583
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The impacts of modelling-based SSI teaching module on preservice teachers’ decision making – a case of Dongfeng Highway route selection

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 65-85 | Received 02 May 2022, Accepted 21 Nov 2022, Published online: 01 Dec 2022

References

  • Bielik, T., Opitz, S. T., & Novak, A. M. (2018). Supporting students in building and using models: Development on the quality and complexity dimensions. Education Sciences, 8(3), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030149
  • Cheng, T. S., Lin, J. W., Lee, Y. Y., & Lin, C. H. (2021). The impacts of socioscientific issue modeling curriculum for preservice teachers’ decision making on highway route selection. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.202109_29(3).0002
  • Chiu, M.-H., & Lin, J.-W. (2019). Modeling competence in science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0012-y
  • Construction Bureau of Taichung City Government. (2022). Construction bureau of Taichung city government 111 annual policy plan. Retrieved November 9, 2022, from https://www.construction.taichung.gov.tw/1890314/post
  • Eş, H., & Öztürk, N. (2021). An activity for transferring the multidimensional structure of SSI to middle school science courses: I discover myself in the decision-making process with SEE-STEP! Research in Science Education, 51(3), 889–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09865-1
  • Forbes, C. T., Zangori, L., & Schwarz, C. V. (2015). Empirical validation of integrated learning performances for hydrologic phenomena: 3rd-grade students’ model-driven explanation-construction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 895–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21226
  • Frangopol, D. M., & Liu, M. (2007). Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost. Structure & Infrastructure Engineering, 3(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470500253164
  • Guo, C.-J., & Chang, K.-T. (Writers). (2021, February 8). Dongfeng express is controversial, road forcibly hits faults and farmland, environmental concerns remain to be resolved [public TV series]. Our Island. https://e-info.org.tw/node/229472
  • Kane, M., & Trochim, W. M. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Sage.
  • Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L. A., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and using multiple models to promote scientific literacy in the context of socio-scientific issues. Science & Education, 30(3), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1
  • Ke, L., Zangori, L. A., Sadler, T. D., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Integrating scientific modeling and socio-scientific reasoning to promote scientific literacy. In W. A. Powell (Ed.), Socioscientific issues-based instruction for scientific literacy development (pp. 31–54). IGI Global.
  • Khan, S. (2007). Model-based inquiries in chemistry. Science Education, 91(6), 877–905. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20226
  • Khan, S. (2011). New pedagogies on teaching science with computer simulations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(3), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9247-2
  • Kiker, G. A., Bridges, T. S., Varghese, A., Seager, T. P., & Linkov, I. (2005). Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 1(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1897/IEAM_2004a-015.1
  • Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lee, T. D., Jones, M. A., & Chesnutt, K. (2019). Teaching systems thinking in the context of the water cycle. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 137–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9613-7
  • Ministry of Education. (2018a). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education for elementary school, junior high and general senior high schools – the domain of natural sciences.
  • Ministry of Education. (2018b). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education for elementary school, junior high and general senior high schools – the domain of social studies.
  • National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
  • Nida, S., Mustikasari, V. R., & Eilks, I. (2021). Indonesian pre-service science teachers’ views on socio-scientific issues-based science learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), em1930. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9378
  • Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173469
  • Patronis, T., Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students’ argumentation in decision-making on a socio-scientific issue: Implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 745–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290408
  • Peel, A., Zangori, L. A., Friedrichsen, P. J., Hayes, E., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). Students’ model-based explanations about natural selection and antibiotic resistance through socio-scientific issues-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 41(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1564084
  • Sabel, J. L., Vo, T., Alred, A., Dauer, J. M., & Forbes, C. T. (2017). Undergraduate students’ scientifically informed decision making about socio-hydrological issues. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(6), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst17_046_06_71
  • Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
  • Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
  • Shen, J., Lei, J., Chang, H. Y., & Namdar, B. (2014). Technology-enhanced, modeling-based instruction (TMBI) in science education. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, & J. E. M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 529–540). Springer.
  • Sormunen, K., Hartikainen-Ahia, A., & Jäppinen, I. (2017). Quality of SSI scenarios designed by science teachers. In K. Hahl, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselka, A. Uitto, & J. Lavonen (Eds.), Cognitive and affective aspects in science education research (pp. 103–116). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_8
  • Tomczak, M., & Tomczak, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited: An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends in Sport Sciences, 1(21), 19–25. http://www.tss.awf.poznan.pl/files/3_Trends_Vol21_2014__no1_20.pdf
  • Ural, E., & Ercan, O. (2020). Exploring pre-service primary school teachers’ informal reasoning and argumentation levels on a socio-scientific issue: The issue of transgenic plants in the agriculture. International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 11(3), 48–66. https://ijrte.penpublishing.net/makale/1690
  • Watson, M. K., Pelkey, J., Noyes, C. R., & Rodgers, M. O. (2016). Assessing conceptual knowledge using three concept map scoring methods. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(1), 118–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20111
  • Wu, J. Y., Hsu, Y. S., Zhang, W. X., & Fang, S. C. (2017). The influence of the online learning module on the multi-perspective decision-making of high school students. International Journal on Digital Learning Technology, 9(3), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.3966/2071260X2017070903004
  • Yannis, G., Kopsacheili, A., Dragomanovits, A., & Petraki, V. (2020). State-of-the-art review on multi-criteria decision-making in the transport sector. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 7(4), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.05.005
  • Zangori, L. A., & Forbes, C. T. (2016). Development of an empirically based learning performances framework for third-grade students’ model-based explanations about plant processes. Science Education, 100(6), 961–982. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21238
  • Zangori, L. A., Foulk, J., Sadler, T. D., & Peel, A. (2018). Exploring elementary teachers’ perceptions and characterizations of model-oriented issue-based teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(7), 555–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1482173
  • Zangori, L. A., Peel, A., Kinslow, A., Friedrichsen, P. J., & Sadler, T. D. (2017). Student development of model-based reasoning about carbon cycling and climate change in a socio-scientific issues unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1249–1273. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21404
  • Zavadskas, E. K., Liias, R., & Turskis, Z. (2008). Multi-attribute decision-making methods for assessment of quality in bridges and road construction: State-of-the-art surveys. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 3(3), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.3846/1822-427X.2008.3.152-160
  • Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.