The effect of the cyclic curricular design of modelling-based instruction with virtual labs

References

• Armstrong, R. A. (2014). When to use the B onferroni correction. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 34(5), 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumfalk, B., Bhattacharya, D., Vo, T., Forbes, C., Zangori, L., & Schwarz, C. (2019). Impact of model-based science curriculum and instruction on elementary students’ explanations for the hydrosphere. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(5), 570–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulter, C. J., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Constructing a typology of models for science education. In J. K. Gilbert, & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 41–57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0876-1
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T., & Oh, P. S. (2015). Engaging students in modeling as an epistemic practice of science: An introduction to the special issue of the journal of science education and technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9544-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H.-Y. (2017). How to augment the learning impact of computer simulations? The designs and effects of interactivity and scaffolding. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(8), 1083–1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1250222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. H., & Lin, J. W. (2019). Modeling competence in science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0001-1
   Google Scholar
• Clement, J. J. (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role of imagery, analogy, and mental simulation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6712-9
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C. P., Nicolaou, C. T., & Papaevripidou, M. (2019). A framework for modeling-based learning, teaching, and assessment. In A. Upmeier zu Belzen, D. Krüger, & J. van Driel (Eds.), Towards a competence-based view on models and modeling in science education. Models and modeling in science education, vol 12. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30255-9_3
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, T., Lazonder, A., Pedaste, M., & Zacharia, Z. (2018). Simulations, games, and modeling tools for learning. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 256–266). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315617572
   Google Scholar
• Efstathiou, C., Hovardas, T., Xenofontos, N. A., Zacharia, Z. C., DeJong, T., Anjewierden, A., & van Riesen, S. A. (2018). Providing guidance in virtual lab experimentation: The case of an experiment design tool. Education Technology Research and Development, 66(3), 767–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9576-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, F. B. (2017). Action research in the physics classroom: The impact of authentic, inquiry based learning or instruction on the learning of thermal physics. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 3(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-017-0014-z
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, T., Bar, C., & Blikstein, P. (2020). Identifying discrepant events as a strategy to improve critical thinking about scientific models in a heat transfer unit in middle-school. In M. Gresalfi, & I. S. Horn (Eds.), The interdisciplinarity of the learning sciences, 14th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS), 2 (pp. 1031–1038). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Gogolin, S., & Krüger, D. (2018). Students’ understanding of the nature and purpose of models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(9), 1313–1338. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (2002). Mental, physical, and mathematical models in the teaching and learning of physics. Science Education, 86(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (2001). The assessment of scientific literacy in the OECD/PISA project. Studies in Science Education 36(1), 79–103.
   Google Scholar
• Hestenes, D. (1987). Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 55(5), 440–454. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hestenes, D. (2013). Modeling theory for math and science education. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies: ICTMA 13 (pp. 13–41). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0561-1
   Google Scholar
• Horton, W. (2001). Evaluating e-learning. American Society for Training & Development.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, K., Ge, X., & Eseryel, D. (2017). Metaconceptually-enhanced simulation-based inquiry: Effects on eighth grade students’ conceptual change and science epistemic beliefs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9462-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S. H. (2016). Spaced repetition promotes efficient and effective learning: Policy implications for instruction. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624708
   Google Scholar
• Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and using multiple models to promote scientific literacy in the context of socio-scientific issues. Science & Education, 30(3), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousa, P., Kavonius, R., & Aksela, M. (2018). Low-achieving students’ attitudes towards learning chemistry and chemistry teaching methods. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00226B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. J., Myller, N., & Korhonen, A. (2009). Comparing learning performance of students using algorithm visualizations collaboratively on different engagement levels. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 267–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, article 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazenby, K., Stricker, A., Brandriet, A., Rupp, C. A., Mauger-Sonnek, K., & Becker, N. M. (2020). Mapping undergraduate chemistry students’ epistemic ideas about models and modeling. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(5), 794–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. H., Lu, T. L., & Huang, K. M. (2014). A study of the learning situation of school underachievers in the field of natural science and technology, and the effectiveness of STS strategies in remedial teaching. STUST Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11, 33–68. [In Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 371–387). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, S. T., Peleg, R., Ofeck, E., Tabor, N., Dubovi, I., Bluestein, S., & Ben-Zur, H. (2018). Designing for discovery learning of complexity principles of congestion by driving together in the traffic jams simulation. Instructional Science, 46(1), 105–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9440-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2014). Curriculum outlines of the 12-year basic education curriculum-the master outline. National Academy for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. B. (2008). Putting the learning curve in context. Journal of Business Research, 61(11), 1182–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H., & Santagata, R. (2021). Impact of computer modeling on learning and teaching systems thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(5), 661–688. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunez-Oviedo, M. C., & Clement, J. J. (2019). Large scale scientific modeling practices that can organize science instruction at the unit and lesson levels. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00068
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016a). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, Reading, mathematic and financial literacy. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016b). Low-performing students: Why they fall behind and how to help them succeed. PISA, OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Passmore, C., Schwarz, C. V., & Mankowski, J. (2017). Developing and using models. In C. V. Schwarz, C. Passmore, & B. J. Reiser (Eds.), Helping students make sense of the world using next generation science and engineering practices (pp. 109–134). National Science Teachers Associations Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pei, X., Jin, Y., Zheng, T., & Zhao, J. (2020). Longitudinal effect of a technology-enhanced learning environment on sixth-grade students’ science learning: The role of reflection. International Journal of Science Education, 42(2), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1710000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner, D. E., Giles, N. D., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1997). Building functional models: Designing an elbow. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<125::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raes, A., Schellens, T., & De Wever, B. (2014). Web-based collaborative inquiry to bridge gaps in secondary science education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(3), 316–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.836656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roll, I., Butler, D., Yee, N., Welsh, A., Perez, S., Briseno-Garzon, A., Pekins, K., & Bonn, D. (2018). Understanding the impact of guiding inquiry: The relationship between directive support, student attributes, and transfer of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors in inquiry learning. Instructional Science, 46(1), 77–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9437-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1996). Computing contrasts, effect sizes, and counternulls on other people's published data: General procedures for research consumers. Pyschological Methods, 1(4), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.4.331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saavedra, J. E., Näslund-Hadley, E., & Alfonso, M. (2019). Remedial inquiry-based science education: Experimental evidence from Peru. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(4), 483–509. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719867081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, P., & Clark, D. (2016). Playing modeling games in the science classroom: The case for disciplinary integration. Educational Technology, 56(3), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1607.05094
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., Jing, L., Chang, H., & Namdar, B. (2014). Technology-enhanced, modeling-based instruction (TMBI) in science education. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communication and technology (4th ed., pp. 529–540). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5
   Google Scholar
• Stieff, M., Scopelitis, S., Lira, M. E., & Desutter, D. (2016). Improving representational competence with concrete models. Science Education, 100(2), 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svoboda, J., & Passmore, C. (2013). The strategies of modeling in biology education. Science & Education, 22(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9425-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thacker, I., & Sinatra, G. M. (2019). Visualizing the greenhouse effect: Restructuring mental models of climate change through a guided online simulation. Education Sciences, 9(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trninic, D. (2018). Instruction, repetition, discovery: Restoring the historical educational role of practice. Instructional Science, 46(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9443-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, C. T., Liu, C. C., Chang, H. Y., Chang, C. J., Chang, M. H., Chiang, S. H. F., Yang, C.-W., & Hwang, F. K. (2020). Students’ guided inquiry with simulation and its relation to school science achievement and scientific literacy. Computers & Education, 149, 103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H. K., & Huang, Y. L. (2007). Ninth-grade student engagement in teacher-centered and student-centered technology-enhanced learning environments. Science Education, 91(5), 727–749. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yacoubian, H. A. (2018). Scientific literacy for democratic decision making. International Journal of Science Education, 40(3), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1420266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, J. X., & Guo, Y. Y. (2018). Core competences and scientific literacy: The recent reform of the school science curriculum in China. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1913–1933. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1514544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangori, L., Peel, A., Kinslow, A., Friedrichsen, P., & Sadler, T. D. (2017). Student development of model-based reasoning about carbon cycling and climate change in a socio-scientific issues unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1249–1273. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar