References
- Appleton, K. (2008). Developing science pedagogical content knowledge through mentoring elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(6), 523–545. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9109-4
- Bamberger, Y. M., & Krajcik, J. (2012). Teacher belief and change about integrating nanoscale science and technology into a secondary science curriculum. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 16(1), 1–20. https://ejrsme.icrsme.com/article/view/9035/8014
- Bang, E., & Luft, J. A. (2014). Exploring the written dialogues of two first-year secondary science teachers in an online mentoring program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(1), 25–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9362-z
- Barnett, E., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2015). Educative mentoring: How a mentor supported a preservice biology teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(7), 647–668. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9442-3
- Beek, G. J., Zuiker, I., & Zwart, R. C. (2019). Exploring mentors’ roles and feedback strategies to analyze the quality of mentoring dialogues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 78(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.006
- Bhushan, B. (2016). Introduction to nanotechnology: History, status, and importance of nanoscience and nanotechnology education. In K. Winkelmann & B. Bhushan (Eds.), Global perspectives of nanoscience and engineering education (pp. 1–31). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31833-2_1
- Bitan-Friedlander, N., Dreyfus, A., & Milgrom, Z. (2004). Types of “teachers in training”: the reactions of primary school science teachers when confronted with the task of implementing an innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(6), 607–619. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.06.007
- Blonder, R. (2010). The influence of a teaching model in nanotechnology on chemistry teachers’ knowledge and their teaching attitudes. Journal of Nano Education, 2(1-2), 67–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1166/jne.2010.1004
- Blonder, R., & Sakhnini, S. (2012). Teaching two basic nanotechnology concepts in secondary school by using a variety of teaching methods. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(4), 500–516. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP20026 K
- Blonder, R., & Yonai, E. (2020). Exposing school students to nanoscience: A review of Published programs. In K. Sattler (Ed.), 21st Century nanoscience–a handbook: Public policy, education, and global trends (volume ten). CRC Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429351631
- Bradbury, L. U., & Koballa, T. R. (2007). Mentor advice giving in an alternative certification program for secondary science teaching: Opportunities and roadblocks in developing a knowledge base for teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(6), 817–840. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9076-1
- Bressman, S., Winter, J. S., & Efron, S. E. (2018). Next generation mentoring: Supporting teachers beyond induction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 162–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.04.003
- Bryan, L. A., Magana, A. J., & Sederberg, D. (2015). Published research on pre-college students’ and teachers’ nanoscale science, engineering, and technology learning. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2014-0029
- Bryan, L. A., Sederberg, D., Daly, S., Sears, D., & Giordano, N. (2012). Facilitating teachers’ development of nanoscale science, engineering, and technology content knowledge. Nanotechnology Reviews, 1(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2011-0015
- Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. BSCS.
- Chaitidou, M., Spyrtou, A., Kariotoglou, P., & Dimitriadou, C. (2018). Professional Development in Inquiry-Oriented Pedagogical Content Knowledge among Primary School Teachers. The International Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Learning, 25(2), 17–36. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7971/CGP
- Coenders, F., & Terlouw, C. (2015). A model for in-service teacher learning in the context of an innovation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(5), 451–470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9432-5
- Crasborn, F., Hennissen, P., Brouwer, N., Korthagen, F., & Bergen, T. (2011). Exploring a two-dimensional model of mentor teacher roles in mentoring dialogues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 320–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.014
- Daly, S., & Bryan, L. A. (2010). Model use choices of secondary teachers in nanoscale science and engineering education. Journal of Nano Education, 2(1-2), 76–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1166/jne.2010.1009
- Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
- Davidson, S. G., & Hughes, R. (2018). Communities of practice as a framework to explain teachers' experiences within the community of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(9), 1287–1312. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.v55.9
- Drane, D., Swarat, S., Light, G., Hersam, M., & Mason, T. (2009). An evaluation of the efficacy and transferability of a nanoscience module. Journal of Nano Education, 1(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1166/jne.2009.001
- Ernst, J., & Erickson, D. M. (2018). Environmental education professional development for teachers: A study of the impact and influence of mentoring. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(5), 357–374. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2018.1451813
- Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). Routledge Press.
- Helman, L. (2006). What’s in a conversation? Mentoring stances in coaching conferences and how they matter. In B. Achinstein & S. Z. Athanases (Eds.), Mentors in the making: Developing new leaders for new teachers (pp. 69–82). Teachers College Press.
- Hennissen, P., Crasborn, F., Brouwer, N., Korthagen, F., & Bergen, T. (2008). Mapping mentor teachers’ roles in mentoring dialogues. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 168–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.01.001
- Hingant, B., & Albe, V. (2010). Nanosciences and nanotechnologies learning and teaching in secondary education: A review of literature. Studies in Science Education, 46(2), 121–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2010.504543
- Hobson, A. J., Ashby, P., Malderez, A., & Tomlinson, P. D. (2009). Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don't. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 207–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.001
- Hudson, P. (2005). Identifying mentoring practices for developing effective primary science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 27(14), 1723–1739. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500206457
- Hudson, P., Skamp, K., & Brooks, L. (2005). Development of an instrument: Mentoring for effective primary science teaching. Science Education, 89(4), 657–674. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20025
- Huizing, R. L. (2012). Mentoring together: A literature review of group mentoring. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(1), 27–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.645599
- Hutchinson, K., Bryan, L., & Bodner, G. (2009, June). Supporting secondary teachers as they implement new science and engineering curricula: Case examples from nanoscale science and engineering education. Paper Presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–5700
- Ipek, Z., Atik, A. D., Tan, S., & Erkoc, F. (2020). Awareness, exposure, and knowledge levels of science teachers about nanoscience and nanotechnology. Issues in Educational Research, 30(1), 134–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.085898016126754
- Jackman, J. A., Cho, D. J., Jackman, J. S., Sweeney, A. E., & Cho, N. J. (2020). Training leaders in nanotechnology. In K. Sattler (Ed.), 21st century nanoscience–a handbook: Public policy, education, and global trends (volume ten). CRC Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429351631
- Jiao, L., & Barakat, N. (2011). Balanced depth and breadth in a new interdisciplinary nanotechnology course. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.40.1.g
- Jones, M. G., Paechter, M., Yen, C. F., Gardner, G., Taylor, A., & Tretter, T. (2013). Teachers’ concepts of spatial scale: An international comparison. International Journal of Science Education, 35(14), 2462–2482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.610382
- Jones, M. G., Taylor, A., Minogue, J., Broadwell, B., Wiebe, E., & Carter, G. (2007). Understanding scale: Powers of ten. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9034-2
- Jones, M. G., Tretter, T., Taylor, A., & Oppewal, T. (2008). Experienced and novice teachers’ concepts of spatial scale. International Journal of Science Education, 30(3), 409–429. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701416624
- Keiler, L. S., Diotti, R., Hudon, K., & Ransom, J. C. (2020). The role of feedback in teacher mentoring: How coaches, peers, and students affect teacher change. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 28(2), 126–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2020.1749345
- Kennedy, A., & McKay, J. (2011). Beyond induction: The continuing professional development needs of early-career teachers in Scotland. Professional Development in Education, 37(4), 551–569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2010.533598
- Kiviniemi, U., Tynjälä, P., Heikkinen, H. L., & Martin, A. (2020). Running a hybrid: Mingling in-service and pre-service teachers in peer-mentoring groups. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 555–571. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1766442.
- Kumar, D. D. (2007). Nanoscale science and technology in teaching. Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 68, 20–22. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.166391
- Lee, C. K., Wu, T. T., Liu, P. L., & Hsu, S. (2006). Establishing a K-12 nanotechnology program for teacher professional development. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(1), 141–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2005.863429
- Lee, E., & Luft, J. A. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers’ representation of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1343–1363. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187058
- Lin, S. F., Chen, J. Y., Shih, K. Y., Wang, K. H., & Chang, H. P. (2015). Science teachers’ perceptions of nanotechnology teaching and professional development: A survey study in Taiwan. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2014-0019
- Lin, S.-Y., Wu, M.-T., Cho, Y.-I., & Chen, H.-H. (2015). The effectiveness of a popular science promotion program on nanotechnology for elementary school students in I-Lan city. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2014.971733
- Luft, J. A., Firestone, J. B., Wong, S. S., Ortega, I., Adams, K., & Bang, E. (2011). Beginning secondary science teacher induction: A two-year mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1199–1224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20444
- Luft, J. A., Roehrig, G. H., & Patterson, N. C. (2003). Contrasting landscapes: A comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning science teachers’ practices, beliefs, and experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10061
- Mandrikas, A., Michailidi, E., & Stavrou, D. (2020). Teaching nanotechnology in primary education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(4), 377–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1631783
- Mandrikas, A., Michailidi, E., & Stavrou, D. (2021). In-service teachers’ needs and mentor’s practices in applying a teaching–learning sequence on nanotechnology and plastics in primary education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(5), 630–641. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09908-1
- Manou, L., Spyrtou, A., Hatzikraniotis, E., & Kariotoglou, P. (2018). Content transformation for experimental teaching nanoscale science and engineering to primary teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1076(1), 012006. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1076/1/012006
- Manou, L., Spyrtou, A., Hatzikraniotis, E., & Kariotoglou, P. (2019). A nanoscale science and technology training course: Primary teachers’ learning on the lotus and gecko effects. In O. Levrini, & G. Tasquier (Eds.), Electronic proceedings of the ESERA 2019 conference. The beauty and pleasure of understanding: Engaging with contemporary challenges through science education, part 14 (co-ed. C. Fazio & M. Welzel-breuer) (pp. 1698–1704). ALMA MATER STUDIORUM – University of Bologna. 978- 88-945874-0-1978-88-945874-0-1.
- Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Background and Procedures. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 365–380). Springer.
- Méheut, M., & Psillos, D. (2004). Teaching–learning sequences: Aims and tools for science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 515–535. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690310001614762
- Melville, W., & Bartley, A. (2010). Mentoring and community: Inquiry as stance and science as inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 807–828. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902914641
- Mena, J., Hennissen, P., & Loughran, J. (2017). Developing pre-service teachers’ professional knowledge of teaching: The influence of mentoring. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 47–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.024
- Michailidi, E., & Stavrou, D. (2021). Mentoring in-service teachers on implementing innovative teaching modules. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103414
- Nilsson, P., & Van Driel, J. (2010). Teaching together and learning together–primary science student teachers’ and their mentors’ joint teaching and learning in the primary classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(6), 1309–1318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.03.009
- Orland-Barak, L., & Klein, S. (2005). The expressed and the realized: Mentors’ representations of a mentoring conversation and its realization in practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 379–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.05.003
- Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751–760. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093
- Pegg, J. M., Schmoock, H. I., & Gummer, E. S. (2010). Scientists and science educators mentoring secondary science teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 110(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.00013
- Peikos, G., Spyrtou, A., Pnevmatikos, D., & Papadopoulou, P. (2020). Nanoscale science and technology education: Primary school students’ preconceptions of the lotus effect and the concept of size. Research in Science & Technological Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1841149
- Quirola, N., Marquez, V., Tecpan, S., & Baltazar, S. E. (2018). Didactic proposal to include nanoscience and nanotechnology at high school curriculum linking physics, chemistry and biology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1043(1), 012050. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1043/1/012050
- Ristvey Jr., J. D., & Pacheco, K. A. (2013). Atomic force microscope mobile lab inspires high school teachers participating in NanoTeach workshops. Journal of Nano Education, 5(2), 148–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1166/jne.2013.1055
- Sakhnini, S., & Blonder, R. (2015). Essential concepts of nanoscale science and technology for high school students based on a Delphi study by the expert community. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1699–1738. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1035687
- Schank, P., Wise, A., Stanford, T., & Rosenquist, A. (2009). Can high school students learn nanoscience? An evaluation of the viability and impact of the nanosense curriculum. SRI International.
- Sgouros, G., & Stavrou, D. (2019). Teachers’ professional development in nanoscience and nanotechnology in the context of a community of learners. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2070–2093. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1659521
- Sibanda, D., & Amin, N. (2021). The link between a mentorship programme for mathematics, science, and technology in-service teachers and professional development. SAGE Open, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020988732
- Smith, T. M., & Ingersoll, R. M. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681–714. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041003681
- Stanulis, R. N., Little, S., & Wibbens, E. (2012). Intensive mentoring that contributes to change in beginning elementary teachers’ learning to lead classroom discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.08.007
- Stavrou, D., Michailidi, E., & Sgouros, G. (2018). Development and dissemination of a teaching learning sequence on nanoscience and nanotechnology in a context of communities of learners. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(4), 1065–1080. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00088C
- Stevens, S. Y., Sutherland, L. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2009). The big ideas of nanoscale science and engineering. NSTA press.
- Stickney, K. W., Baker, K. M., & Sachs, D. D. (2019). Teach (STEM) 3: A clinical residency model for preparing effective STEM teachers. In S. B. Boesdorfer (Ed.), Best practices in chemistry teacher education (pp. 19–34). American Chemical Society.
- Taylor, A., & Jones, G. (2009). Proportional reasoning ability and concepts of scale: Surface area to volume relationships in science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(9), 1231–1247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802017545
- Wischow, E. D., Bryan, L., & Bodner, G. M. (2013). Secondary science teachers’ development of pedagogical content knowledge as result of integrating nanoscience content in their curriculum. Cosmos, 8(2), 187–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219607712500073
- Yu, H. P., & Jen, E. (2020). Integrating nanotechnology in the science curriculum for elementary high-ability students in Taiwan: Evidenced-based lessons. Roeper Review, 42(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1690078