380
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Developing prospective primary teachers’ learning-to-learn competence through experimental activities

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2015-2034 | Received 14 Feb 2022, Accepted 29 Jul 2022, Published online: 14 Aug 2022

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118
  • Angulo, F. (1998). La formación del profesor de ciencias: Fundamentos teóricos en una perspectiva de autorregulación metacognitiva [science teacher education: Theoretical bases from a metacognitive self-regulation perspective]. Educación y Pedagogía, 10(21), 69–96. https://hdl.handle.net/10495/8761
  • Campanario, J. M. (2000). El desarrollo de la metacognición en el aprendizaje de las ciencias: Estrategias para el profesor y actividades orientadas al alumno [development of metacognition in science learning: Teacher strategies and activities aimed at student]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 18(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.4025
  • Cañal, P., Criado, A. M., García-Carmona, A., & Muñoz, G. (2013). La enseñanza relativa al medio en las aulas españolas de Educación infantil y primaria: Concepciones didácticas y práctica docente [science teaching in spanish elementary education classrooms: Didactic conceptions and teaching practice]. Investigación en la Escuela, (81), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.2013.i81.02
  • Cañal, P., García-Carmona, A., & Cruz-Guzmán, M. (2016). Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales en Educación Primaria [didactics of experimental science in primary education]. Paraninfo.
  • Cañal, P., Travé, G., & Pozuelos, F. J. (2011). Análisis de obstáculos y dificultades de profesores y estudiantes en la utilización de enfoques de investigación escolar [An analysis of teachers’ and students’ obstacles and difficulties in using inquiry-based educational approaches]. Investigación en la Escuela, (73), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.2011.i73.01
  • Chang, P. S., Lee, S. H., & Wen, M. L. (2020). Metacognitive inquiry activities for instructing the central dogma concept: ‘button code’ and ‘beaded bracelet making’. Journal of Biological Education, 54(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1546756
  • Charrier, M., Cañal, P., & Rodrigo, M. (2006). Las concepciones de los estudiantes sobre la fotosíntesis y la respiración: Una revisión sobre la investigación didáctica en el campo de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de la nutrición de las plantas [students’ conceptions of photosynthesis and respiration: A review of didactic research on teaching and learning of plant nutrition]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 24(3), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3790
  • Cornford, I. R. (2002). Learning-to-learn strategies as a basis for effective lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21(4), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370210141020
  • Cortés, A. L., & Gándara, M. (2006). La construcción de problemas en el laboratorio durante la formación del profesorado: Una experiencia didáctica [construction of problems in the laboratory during teacher training: A didactic experience.]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 25(3), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3707
  • Cruz-Guzmán, M., García-Carmona, A., & Criado, A. M. (2017). An analysis of the questions proposed by elementary pre-service teachers when designing experimental activities as inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 39(13), 1755–1774. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1351649
  • Divrik, R., Pilten, P., & Tas, A. M. (2020). Effect of inquiry-based learning method supported by metacognitive strategies on fourth-grade students’ problem-solving and problem-posing skills: A mixed methods research. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 287–308. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/1330
  • Elliot, J. (2000). La investigación-acción en educación [action research in education] (4th ed.). Morata.
  • Erenler, S., & Cetin, P. S. (2019). Utilizing argument-driven-inquiry to develop pre-service teachers’ metacognitive awareness and writing skills. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(2), 628–638. https://www.ijres.net/index.php/ijres/article/view/618
  • European Commission. (2012). Assessment of Key Competences in Initial Education and Training: Policy Guidance. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = SWD:2012:0371:FIN:EN:PDF
  • García-Carmona, A. (2012). ¿Qué he comprendido? ¿Qué sigo sin entender?”: promoviendo la autorreflexión en clase de ciencias [«what have I understood? What do not I still understand?»: promoting self-reflection in science classroom]. Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 9(2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2012.v9.i2.05
  • García-Carmona, A. (2019). Pre-service primary science teachers’ abilities for solving a measurement problem through inquiry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9858-7
  • García-Carmona, A. (2020). Prospective elementary teachers’ abilities in tackling a contextualized physics problem as guided inquiry. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 42, e20190280. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9126-rbef-2019-0280
  • García-Carmona, A., Criado, A. M., & Cruz-Guzmán, M. (2017). Primary pre-service teachers’ skills in planning a guided scientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 47(5), 989–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9536-8
  • García-Carmona, A., Criado, A. M., & Cruz-Guzmán, M. (2018). Prospective primary teachers’ prior experiences, conceptions, and pedagogical valuations of experimental activities in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9773-3
  • García-Carmona, A., & Cruz-Guzmán, M. (2016). ¿Con qué vivencias, potencialidades y predisposiciones inician los futuros docentes de Educación Primaria su formación en la enseñanza de la ciencia? [what personal experiences, potentialities and predispositions do prospective primary teachers manifest when they start their training in science teaching?]. Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 13(2), 440–458. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2016.v13.i2.15
  • Guerra, M. T., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2011). ¿Qué se necesita para enseñar ciencias? [what is necessary to teach science?]. In Las ciencias naturales en educación básica: Formación de ciudadanía para el siglo XXI (pp. 129–157). Secretaría de Educación Pública de México.
  • Huang, Y. P., & Chang, C. S. (2013). A study of the metacognition performance in online inquiry learning. Iadis international conference e-learning 2013. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED562285.pdf
  • Kipnis, M., & Hofstein, A. (2008). The inquiry laboratory as a source for development of metacognitive skills. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(3), 601–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9066-y
  • Latorre, A. (2003). La investigación-acción. Conocer y cambiar la práctica educativa [action research. Know and change educational practice]. Graó.
  • Márquez, C., & Pedreira, M. (2005). Dialogar sobre lo esencial: Una propuesta de trabajo en la clase de ciencias [dialogue on the essentials: A proposal for work in the science classroom]. Alambique, (44), 105–112.
  • Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry: Exploring the many types of inquiry in the science classroom. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 34-37. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24154746
  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089
  • McLaughlin, C. A., & MacFadden, B. J. (2014). At the elbows of scientists: Shaping science teachers’ conceptions and enactment of inquiry-based instruction. Research in Science Education, 44(6), 927–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9408-z
  • Ministerio de Educación. (2014). Real Decreto 126/2014, de 28 de febrero, por el que se establece el currículo básico de la Educación Primaria [Royal Decree 126/2014, February 28, establishing the basic curriculum of primary education]. https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2014/BOE-A-2014-2222-consolidado.pdf
  • Nunaki, J. H., Damopolii, I., Kandowangko, N. Y., & Nusantari, E. (2019). The effectiveness of inquiry-based learning to train the students’ metacognitive skills based on gender differences. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12232a
  • Oh, P. S. (2010). How can teachers help students formulate scientific hypotheses? Some strategies found in abductive inquiry activities of earth science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(4), 541–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903104457
  • Osses, S., & Jaramillo, S. (2008). Metacognición: Un camino para aprender a aprender [metacognition: A way towards learning how to learn]. Estudios Pedagógicos, 34(1), 187–197. http://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-0705200800010001
  • Padilla, M. T. (2002). Técnicas e instrumentos para el diagnóstico y la evaluación educativa [techniques and tools for educational diagnosis and assessment]. CCS.
  • Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground –A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351
  • Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Ayala, C., & Shavelson, R. J. (2004). Evaluating students’ science notebooks as an assessment tool. International Journal of Science Education, 26(12), 1477–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000177299
  • Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1), 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
  • Schwichow, M., Christoph, S., Boone, W. J., & Härtig, H. (2016). The impact of sub-skills and item content on students’ skills with regard to the control-of-variables strategy. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 216–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1137651
  • Science Community Representing Education [SCORE]. (2013). Resourcing practical science in primary schools. SCORE.
  • Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
  • Vílchez, J. M., & Bravo, B. (2015). Percepción del profesorado de ciencias de educación primaria en formación acerca de las etapas y acciones necesarias para realizar una indagación escolar [perceptions of pre-service science teachers in primary education about the steps and actions needed to carry out a school inquiry]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 33(1), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1529
  • White, B., Frederiksen, J., & Collins, A. (2009). The interplay of scientific inquiry and metacognition: More than a marriage of convenience. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 175–205). Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.