References
- Abdullah, C., Parris, J., Lie, R., Guzdar, A., & Tour, E. (2015). Critical analysis of primary literature in a master’s-level class: Effects on self-efficacy and science-process skills. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(3), ar34,1–ar34,13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-10-0180
- Adelson, J. L., Dickinson, E. R., & Cunningham, B. C. (2015). Differences in the reading-mathematics relationship: A multi-grade, multi-year statewide examination. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 118–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.006
- Aditomo, A., & Klieme, E. (2020). Forms of inquiry-based science instruction and their relations with learning outcomes: Evidence from high and low-performing education systems. International Journal of Science Education, 42(4), 504–525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1716093
- Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011a). A cultural perspective on the structure of student interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518640
- Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011b). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001
- Ajello, A. M., Caponera, E., & Palmerio, L. (2018). Italian students’ results in the PISA mathematics test: Does reading competence matter? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(3), 505–520. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0385-x
- Allen, D. A. (2014). A test of the relationship between reading ability & standardized biology assessment scores. The American Biology Teacher, 76(4), 247–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2014.76.4.6
- Beal, C. R., Adams, N. M., & Cohen, P. R. (2010). Reading proficiency and mathematics problem solving by high school English language learners. Urban Education, 45(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085909352143
- Birgisdottir, F., Gestsdottir, S., & Geldhof, G. J. (2020). Early predictors of first and fourth grade reading and math: The role of self-regulation and early literacy skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 53, 507–519. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.05.001
- Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
- Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M., & Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95(6), 1049–1065. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20462
- Cai, Y., & Zhu, X. (2017). Learning strategies and reading literacy among Chinese and Finnish adolescents: Evidence of suppression. Educational Psychology, 37(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1170105
- Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9639-x
- Cano, F., García, Á, Berbén, A. B. G., & Justicia, F. (2014). Science learning: A path analysis of its links with reading comprehension, question-asking in class and science achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1710–1732. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.876678
- Caponera, E., Sestito, P., & Russo, P. M. (2016). The influence of reading literacy on mathematics and science achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(2), 197–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.936998
- Chalmers, A. F. (2013). What is this thing called science? (4th ed.). University of Queensland Press.
- Cheung, D. (2018). The key factors affecting students’ individual interest in school science lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 40(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1362711
- Chow, J. C., & Ekholm, E. (2019). Language domains differentially predict mathematics performance in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 46, 179–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.02.011
- Codding, R. S., Petscher, Y., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015). CBM reading, mathematics, and written expression at the secondary level: Examining latent composite relations among indices and unique predictions with a state achievement test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 437–450. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037520
- Cooper, C. I., & Pearson, P. T. (2012). A genetically optimized predictive system for success in general chemistry using a diagnostic algebra test. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 197–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9318-z
- Cornog, J., & Stoddard, G. D. (1925). Predicting performance in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 2(8), 701–708. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/ed002p701
- Counts, A. (1980). Achievement in reading and mathematics as predictors of achievement in science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, South Carolina.
- Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. The MacMillan Company.
- Ding, H., & Homer, M. (2020). Interpreting mathematics performance in PISA: Taking account of reading performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101566. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101566
- Dvorak, A. (1925). A study of achievement and subject matter in general science. General Science Quarterly, 10(1), 289–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730100101
- Edwards, A. C. (2012). An analysis of high school mathematics achievement and English language arts achievement as predictors of science achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tarleton State University, Texas.
- Ellis, R. M. (2006). An empirical analysis of the efficacy of race, reading, sex, and socioeconomic status as predictors of student achievement relative to mathematics and science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, South Carolina State University, South Carolina.
- Erbeli, F., Shi, Q., Campbell, A. R., Hart, S. A., & Woltering, S. (2021). Developmental dynamics between reading and math in elementary school. Developmental Science, 24(1), e13004. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13004
- Fang, Z. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 491–520. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500339092
- Fang, Z., Lamme, L., Pringle, R., Patrick, J., Sanders, J., Zmach, C., Charbonnet, S., & Henkel, M. (2008). Integrating reading into middle school science: What we did, found and learned. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 2067–2089. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701644266
- Fang, Z., & Wei, Y. (2010). Improving middle school students’ science literacy through reading infusion. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(4), 262–273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383051
- Ferrell, B., Phillips, M. M., & Barbera, J. (2016). Connecting achievement motivation to performance in general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 1054–1066. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00148C
- Forrest, R. L., Stokes, D. W., Burridge, A. B., & Voight, C. D. (2017). Math remediation intervention for student success in the algebra-based introductory physics course. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020137-1–020137-8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020137
- Foster, M. E., Anthony, J. L., Zucker, T. A., & Branum-Martin, L. (2019). Prediction of English and Spanish kindergarten mathematics from English and Spanish cognitive and linguistic abilities in Hispanic dual language learners. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 46, 213–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.02.007
- Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., Mcdonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
- Glynn, S. M., & Muth, K. D. (1994). Reading and writing to learn science: Achieving scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 1057–1073. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310915
- Gomez, K., Gomez, L. M., Cooper, B., Lozano, M., & Mancevice, N. (2019). Redressing science learning through supporting language: The biology credit recovery course. Urban Education, 54(10), 1489–1519. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916677345
- González-Gómez, D., Jeong, J. S., Rodríguez, D. A., & Cañada-Cañada, F. (2016). Performance and perception in the flipped learning model: An initial approach to evaluate the effectiveness of a new teaching methodology in a general science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 450–459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9605-9
- Grimm, K. J. (2008). Longitudinal associations between reading and mathematics achievement. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/87565640801982486
- Haak, D. C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332(6034), 1213–1216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204820
- Hall, S. S., Maltby, J., Filik, R., & Paterson, K. B. (2016). Key skills for science learning: The importance of text cohesion and reading ability. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.926313
- Harlaar, N., Kovas, Y., Dale, P. S., Petrill, S. A., & Plomin, R. (2012). Mathematics is differentially related to reading comprehension and word decoding: Evidence from a genetically sensitive design. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 622–635. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027646
- Hodgkiss, A., Gilligan, K. A., Tolmie, A. K., Thomas, M. S. C., & Farran, E. K. (2018). Spatial cognition and science achievement: The contribution of intrinsic and extrinsic spatial skills from 7 to 11 years. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 675–697. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12211
- Hughes, J. M. (1925). The use of tests in the evaluation of factors which condition the achievement of pupils in high school physics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 16(4), 217–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0072935
- Isphording, I. E., Piopiunik, M., & Rodríguez-Planas, N. (2016). Speaking in numbers: The effect of reading performance on math performance among immigrants. Economics Letters, 139, 52–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.11.031
- Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
- Koomen, M. H., Weaver, S., Blair, R. B., & Oberhauser, K. S. (2016). Disciplinary literacy in the science classroom: Using adaptive primary literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 847–894. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21317
- Korpershoek, H., Kuyper, H., & van der Werf, G. (2015). The relation between students’ math and reading ability and their mathematics, physics, and chemistry examination grades in secondary education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1013–1037. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9534-0
- Kyttälä, M., & Björn, P. M. (2014). The role of literacy skills in adolescents’ mathematics word problem performance: Controlling for visuo-spatial ability and mathematics anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 59–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.010
- Laere, E. V., Aesaert, K., & van Braak, J. (2014). The role of students’ home language in science achievement: A multilevel approach. International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2772–2794. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.936327
- Lawson, A. E., Banks, D. L., & Logvin, M. (2007). Self-efficacy, reasoning ability, and achievement in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 706–724. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20172
- Lee, J. (2016). Attitude toward school does not predict academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.09.009
- Luykx, A., Lee, O., Mahotiere, M., Lester, B., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2007). Cultural and home language influences on children’s responses to science assessments. Teachers College Record, 109(4), 897–926.
- Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215
- Neri, N. C., Guill, K., & Retelsdorf, J. (2021). Language in science performance: Do good readers perform better? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00453-5
- Noble, T., Rosebery, A., Suarez, C., Warren, B., & O’Connor, M. C. (2014). Science assessments and English language learners: Validity evidence based on response processes. Applied Measurement in Education, 27(4), 248–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2014.944309
- OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: A new framework for assessment.
- OECD. (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework – mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills.
- OECD. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006.
- OECD. (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science.
- OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy.
- OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematics and financial literacy.
- OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework.
- OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do.
- OECD. (2019c). PISA 2018 results (Volume II): Where all students can succeed.
- OECD. (2020). Benchmarking the performance of China’s education system.
- OECD. (in press). PISA 2018 technical report. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/pisa2018technicalreport/
- Powell, C. B., Simpson, J., Williamson, V. M., Dubrovskiy, A., Walker, D. R., Jang, B., Shelton, G. R., & Mason D. (2020). Impact of arithmetic automaticity on students’ success in second-semester general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(4), 1028–1041. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00006J
- Powers, S. R. (1921). The achievement of high school and freshman college students in chemistry. School Science and Mathematics, 21(4), 366–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1921.tb08000.x
- Powers, S. R. (1924). Tests of achievement in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 1(9), 139–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/ed001p139
- Powers, S. R. (1925). Achievement in high school chemistry—An examination of subject matter. School Science and Mathematics, 25(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1925.tb07538.x
- Powersa, S. B. (1922). A comparison of the achievement of high school and university students in certain tasks in chemistry. The Journal of Educational Research, 6(4), 332–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1922.10879309
- Pursell, D. P., Forlemu, N. Y., & Anagho, L. E. (2017). Mathematics competency for beginning chemistry students through dimensional analysis. Journal of Nursing Education, 56(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20161219-05
- Pyburn, D. T., Pazicni, S., Benassi, V. A., & Tappin, E. E. (2013). Assessing the relation between language comprehension and performance in general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 524–541. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00014A
- Ralph, V. R., & Lewis, S. E. (2019). An explanative basis for the differential performance of students with low math aptitude in general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(3), 570–593. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00068B
- Reed, D. K., Petscher, Y., & Truckenmiller, A. J. (2017). The contribution of general reading ability to science achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(2), 253–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.158
- Rich, S. G. (1925). Achievements of pupils in chemistry. School Science and Mathematics, 25(2), 145–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1925.tb04899.x
- Ryan, M. D., & Reid, S. A. (2016). Impact of the flipped classroom on student performance and retention: A parallel controlled study in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00717
- Schroeder, C. M., Scott, T. P., Tolson, H., Huang, T., & Lee, Y. (2007). A meta-analysis of national research: Effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(10), 1436–1460. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20212
- Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Routledge.
- Scott, F. J. (2012). Is mathematics to blame? An investigation into high school students’ difficulty in performing calculations in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 330–336. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP00001F
- Shirley, T. A. (2014). Language learners and the impact of reading ability and socioeconomic inequality on science and math achievement: Discriminate function analysis and differential item functioning (item bias) studies of the PISA across 45 countries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, California.
- Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596607
- Stoffelsma, L., & Spooren, W. (2019). The relationship between English reading proficiency and academic achievement of first-year science and mathematics students in a multilingual context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(5), 905–922. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9905-z
- Tang, N., Tsai, C., Barrow, L., & Romine, W. (2019). Impacts of enquiry-based science teaching on achievement gap between high-and-low SES students: Findings from PISA 2015. International Journal of Science Education, 41(4), 448–470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1555726
- Taraban, R., Box, C., Myers, R., Pollard, R., & Bowen, C. W. (2007). Effects of active-learning experiences on achievement, attitudes, and behaviors in high school biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 960–979. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20183
- Teig, N., Scherer, R., & Nilsen, T. (2018). More isn’t always better: The curvilinear relationship between inquiry-based teaching and student achievement in science. Learning and Instruction, 56, 20–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.02.006
- Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintrón, D. L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G., Grummer, J. A., Hennessey, K., Hsiao, J., Iranon, N., Jones II, L., Jordt, H., Keller, M., Lacey, M. E., Littlefield, C. E., ... Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(12), 6476–6483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117
- Thompson, E. D., Bowling, B. V., & Markle, R. E. (2018). Predicting student success in a major’s introductory biology course via logistic regression analysis of scientific reasoning ability and mathematics scores. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 151–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9563-5
- Trakulphadetkrai, N. V., Courtney, L., Clenton, J., Treffers-Daller, J., & Tsakalaki, A. (2020). The contribution of general language ability, reading comprehension and working memory to mathematics achievement among children with English as additional language (EAL): An exploratory study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(4), 473–487. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1373742
- U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Every Student Succeeds Act. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/index.html
- Vukovic, R. K., Lesaux, N. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2010). The mathematics skills of children with reading difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 639–643. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.08.004
- Walker, C. M., Zhang, B., & Surber, J. (2008). Using a multidimensional differential item functioning framework to determine if reading ability affects student performance in mathematics. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(2), 162–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08957340801926201
- Wilcox, B. R., Caballero, M. D., Rehn, D. A., & Pollock, S. J. (2013). Analytic framework for students’ use of mathematics in upper-division physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 9(2), 020119-1–020119-17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020119
- Williamson, V. M., Walker, D. R., Chuu, E., Broadway, S., Mamiya, B., Powell, C. B., Shelton, G. R., Weber, R., Dabney, A. R., & Mason, D. (2020). Impact of basic arithmetic skills on success in first-semester general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00077A
- Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 321–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9052-y
- Zhang, X., Hu, B. Y., Ren, L., & Fan, X. (2017). Pathways to reading, mathematics, and science: Examining domain-general correlates in young Chinese children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 366–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.09.004
- Zhu, Y. (2019). How Chinese students’ scientific competencies are influenced by their attitudes? International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2094–2112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1660926