How the co-design, use, and refinement of an instructional model emphasizing argumentation relates to changes in teachers’ beliefs and practices

References

• Bodzin, A. M., & Beerer, K. M. (2003). Promoting inquiry-based science instruction: The validation of the Science Teacher Inquiry Rubric (STIR). Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173842
   Google Scholar
• Buehl, M. M., & Beck, J. S. (2015). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and teachers’ practices. In H. Fives & M. Gregoire Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 66–84). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(3), 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students’ questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883–908. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenders, F., & Terlouw, C. (2015). A model for in-service teacher learning in the context of an innovation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(5), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9432-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 515–541). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Crippen, K. J. (2012). Argument as professional development: Impacting teacher knowledge and beliefs about science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(8), 847–866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9282-3
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, S., Jansen, E. P., & van de Grift, W. J. (2013). Profiling teachers’ continuing professional development and the relation with their beliefs about learning and teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfner, T., Förtsch, C., Germ, M., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2018). Biology instruction using a generic framework of scientific reasoning and argumentation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 232–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enderle, P., Dentzau, M., Roseler, K., Southerland, S., Granger, E., Hughes, R., Golden, B., & Saka, Y. (2014). Examining the influence of RET’s on science teacher beliefs and practice. Science Education, 98(6), 1077–1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., & Dillon, J. (2011). Argumentation in the teaching of science. In E. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 189–203). Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J. (2015). Educational implications of choosing “practice” to describe science in the next generation science standards. Science Education, 99(6), 1041–1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Howard, M., & McNeill, K. L. (2019). Teachers’ framing of argumentation goals: Working together to develop individual versus communal understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(6), 821–844. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grooms, J., Enderle, P., & Sampson, V. (2015). Coordinating scientific argumentation and the next generation science standards through argument-driven inquiry. Science Educator, 24(1), 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Haney, J. J., & McArthur, J. (2002). Four case studies of prospective science teachers’ beliefs concerning constructivist teaching practices. Science Education, 86(6), 783–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., & Leagon, M. (2014). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 830–847). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, N. H., & Wallace, C. S. (2005). Secondary science teachers’ use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89(1), 140–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065–1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Hand, B. (2015). An analysis of argumentation discourse patterns in elementary teachers’ science classroom discussions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9416-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, B. B. (2015). The development of teachers’ beliefs. In H. Fives & Gregoire Gill M. (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (Vol. 1, pp. 48–65). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loper, S., McNeill, K. L., & González-Howard, M. (2017). Multimedia educative curriculum materials (MECMs): Teachers’ choices in using MECMs designed to support scientific argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(1), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2016.1277600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1318–1347. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Capturing science teachers’ epistemological beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 38–63.
   Google Scholar
• Mansour, N. (2008). Models of understanding science teachers’ beliefs and practices: Challenges and potentials for science education. VDM Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mansour, N. (2013). Consistencies and inconsistencies between science teachers’ beliefs and practices. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1230–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.743196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz, E. (2015). Representing student argumentation as functionally emergent from scientific activity. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 553–590. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314558490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., González-Howard, M., Katsh-Singer, R., & Loper, S. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge of argumentation: Using classroom contexts to assess high-quality PCK rather than pseudoargumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(2), 261–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., González-Howard, M., Katsh-Singer, R., & Loper, S. (2017). Moving beyond pseudoargumentation: Teachers’ enactments of an educative science curriculum focused on argumentation. Science Education, 101(3), 426–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K–12 teachers. Science Education, 97(6), 936–972. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., Marco-Bujosa, L. M., González-Howard, M., & Loper, S. (2018). Teachers’ enactments of curriculum: Fidelity to procedure versus fidelity to goal for scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1455–1475. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1482508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., & Mason, L. (2006). Changing knowledge and beliefs. In L. Corno & M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 305–324). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olin, A., & Ingerman, Å. (2016). Features of an emerging practice and professional development in a science teacher team collaboration with a researcher team. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(6), 607–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, L. D. (2006). The voice of reason: A qualitative examination of Black student perceptions of Black culture centers. Journal of College Student Development, 47(6), 628–646. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2006.0068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimentel, D. S., & McNeill, K. L. (2013). Conducting talk in secondary science classrooms: Investigating instructional moves and teachers’ beliefs. Science Education, 97(3), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2006). Assessment of argument in science education: A critical review of the literature. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), The international conference of the learning sciences: Indiana University 2006. Proceedings of ICLS 2006 (Vol. 2, pp. 655–661). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to learn by learning to write during the school science laboratory: Helping middle and high school students develop argumentative writing skills as they learn core ideas. Science Education, 97(5), 643–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument-Driven inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengul, O., Enderle, P., & Schwartz, R. (2021). Examining science teachers' enactment of argument-driven inquiry (ADI) instructional model. International Journal of Science Education, 43(8), 1273–1291. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1908641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, S., & Richardson, K. (2009). Argumentation in school science: Breaking the tradition of authoritative exposition through a pedagogy that promotes discussion and reasoning. Argumentation, 23(4), 469–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-009-9164-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. K., & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Reforming practice or modifying reforms?: Elementary teachers’ response to the tools of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 396–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southerland, S., Granger, D., Hughes, R., Enderle, P., Ke, F., Roselor, K., & Tekkumru Kisa, M. (2016). Essential aspects of science teacher professional development: Making research participation instructionally effective. AERA Open, 2(4), 233285841667420. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416674200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In N. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–453). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., Cartier, J. L., & Passmore, C. (2005). Developing understanding through model-based inquiry. In S. Donovan, & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn science in the classroom (pp. 147–198). National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (Vol. 17, pp. 273–285). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Strimaitis, A. M., Southerland, S. A., Sampson, V. D., Enderle, P. J., & Grooms, J. (2017). Promoting equitable biology lab instruction by engaging all students in a broad range of science practices: An exploratory study. School Science and Mathematics, 117(3-4), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, J. K., & Park, S. (2017). Exploring the relationship between pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and sustainability of an innovative science teaching approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurlings, M., & den Brok, P. (2017). Learning outcomes of teacher professional development activities: A meta-study. Educational Review, 69(5), 554–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1281226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., Laferrière, T., Breuleux, A., Itow, R. C., Hickey, D. T., & McKenney, S. (2015). Collaborative design as a form of professional development. Instructional Science, 43(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9340-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Buck, G. A. (2016). Understanding a high school physics teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge of argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(5), 577–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9476-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M. (2013). Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340(6130), 310–313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyner, Y. (2013). The impact of a novel curriculum on secondary biology teachers’ dispositions toward using authentic data and media in their human impact and ecology lessons. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(5), 833–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9335-2
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. S., Ducan, T., Lee, S. W. Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. L. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar