Evaluation of knowledge in science lessons: an analysis of epistemic practices in an 8th grade classroom

References

• Agar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. William Morrow and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2020). A review of educational responses to the “post-truth” condition: Four lenses on “post-truth” problems. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1786388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (2019). Teaching media in a “post-truth” age: Fake news, media bias and the challenge for media/digital literacy education / La enseñanza mediática en la era de la posverdad: Fake news, sesgo mediático y el reto para la educación en materia de alfabetización mediática y digital. Cultura Y Educación, 31(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2019.1603814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castanheira, M. L., Crawford, T., Dixon, C., & Green, J. (2001). Interactional ethnography: An approach to studying the social construction of literate practices. Linguistics an Education, 11(4), 353–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00032-2
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C., & Qiao, X. (2020). Using students’ epistemic uncertainty as a pedagogical resource to develop knowledge in argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 42(13), 2145–2180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1813349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrado, D. M., & Nunes-Neto, N. F. (2018). Questões sociocientíficas: Fundamentos, propostas de ensino e perspectivas para ações sociopolíticas. EDUFBA.
   Google Scholar
• Cowgill, B. O., Herrmann, A., Richardson, J., Guthmann, D. S., McKee, M. M., Malzkuhn, M., & Berman, B. A. (2020). Understanding e-cigarette knowledge and use among d/deaf and hard of hearing students and the need for tailored prevention programming: A qualitative study. American Annals of the Deaf, 165(3), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2020.0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A. (2008). Science education in 3 part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic and social goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, I., & Lindberg, V. (2016). Enriching “learning activity” with “epistemic practices” – enhancing students’ epistemic agency and authority. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, (1), 32432. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v2.32432
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein, N. W., & Waddington, D. I. (2020). Individual truth judgments or purposeful, collective sensemaking? Rethinking science education’s response to the post-truth era. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1780130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, L. G., & Munford, D. (2020). Inquiry-based science teaching under construction: Possibilities of articulations between conceptual, epistemic and social domains within scientific knowledge in the classroom. Revista Brasileira De Pesquisa Em Educação Em Ciências, 20, 721–753. https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2020u721753
   Google Scholar
• Golan, R., Muthigi, A., Ghomeshi, A., White, J., Saltzman, R. G., Diaz, P., & Ramasamy, R. (2023). Misconceptions of vaping among young adults. Cureus, 15(4), e38202. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Howard, M., & Mcneill, K. L. (2020). Acting with epistemic agency: Characterizing student critique during argumentation discussions. Science Education, 104(6), 953–982. https://doi.org/10.1002/Sce.21592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. L., Dixon, C. N., & Zaharlic, A. (2001). Ethnography as a logic of inquiry. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire, & J. Jensen (Eds.), Research in the teaching of the English language arts (pp. 201–224). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (LEA).
   Google Scholar
• Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Güneş, P. (2020). Students’ belief biases concerning climate change and factors considered while evaluating informal reasoning arguments. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 6(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.560668
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. B., McNeill, K. L., González-Howard, M., Close, K., & Evans, M. (2017). Key challenges and future directions for educational research on scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Chinn, C. A., Fischer, F., Gobert, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Koedinger, K. R., Krajcik, J. S., Kyza, E. A., Linn, M. C., Pedaste, M., Scheiter, K., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2023). Let’s talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction. Educational Research Review, 39(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100536
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. (2008). Inquiry, activity and epistemic practice. In R. A. Duschl, & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry (pp. 99–117). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460911453_009
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J. (2016). Methodological considerations for the study of epistemic cognition in practice. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Braten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 393–408). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., & Licona, P. (2018). Epistemic practices and science education. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), History, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 139–165). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62616-1_5
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, J. S. C., & Cheng, M. M. W. (2021). Trust in the time of Corona: Epistemic practice beyond hard evidence. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(2), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10045-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” Era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., Bickel, E. S., Bailey, J. M., & Burrell, S. (2017a). High school students’ evaluations, plausibility (re) appraisals, and knowledge about topics in Earth science. Science Education, 102(1), 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., Bickel, E. S., Brandt, C. B., & Burg, C. (2017b). Categorising students’ evaluations of evidence and explanations about climate change. International Journal of Global Warming, 12(3/4), 313. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijgw.2017.084782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., Brandt, C. B., Bickel, E. S., & Burg, C. (2016). Students’ evaluations about climate change. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1392–1414. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1193912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv2tvzv0.1
   Google Scholar
• Moura, C. B., Nascimento, M. M., & Lima, N. W. (2021). Epistemic and political confrontations around the public policies to fight COVID-19 pandemic. Science & Education, 30(3), 501–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00193-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, Y., & Chen, Y.-C. (2017). Promoting argumentative practice in socio-scientific issues through a science inquiry activity. Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3431–3461. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00737a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A. (2013). Delusions about evidence: On why scientific evidence should not be the main concern in socioscientific decision making. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(4), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.845323
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Pimentel, D., Alberts, B., Allchin, D., Barzilai, S., Bergstrom, C., Coffey, J., Donovan, B., Kivinen, K., Kozyreva, A., & Wineburg, S. (2022). Science education in an Age of misinformation. Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, D., Zeidler, D., & Sadler, T. (2017). Controversial issues in the science classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(4), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717745544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdemir, G., & Clark, D. B. (2007). An overview of conceptual change theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75414
   Google Scholar
• Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Siswa, A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos, T. C., & Mendonça, P. C. C. (2021). A model proposal to address relationships between epistemic practices and socioscientific issues in science education. Revista Brasileira De Pesquisa Em Educação Em Ciências, 21(e35748), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2021u743770
   Google Scholar
• Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground – A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, S., & Lombardi, D. (2015). Coding classroom interactions for collective and individual engagement. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1001891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues: A critical review research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Uum, M. S. J., Verhoeff, R. P., & Peeters, M. (2017). Inquiry-based science education: Scaffolding pupils’ self-directed learning in open inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2461–2481. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1388940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2014). Constructing a scientific explanation – A narrative account. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1902–1935. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.880527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684
   Google Scholar