The synergy of peer collaboration and mind mapping in cultivating primary students’ science understanding: an integrative pedagogy to enhance science concept acquisition

References

• Ali, N. N. G., & Abdullah, S. A. I. (2021). The impact of round robin strategy on the acquisition of chemical concepts among fourth-grade high school students in chemistry. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(8), 1248–1259.
   Google Scholar
• Alok, G., Govil, V., Srikar, K., Reddy, V. S., & Lohith, M. (2021). A pellucid approach for PBL using advanced mind mapping. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34, 675–680. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157242
   Google Scholar
• Ang, S., Rzadca, K., & Datta, A. (2010, July). SharedMind: A tool for collaborative mind-mapping. In Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 2010 IEEE International Conference (pp. 1154–1155). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, D., Hung, V., & Lui, W. M. (2018). Enhancing science learning through the introduction of effective group work in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 1291–1314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, D., & Liang, T. (2023). The effectiveness of collaborative mind mapping in Hong Kong primary science classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(3), 899–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, J. T., & Cahill, K. (2007). New York State grade 4 elementary-level science test. Barron's Educational Series.
   Google Scholar
• Barufaldi, J. P., Worthy, M. J., & Jackson, J. (2005). Mindmapping: Its effects on student achievement in high school biology. Unpublished thesis for the degree of doctor of philosophy. The University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Birgin, O., & Baki, A. (2009). An investigation of primary school teachers’ proficiency perceptions about measurement and assessment methods: The case of Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 681–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.119
   Google Scholar
• Bolderston, A. (2012). Conducting a research interview. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 43(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2011.12.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brink, H. I. (1993). Validity and reliability in qualitative research. Curationis, 16(2), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v16i2.1396
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buzan, T. (1974). Use your head: How to unleash the power of your mind. BBC Books.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, T. (1994). The mind map book: How to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain’s untapped potential. Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, T. (2017). The power of creative intelligence. Thorsons.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (2006). The mind map book. BBC Active.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (2010). The mind map book: Unlock your creativity, boost your memory, change your life. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum Development Council. (2001). Learning to learn: The way forward in curriculum development. Printing Department.
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum Development Council. (2017). Science education: Key Learning Area Curriculum Guide (primary 1-secondary 3). Printing Department.
   Google Scholar
• Daneshpour, H., & Kwegyir-Afful, E. (2022). Analysing transdisciplinary education: A scoping review. Science & Education, 31(4), 1047–1074. doi:10.1007/s11191-021-00277-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, D., Siraj, S., & Alias, N. (2014). Collaborative mLearning: A module for learning secondary school science. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhindsa, H. S., Makarimi-Kasim, O., & Anderson, O. R. (2011). Constructivist-visual mind map teaching approach and the quality of students’ cognitive structures. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9245-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187
   Google Scholar
• EASE [East-Asian Association for Science Education]. (2011). The Newsletter of the East-Asian Association for Science Education, 4(3), 7–8. http://new.theease.org/transfer.php?atid=73.
   Google Scholar
• Education Bureau. (2008). Small class teaching in public sector primary schools. Education Bureau Circular. https://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/edu-system/primary-secondary/applicable-to-primary/small-class-teaching/edbc08019e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, M., & Pell, T. (2009). Study on small class teaching in primary schools in Hong Kong. Education Bureau and Cambridge University. https://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/tc/edu-system/primary-secondary/applicable-to-primary/small-class-teaching/study_on_SCT_final_report_(dec2009).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, M., & Pell, T. (2012). Longitudinal effects of class size reductions on attainment: Results from Hong Kong primary classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Garcia I Grau, F., Valls, C., Piqué, N., & Ruiz-Martín, H. (2021). The long-term effects of introducing the 5E model of instruction on students’ conceptual learning. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1441–1458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1918354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harfitt, G. J. (2012). Class size and language learning in Hong Kong: The students’ perspective. Educational Research, 54(3), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2012.710091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilmi, R., & Bentri, A. (2019, November). Rme approach and mind map method to enhance mathematical cognition of elementary school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1387(1), 012138. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012138
   Google Scholar
• Indriani, D., & Mercuriani, I. S. (2019). Experiential learning model with mind mapping on fungi: how to improve science process skills? Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(2), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v12n2.223-237
   Google Scholar
• Istikomah, D., & Koeswanti, H. D. (2019). Mind mapping: an effective model to improve thematic learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 52(1), 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., & Malmberg, J. (2020). Supporting groups’ emotion and motivation regulation during collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 70, 101090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson, H., Leahy, P., Scanlon, M., Powell, F., & Byrne, O. (2019). The value of groupwork knowledge and skills in focus group research: A focus group approach with marginalized teens regarding access to third-level education. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919881853. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919881853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, F., & Carafano, P. (2016). Collaborative science learning in an immersive flight simulation. Computers & Education, 103, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutnick, P., & Blatchford, P. (2014). SPRinG at key stage 1: Effective group work with young children. In P. Kutnick & P. Blatchford (Eds.), Effective group work in primary school classrooms (pp. 81–101). Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, S., Hederman, L., & Wade, V. (2008, June). Enhancing access to open corpus educational content: Learning in the wild. In Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia (pp. 167–174). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Limbere, A. M., Munakata, M., Klein, E. J., & Taylor, M. (2022). Exploring the tensions science teachers navigate as they enact their visions for science teaching: what their feedback can tell US. International Journal of Science Education, 44(12), 1897–1915. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2105413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D., & Carlson, D. (2011). Mind the map: How thinking maps affect student achievement. Networks, 13(2), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoud, R. A. (2022). The effect of the use of the Round Robin strategy in the acquisition of historical concepts among secondgrade intermediate students in the history course of social writers. Eurasian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 161–175.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. O., von Davier, M., & Mullis, I. V. (2020). Methods and procedures: TIMSS 2019 technical report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Maryeni, L., Siregar, S. N., Roza, Y., & Jalinus, J. (2020). Development of computer-based learning media using mind map for learning mathematics in topics of rectangle and triangle at secondary school. In Companion proceedings of the 7th South East Asia design research international conference (SEADRIC 2019) (pp. 73–84). Sanata Dharma University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michalko, M. (2011). Cracking creativity: The secrets of creative genius. California Ten Speed Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, I., Keast, S., Panizzon, D., & Mitchell, J. (2017). Using ‘big ideas’ to enhance teaching and student learning. Teachers and Teaching, 23(5), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1218328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok, I. A. C., & Morris, P. (2001). The metamorphosis of the ‘Virtuoso’: Pedagogic patterns in Hong Kong primary mathematics classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(4), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00006-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, H., Signes-Pont, M. T., Fuster-Guilló, A., & Pertegal-Felices, M. L. (2020). A collaborative working model for enhancing the learning process of science & engineering students. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özsevgeç, T., Çepni, S., & Demircioğlu, G. (2004). The level of science teachers’ awareness of measurement and assessment. In Congress of the 4th national science and mathematics education. Marmara University.
   Google Scholar
• Polat, O., Yavuz, E. A., & Tunc, A. B. O. (2017). The effect of using mind maps on the development of maths and science skills. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v12i1.1201
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, A. D., & Daane, A. R. (2017). Energy project professional development: Promoting positive attitudes about science among K-12 teachers. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, P. M., & Tronson, D. A. (2007). Intervening to create conceptual change. In Proceedings of the assessment in science teaching and learning symposium (pp. 89–94). UniServe Science. http://science.uniserve.edu.au/pubs/procs/2007/19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., Yang, H., Dou, Y., & Zeng, Y. (2022). Effects of mind mapping-based instruction on student cognitive learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09746-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, D. A. (2009). How the arts develop the young brain: Neuroscience research is revealing the impressive impact of arts instruction on students’ cognitive, social, and emotional development. School Administrator, 63(11), 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Steyn, T., & Boer, A. (1998). Mind mapping as a study tool for underprepared students in mathematics and science. South African Journal of Ethnology, 21(3), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Stokhof, H., de Vries, B., Bastiaens, T., & Martens, R. (2018). To adopt or reject? Testing the robustness of a principle-based scenario for guiding effective student questioning. EDeR – Educational Design Research, 2(1), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Stokhof, H., De Vries, B., Bastiaens, T., & Martens, R. (2019). Mind map our way into effective student questioning: A principle-based scenario. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9625-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokhof, H., De Vries, B., Bastiaens, T., & Martens, R. (2020). Using mind maps to make student questioning effective: Learning outcomes of a principle-based scenario for teacher guidance. Research in Science Education, 50(1), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9686-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokhof, H. J., De Vries, B., Martens, R. L., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2017). How to guide effective student questioning: a review of teacher guidance in primary education. Review of Education, 5(2), 123–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, M., Wang, M., Wegerif, R., & Peng, J. (2022). How do students generate ideas together in scientific creativity tasks through computer-based mind mapping? Computers & Education, 176, 104359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törmänen, T., Järvenoja, H., & Mänty, K. (2021). Exploring groups’ affective states during collaborative learning: what triggers activating affect on a group level?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(5), 2523–2545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twiner, A., Major, L., & Wegerif, R. (2022). School-based Simulated Internships to support dialogic collaboration and authentic links with the world of work: a design-based research study. Irish Educational Studies, 41(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.2022515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilev, A., Golovchenko, A., Kulikov, A., & Paramonov, I. (2010). HiveMind: Cross-platform application for collaborative mind mapping. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference of Open Innovation Framework Program FRUCT, 219–224.
   Google Scholar
• Volet, S., Seghezzi, C., & Ritchie, S. (2019). Positive emotions in student-led collaborative science activities: Relating types and sources of emotions to engagement in learning. Studies in Higher Education, 44(10), 1734–1746. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1665314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (Vol. 49). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H. Z., & Wu, Q. T. (2020). Impact of mind mapping on the critical thinking ability of clinical nursing students and teaching application. Journal of International Medical Research, 48(3), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zambrano, J., Kirschner, F., Sweller, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2019). Effects of group experience and information distribution on collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 47(5), 531–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09495-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarzour, H., Abid, T., & Sellami, M. (2014). Conflict-Free Collaborative Decision-Making over Mind-Mapping. In Fourth International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies (pp. 509–515). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCT.2014.34
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (2003). Classroom assessment practices and teachers’ self-perceived assessment skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(4), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1604_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar