Teachers’ support in developing year 7 students’ argumentation skills about water-based socioscientific issues

References

• Bossér, U., & Lindahl, M. (2019). Students’ positioning in the classroom: A study of teacher-student interactions in a socioscientific issue context. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9627-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, J., Ideland, M., Malmberg, C., & Grace, M. (2014). Climate change and everyday life: Repertoires children use to negotiate a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 36(9), 1491–1509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.891159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, A., & Osborne, J. (2014). The science classroom as a site of epistemic talk: A case study of a teachers’ attempts to teach science based on argument. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(10), 1275–1300. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Crowell, A., & Kuhn, D. (2014). Developing dialogic argumentation skills: A 3-year-intervention study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(2), 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.725187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, V., & Venville, G. (2020). Testing a methodology for the development of socioscientific issues to enhance middle school students’ argumentation and reasoning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 40(4), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1830267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S. (2008). Methodological foundations in the study of argumentation in science classrooms. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 47–69). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., & Osborne, J. (2012). ‘Should we kill the grey squirrels?’ A study exploring students’ justifications and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 401–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.619211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrecht, C., Reiss, M., & Harms, U. (2021). ‘I wouldn’t want to be the animal in use nor the patient in need’ – The role of issue familiarity in students’ socioscientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 2065–2086. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1950944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, T. S., Friedrichsen, P. J., Kinslow, A. T., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). Selecting socio-scientific issues for teaching: A grounded theory study of how science teachers collaboratively design SSI-based curricula. Science and Education, 28(6–7), 639–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00065-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R. (2014). Explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction in the context of socioscientific issues: An effect on student learning and transfer. International Journal of Science Education, 36(6), 974–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.832004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinslow, A. T., Sadler, T. D., & Nguyen, H. T. (2019). Socio-scientific reasoning and environmental literacy in a field-based ecology class. Environmental Education Research, 25(3), 388–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1442418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Lerman, D. (2021). Yes but: Developing a critical stance toward evidence. International Journal of Science Education, 43(7), 1035–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1897897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, S. (2009). A pluralist view of generalization in qualitative research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270902759931
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. C., & Grace, M. (2012). Students’ reasoning and decision making about a socioscientific issue: A cross-context comparison. Science Education, 96(5), 787–807. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L. (2011). Elementary students’ views of explanation, argumentation and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793–823. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, M., & Voss, J. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informed reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14(2), 139–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A. (2020). Teachers and socioscientfic issues – An overview of recent empirical research. In M. Evagorou, J. A. Nielsen, & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science teacher education for responsible citizenship: Towards a pedagogy for relevance through socioscientific issues (pp. 13–20). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Oana, I., Schneider, C., & Thomann, E. (2021). Qualitative comparative analysis using R: A beginner’s guide (methods for social inquiry). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009006781
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004a). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004b). Ideas, evidence and argument in science. In-service Training Pack, Resource Pack and Video. Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Henderson, B., MacPherson, A., Szu, E., Wild, A., & Yao, S.-Y. (2016). The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 821–846. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell-Richardson, C., & Richardson, K. (2013). Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 315–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottander, K., & Simon, S. (2021). Learning democratic participation? Meaning-making in discussion of socioscientific issues in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1895–1925. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1946200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2021). Teaching practices for enactment of socio-scientific issues instruction: An instrumental case study of an experienced biology teacher. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9799-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Dawson, V. M. (2012). Socioscientific issues in science education: Contexts for the promotion of key learning outcomes. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), The second international handbook of science education (pp. 799–809). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto, M., Yamaguchi, E., Yamamoto, T., & Wakabayashi, K. (2021). An intervention study on students’ decision-making towards consensus building on socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1965–1983. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1947541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W., Enyedy, N., Redman, E., & Xiao, S. (2019). Organising a culture of argumentation in elementary science. International Journal of Science Education, 41(13), 1848–1869. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1641856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvester, H, & Yap, S. (2016). Oxford Science 7 Western Australia, Curriculum Student Book. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). (2022). Sustainable development goals. Retrieved August 2, 2022 from http://en.unesco.org
   Google Scholar
• Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1830267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). High school students’ informal reasoning on a socio-scientific issue: Qualitative and quantitative analyses. International Journal of Science Education, 29(9), 1163–1187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601083375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., Degani, A., & Vaaknin, E. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about low achieving students and higher order thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(4), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00007-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar