Making it in undergraduate STEM education: the role of a maker course in fostering STEM identities

References

• Andrews, M. E., Borrego, M., & Boklage, A. (2021). Self-efficacy and belonging: The impact of a university makerspace. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Balancing acts'': Elementary school girls’ negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science. Science Education, 96(6), 967–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, T., Pizzico, M., Levy, B. D., Nagel, R. L., Linsey, J. S., Talley, K. G., … Newstetter, W. C. (2015). A review of university maker spaces.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, B. (2017). The promise and promises of making in science education. Studies in Science Education, 53(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1275380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, B., Gutwill, J., Petrich, M., & Wilkinson, K. (2015). Learning through STEM-rich tinkering: Findings from a jointly negotiated research project taken up in practice. Science Education, 99(1), 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and “making” in education: The democratization of invention. In J. Walter-Hermann, & C. Buching (Eds.), Fablabs: Of machines, makers and inventors (pp. 1–21). Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, D., & Peat, F. D. (2011). Science, order, and creativity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braxton, J. (2008). Toward a scholarship of practice centered on college student retention. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2008(115), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.328
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., & Kuratko, D. (2015). The impact of design and innovation on the future of education. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese, B. A., Birmingham, D., Takumi, S., Tan, E., & Calabrese, B. S. (2013). Supporting youth in becoming community science experts. Afterschool Matters Journal, 2013, 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Cannady, M. A., Greenwald, E., & Harris, K. N. (2014). Problematizing the STEM pipeline metaphor: Is the STEM pipeline metaphor serving our students and the STEM workforce? Science Education, 98(3), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlone, H., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B., Haun-Frank, J., & Webb, A. (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge-and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 459–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (1998). Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Perrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, S. L., Quek, F., Bhangaonkar, S., Ging, A. B., & Sridharamurthy, K. (2015). Making the maker: A means-to-an-ends approach to nurturing the maker mindset in elementary-aged children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Chu, S. L., Schlegel, R., Quek, F., Christy, A., & Chen, K. (2017, May). 'I Make, Therefore I Am' The Effects of Curriculum-Aligned Making on Children's Self-Identity. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 109–120).
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, E., Ross, J., & Tishman, S. (2016). Maker-centered learning. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, E. P., & Jimenez, R. L. (2016). Implementing STEAM in maker-centered learning. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(4), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, K., & Bush, S. (2018). Design thinking in integrated STEAM learning: Surveying the landscape and exploring exemplars in elementary grades. School Science and Mathematics, 1(18), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12268
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, M., Forest, C. R., Hartmann, B., Hoover, A. M., Hunt, J., Kohn, M., Culpepper, M. L., & Wilczynski, V. (2018). Models for curricular integration of higher education makerspaces. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Academic Makerspaces.
   Google Scholar
• DiGiacomo, D., Gutierrez, K., & Schwartz, L. (2013, December). Relationships and tinkering: The generative power of the relationship as a tool for expansive literacies and learning. In Literacy Research Association Conference, Dallas, Texas (pp. 3–6).
   Google Scholar
• DiGiacomo, D. K., & Gutierrez, K. D. (2016). Relational equity as a design tool within making and tinkering activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2015.1058398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans, D., De Grave, W., Wolfhagen, I., & Van Der Vleuten, C. (2005). Problem-based learning: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education, 39(7), 732–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02205.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, K. J. (1992). Community colleges and baccalaureate attainment. The Journal of Higher Education, 63(2), 188–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, C., Mavriplis, C., & Anis, H. (2020). An entrepreneurship education and peer mentoring program for women in STEM: Mentors’ experiences and perceptions of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intent. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(1), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00624-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A. G., Campbell, P. B., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutiérrez, C. G., Hurtado, S., John, G. H., Matsui, J., McGee, R., Okpodu, C. M., Robinson, T. J., Summers, M. F., Werner-Washburne, M., & Zavala, M. (2016). Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(es5).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasso, W. Knight, & B. A. (2020). Identity development in school makerspaces: Intentional design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(2), 275–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2000). Chapter 3: Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99–125
   Google Scholar
• Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education, 53(2), 229–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9247-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godhe, A.-L., Lilja, P., & Selwyn, N. (2019). Making sense of making: Critical issues in the integration of maker education in schools. Technology, Pedagogy, and Education, 28(3), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1610040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M. J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A. B., & Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science, 341(6153), 1455–1456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. M. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M. C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hira, A., & Hynes, M. M. (2018). People, means, and activities: A conceptual framework for realizing the educational potential of makerspaces. Education Research International, 1, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6923617
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D., & Lave, J. (2019). Social practice theory and the historical production of persons. Cultural-Historical Approaches to Studying Learning and Development: Societal, Institutional and Personal Perspectives, 2, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2007). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century (Part One). Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 2(1), 23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, W., Smith, S., & Cohen, J. (2017). Preservice teachers’ beliefs about using maker activities in formal k-12 educational settings: A multi-institutional study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3-4), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1318097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas, K., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2013). Design thinking inelementary students’ collaborative lamp designing process. Design and Technology Education, 18(1), 30–43.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A. Y., Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V. (2018). Developing a STEM identity among young women: A social identity perspective. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 589–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luka, I. (2014). Design thinking in pedagogy. Journal of Education and Society, 2, 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, S., & Stager, G. (2014). The maker movement: A learning revolution. Learning and Leading with Technology, 41(7), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Polanco, R., Calderón, P., & Delgado, F. (2004). Effects of a problem-based learning program on engineering students’ academic achievements in a Mexican university. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/1470329042000208675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta-Irving, T., & Vossoughi, S. (2019). Not in their name: Re-interpreting discourses of STEM learning through the subjective experiences of minoritized girls. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 22(4), 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1592835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starobin, S., Laanan, F., & Lester, J. (2008). Broadening female participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Experiences at community colleges. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2008(142), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.323
   Google Scholar
• Starobin, S., & Laanan, F. S. (2008). Broadening female participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Experiences at community colleges. In J. Lester (Ed.), New Directions for Community Colleges: No. 142. Gendered perspectives on community colleges (pp. 37–46). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M., Bower, M., Falloon, G., Forbes, A., & Hatzigianni, M. (2019). By design: Professional learning ecologies to develop primary school teachers’ makerspaces pedagogical capabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1260–1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 273–285). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, E., Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., & O'Neill, T. (2013). Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1143–1179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, E., & Barton, A. C. (2018). Towards critical justice: Exploring intersectionality in community-based STEM-rich making with youth from non-dominant communities. Equity and Excellence in Education, 51(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2018.1439786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. (2016). Evaluating the benefit of the maker movement in K-12 STEM education. Electronic International Journal of Education, Arts, and Science, 2, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., Hooper, P. K., & Escude, M. (2016). Making through the lens of culture and power: Toward transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 206–231. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2008). Identity in practice. In K. Hall, P. Murphy, & J. Soler (Eds.), Pedagogy and Practice: Culture and Identities (pp. 105–114). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2016). Rigor and equity by design: Seeking a core of practices for the science education community. In D. H. Gitomer & C. A. Bell (Eds.), AERA Handbook of Research on Teaching (5th ed., pp. 1099–1158). American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar