Teaching science & technology: components of scientific literacy and insight into the steps of research

References

• Abu-Zaid, A. (2014). Research skills: The neglected competency in tomorrow’s 21st-century doctors. Perspectives on Medical Education, 3(1), 63–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-013-0087-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aiman, U., & Hasyda, S. (2020). The influence of process oriented guided inquiry learning (pogil) model assisted by realia media to improve scientific literacy and critical thinking skill of primary school students. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1635–1647. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1635
   Google Scholar
• Amir, A., Mandler, D., Hauptman, S., & Gorev, D. (2017). Discomfort as a means of pre-service teachers’ professional development – an action research as part of the ‘research literacy’ course. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1284197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avsec, S., & Savec, V. F. (2019). Creativity and critical thinking in engineering design: The role of interdisciplinary augmentation. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bačnik, A., Slavič Kumer, S., Bah Brglez, E., Eršte, S., Golob, N., Gostinčar Blagotinšek, A., Hajdinjak, M., Hartman, S., Ivančič, G., Kljajič. S., Majer Kovačič, J., Mohorič, A., Moravec, B., Novak, N., Pavlin, J., Repnik, R., Vičič, T. (2019). Gradniki naravoslovne pismenosti. [Science literacy building blocks]. https://www.zrss.si/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/2021-11-15-Gradniki-NARAVOSLOVNA-PISMENOST_11V_16_07_2021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America's Research Universities. Stoney Brook, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B. A., Reveles, J. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education, 89(5), 779–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2. Auflage). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J., Schwantner, U., & Waters, C. (2015). A review of international large-scale assessments in education: Assessing component skills and collecting contextual data. PISA, The World Bank, Washington, D.C./OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264248373-en.
   Google Scholar
• DebBurman, S. K. (2002). Learning how scientists work: Experiential research projects to promote cell biology learning and scientific process skills. Cell Biology Education, 1(4), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.02-07-0024
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glaze, A. L. (2018). Teaching and learning science in the 21st century: Challenging critical assumptions in post-secondary science. Education Sciences, 8(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gucluer, E., & Kesercioglu, T. (2012). The effect of using activities improving scientific literacy on students’ achievement in science and technology lesson. Online Submission, 1(1), 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.
   Google Scholar
• Jonāne, L. (2015). Analogies in science education. Pedagogika, 119(3), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2015.027
   Google Scholar
• Kaeedi, A., Nasr Esfahani, A., Sharifian, F., & Moosavipour, S. (2021). Research methods curriculum in graduate program: An investigation of the world’s top universities approaches to design. Implementation and Evaluation. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies, 10(32), https://doi.org/10.22034/emes.2021.242398
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, P., & O’Rourke, K. (2005). Understanding enquiry based learning. In T. Barrett, I. MacLabhrainn, & H. Fallon (Eds.), Handbook of enquiry and problem based learning (pp. 1–12). AISHE and CELT, NUI Galway.
   Google Scholar
• Koballa, T., Kemp, A., & Evans, R. (1997). The spectrum of scientific literacy. Sci. Teach, 64(7), 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemon, T. I., Lampard, R., & Stone, B. A. (2013). Research skills for undergraduates: A must!. Perspectives on Medical Education, 2(3), 174–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-013-0054-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenhard, W., & Lenhard, A. (2016). Calculation of effect sizes. https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html Dettelbach (Germany): Psychometrica. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17823.92329.
   Google Scholar
• Marteel-Parrish, A. E., & Lipchock, J. M. (2018). Preparing chemistry majors for the 21st century through a comprehensive one-semester course focused on professional preparation, contemporary issues, scientific communication, and research skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nja, C. O. (2019). Scientific literacy of undergraduate science education students in the university of Calabar Cross River State Nigeria. Quest Journals Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 7(5), 35–39.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). PISA 2015 Draft Science Framework. www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/ Draft%20PISA%202015%20Science%20Framework%20.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pella, M. O., O'hearn, G. T., & Gale, C. W. (1966). Referents to scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660040317
   Google Scholar
• Pisano, R., Vincent, P., Dolenc, K., & Ploj Virtič, M. (2020). Historical foundations of physics & applied technology as dynamic frameworks in pre-service STEM. Foundations of Science, 26(3), 727–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09662-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ploj Virtič, M., & Šorgo, A. (2016). Can we expect to recruit future engineers among students who have never repaired a toy? eurasia journal of mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1201a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratte, A., Drees, S., & Schmidt-Ott, T. (2018). The importance of scientific competencies in German medical curricula - the student perspective. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1257-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts, D. A. (1988). Development and Dilemmas in Science Education (pp. 27–54)
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutt, A. A., & Mumba, F. (2021). Pre-service teachers enactment of language-and literacy-integrated science instruction in linguistically diverse science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(4), https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21739
   Google Scholar
• Sastradika, D., & Defrianti, D. (2019). Optimizing inquiry-based learning activity in improving students’ scientific literacy skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 012061. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012061
   Google Scholar
• Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Showalter, V. M. (1974). What is unified science education? Program Objectives and Scientific Literacy. Prism II, 2(3–4), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2005). The importance of involving high-school chemistry teachers in the process of defining the operational meaning of “chemical literacy”. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000266191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šorgo, A., & Ploj Virtič, M. (2020). Engineers do not grow on trees. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 168–173.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., & Durant, J. (1987). Why should we promote the public understanding of science? In M. Shortland (Ed.), Scientific literacy papers (pp. 1–14). Department for External Studies, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. Y. (2015). Improving students’ PISA scientific competencies through online argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(2), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.987712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. Y., Lin, H. S., & Liu, S. C. (2020). The effect of pedagogical GAME model on students’ PISA scientific competencies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Aalsvoort, J. (2004a). Logical positivism as a tool to analyse the problem of chemistry’s lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1151–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000205369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Aalsvoort, J. (2004b). Activity theory as a tool to address the problem of chemistry’s lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1635–1651. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000205378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, A., Bachman, B., Josway, S., Laemmerzahl, A. F., & North, B. (2014). Guiding student inquiry into eukaryotic organismal biology using the plasmodial slime mold physarum polycephalum. The American Biology Teacher, 76(3), 196–200. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2014.76.3.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y. (2019). How Chinese students’ scientific competencies are influenced by their attitudes? International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2094–2112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1660926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar