2,296
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Intersectionality as personal: the science identity of two young immigrant Muslim women

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 921-938 | Received 21 Apr 2021, Accepted 24 Mar 2022, Published online: 27 May 2022

References

  • Afshar, H. (2008). Can i see your hair? Choice, agency and attitudes: The dilemma of faith and Feminism for Muslim women who cover. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(2), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701710930
  • Archer, L. (2018). An intersectional approach to classed injustices in education: Gender, ethnicity, ‘heavy’ funds of knowledge and working-class students’ struggles for intelligibility in the classroom. In Simmons, R., Smyth, J. (eds.), Education and working-class youth (pp. 155–179). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015a). “Science capital”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending Bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922–948. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227
  • Archer, L., Dewitt, J., & Osborne, J. (2015b). Is science for us? Black students’ and parents’ views of science and science careers. Science Education, 99(2), 199–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21146
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous: Primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 21(1), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.748676
  • Archer, L., Moote, J., Francis, B., DeWitt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2017). The “exceptional” physics girl: A sociological analysis of multimethod data from young women aged 10–16 to explore gendered patterns of post-16 participation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 88–126. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216678379
  • Avraamidou, L. (2016). Intersections of life histories and science identities: The stories of three preservice elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 861–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1169564
  • Avraamidou, L. (2020). “I am a young immigrant woman doing physics and on top of that I am Muslim”: Identities, intersections, and negotiations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(3), 311–341.
  • Barnes, M. E., Truong, J. M., & Brownell, S. E. (2017). Experiences of Judeo-Christian students in undergraduate biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(1), ar15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0153
  • Bhopal, K. (2011). ‘Education makes you have more say in the way your life goes’: Indian women and arranged marriages in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(3), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2011.559342
  • Brown, B. A. (2004). Discursive identity: Assimilation into the culture of science and its implications for minority students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 810–834. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20228
  • Business in the Community (BIC). (2015). Sector factsheet: Ethnic minorities in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematica (STEM). http://race.bitc.org.uk/sites/default/files/rfo_sector_factsheet_set_vfinal_new_2.pdf
  • Carbado, D. W., Crenshaw, K. W., Mays, V. M., & Tomlinson, B. (2013). Intersectionality. Du Bois Review, 10(2), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000349
  • Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
  • Carlone, H. B., Johnson, A., & Scott, C. M. (2015). Agency amidst formidable structures: How girls perform gender in science class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21224
  • Census. (2011). Census national statistics. Office for National Statistics (ONS). https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/2011census
  • Chan, C. D. (2017). A critical analysis of systemic influences on spiritual development for LGBTQC youth. Journal of Child and Adolescent Counseling, 3(3), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/23727810.2017.1341795
  • Christensen, A. D., & Jensen, S. Q. (2012). Doing intersectional analysis: Methodological implications for qualitative research. NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 20(2), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2012.673505
  • Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Polity.
  • Cooper, B. (2015). Intersectionality. In L. Disch & M. Hawkesworth (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of feminist theory. Oxford University Press (pp. 385–406). https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328581.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199328581-e-20
  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum(1), 139–167.
  • Dawson, E., Archer, L., Seakins, A., Godec, S., DeWitt, J., King, H., & Nomikou, E. (2020). Selfies at the science museum: Exploring girls’ identity performances in a science learning space. Gender and Education, 32(5), 664-681.
  • De Gayardon, A., Callender, C., & Green, F. (2019). The determinants of student loan take-up in England. Higher Education, 78(6), 965–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00381-9
  • Department for Children, Schools and Families. (2008). Statistical first release: Attainment by pupil characteristics, in England 2007/08 (Annex 1) SFR 32/2008. Department for Children, Schools and Families.
  • EngineeringUK. (2015). Engineering UK 2015: The state of engineering. EngineeringUK.
  • Francis, B. (2001). Beyond postmodernism: Feminist agency in educational research. In B. Francis & C. Skelton (Eds.), Investigating gender: Contemporary perspectives in education (pp. 65–76). Open University Press.
  • Giordano, S. (2017). Who can’t, teach: Critical science literacy as a queer science of failure. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 3(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v3i1.28790
  • Hankivsky, O., Vorobyova, A., Salnykova, A., & Rouhani, S. (2017). The importance of community consultations for generating evidence for health reform in Ukraine. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 6(3), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.104
  • Hanley, P., Bennett, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2014). The inter-relationship of science and religion: A typology of engagement. International Journal of Science Education, 36(7), 1210–1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.853897
  • Haw, K. (2010). Being, becoming and belonging: Young Muslim women in contemporary Britain. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 31(4), 221–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2010.491273
  • Hazari, Z., Sadler, P. M., & Sonnert, G. (2013). The science identity of college students: Exploring the intersection of gender, race, and ethnicity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 82–91. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43631586
  • HESA. (2015/2016). Introduction – students 2015/16. HESA. https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/publications/students-2015-16/introduction
  • Homer, M., Ryder, J., & Banner, I. (2014). Measuring determinants of post-compulsory participation in science: A comparative study using national data. British Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 610–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3106
  • Jang, S. T. (2018). The implications of intersectionality on southeast Asian female students’ educational outcomes in the United States: A critical quantitative intersectionality analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 55(6), 1268–1306. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218777225
  • Jensen, E., & Wright, D. (2015). Critical response to Archer et al. (2015). “science capital”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending Bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Science Education, 99(6), 1143–1146. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21208
  • Knapp, G. A. (2005). Intersectionality: ein neues Paradigma feministischer Theorie?; Zur transatlantischen Reise von, race, class, gender. Feministische Studien: Zeitschrift für Interdisziplinäre Frauen-und Geschlechterforschung, 23(1), 68–81.
  • Ludhra, G. (2015). A Black feminist exploration of the cultural experiences and identities of academically ‘successful’ British South-Asian girls [Doctoral dissertation]. Brunel University Research Archive (BURA), Brunel Univeristy London, Uxbridge, UK.
  • McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800
  • Meetoo, V. (2021). Beyond ‘between two cultures’: Micro processes of racialised and gendered positioning of South Asian and Muslim girls in an ‘everyday’ British multicultural school context. Gender and Education, 33(7), 864–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2019.1632810
  • Mirza, H. S. (2009). Race, gender and educational desire: Why Black women succeed and fail. Routledge.
  • Mirza, H. S., & Meetoo, V. (2018). Empowering Muslim girls? Post-feminism, multiculturalism and the production of the ‘model’ Muslim female student in British schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(2), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2017.1406336
  • Patil, V. (2013). From patriarchy to intersectionality: A transnational feminist assessment of how far we’ve really come. Signs, 38(4), 847–867. https://doi.org/10.1086/669560
  • Phoenix, A. (2011). Psychosocial intersections: Contextualising the accounts of adults who grew up in visibly ethnically different households. In H. Lutz, M. Vivar, & L. Supik (Eds.), Framing intersectionality: Debates on a multi-faceted concept in gender studies (pp. 137–152). Ashgate.
  • Rossi, A. (1965). Women in science: Why so few? Social and psychological influences restrict women’s choice and pursuit of careers in science. Science, 148(3674), 1196–1202. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3674.1196
  • Ruiz Castro, M., & Holvino, E. (2016). Applying intersectionality in organizations: Inequality markers, cultural scripts and advancement practices in a professional service firm. Gender, Work & Organization, 23(3), 328–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12129
  • Salehjee, S. Q. (2017). Making scientists: Developing a model of science identity (Doctoral Dissertation). Brunel University Research Archive (BURA), Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
  • Salehjee, S., & Watts, M. (2018). Models of scientific identity. In S. Pabst (Ed.), Science and technology education: Perspectives, opportunities and challenges (pp. 1–30). Hauppauge, NY: NOVA Science Publishers.
  • Salehjee, S., & Watts, M. (2020). Becoming scientific: Developing science across the life-course. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Sang, K., Al-Dajani, H., & Ozbilgin, M. (2013). Frayed careers of migrant female professors in British academia. Gender, Work and Organisation, 20(2), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12014
  • Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, S. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 9. 32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23463672
  • Smith, E. (2011). Women into science and engineering? Gendered participation in higher education STEM subjects. British Educational Research Journal, 37(6), 993–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.515019
  • Social Mobility Commission. (2016). Asian Muslims and black people do better in school, worse in work. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/asian-muslims-and-black-people-do-better-in-school-worse-in-work
  • Squires, J. (2007). The new politics of gender equality. Palgrave/Macmillan.
  • The Pew Research Centre. (2012). The global religious landscape. A report on the size and distribution of the world’s major religious groups as of 2010. Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life,1615 L St., NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC.
  • Victor, C., & Zubair, M. (2015). Expectations of care and support in old age by Bangladeshi and Pakistani elders. In Ute Karl & Sandra Torres (eds.), Ageing in contexts of migration (pp. 108–118). Routledge.
  • Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). The nature of science identity and its role as the driver of student choices. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(48), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0140-5
  • Wagner, W., Sen, R., Permanadeli, R., & Howarth, C. S. (2012). The Veil and Muslim women’s identity: Cultural pressures and resistance to stereotyping. Culture and Psychology, 18(4), 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X12456713
  • Wells, C., Gill, R., & McDonald, J. (2015). ‘Us foreigners’: Intersectionality in a scientific organization. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 34(6), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-12-2014-0086
  • Wong, B. (2012). Identifying with science: A case study of two 13-year-old ‘high achieving working class’ British Asian girls. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.551671
  • Wong, B. (2015). Careers ‘from’ but not ‘in’ science: Why aspirations to be a scientist are challenging for minority ethnic students? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 979–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21231. http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69979/