Analyzing visual attention during TAP learning and the effect of epistemic beliefs on the understanding of argument components

References

• Allchin, D., Andersen, H. M., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Complementary approaches to teaching nature of science: Integrating student inquiry, historical cases, and contemporary cases in classroom practice. Science Education, 98(3), 461–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the Web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900412284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Strømsø, H. I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2014). Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: Relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 58–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92(3), 473–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. A., & Pajares, F. (2010). Implicit theories of ability of Grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C. H., Bråten, I., Yang, F. Y., & Brandmo, C. (2021). Investigating structural relationships among upper-secondary school students’ beliefs about knowledge, justification for knowing, and Internet-specific justification in the domain of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(7), 980–1009. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C. H., Bråten, I., Yang, F. Y., & Brandmo, C. (2021). Investigating structural relationships among upper-secondary school students' beliefs about knowledge, justification for knowing, and Internet-specific justification in the domain of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(7), 980–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou, G.-L., Hsu, C.-Y., & Tsai, M.-J. (2022). Exploring how students interact with guidance in a physics simulation: Evidence from eye-movement and log data analyses. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(3), 484–497.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. E. (2008). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Framing the debates. In R. A. Duschl, & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 1–37). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, L. E., & Bråten, I. (2013). Student profiles of knowledge and epistemic beliefs: Changes and relations to multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueira, M. J. S., Nardi, R., & Cortela, B. S. C. (2019, August). Introducing scientific argumentation practices in physics teacher’s undergraduate curricula. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1286(1), 012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1286/1/012038
   Google Scholar
• Ho, H. Y., Chang, T. L., Lee, T. N., Chou, C. C., Hsiao, S. H., Chen, Y. H., & Lu, Y. L. (2019). Above- and below-average students think differently: Their scientific argumentation patterns. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 34, 100607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. (2016). Epistemic cognition as a psychological construct: Advancements and challenges. In Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 31–50). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C.-Y., Chiou, G.-L., & Tsai, M.-J. (2019). Visual behavior and self-efficacy of game playing: An eye movement analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(7), 942–952. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1504309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iordanou, K., Kendeou, P., & Beker, K. (2016). Argumentative reasoning. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 51–65). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2007). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education. Perspectives from classroom-Based Research (pp. 3–27). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. Y., & Irving, K. E. (2010). History of science as an instructional context: Student learning in genetics and nature of science. Science & Education, 19(2), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9191-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizilgunes, B., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2009). Modeling the relations among students’ epistemological beliefs, motivation, learning approach, and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.4.243-256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, M. L., Tsai, M. J., Yang, F. Y., Hsu, C. Y., Liu, T. C., Lee, S. W. Y., Lee, M. H., Chiou, G. L., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review, 10, 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, A. A., Britt, M. A., & Kurby, C. (2009). Improving students’ evaluation of informal arguments. Journal of Experimental Education, 77(4), 339–365. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.77.4.339-366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, M., Britt, M. A., & Larson, A. (2004). Disfluencies in comprehending argumentative texts. Reading Psychology, 25(3), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710490489908
   Google Scholar
• Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Relational analysis of college science-major students’ epistemological beliefs toward science and conceptions of learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(17), 2273–2289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903397796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S. S. (2014). Science and non-science undergraduate students’ critical thinking and argumentation performance in reading a science news report. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1023–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9451-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liversedge, S. P., Paterson, K. B., & Pickering, M. J. (1998). Eye movements and measures of reading time. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 55–75). Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Boscolo, P., Tornatora, M. C., & Ronconi, L. (2013). Besides knowledge: A cross-sectional study on the relations between epistemic beliefs, achievement goals, self-beliefs, and achievement in science. Instructional Science, 41(1), 49–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9210-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2013). The Nation’s Report Card.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O. (2018). Considering students’ epistemic beliefs to facilitate their argumentative discourse and attitudinal change with a digital dialogue game. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(3), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1208112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Kirschner, P., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2018). Promoting argumentation competence: Extending from first- to second-order scaffolding through adaptive fading. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9400-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., McAlister, S., & Mulder, M. (2016). Impacts of a digital dialogue game and epistemic beliefs on argumentative discourse and willsingness to argue. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 208–230. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M., & Bendixen, L. M. (2003). Approaching and avoiding arguments: The role of epistemological beliefs, need for cognition, and extraverted personality traits. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 573–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00062-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M., & Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Argument and conceptual engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00038-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Poliquin, A. (2008). Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 1977–1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701545919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What ‘ideas-about-science’ should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). The thirty fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., Enderle, P., & Grooms, J. (2013). Argumentation in science education. The Science Teacher, 80(5), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst13_080_05_30
   Google Scholar
• Stathopoulou, C., & Vosnidou, S. (2007). Conceptual change in physics and physics-related epistemological beliefs: A relationship under scrutiny. In S. Vosnidou, A. Baltas, & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Re-framing the problem of conceptual change in learning and instruction (pp. 145–163). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. C., Ho, H. N. J., Liang, J. C., & Lin, H. M. (2011). Scientific epistemic beliefs, conceptions of learning science and self-efficacy of learning science among high school students. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 757–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, M.-J., Wu, A. H., & Chen, Y. (2019). Static and dynamic seductive illustration effects on text-and-graphic learning processes, perceptions and outcomes: Evidence from eye-tracking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F. Y. (2005). Student views concerning evidence and the expert in reasoning a socio-scientific issue and personal epistemology. Educational Studies, 31(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569042000310976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F. Y. (2017). Examining the reasoning of conflicting science information from the information processing perspective—An eye movement analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1347–1372. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F. Y., Bhagat, K. K., & Cheng, C. H. (2019). Associations of epistemic beliefs in science and scientific reasoning in university students from Taiwan and India. International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1347–1365. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1606960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F. Y., Chen, Y. H., & Tsai, M. J. (2013). How university students evaluate online information about a socio-scientific issue and the relationship with their epistemic beliefs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(3), 385–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Reasoning about science-related uncertain issues and epistemological perspectives among children. Instructional Science, 38(4), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9084-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, M. H., & Yang, F. Y. (2016). Methodology and application of eye-tracking techniques in science education. In Science education research and practices in Taiwan (pp. 249–277). Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar