Girls’ participation in science education: structural limitations and sustainable alternatives

Reference

• Akuaku, J. R. (2015). Girls’ low participation in science: A comparative study of four selected senior high schools in greater Accra region, Ghana. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Olso.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). “Science capital”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922–948. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B., Chávez, J., & Vílchez-Román, C. (2020). Factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in science careers worldwide: A literature review. Social Psychology of Education, 23(3), 773–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09558-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian, L., Leslie, S.-J., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetcuti, D. A., & Kioko, B. (2012). Girls’ attitudes towards science in Kenya. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1571–1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.665196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry research design: Choosing from five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eidelman, L., Hazzan, O., Lapidot, T., Matias, Y., Raijman, D., & Seglaov, M. (2011). Mind the (gender) gap. ACM Inroads, 2(3), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/2003616.2003637
   Google Scholar
• European institute for gender equality – EIGE. (2017). Economic benefits of gender equality in the EU: How gender equality in STEM education leads to economic growth. EIGE.
   Google Scholar
• García-Ramos, L., Peñabaena-Niebles, R., Camacho, A., Calle, M., & García-Barreneche, S. (2022). Promoting the participation of women in STEM: A methodological view. In F. J. García-Peñalvo, A. García-Holgado, A. Dominguez, & J. Pascual (Eds.), Women in STEM in higher education: Good practices of attraction, access and retainment in higher education (pp. 1–19). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gladstone, J. R., & Cimpian, A. (2021). Which role models are effective for which students? A systematic review and four recommendations for maximizing the effectiveness of role models in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(59), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00315-x
   Google Scholar
• González-Pérez, S., Mateos de Cabo, R., & Sáinz, M. (2020). Girls in STEM: Is it a female role-model thing? Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Rozek, C. S., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science. Psychological Science, 23(8), 899–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M., Gneezy, U., & List, J. A. (2011). Nurture affects gender differences in spatial abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(36), 14786–14788. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015182108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jocz, J. A., Zhai, J., & Tan, A. L. (2014). Inquiry learning in the Singaporean context: Factors affecting student interest in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2596–2618. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.908327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, C. (2015). Efforts to increase students’ interest in pursuing science, technology, engineering and mathematics studies and careers. National Measures taken by 30 Countries - 2015 Report. European Schoolnet.
   Google Scholar
• Kibga, E. S., Sentongo, J., & Gakuba, E. (2021). Effectiveness of hands-on activities to develop chemistry learners’ curiosity in community secondary schools in Tanzania. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 605–621. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.93.
   Google Scholar
• Lavy, V., & Sand, E. (2018). On the origins of gender gaps in human capital: Short- and long-term consequences of teachers’ biases. Journal of Public Economics, 167, 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaper, C., Farkas, T., & Brown, C. S. (2012). Adolescent girls’ experiences and gender-related beliefs in relation to their motivation in math/science and English. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(3), 268–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9693-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2015). The millennium development goals agenda: Constraints of culture, economy and empowerment in influencing the social mobility of Pakistani girls on mathematics and science related higher education courses in Universities in Pakistan. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2014.992556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. TIMSS and PIRLS International Study.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS Advanced 2015 international results in advanced mathematics and physics. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/advanced/.
   Google Scholar
• Musau, L. M., & Migosi, J. A. (2014). Instructional resources and girls’ academic achievement in science, mathematics and technology subjects: Experiences from Kenya. International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 5(2), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEED.2014.061452
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences. (2022). Why is it important to encourage more women to pursue science and engineering careers? https://thesciencebehindit.org/why-is-it-important-to-encourage-more-women-to-pursue-science-and-engineering/.
   Google Scholar
• National Examinations Council of Tanzania [NECTA]. (2023). The 2022 Form Two National Assessment (FTNA) results. https://www.necta.go.tz/.
   Google Scholar
• Naugah, J., Reiss, M. J., & Watts, M. (2020). Parents and their children’s choice of school science subjects and career intentions: A study from Mauritius. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(4), 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1645107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwosu, S. N., Etiubon, R. U., & Udofia, T. M. (2014). Tackling inhibitions to careers in science and technology through differentiated mentoring approach. International Education Studies, 7(8), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n8p124
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2017). Gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for STEM education and approaches to reducing the gender gap for parents and educators. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Visual-spatial ability in STEM education (pp. 195–224). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Simpkins, S. D., Price, C. D., & Garcia, K. (2015). Parental support and high school students’ motivation in biology, chemistry, and physics: Understanding differences among Latino and Caucasian boys and girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(10), 1386–1407. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolnik, J. (2015). Why are girls and women underrepresented in STEM, and what can be done about it? Science & Education, 24(9-10), 1301–1306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9774-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stearns, E., Bottia, M. C., Davalos, E., Mickelson, R., Moller, S., & Valentino, L. (2016). Demographic characteristics of high school math and science teachers and girls’ success in STEM. Social Problems, 63(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spv027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart-Williams, S., & Halsey, L. G. (2021). Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done? European Journal of Personality, 35(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890207020962326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The United Republic of Tanzania [URT]. (2020). Basic education statistics in Tanzania (BEST) 2020. President's Office - Regional Administration and Local Government. https://www.tamisemi.go.tz/storage/app/media/uploaded-files/BEST%202020%20Regional%20Data_Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The United Republic of Tanzania [URT]. (2022). National basic education data 2022. President's Office - Regional Administration and Local Government. https://www.tamisemi.go.tz/singleministers/basic-education-data-2022.
   Google Scholar
• Timms, M., Moyle, K., Weldon, P., & Mitchell, P. (2018). Challenges in STEM learning in Australian schools. Policy Insights Issue 7. ACER.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2020). STEM education for girls and women: Breaking barriers and exploring gender inequality in Asia. UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Yuan, Y., & Wang, G. (2022). The construction of civil scientific literacy in China from the perspective of science education. Science & Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00367-7
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. (2013). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy-value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review, 33(4), 304–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T. J., Delaloye, N., Adams, E. R., Ware, D., Vanek, D., Knuth, R., Hester, C. L., Marra, N. N., & Holian, A. (2016). Air toxics under the big sky: Examining the effectiveness of authentic scientific research on high school students’ science skills and interest. International Journal of Science Education, 38(6), 905–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1167984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Designs and methods (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar