How do interdisciplinary teams co-construct instructional materials emphasising both science and engineering practices?

References

• Bouwma-Gearhart, J., Perry, K. H., & Presley, J. B. (2014). Improving postsecondary STEM education: Strategies for successful interdisciplinary collaborations and brokering engagement with education research and theory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst14_044_01_40
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R W, Taylor, J A, Gardner, A, Van Scotter, P, Powell, J C, Westbrook, A, & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Co: BSCS, 5, 88–98.
   Google Scholar
• Christian, K. B., Kelly, A. M., & Bugallo, M. F. (2021). NGSS-based teacher professional development to implement engineering practices in STEM instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00284-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., Penuel, W. R., & Geil, K. E. (2013). Practice partnerships: A strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts. William T. Grant Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on STEM Education of the National Science & Technology Council. (2018). Chartering a course for success: America’s strategy for STEM education. Executive Office of the President of the United States.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, E. A., Guzey, S. S., Roehrig, G. H., Glancy, A. W., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Moore, T. J. (2017). Approaches to integrating engineering in STEM units and student achievement gains. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 7(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1148
   Google Scholar
• Engineering Committee on Science, Policy, P., Institute of Medicine (US), National Academie (US). Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, National Academy of Engineering (US), & National Academy of Sciences (US). (2004). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galoyan, T., Barany, A., Donaldson, J. P., Ward, N., & Hammrich, P. L. (2022). Connecting science, design thinking, and computational thinking through sports. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 601–618. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15134a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzey, S. S., Harwell, M., Moreno, M., Peralta, Y., & Moore, T. J. (2017). The impact of design-based STEM integration curricula on student achievement in engineering, science, and mathematics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9673-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, D., & Lave, J. (2009). Social practice theory and the historical production of persons. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 2, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kilty, T., Burrows, A., Welsh, K., Kilty, K., McBride, S., & Bergmaier, P. (2021). Transcending disciplines: Engaging college students in interdisciplinary research. Integrated STEM, and partnerships. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1139
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. In R. Pea & J. S. Brown (Eds.), Learning in doing: Social, cognitive, and computational perspectives (pp. 29–129). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, V. C., & Bell, P. (2020). Engineering education as the development of critical sociotechnical literacy. Science & Education, 29(4), 981–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00151-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed). San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12635
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts and core ideas. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2019). Science and engineering for grades 6-12: Investigation and design at the center. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/2516
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2018). OECD The Future of Education and Skills Education 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2020). Progress report on the implementation of the federal STEM education strategic plan. Executive Office of the President of the United States.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325002001003636
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W. (2020). Sciences of learning and development: Some thoughts from the learning sciences. Applied Developmental Science, 24(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1421427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, B., & Reiser, B. J. (2018). Designing NGSS Curriculum Materials. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url = http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_189504.pdf&hl = en&sa = X&scisig = AAGBfm2Z0Q3-AmNoAk1sIBFM6krh_BYbqQ&nossl = 1&oi = scholarr
   Google Scholar
• Permanasari, A., Rubini, B., & Nugroho, O. F. (2021). STEM education in Indonesia: Science teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 2(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v2i1.24
   Google Scholar
• Purzer, S., & Quintana-Cifuentes, J. P. (2019). Integrating engineering in K-12 science education: Spelling out the pedagogical, epistemological, and methodological arguments. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0010-0
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, N. A., Rosli, R., Rambely, A. S., & Halim, L. (2021). Mathematics teachers’ practices of STEM education: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1541–1559. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1541
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B., Moore, L., Najafi, B., Dexter, A., Correa-Chavez, M., & Solis, J. (2007). Children’s development of cultural repertoires through participation in everyday routines and practices. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 490–515). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Songer, N. B., & Ibarrola Recalde, G. D. (2021). Eco-solutioning: The design and evaluation of a curricular unit to Foster students’ creation of solutions to address local socio-scientific issues. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.642320
   Google Scholar
• Songer, N. B., & Kali, Y. (2022). Science education and the learning sciences: A coevolutionary connection. In R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the learning sciences (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, pp. 486–503). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108888295.030
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed). Sage.
   Google Scholar