References
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA, APA, NCME). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
- Arjoon, J. A., Xu, X., & Lewis, J. E. (2013). Understanding the state of the art for measurement in chemistry education research: Examining the psychometric evidence. Journal of Chemistry Education, 90(5), 536–545. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/ed3002013
- Atilhan, M., Eljack, F., Alfadala, H., Froyd, J. E., El-Halwagi, M., & Mahalec, V. (2014). Inquiry guided learning in a chemical engineering core curriculum: General instructional approach and specific application to the fluid mechanics case. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(6), 1450–1460. http://hdl.handle.net/10576/4605
- Bain, K., Moon, A., Mack, M. R., & Towns, M. H. (2014). A review of research on the teaching and learning of thermodynamics at the university level. Chemistry Education Resource and Practice, 15(3), 320–335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00011K
- Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change (pp. 61–82). Routledge.
- Clark, J. W., Thompson, J. R., & Mountcastle, D. B. (2014). Investigating student conceptual difficulties in thermodynamics across multiple disciplines: The first law and p-v diagrams. In the 121st American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 24.821.1–24.821.17). https://peer.asee.org/20713
- Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
- Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Holt.
- Firetto, C. M., Van Meter, P. N., Turns, S. R., & Litzinger, T. A. (2016). The validation of a conceptual reasoning inventory for introductory thermodynamics. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), 2635–2652. https://www.ijee.ie/latestissues/Vol32-6/25_ijee3340ns.pdf
- Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505
- Goldstein, G., & Hersen, M. (2000). Handbook of Psychological Assessment. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Jacobs, T. J., & Caton, J. A. (2014). An inventory to assess students’ knowledge of second law concepts. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, paper ID #10253.
- Jorion, N., Gane, B., James, K., Schroeder, L., Dibello, L., & Pellegrino, J. (2015). An analytic framework for evaluating the validity of concept inventory claims. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(4), 454–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20104
- Kamcharean, C., & Wattanakasiwich, P. (2016). Development and implementation of a two-tier thermodynamics diagnostic test to survey students’ understanding in thermal physics. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 24(2), 14–36.
- Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12000
- Kautz, C. H., & Schmitz, G. (2007, November 11-15). Probing student understanding of basic concepts and principles in introductory engineering thermodynamics. In Proceedings of the ASME 2007 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Volume 6: Energy Systems: Analysis, Thermodynamics and Sustainability, Seattle, Washington, USA, 473–480. ASME. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2007-41863
- Kelley, T. L. (1939). Selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(1), 17–24. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057123
- Kim, H. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
- Koretsky, M. D., & Brooks, B. J. (2011). Comparison of student responses to easy and difficult thermodynamics conceptual questions during peer instruction. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27(4), 897–908.
- Krell, M., Mathesius, S., van Driel, J., Vergara, C., & Krüger, D. (2020). Assessing scientific reasoning competencies of pre-service science teachers: Translating a German multiple-choice instrument into English and Spanish. International Journal of Science Education, 42(17), 2819–2841. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1837989
- Kulkarni, V. D., & Tambade, P. S. (2013). Assessing the conceptual understanding about heat and thermodynamics at undergraduate level. European Journal of Physics Education, 4(2), 9–16.
- Kuschmierz, P., Beniermann, A., & Graf, D. (2020). Development and evaluation of the knowledge about evolution 2.0 instrument (KAEVO 2.0). International Journal of Science Education, 42(15), 2601–2629. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1822561
- Lei, P.-W., & Wu, Q. (2007). CTTITEM: SAS macro and SPSS syntax for classical item analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 527–530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193021
- Loverude, M. E., Kautz, C. H., & Heron, P. R. (2002). Student understanding of the first law of thermodynamics: Relating work to the adiabatic compression of an ideal gas. American Journal of Physics, 70(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1417532
- Meltzer, D. E. (2004). Investigation of students’ reasoning regarding heat, work, and the first law of thermodynamics in an introductory calculus-based general physics course. American Journal of Physics, 72(11), 1432–1446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1789161
- Meltzer, D. E.. (2008). Investigating and addressing learning difficulties in thermodynamics. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. (pp. 13.812.1–13.812.11). https://peer.asee.org/3900
- Midkiff, K. C., Litzinger, T. A., & Evans, D. L. (2001). Development of engineering thermodynamics concept inventory instruments. In 31st Annual frontiers in education conference. Impact on engineering and science education. Conference proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37193) (Vol. 2, pp. F2A–F23). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2001.963691
- Miller, R. L., Streveler, R. A., Olds, B. M., Chi, M. T. H., Nelson, M. A., & Geist, M. R. (2006). Misconceptions about rate processes: Preliminary evidence for the importance of emergent conceptual schemas in thermal and transport sciences. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (11.933.1–11.933.20). https://peer.asee.org/596
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). (2018). Indicators for monitoring undergraduate STEM education. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/24943
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
- Nelson, M. A., Miller, R. L., Streveler, R. A., Olds, B. M., & Geist, M. R. (2006, April 7). Using concept inventories for formative assessment of conceptual learning: A case study from engineering. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
- Nottis, K., Prince, M., & Vigeant, M. (2010). Building an understanding of heat transfer concepts in undergraduate chemical engineering courses. U.S.-China Education Review, 7(2), 1–9.
- Odom, A. L., & Barrow, L. H. (1995). Development and application of a two-tiered diagnostic test measuring college biology students’ understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320106
- Opitz, A., Heene, M., & Fischer, F. (2017). Measuring scientific reasoning – A review of test instruments. Educational Research and Evaluation, 23(3–4), 78–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2017.1338586
- Osterhaus, C., Koerber, S., & Sodian, B. (2020). The Science-P Reasoning Inventory (SPR-I): Measuring emerging scientific-reasoning skills in primary school. International Journal of Science Education, 42(7), 1087–1107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1748251
- Pathare, S., Huli, S., Ladage, S., & Pradhan, H. (2018). Understanding first law of thermodynamics through activities. Physics Education, 53(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/aa9de7
- Physport.org (ND). Heat and Temperature Conceptual Evaluation (HTCE). https://www.physport.org/assessments/assessment.cfm?I=16&A=HTCE
- Prince, M., Vigeant, M., & Nottis, K. (2010). Assessing misconceptions of undergraduate engineering students in the thermal sciences. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 880–890.
- Prince, M., Vigeant, M. A., & Nottis, K. (2012). Development of the Heat and Energy Concept Inventory: Preliminary results on the prevalence and persistence of engineering students’ misconceptions. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 412–438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00056.x
- Prince, M., Vigeant, M. A., & Nottis, K. (2013). Assessment and repair of critical misconceptions in engineering heat transfer and thermodynamics. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/6584/view
- Romine, W. L., Sadler, T. D., Dauer, J. M., & Kinslow, A. (2020). Measurement of socio-scientific reasoning (SSR) and exploration of SSR as a progression of competencies. International Journal of Science Education, 42(18), 2981–3002. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1849853
- Saricayir, H., Ay, S., Comek, A., Cansiz, G., & Uce, M. (2016). Determining students’ conceptual understanding level of thermodynamics. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(6), 69–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i6.1421
- Simon, M. N., Prather, E. E., Buxner, S. R., & Impey, C. D. (2019). The development and validation of the Planet Formation Concept Inventory. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2448–2464. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1685140
- Sreenivasulu, B., & Subramaniam, R. (2013). University students’ understanding of chemical thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education, 35(4), 601–635. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.683460
- Stern, F., Kampourakis, K., Delaval, M., & Müller, A. (2020). Development and validation of a questionnaire measuring secondary students’ genetic essentialism and teleology (GET) conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 42(2), 218–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1707905
- Streveler, R. A., Litzinger, T., Miller, R., & Steif, P. (2008). Learning conceptual knowledge in the engineering sciences: Overview and future research directions. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00979.x
- Streveler, R. A., Olds, B. M., Miller, Nelson, R. L., & Nelson, M. A. (2003). Using a delphi study to identify the most difficult concepts for students to master in thermal and transport science. In the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (pp, 8.1235.1–8.1235.8). https://peer.asee.org/12592
- Tamir, P. (1989). Some issues related to the use of justifications to multiple choice answers. Journal of Biological Education, 23(4), 285–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1989.9655083
- Tanahoung, C., Sharma, M., Johnston, I., Chitaree, R., & Soankwan, C. (2006, December 3-8). Surveying sydney introductory physics students’ understandings of heat and temperature. Presented at the Australian Institute of Physics National Congress, Brisbane, AUS.
- Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100204
- Turns, S. R., Pauley, L. L., & Zappe, S. E. (2009). Active and collaborative learning in a first course in fluid mechanics: Implementation and transfer. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25(5), 979–997.
- Van Meter, P. N., Firetto, C. M., Turns, S. R., Litzinger, T. A., Cameron, C. E., & Shaw, C. W. (2016). Improving students’ conceptual reasoning by prompting cognitive operations. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 245–277. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20120
- Villablanca, S., Montenegro, M., & Ramos-Moore, E. (2020). Analysis of student perceptions of scientific models: Validation of a Spanish-adapted version of the students’ understanding of models in science instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 42(17), 2945–2958. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1843735
- Wattanakasiwich, P., Taleab, P., Sharma, M. D., & Johnston, I. D. (2013). Development and implementation of a conceptual survey in thermodynamics. International Journal Innovation in Science Mathematics Education, 21(1), 29–53. https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/CAL/article/view/6459/7493
- Wren, D., & Barbera, J. (2014). Psychometric analysis of the thermochemistry concept inventory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(3), 380–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00170A
- Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. (2001). Introductory thermal concept evaluation: Assessing students’ understanding. The Physics Teacher, 39(8), 496–504. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1424603