in undergraduate biology. International Journal of Science Education, 42(10), 1697–1714. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1777343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, D., Carroll-Steward, K., & Forbes, C.T. (in press). Empirical research on K-16 climate education: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Geoscience Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2020.1838848
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, D., Chandler, M., Carroll-Steward, K., & Forbes, C.T. (2020). Investigating the phenomenon of increasing surface air temperatures using a global climate modeling approach. The Science Teacher, 88(1), 58–66.
   Google Scholar
• Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1998). High school students’ perceptions of how major global environmental effects might cause skin cancer. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969809599110
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S. N., Furtak, E. M., Timms, N., Nagashima, S. O., & Wilson, M. (2010). The evidence-based reasoning framework: Assessing scientific reasoning. Educational Assessment, 15(3–4), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2010.530551
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. M., & Macgregor, I. D. (2003). GLOBE: Science education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-51.1.9
   Google Scholar
• Carroll-Steward, K., Bhattacharya, D., Chandler, M., & Forbes, C.T. (accepted pending revisions). Secondary science teachers’ implementation of a curricular intervention when teaching with global climate models. Journal of Geoscience Education.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, L.H., Alston, E.J., Phelps, C.S., Moore, S.W., Diones, D.D., Oots, P.C., Fischer, J.D., & Mims, F.M., III. (2008). The My NASA data project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 89(4), 437. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-89-4-437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, H., Kelly, K., & Yetter, L. (2014). Using remote sensing and geospatial technology for climate change education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(4), 609–620. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-040.1
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, C.T., Chandler, M., Blake, J., Bhattacharya, D., Carroll-Steward, K., Johnson, V., DeGrand, T., Mason, W., & Murrow, B. (2020). Fostering climate literacy with global climate models in secondary science classrooms: Insights from a collaborative partnership. In J. Henderson & A. Drewes (Eds.), Teaching climate change in the United States (pp. 29–43). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, C.T., Zangori, L., & Schwarz, C. (2015). Empirical validation of integrated learning performances for hydrologic phenomena: 3rd-grade students’ model-driven explanation-construction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 895–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouveau, J., & Passmore, C. (2017). “Models of” versus “models for”: Toward an agent-based conception of modeling in the science classroom. Science & Education, 26(1–2), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9884-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2001). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 881). J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, & C. A. Johnson (Eds.), Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., & Sinatra, G. M. (2012). College students’ perceptions about the plausibility of human-induced climate change. Research in Science Education, 42(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9196-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louca, L. T., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Modeling-based learning in science education: Cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions. Educational Review, 64(4), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.628748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magana, A. J., Fennell, H. W., Vieira, C., & Falk, M. J. (2019). Characterizing the interplay of cognitive and metacognitive knowledge in computational modeling and simulation practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(2), 276–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis: A companion to qualitative research. Retrieved February 12, 2020, from http://www.qualitative research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385
   Google Scholar
• McNeal, K. S., Spry, J. M., Mitra, R., & Tipton, J. L. (2014). Measuring student engagement, knowledge, and perceptions of climate change in an introductory environmental geology course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(4), 655–667. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-111.1
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. R., & Kastens, K. A. (2018). Investigating the impacts of targeted professional development around models and modeling on teachers’ instructional practice and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(5), 641–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2017). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Standards and Technology (2015). Big Data Interoperability Framework. http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1500-1
   Google Scholar
• Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant, A., & Lee, H. S. (2015). Constructing scientific arguments using evidence from dynamic computational climate models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9499-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Plano Clark, V. L., & Ivankova, N. V. (2019). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Pruneau, D., Gravel, H., Bourque, W., & Langis, J. (2003). Experimentation with a socio-constructivist process for climate change education. Environmental Education Research, 9(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462032000126096
   Google Scholar
• Psycharis, S. (2013). Examining the effect of the computational models on learning performance, scientific reasoning, epistemic beliefs and argumentation: An implication for the STEM agenda. Computers & Education, 68, 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinfried, S., & Tempelmann, S. (2014). The impact of secondary school students’ preconceptions on the evolution of their mental models of the greenhouse effect and global warming. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 304–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.773598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C., Reiser, B., Davis, B., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Designing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Choi, S., & Charusombat, U. (2009). Seventh grade students’ conceptions of global warming and climate change. Environmental Education Research, 15(5), 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903114592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, N., Stevens, S. Y., & Krajcik, J. (2010). Tracking student learning over time using construct-centered design. In S. Rodrigues (Ed.), Using analytical frameworks for classroom research: Collecting data and analyzing narrative (pp. 38–58). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Svihla, V., & Linn, M. C. (2012). A design-based approach to fostering understanding of global climate change. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 651–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.597453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasquier, G., Levrini, O., & Dillion, J. (2016). Exploring students’ epistemological knowledge of models and modeling in science: Results from a teaching/learning experience on climate change. International Journal of Science Education, 38(4), 539–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1148828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2016). Action for climate empowerment: Guidelines for accelerating solutions through education, training and public awareness. https://unfccc.int/topics/education-and-outreach/resources/ace-guidelines
   Google Scholar
• Varma, K., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Using interactive technology to support students understanding of the greenhouse effect and global warming. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(4), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9337-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visintainer, T., & Linn, M. (2015). Sixth-grade students’ progress in understanding the mechanisms of global climate change. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9538-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangori, L., Peel, A., Kinslow, A., Friedrichsen, P., & Sadler, T. D. (2017). Student development of model-based reasoning about carbon cycling and climate change in a socio-scientific issues unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1249–1273. doi:10.1002/tea.21404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar