Features of and representational strategies in instructional videos for primary science classes

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Nature of science in science education: Toward a coherent framework for synergistic research and development. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. F. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1041–1060). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, V. d., Freire, S., & Baptista, M. (2017). Constructing scientific explanations: A system of analysis for students’ explanations. Research in Science Education, 49(3), 787–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9648-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, A. C., & Upadhyay, B. (2010). Teaching and learning science for social justice: Introduction to the special issue. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680903484917
   Google Scholar
• Bencze, J. L., & Alsop, S. (2009). A critical and creative inquiry into school science inquiry. In W.-M. Roth, & K. Tobin (Eds.), World of science education: North America (pp. 27–47). Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Bencze, L., Sperling, E., & Carter, L. (2012). Students’ research-informed socio-scientific activism: Re/visions for a sustainable future. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9260-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict-Chambers, A., Kademian, S. M., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2017). Guiding students towards sensemaking: Teacher questions focused on integrating scientific practices with science content. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1366674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2015). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), es6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25(4), 471–533. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2504_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Koning, B. B., Hoogerheide, V., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2018). Developments and trends in learning with instructional video. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 395–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review, 21(2), 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9098-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732 x07309371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fendler, L. (2014). The ethics of materiality: Some insights from non-representational theory. In P. Smeyers, & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational research: Material culture and its representation (pp. 115–132). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). What works and doesn’t work with instructional video. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2009). Introduction: Macro, submicro and symbolic representations and the relationship between them: Key models in chemical education. In J. K. Gilbert & D. F. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in chemical education (pp. 1–8). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Given, L. (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Haagsman, M. E., Scager, K., Boonstra, J., & Koster, M. C. (2020). Pop-up questions within educational videos: Effects on students’ learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(6), 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09847-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (1999). Going beyond cultural pluralism: Science education for sociopolitical action. Science Education, 83(6), 775–796. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(199911)83:6<775::aid-sce8>3.0.co;2-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teachers’ guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, M., Antonenko, P. D., Greenwood, C. M., & Wheeler, D. (2012). Effects of segmenting, signalling, and weeding on learning from educational video. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2011.585993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köse, E., Taşlıbeyaz, E., & Karaman, S. (2021). Classification of instructional videos. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 1079–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09530-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulgemeyer, C. (2018). Towards a framework for effective instructional explanations in science teaching. Studies in Science Education, 54(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2018.1598054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulgemeyer, C. (2020). A framework of effective science explanation videos informed by criteria for instructional explanations. Research in Science Education, 50(6), 2441–2462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9787-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S. W., Krajcik, J., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079–2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loving, C. C. (1991). The scientific theory profile: A philosophy of science model for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 823–838. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511811678.018
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Fiorella, L., & Stull, A. (2020). Five ways to increase the effectiveness of instructional video. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 837–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09749-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, R., & Suthers, D. (2013). Inscriptions becoming representations in representational practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(1), 33–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2012.737390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkt, M., Ballmann, A., Felfeli, J., & Schwan, S. (2018). Pauses in educational videos: Testing the transience explanation against the structuring explanation. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in Education, 31(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07300046001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, W., Georgiou, H., Jones, P., & Turney, A. (2020a). Digital explanation as assessment in university science. Research in Science Education, 50(6), 2391–2418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9785-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, W., Turney, A., Georgiou, H., & Jones, P. (2020b). Working with multiple representations: Preservice teachers’ decision-making to produce a digital explanation. Learning: Research and Practice, 6(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2020.1750673
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., Chang, J., Tang, K. S., Treagust, D. F., & Won, M. (2020). Sequential patterns of students’ drawing in constructing scientific explanations: Focusing on the interplay among three levels of pictorial representation. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 677–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1724351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M. (2000). Explanations of mathematical concepts in Japanese, Chinese, and U.S. First-and fifth-grade classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 18(2), 181–207. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1802_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, H. (2004). Naturalism without representationalism. In M. D. Caro, & D. Macarthur (Eds.), Naturalism in question (pp. 71–88). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. (2001). Learning science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 768–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydenfelt, H. (2021). Realism without representationalism. Synthese, 198(4), 2901–2918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02251-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1964). The structure of the disciplines: Meanings and significances. In G. W. Ford, & L. Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 1–30). Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Settlage, J., & Southerland, S. (2012). Teaching science to every child: Using culture as a starting point. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 435–454). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, K. S. (2022). Material inquiry and transformation as prerequisite processes of scientific argumentation: Toward a social-material theory of argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(6), 969–1009. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.v59.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1981). Episodes as units of discourse analysis. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 177–195). Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.v92:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittwer, J., & Renkl, A. (2008). Why instructional explanations often do not work: A framework for understanding the effectiveness of instructional explanations. Educational Psychologist, 43(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701756420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Jr, J. F. N. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar