Czech and Slovak intended curricula in science subjects and mathematics: a comparative study

References

• Amer, A. A. (2006). Reflections on Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 4(1), 213–230.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., (Ed.) Krathwohl, D. R., (Ed.) Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete edition). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Association of College and Research Libraries. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. David McKay Company.
   Google Scholar
• Braund, H. (2017). Exploring the dynamic relationship between metacognition and curriculum: Suggestions for integration and implementation. Graduate Student Symposium, Selected Papers, 11, 71–94.
   Google Scholar
• Brotherton, P. N., & Preece, P. F. W. (1995). Science process skills: Their nature and interrelationships. Research in Science & Technological Education, 13(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514950130101
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Assessment International Education. (2019). Metacognition. https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/Images/272307-metacognition.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, S. (1997). Content analysis: Concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Researcher, 4(3), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.4.3.5.s2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cowles, H. M. (2020). The scientific method: An evolution of thinking from Darwin to Dewey. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elmas, R., Rusek, M., Lindell, A., Nieminen, P., Kasapoglu, K., & Bílek, M. (2020). The intellectual demands of the intended chemistry curriculum in Czechia, Finland, and Turkey: A comparative analysis based on the revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(3), 839–851. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00058B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germann, P. J., & Aram, R. J. (1996). Student performances on the science processes of recording data, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and providing evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 773–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199609)33:7<773::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U. H., Lindgren, B.-M., & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 56, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanus, M., & Marada, M. (2013). Map skills in Czech and foreign curricula: A comparative study. Geografie, 118(2), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2013118020158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden, R. M. (2002). Learning outcomes and instructional objectives: Is there a difference? Medical Teacher, 24(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159022020687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and procedures for assessing science process skills. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949993044
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, H. J. (Ed.).2001). Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Janoušková, S., Dvořák, L., & Vondrová, N. (Eds.). (2019). Comparative study of mathematical and science education in the Czech Republic and in selected European countries [Special issue]. Scientia in educatione, 10(3). https://ojs.cuni.cz/scied/issue/view/146/15.
   Google Scholar
• Kácovský, P., Jedličková, T., Kuba, R., Snětinová, M., Surynková, P., Vrhel, M., & Stratilová Urválková, E. (2022). Lower secondary intended curricula of science subjects and mathematics: A comparison of the Czech Republic. Estonia, Poland and Slovenia. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 54(3), 384–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1978557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerski, J. J. (2020). Connecting GIS education to Bloom’s taxonomy. Esri Communiti: Education Blog.https://community.esri.com/t5/education-blog/connecting-gis-education-to-bloom-s-taxonomy/ba-p/1011891.
   Google Scholar
• Kridel, C. (Ed.). (2010). Encyclopedia of curriculum studies. SAGE, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kudláčová, B. (2020). Reform pedagogy in Slovakia in the interwar period (Specifics and selected examples from practice). Historia Scholastica, 6(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/006/2020-1-007.
   Google Scholar
• Kumpas-Lenk, K., Eisenschmidt, E., & Veispak, A. (2018). Does the design of learning outcomes matter from students’ perspective? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyngäs, H. (2020). Inductive Content Analysis. In H. Kyngäs, K. Mikkonen, & M. Kääriäinen (Eds.), The Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research (pp. 13–21). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-J., Kim, M., Jin, Q., Yoon, H. G., & Matsubara, K. (2017). East-Asian primary science curricula: An overview using revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-J., Kim, M., & Yoon, H. G. (2015). The intellectual demands of the intended primary science curriculum in Korea and Singapore: An analysis based on revised Bloom’s taxonomy. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2193–2213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1072290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock, R. (1990). Assessment of practical skills. Part 2. Context dependency and construct validity. Research in Science & Technological Education, 8(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514900080104
   Google Scholar
• Lokajíčková, V. (2014). Metakognice – vymezení pojmu a jeho uchopení v kontextu výuky [Metacognition – definition of the term and its understanding in the context of teaching]. Pedagogika, 64, 287–306.
   Google Scholar
• Marada, M., Řezníčková, D., Hanus, M., Matějček, T., Hofmann, E., Svatoňová, H., & Knecht, P. (2017). Koncepce geografického vzdělávání v Česku. Certifikovaná metodika [Conception of geographical education in the Czech Republic. Certified methodology]. https://www.egeografie.cz/egeografie/metodika.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (1993). What is ‘scientific method’ and can it be taught? In R. Levinson (Ed.), Teaching science (1st ed., pp. 165–178). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (2010). Practical work. In J. Osborne & J. Dillon (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (pp. 108–134). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (2015). Process science. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 796–797). Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the Czech Republic. (2021). RVP ZV - Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání [FEP BE - Framework educational programme for basic education]. Retrieved November 23, 2022, from https://www.edu.cz/rvp-ramcove-vzdelavaci-programy/ramcovy-vzdelavacici-program-pro-zakladni-vzdelavani-rvp-zv/
   Google Scholar
• Momsen, J., Offerdahl, E., Kryjevskaia, M., Montplaisir, L., Anderson, E., & Grosz, N. (2013). Using assessments to investigate and compare the nature of learning in undergraduate science courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12, 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-08-0130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momsen, J. L., Long, T. M., Wyse, S. A., & Ebert-May, D. (2010). Just the facts? Introductory undergraduate biology courses focus on low-level cognitive skills. [Reports - Evaluative]. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9, 435–440. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-01-0001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Education in Slovak Republic. (2015). Inovovaný ŠVP pre 2. stupeň ZŠ [New state educational programme for the second stage of the primary school]. Retrieved November 23, 2022, from https://www.statpedu.sk/sk/svp/inovovany-statny-vzdelavaci-program/inovovany-svp-2.stupen-zs/
   Google Scholar
• Nieveen, N., & Kuiper, W. (2012). Balancing curriculum freedom and regulation in the Netherlands. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.357
   Google Scholar
• Nisha, N. B., & Varghese, R. R. (2021). Literature on information literacy. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 41(4), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.41.4.16405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). Education at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2021_b35a14e5-en
   Google Scholar
• Ormell, C. P. (1974). Bloom’s taxonomy and the objectives of education. Educational Research, 17(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188740170101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla, M. J. (1990). The science process skills. Research Matters — to the science teacher, No. 9004. National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST). Retrieved November 23, 2022, from https://narst.org/research-matters/science-process-skills
   Google Scholar
• Pawilen, G. T., & Sumida, M. (2005). A comparative study of the elementary science curriculum of Philippines and Japan. Ehime University Faculty of Education Bulletin, 52, 167–180.
   Google Scholar
• Poupová, J., Janštová, V., Kuba, R., & Mourek, J. (2019). A comparative analysis of the biological parts of the national curricula in lower secondary education in the Czech Republic and selected post-communist countries. Scientia in Educatione, 10(3), 94–124. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1294
   Google Scholar
• Staddon, J. (2018). Scientific method: How science works, fails to work, and pretends to work. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. Harcourt Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253
   Google Scholar
• van den Akker, J. (2006). Curriculum development re-invented: Evolving challenges for SLO. In J. Letschert (Ed.), Curriculum development re-invented: Proceedings of the invitational conference on the occasion of 30 years SLO 1975–2005 Leiden (pp. 16–31). Stichting Leerplan Ontwikkeling (SLO).
   Google Scholar
• Vrhel, M. (2021). Srovnání koncepce zeměpisu v národních kurikulech zemí V4 [School geography in the national curricula in the states of the Visegrad Group: A comparative study.]. Geografické rozhledy, 30, 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, D., & Lee, Y.-J. (2021). The intellectual demands and coherency of topics of reformed primary science curricula from three East-Asian regions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(6), 1125–1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10115-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, B. (2020). The change in the intended senior high school chemistry curriculum in China: Focus on intellectual demands. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00115H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, B., & Ou, Y. (2019). A comparative analysis of junior high school science curriculum standards in Mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macao: Based on revised Bloom’s taxonomy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(8), 1459–1474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9935-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, T. S., & Wright, M. S. (2010). Information literacy in the digital age: An evidence-based approach. Chandos Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yaz, Ö. V., & Kurnaz, M. A. (2020). Comparative analysis of the science teaching curricula in Turkey. SAGE Open, 10, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorluoglu, S. L., Kizilaslan, A., & Yapucuoglu- Donmez, M. (2021). The analysis of 9th grade chemistry curriculum and textbook according to revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i1.3516
   Google Scholar