Modelling of interest in out-of-school science learning environments: a systematic literature review

References

• Affeldt, F., Weitz, K., Siol, A., Markic, S., & Eilks, I. (2015). A non-formal student laboratory as a place for innovation in education for sustainability for all students. Education Sciences, 5(3), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci5030238
   Google Scholar
• Beranek-Knauer, H., Walter, H., Paleczek, D., Eder, L., Jungwirth, K., & Jungwirth, H. (2020). Discourse-directed framing as communication strategy alters students’ concept of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance formation. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 10(4), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1844921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budke, M., Parchmann, I., & Beeken, M. (2019). Empirical study on the effects of stationary and mobile student laboratories: How successful are mobile student laboratories in comparison to stationary ones at universities? Journal of Chemical Education, 96(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00608
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43–70). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Current theory and research in motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation: Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1990 (pp. 237–288). University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, T. W., Reif, H. L., & Thomas, D. S. (2016). An ROI comparison of initiatives designed to attract diverse students to technology careers. Journal of Information Systems Education, 27(2), 105–118.
   Google Scholar
• Dohn, N. B. (2011). Situational interest of high school students who visit an aquarium. Science Education, 95(2), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohn, N. B. (2013). Upper secondary students’ situational interest: A case study of the role of a zoo visit in a biology class. International Journal of Science Education, 35(16), 2732–2751. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.628712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, R. J., Walker, G. J., & Orthia, L. A. (2021). Interest, emotions, relevance: Viewing science centre interactive exhibit design through the lens of situational interest. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2021.1938740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortus, D. (2014). Attending to affect. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fröhlich, G., Sellmann, D., & Bogner, F. X. (2013). The influence of situational emotions on the intention for sustainable consumer behaviour in a student-centred intervention. Environmental Education Research, 19(6), 747–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.749977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulmer, S. M., & Frijters, J. C. (2011). Motivation during an excessively challenging Reading task: The buffering role of relative topic interest. The Journal of Experimental Education, 79(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2010.481503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glowinski, I., & Bayrhuber, H. (2011). Student labs on a university campus as a type of out-of-school learning environment: Assessing the potential to promote students’ interest in science. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(4), 371–392. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ959426.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Guderian, P., & Priemer, B. (2008). Interessenförderung durch Schülerlaborbesuche - eine Zusammenfassung der Forschung in Deutschland [Promoting interest by Schülerlabor visits - A review of the research in Germany]. Physik Und Didaktik in Schule Und Hochschule, 2(7), 27–36. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228858933.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gumaelius, L., Almqvist, M., Árnadóttir, A., Axelsson, A., Conejero, J. A., García-Sabater, J. P., Klitgaard, L., Kozma, C., Maheut, J., Marin-Garcia, J., Mickos, H., Nilsson, P.-O., Norén, A., Pinho-Lopes, M., Prenzel, M., Ray, J., Roxå, T., & Voss, M. (2016). Outreach initiatives operated by universities for increasing interest in science and technology. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(6), 589–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2015.1121468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutual, J. W. (2019). Effect of a hands-on biomedical engineering outreach project on middle school students’ interest and identity in engineering: A quantitative study [Master’s thesis, University of Nevada, Reno]. ScholarWorks. https://scholarworks.unr.edu/handle/11714/6675.
   Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausamann, D. (2012). Extracurricular science labs for STEM talent support. Roeper Review, 34(3), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.686424
   Google Scholar
• Häußler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (1995). Physikunterricht - an den Interessen von Mädchen und Jungen orientiert [Physics instruction - based on girls‘ and boys‘ interests]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 23(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:8124
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060004549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151–179. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, L. (2002). Promoting girls’ interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00010-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itzek-Greulich, H., Flunger, B., Vollmer, C., Nagengast, B., Rehm, M., & Trautwein, U. (2017). Effectiveness of lab-work learning environments in and out of school: A cluster randomized study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 48, 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itzek-Greulich, H., & Vollmer, C. (2017). Emotional and motivational outcomes of lab work in the secondary intermediate track: The contribution of a science center outreach lab. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffers, A. T., Safferman, A. G., & Safferman, S. I. (2004). Understanding K–12 engineering outreach programs. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2004)130:2(95)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapp, A.. (1992 Das Interessenkonstrukt. Bestimmungsmerkmale der Interessenhandlung und des individuellen Interesses aus der Sicht einer Person-Gegenstands-Konzeption [The construct of interest. Characteristics of interest-related actions and individual interests from the perspective of a person-object-theory]. In A. Krapp & M. Prenzel (Eds.), Interesse, Lernen, Leistung: Neuere Ansätze der pädagogisch-psychologischen Interessenforschung (pp. 297–329). Aschendorff.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. (1998). Entwicklung und Förderung von Interessen im Unterricht [Development and promotion of interest in instruction]. Psychologie in Erziehung Und Unterricht, 44(3), 185–201.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. (2002a). An educational-psychological theory of interest and its relation to SDT. In E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 405–427). University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. (2002b). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 383–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3–25). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lelliott, A. D. (2007). Learning about astronomy: a case study exploring how grade 7 and 8 students experience sites of informal learning in South Africa [Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg]. Semantic Scholar. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1fad/1304dfed392a780fe4140c7e7ddf536f4469.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• LernortLabor. (2023, January 10). Bundesverband der Schülerlabore e.V. [Federal Association of School Labs e.V.]. https://www.lernortlabor.de/.
   Google Scholar
• Lewalter, D., Gegenfurtner, A., & Renninger, K. A. (2021). Out-of-school programs and interest: Design considerations based on a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 34(1), 100406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100406
   Google Scholar
• Markic, S., Wichmann, J., Affeldt, F., Siol, A., & Eilks, I. (2017). Promoting education for sustainability for All learners by Non-formal chemistry laboratories. Daruna, 44, 44–53. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/ingo-eilks/publication/320907395_promoting_education_for_sustainability_for_all_learners_by_non-formal_chemistry_laboratories/links/5a01b1590f7e9bfd745d02f9/promoting-education-for-sustainability-for-all-learners-by-non-formal-chemistry-laboratories.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Marth-Busch, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). Technology interest of secondary school students at five testing points over one complete school year after participating at a student-centered learning program about bionics. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(2), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.2.7
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, T. P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher-Asylbekov, S., & Wagner, I. (2022). Effects of out-of-school STEM learning environments on student interest: A critical systematic literature review. Journal for STEM Education Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-022-00080-8
   Google Scholar
• Ozogul, G., Miller, C. F., & Reisslein, M. (2019). School fieldtrip to engineering workshop: Pre-, post-, and delayed-post effects on student perceptions by age, gender, and ethnicity. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(5), 745–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1518408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehfeldt, D., Klempin, C., Brämer, M., Seibert, D., Rogge, I., Lücke, M., Sambanis, M., Nordmeier, V., & Köster, H. (2020). Empirische Forschung in Lehr- Lern-Labor-Seminaren – Ein Systematic Review zu Wirkungen des Lehrformats [Empirical research in teaching-learning-laboratory seminars – A systematic review on the effects of the teaching format]. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 34, 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000270
   Google Scholar
• Röllke, K., Maak, A.-L., Wenzel, A., & Grotjohann, N. (2020). What makes learning enjoyable perspectives of today s college students in the U.S. And Brazil. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(1), 1. Article em0050. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2020065267
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Plant, R. W. (1990). Emotions in nondirected text learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 2(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(90)90014-8
   Google Scholar
• Salmi, H., & Thuneberg, H. (2019). The role of self-determination in informal and formal science learning contexts. Learning Environments Research, 22(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-018-9266-0
   Google Scholar
• Salmi, H., Thuneberg, H., Bogner, F. X., & Fenyvesi, K. (2021). Individual creativity and career choices of Pre-teens in the context of a math-Art learning event. Open Education Studies, 3(1), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2020-0147
   Google Scholar
• Salmi, H., Thuneberg, H., & Vainikainen, M.-P. (2017). Learning with dinosaurs: A study on motivation, cognitive reasoning, and making observations. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(3), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2016.1200155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmi, H. S., Thuneberg, H., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). Is there deep learning on Mars? STEAM education in an inquiry-based out-of-school setting. Interactive Learning Environments, 1), https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1823856
   Google Scholar
• Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. B. (2005). Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation. European Psychologist, 10(3), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.10.3.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (1990). Thematisches interesse, Variablen des Leseprozesses und Textverstehen [Thematic interest, variables of the reading process and text comprehension]. Zeitschrift Für Experimentelle Und Angewandte Psychologie, 37(2), 304–332.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwan, S., Grajal, A., & Lewalter, D. (2014). Understanding and engagement in places of science experience: Science museums, science centers, zoos, and aquariums. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.917588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seakins, A. J. (2015). Meeting scientists: Impacts on visitors to the natural history museum, London [Doctoral dissertation]. King’s College London, London. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/45227443/2015_seakins_amy_1021413_ethesis.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Snetinová, M., Kácovský, P., & Machalická, J. (2018). Hands-on experiments in the interactive physics laboratory: Students’ intrinsic motivation and understanding. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 8(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.319
   Google Scholar
• Sripaoraya, E. (2020). Effectiveness of a science outreach programme in regional communities of Thailand [Doctoral dissertation, University of Otago]. OUR Archive. https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/handle/10523/12324.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrova, O., & Urhahne, D. (2010). Modification of a school programme in the deutsches museum to enhance students’ attitudes and understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 32(17), 2291–2310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903471583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streller, M. (2015). The educational effects of pre and post-work in out-of-school laboratories [Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany]. Semantic Scholar. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a899/e216cbc89bdfbc0af7bb74dbb004561aadd5.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Suviniitty, J., & Clavert, M. (2020). Attracting (female) adolescents into STEM studies – where’s the beef? In B. V. Nagy, M. Murphy, H.-M. Järvinen, & A. Kálmán (Eds.), Proceedings of the SEFI 47th Annual Conference: Varietas delectat … Complexity is the new normality (pp. 1123–1138). European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). https://www.nordenhub.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2019/11/sefi2019finalpaper_stem20attractiveness.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thuneberg, H., & Salmi, H. (2018). To know or not to know: Uncertainty is the answer. Synthesis of six different science exhibition contexts. Journal of Science Communication, 17(2), A01. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17020201
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, Y.-M., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). What makes lessons interesting? The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vainikainen, M.-P., Salmi, H., & Thuneberg, H. (2015). Situational interest and learning in a science center mathematics exhibition. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 1(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2015.6
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, C., & Schmiedebach, M. (2020). Interest in biology: Grade-dependent differences and benefits of participating in out-of-school interventions. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(3), 427–434. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85090703569&partnerID=40&md5=fb69fb744e6e56250544d0469caf2969 https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i3.1051.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12(3), 265–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Möller, J. (2020). How dimensional comparisons help to understand linkages between expectancies, values, performance, and choice. Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09524-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar