References
- Anderhag, P. (2017). Taste for science: A Bourdieu-pragmatism approach to interest, aesthetics and learning. In A. Bellocchi, C. Quigley, & K. Otrel-Cas (Eds.), Exploring emotions, aesthetics and wellbeing in science education research (pp. 39–54). Springer.
- Anderhag, P., Emanuelsson, P., Wickman, P.-O., & Hamza, K. M. (2013). Students’ choice of post-compulsory science: In search of schools that compensate for the socio-economic background of their students. International Journal of Science Education, 35(18), 3141–3160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.696738
- Anderhag, P., Wickman, P.-O., & Hamza, K. M. (2015). Signs of taste for science: A methodology for studying the constitution of interest in the science classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(2), 339–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9641-9
- Atkinson, P., & Delamont, S. (2006). Rescuing narrative from qualitative research. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 164–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.21atk
- Bevins, S., & Price, G. (2016). Reconceptualising inquiry in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1124300
- Bloom, J. W. (1992). The development of scientific knowledge in elementary school children: A context of meaning perspective. Science Education, 76(4), 399–413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760405
- Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Routledge.
- Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.
- Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9639-x
- Carlone, H. B., Haun-Frank, J., & Kimmel, S. C. (2010). Tempered radicals: Elementary teachers’ narratives of teaching science within and against prevailing meanings of schooling. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(4), 941–965. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-010-9282-6
- Cheung, D., & Ng, P.-H. (2000). Science teachers’ beliefs about curriculum design. Research in Science Education, 30(4), 357–375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461556
- Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019005002
- Contreras, J. (2002). Autonomia de professores. Cortez.
- Deneroff, V. (2016). Professional development in person: Identity and the construction of teaching within a high school science department. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9546-z
- Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. Berkley Publishing Group.
- Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Kappa Delta Pi.
- Dominguez, C. R. C., Viviani, L. M., Cazetta, V., Guridi, V. M., Faht, E. C., Pioker, F. C., & Cubero, J. (2015). Professional choices and teacher identities in the science teacher education program at EACH/USP. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(4), 1189–1213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9650-8
- Engström, S., & Carlhed, C. (2014). Different habitus: Different strategies in teaching physics? Relationships between teachers’ social, economic and cultural capital and strategies in teaching physics in upper secondary school. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(3), 699–728. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9538-z
- Enyedy, N., Goldberg, J., & Welsh, K. M. (2006). Complex dilemmas of identity and practice. Science Education, 90(1), 68–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20096
- Feille, K. K. (2017). Teaching in the field: What teacher professional life histories tell about How they learn to teach in the outdoor learning environment. Research in Science Education, 47(3), 603–620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9519-9
- Gao, L., & Watkins, D. A. (2002). Conceptions of teaching held by school science teachers in P.R. China: Identification and cross-cultural comparisons. International Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110066926
- Geelan, D. R., Wildy, H., Louden, W., & Wallace, J. (2004). Teaching for understanding and/or teaching for the examination in high school physics. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 447–462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000097398
- Geldenhuys, M., & Bosch, A. (2019). A Rasch adapted version of the 30-item Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI). Journal of Personality Assessment, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1527343
- Girod, M., Rau, C., & Schepige, A. (2003). Appreciating the beauty of science ideas: Teaching for aesthetic understanding. Science Education, 87(4), 574–587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1054
- Glackin, M. (2016). ‘Risky fun’ or ‘authentic science’? How teachers’ beliefs influence their practice during a professional development programme on outdoor learning. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 409–433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1145368
- Hong, J. Y. (2010). Pre-service and beginning teachers’ professional identity and its relation to dropping out of the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1530–1543. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.003
- Jakobson, B., & Wickman, P.-O. (2008). The roles of aesthetic experience in elementary school science. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9039-8
- Jones, M. G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84(2), 180–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<180::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-X
- Jordens, J. Z., & Zepke, N. (2019). Quality teaching in science: An emergent conceptual framework. Research in Science Education, 49(5), 1415–1432. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9661-z
- Lahire, B. (2002). Portraits sociologiques: Dispositions et variations individuelles. Armand Colin.
- Lahire, B. (2003). From the habitus to an individual heritage of dispositions. Towards a sociology at the level of the individual. Poetics, 31(5–6), 329–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2003.08.002
- Ma, H. (2018). Influence of the Interplay of Habitual Affective Attributes and Classroom Learning Environments on Learners’ Situational Affective Experiences in Learning Science: The Narratives of Primary Pre-Service Teachers. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9800-1
- Mark, S. L. (2018). A bit of both science and economics: A non-traditional STEM identity narrative. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(4), 983–1003. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9832-2
- McAdams, D. P. (2006). The role of narrative in personality psychology today. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.04mca
- Mendick, H., Berge, M., & Danielsson, A. (2017). A critique of the stem pipeline: Young people’s identities in Sweden and science education policy. British Journal of Educational Studies, 65(4), 481–497. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2017.1300232
- Peterson, E. E., & Langellier, K. M. (2006). The performance turn in narrative studies. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 173–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.22pet
- Pillen, M., Beijaard, D., & Den Brok, P. (2013). Professional identity tensions of beginning teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 19(6), 660–678. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.827455
- Rezende, F., & Ostermann, F. (2019). Hegemonic and counter-hegemonic discourses in science education from the perspective of a post-critical curriculum theory. Cultural Studies of Science Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09945-8
- Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground – A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351
- Salloum, S., & Abd-El-khalick, F. (2010). A study of practical-moral knowledge in science teaching: Case studies in physical science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 929–951. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20361
- Šimunović, M., Reić Ercegovac, I., & Burušić, J. (2018). How important is it to my parents? Transmission of STEM academic values: The role of parents’ values and practices and children’s perceptions of parental influences. International Journal of Science Education, 40(9), 977–995. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1460696
- Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040200800103
- Taylor, M., Yates, A., Meyer, L. H., & Kinsella, P. (2011). Teacher professional leadership in support of teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.005
- Tollefson, J. (2019). ‘Tropical Trump’ sparks unprecedented crisis for Brazilian science. Nature, 572(7768), 161–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02353-6
- van Driel, J. H., Meirink, J. A., van Veen, K., & Zwart, R. C. (2012). Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: A review of design features and quality of research. Studies in Science Education, 48(2), 129–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.738020
- Wade, L. (2016). Brazilian crisis threatens science and environment. Science, 352(6289), 1044–1044. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.352.6289.1044
- Wickman, P.-O. (2013). Aesthetic experience in science education (1st ed.). Routledge.
- Wickman, P.-O. (2017). Back to the drawing board: examining the philosophical foundations of educational research on aesthetics and emotions. In A. Bellocchi, C. Quigley, & K. Otrel-Cass (Eds.), Exploring emotions, aesthetics and wellbeing in science education research (Vol. 13), pp. 9–38). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43353-0