2,522
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

STEM-oriented primary school children: participation in informal STEM programmes and career aspirations

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 923-945 | Received 23 Aug 2022, Accepted 05 Feb 2023, Published online: 23 Feb 2023

References

  • Abe, E. N., & Chikoko, V. (2020). Development and application of the action taxonomy for learning assistants (ATLAs). International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0200-5
  • Adedokun, O., Bessenbacher, A., Parker, L., Kirkham, L., & Burgess, W. (2013). Research skills and STEM undergraduate research students’ aspirations for research careers: Mediating effects of research self-efficacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 940–951. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21102
  • Alexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., & Neitzel, C. (2019). Multiple points of access for supporting interest in science. In K. A. Renninger, & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning (pp. 312–352). Cambridge University Press.
  • Allen, S., & Peterman, K. (2019). Evaluating informal STEM education: Issues and challenges in context. In A. C. Fu, A. Kannan, & R. J. Shavelson (Eds.), Evaluation in informal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. New directions for evaluation (161, pp. 17–33). Malden, MA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
  • Archer, L., Godec, S., Calabrese Barton, A., Dawson, E., Mau, A., & Patel, U. (2021). Changing the field: A bourdieusian analysis of educational practices that support equitable outcomes among minoritized youth on two informal science learning programs. Science Education, 105(1), 166–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21602
  • Archer, L., Moote, J., Macleod, E., Francis, B., & DeWitt, J. (2020). ASPIRES 2: Young people's science and career aspirations, age 10–19. UCL Institute of Education.
  • Archer, L., Osborne, J. F., DeWitt, J., Dillon, J., Wong, B., & Wills, B. (2013). ASPIRES: Young people’s science and career aspirations, age 10-14. King's College.
  • Ayers, K. A., Wade-Jaimes, K., Wang, L., Pennella, R. A., & Pounds, S. B. (2020). The St. Jude STEM clubs: An afterschool STEM club for upper elementary school students in Memphis. TN. Journal of STEM Outreach, 3(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v3i1.13
  • Badri, M., Alnuaimi, A., Mohaidat, J., Al Rashedi, A., Yang, G., & Al Mazroui, K. (2016). My science class and expected career choices—a structural equation model of determinants involving Abu Dhabi high school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0045-0
  • Bindis, M. (2020). “I love science”: opinions of secondary school females toward science and science careers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(8), 1655–1671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10036-x
  • Blotnicky, K. A., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F., & Joy, P. (2018). A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0118-3
  • Callegaro, M., Manfreda, K. L., & Vehovar, V. (2015). Web survey methodology. Sage.
  • Cannady, M., Greenwald, E., & Harris, K. (2014). Problematizing the STEM pipeline metaphor: Is the STEM pipeline metaphor serving our students and the STEM workforce? Science Education, 98(3), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21108
  • Caspi, A., Gorsky, P., Nitzani-Hendel, R., Zacharia, Z., Rosenfeld, S., Berman, S., & Shildhouse, B. (2019). Ninth-grade students’ perceptions of the factors that led them to major in high school science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines. Science Education, 103(5), 1176–1205. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21524
  • Caspi, A., Gorsky, P., Nitzani-Hendel, R., Zacharia, Z. C., Rosenfeld, S., Berman, S., & Shildhouse, B. (2020). Children's perceptions of the factors that led to their enrolment in advanced, middle-school science programmes. International Journal of Science Education, 42(11), 1915–1939. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1802083
  • Chambers, N., Kashefpakdel, E. T., Rehill, J., & Percy, C. (2018). Drawing the future: Exploring the career aspirations of primary school children from around the world. Education and Employers.
  • Cheng, L., Hao, M., Xiao, L., & Wang, F. (2022). Join us: Dynamic norms encourage women to pursue STEM. Current Psychology, 41, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01105-4
  • Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052
  • Clark, S. L., Dyar, C., Inman, E. M., Maung, N., & London, B. (2021). Women’s career confidence in a fixed, sexist STEM environment. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00313-z
  • Copur-Gencturk, Y., Thacker, I., & Quinn, D. (2021). K-8 teachers’ overall and gender-specific beliefs about mathematical aptitude. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(6), 1251–1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10104-7
  • Dabney, K. P., Chakraverty, D., & Tai, R. H. (2013). The association of family influence and initial interest in science. Science Education, 97(3), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21060
  • DeWitt, J., & Archer, L. (2015). Who aspires to a science career? A comparison of survey responses from primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2170–2192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1071899
  • DeWitt, J., & Archer, L. (2017). Participation in informal science learning experiences: The rich get richer? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(4), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1360531
  • DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Archer, L., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). Young children's aspirations in science: The unequivocal, the uncertain and the unthinkable. International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 1037–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.608197
  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the eccles et al. Model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliott, & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). Guilford Press.
  • Else-Quest, N. M., Mineo, C. C., & Higgins, A. (2013). Math and science attitudes and achievement at the intersection of gender and ethnicity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313480694
  • Fallik, O., Rosenfeld, S., & Eylon, B. S. (2013). School and out-of-school science: A model for bridging the gap. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.822166
  • Fitzgerald, A., Leach, T., Davis, K., Martin, N., & Dunlop, S. (2020). Informal spaces for STEM learning and teaching: STEM clubs. In A. Fitzgerald, C. Haeusler, & L. Pfeiffer (Eds.), STEM education in primary classrooms: Unravelling contemporary approaches in Australia and New Zealand (pp. 168–187). Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9780367229368.
  • Gecu-Parmaksiz, Z., Hughes, J., & Butler-Ulrich, T. (2021). Overview of current after school - OST STEM programs for girls. Journal of Digital Life and Learning, 1(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.51357/jdll.v1i1.150
  • Ginzberg, E. (1952). Toward a theory of occupational choice. Occupations; the Vocational Guidance Journal, 30(7), 491–494.
  • Gore, J., Holmes, K., Smith, M., Fray, L., McElduff, P., Weaver, N., & Wallington, C. (2017). Unpacking the career aspirations of Australian school students: Towards an evidence base for university equity initiatives in schools. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(7), 1383–1400. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1325847
  • Habig, B., Gupta, P., Levine, B., & Adams, J. (2020). An informal science education program’s impact on STEM major and STEM career outcomes. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1051–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9722-y
  • Helwig, C. C. (2006). The development of personal autonomy throughout cultures. Cognitive Development, 21(4), 458–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.06.009
  • Hite, R. L., & White, J. (2021). Hispanic elementary students’ improved perceptions of science and scientists upon participation in an environmental science afterschool club. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 21(1), 1–14.
  • Holmes, K., Gore, J., Smith, M., & Lloyd, A. (2018). An integrated analysis of school students’ aspirations for STEM careers: Which student and school factors are most predictive? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(4), 655–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9793-z
  • Jiang, S., Simpkins, S. D., & Eccles, J. S. (2020). Individuals’ math and science motivation and their subsequent STEM choices and achievement in high school and college: A longitudinal study of gender and college generation status differences. Developmental Psychology, 56(11), 2137–2151. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001110
  • Kang, J., Hense, J., Scheersoi, A., & Keinonen, T. (2019). Gender study on the relationships between science interest and future career perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1534021
  • Kim, A. Y., Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V. (2018). Developing a STEM identity among young women: A social identity perspective. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 589–625. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318779957
  • Kong, X., Dabney, K. P., & Tai, R. H. (2014). The association between science summer camps and career interest in science and engineering. International Journal of Science Education. Part B, 4(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2012.760856
  • Krosnick, J. A., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and questionnaire design. In P. V. Marsden & J.D. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (2nd ed., pp. 263–314). Bingley.
  • Kuchynka, S. L., Eaton, A., & Rivera, L. M. (2022). Understanding and addressing gender-based inequities in STEM: Research synthesis and recommendations for U.S. K-12 education. Social Issues and Policy Review, 16(1), 252–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12087
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
  • Lent, R. W., Sheu, H. B., Miller, M. J., Cusick, M. E., Penn, L. T., & Truong, N. N. (2018). Predictors of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics choice options: A meta-analytic path analysis of the social-cognitive choice model by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000243
  • Luo, T., So, W. W. M., Wan, Z. H., & Li, W. C. (2021). Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers’ engineering design thinking. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00258-9
  • Maiorca, C., Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Bush, S., Delaney, A., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., & Soledad, S. Y. (2021). Informal learning environments and impact on interest in STEM careers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10038-9
  • Maltese, A. V., & Cooper, C. S. (2017). STEM pathways: Do men and women differ in why they enter and exit? American Educational Research Association Open, 3(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417727276
  • Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902792385
  • Moote, J., Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & MacLeod, E. (2020). Science capital or STEM capital? Exploring relationships between science capital and technology, engineering, and maths aspirations and attitudes among young people aged, 17/18). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 1228–1249. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21628
  • National Science Foundation (2016). Science and engineering indicators 2016.
  • Neitzel, C. L., Alexander, J. M., & Johnson, K. E. (2019). The emergence of children's interest orientations during early childhood: When predisposition meets opportunity. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 23, 100271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.01.004
  • Newell, A. D., Zientek, L. R., Tharp, B. Z., Vogt, G. L., & Moreno, N. P. (2015). Students' attitudes toward science as predictors of gains on student content knowledge: Benefits of an after-school program. School Science and Mathematics, 115(5), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12125
  • Nugent, G., Barker, B., Welch, G., Grandgenett, N., Wu, C., & Nelson, C. (2015). A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863
  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. OECD Publishing.
  • Raabe, I. J., Boda, Z., & Stadtfeld, C. (2019). The social pipeline: How friend influence and peer exposure widen the stem gender gap. Sociology of Education, 92(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040718824095
  • Raabe, I. J., & Wölfer, R. (2019). What is going on around you: Peer milieus and educational aspirations. European Sociological Review, 35(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy048
  • Rende, K., Jones, M. G., Refvem, E., Carrier, S. J., & Ennes, M. (2022). Accelerating high school students’ science career trajectories through non-formal science volunteer programs. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2100942
  • Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Cavalcanti, M., Craig Schroeder, D., Delaney, A., Putnam, L., & Cremeans, C. (2018). Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4
  • Sha, L., Schunn, C., & Bathgate, M. (2015). Measuring choice to participate in optional science learning experiences during early adolescence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 686–709. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21210
  • Shaby, N., Staus, N., Dierking, L., & Falk, J. (2021). Pathways of interest and participation: How STEM-interested youth navigate a learning ecosystem. Science Education, 105(4), 628–652. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21621
  • Shin, D. D., Lee, M., Ha, J. E., Park, J. H., Ahn, H. S., Son, E., Chung, Y., & Bong, M. (2019). Science for all: Boosting the science motivation of elementary school students with utility value intervention. Learning and Instruction, 60, 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.003
  • Šimunović, M., Reić Ercegovac, I., & Burušić, J. (2018). How important is it to my parents? Transmission of STEM academic values: The role of parents’ values and practices and children’s perceptions of parental influences. International Journal of Science Education, 40(9), 977–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1460696
  • Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719
  • Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2022). Sex differences in adolescents’ occupational aspirations: Variations across time and place. Plos one, 17(1), e0261438. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261438
  • Su, R., & Rounds, J. (2015). All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interest explain gender disparities across STEM fields. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00189
  • Venville, G., Rennie, L., Hanbury, C., & Longnecker, N. (2013). Scientists reflect on why they chose to study science. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2207–2233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9352-3
  • Vinni-Laakso, J., Guo, J., Juuti, K., Loukomies, A., Lavonen, J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2019). The relations of science task values, self-concept of ability, and STEM aspirations among Finnish students from first to second grade. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1449. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01449
  • Vrieler, T., Nylén, A., & Cajander, Å. (2020). Computer science club for girls and boys–a survey study on gender differences. Computer Science Education, 31(4), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1832412
  • Wang, M. T., Degol, J., & Ye, F. (2015). Math achievement is important, but task values are critical, too: Examining the intellectual and motivational factors leading to gender disparities in STEM careers. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(36). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00036
  • Young, J., Ortiz, N., & Young, J. (2016). STEMulating interest: A meta-analysis of the effects of out-of-school time on student STEM interest. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.61149