Using video-elicitation focus group interviews to explore pre-service science teachers’ views and reasoning on artificial intelligence

References

• Babchuk, W. A. (2019). Fundamentals of qualitative analysis in family medicine. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2), e000040. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2020). A review of educational responses to the “post-truth” condition: Four lenses on “post-truth” problems. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1786388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., Matkins, J. J., & Gansneder, B. M. (2011). Impacts of contextual and explicit instruction on preservice elementary teachers’ understandings of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 414–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. (2006). Deliberative democracy and the epistemic benefits of diversity. Episteme, 3(3), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2006.3.3.175
   Google Scholar
• Borgerding, L. A., & Dagistan, M. (2018). Preservice science teachers’ concerns and approaches for teaching socioscientific and controversial issues. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(4), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1440860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgerding, L. A., & Mulvey, B. K. (2022). Elementary teachers’ trust in science and scientists throughout a COVID-19 SSI unit. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(8), 837–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.2007320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang Rundgren, S., & Rundgren, C. (2010). SEE-SEP: From a separate to a holistic view of socio-scientific issues. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1, 2), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. N. K., & Wen, C. H. R. (2021). Impacts of attitudes toward government and corporations on public trust in artificial intelligence. Communication Studies, 72(1), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1807380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eggert, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Students’ use of decision-making strategies with regard to SSI: An application of the Rasch partial credit model. Science Education, 94(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., & Kaya, E. (2016). Scientific argumentation and deliberative democracy: An incompatible mix in school science? Theory Into Practice, 55(4), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1208067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., & Dillon, J. (2020). Introduction: Socio-scientific issues as promoting responsible citizenship and the relevance of science. In M. Evagorou, J. A. Nielson, & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science teacher education for responsible citizenship: Towards a pedagogy for relevance through SSI (pp. 1–11). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, H., Park, W., & Song, J. (2022). Preservice elementary teachers’ socioscientific reasoning during a decision-making activity in the context of COVID-19. Science & Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00359-7
   Google Scholar
• Haynes-Brown, T. K., & Shannon-Baker, P. (2021). Integrating video evidence in mixed methods research: Innovations, benefits, and challenges for research exploring how beliefs shape actions. Methods in Psychology, 5, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100068
   Google Scholar
• Henry, S. G., & Fetters, M. D. (2012). Video elicitation interviews: A qualitative research method for investigating physician-patient interactions. The Annals of Family Medicine, 10(2), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, B. C., Clough, M. P., & Rao, A. (2022). Socioscientific issues thinking and action in the midst of science-in-the-making. Science & Education, 31, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00306-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, B. C., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., & Newton, M. H. (2018). A socioscientific issues approach to environmental education. In G. Reis & J. Scott (Eds.), International perspectives on the theory and practice of environmental education: A reader (pp. 145–161). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, B. C., Zeidler, D. L., & Newton, M. (2020). Students’ emotive reasoning through place-based environmental socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 50(5), 2081–2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9764-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jho, H., Yoon, H., & Kim, M. (2014). The relationship of science knowledge, attitude and decision making on socio-scientific issues: The case study of students’ debates on a nuclear power plant in Korea. Science & Education, 23(5), 1131–1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9652-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2019). A conceptual analysis of perspective taking in support of socioscientific reasoning. Science & Education, 28(6), 605–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00044-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K. (2016). The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karisan, D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2017). Contextualization of nature of science within the socioscientific issues framework: A review of research. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.270186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. Y., & Kim, S. H. (2018). Effects of SSI argumentation program based on SEL for preservice biology teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(2), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10040
   Google Scholar
• Knippels, M. C. P., Severiens, S. E., & Klop, T. (2009). Education through fiction: Acquiring opinion-forming skills in the context of genomics. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 2057–2083. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802345888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. (2001). 'To trust or not to trust, … '-Pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 877–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010016102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, 23(2), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L. (2016). Using generic inductive approach in qualitative educational research: A case study analysis. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n2p129
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, C., Palmgren, P. J., & Liljedahl, M. (2019). Twelve tips for conducting qualitative research interviews. Medical Teacher, 41(9), 1002–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1497149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mikalef, P., Conboy, K., Lundström, J. E., & Popovič, A. (2022). Thinking responsibly about responsible AI and ‘the dark side’ of AI. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2026621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mun, J., Kim, M., & Kim, S. W. (2022). How seventh-grade students experience the complexity of socioscientific issues through decision making on the autonomous vehicle issue. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 8(1), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10040
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A. (2012). Science in discussions: An analysis of the use of science content in socioscientific discussions. Science Education, 96(3), 428–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., Petitt, D. N., & Forbes, C. T. (2021). Exploring undergraduates’ breadth of socio-scientific reasoning through domains of knowledge. Research in Science Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10014-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozden, M. (2020). Elementary school students’ informal reasoning and its’ quality regarding socioscientific issues. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 86(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2020.86.4
   Google Scholar
• Ozturk, K., & Sahin, M. E. (2018). A general view of artificial neural networks and artificial intelligence. Takvim-i Vekayi, 6(2), 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2004). Visual methods. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 391–406). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education volume II (pp. 559–572). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruto-Korir, R., & Lubbe-De Beer, C. (2012). The potential for using visual elicitation in understanding preschool teachers’ beliefs of appropriate educational practices. South African Journal of Education, 32(4), 393–405. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v32n4a661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific issues-based education: What we know about science education in the context of SSI: Teaching, learning and research. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom (pp. 355–369). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Romine, W. L., & Topcu, M. S. (2016). Learning science content through socio-scientific issues-based instruction: A multi-level assessment study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1622–1635. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1204481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, L. D. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, S., Ha, M., & Lee, J. K. (2018). Exploring elementary school students’ image of artificial intelligence. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 37(2), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2018.37.2.126
   Google Scholar
• Smallman, M. (2018). Science to the rescue or contingent progress? Comparing 10 years of public, expert and policy discourses on new and emerging science and technology in the United Kingdom. Public Understanding of Science, 27(6), 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517706452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, S., & Abelson, J. (2012). Why and when should we use public deliberation? Hastings Center Report, 42(2), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soydemir Bor, S., & Alkis Kucukaydin, M. (2021). The effect of SSI teaching on primary school students on problem solving and creative writing skills in the theme of artificial intelligence. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(2), 432–446. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.904806
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). Multiple case study analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Su, K.P. (2019, May 22). Preventing AI abuse requires cooperation. Taipei Times. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2019/05/22/2003715563
   Google Scholar
• Tasci, G., & Celebi, M. (2020). A new paradigm in education: Artificial intelligence in higher education. International Journal of Society Researches, 16(29), 2346–2370. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.747634
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. Y. (2018). The effect of online argumentation of socio-scientific issues on students’ scientific competencies and sustainability attitudes. Computers & Education, 116, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. H., Hong, Z. R., Liu, S. C., & Lin, H. S. (2018). The impact of socio-scientific issue discussions on student environmentalism. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1624. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95134
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S. Y., & Yang, K. K. (2022). Influence and behavioral pattern of university students’ participation in decision-making on socio-scientific issues. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2093345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. (2014). SSI as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research and practice. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 697–726). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D., Sadler, T., Simmons, M., & Howes, E. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar