Research trends on systems thinking approach in science education

References

• Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York:Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: The art and science of quality systematic reviews. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319854352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristotle. Metaphysics. Book VIII, 1045a10.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050
   Google Scholar
• Assaraf, B. O., Dodick, J., & Tripto, J. (2013). High school students’ understanding of the human body system. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9245-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assaraf, B. O., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 518–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assaraf, B. O., & Orion, N. (2010). System thinking skills at the elementary school level. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 540–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition – implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33(5-6), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., Lubben, F., Hogarth, S., & Campbell, B. (2004). A systematic review of the use of small group discussions in science teaching with students aged 11–18, and their effects on students’ understanding in science or attitude to science. In Research evidence in education library. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London. http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=326
   Google Scholar
• Bergan-Roller, H. E., Galt, N. J., Chizinski, C. J., Helikar, T., & Dauer, J. T. (2018). Simulated computational model lesson improves foundational systems thinking skills and conceptual knowledge in biology students. BioScience, 68(8), 612–621. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U., & Cabrera, M. (2022). Greencomp, the European sustainability competence framework. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2760/13286
   Google Scholar
• Bielik, T., Stephens, L., McIntyre, C., Damelin, D., & Krajcik, J. S. (2022). Supporting student system modelling practice through curriculum and technology design. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(2), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09943-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018
   Google Scholar
• Boardman, J., & Sauser, B. (2008). Systems thinking. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420054927
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., Chang, C., & Tseng, Y. (2010). Trends of science education research: An automatic content analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(4), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9202-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberbach, C., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jordan, R., Taylor, J., & Hunter, R. (2021). Multidimensional trajectories for understanding ecosystems. Science Education, 105(3), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmas, R., Arslan, HÖ, Pamuk, S., Pesman, H., & Sözbilir, M. (2021). Fen eğitiminde yeni bir yaklaşım olarak sistemsel düşünme. Turkiye Kimya Dernegi Dergisi Kısım C: Kimya Egitimi, 6(1), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.37995/jotcsc.889340
   Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., Korfiatis, K., Nicolaou, C., & Constantinou, C. (2009). An investigation of the potential of interactive simulations for developing system thinking skills in elementary school: A case study with fifth-graders and sixth-graders. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, H., & Gonzalez, C. (2016). Making sense of dynamic systems: how our understanding of stocks and flows depends on a global perspective. Cognitive Science, 40(2), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. M., & Systems Thinking Association. (2023). Systems thinking activities used in K-12 for up to two decades. Frontiers in Education, 8), https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1059733
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. (1994). System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. System Dynamics Review, 10(2-3), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghalichi, N., Schuchardt, A., & Roehrig, G. (2021). Systems object framework: A framework for describing students’ depiction of object organisation within systems. International Journal of Science Education, 43(10), 1618–1639. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1923855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilissen, M. G. R., Knippels, M.-C. P. J., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2020). Bringing systems thinking into the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1253–1280. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1755741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golan, R., & Reiser, B. (2004). Investigating students’ reasoning about the complexity manifested in molecular genetics phenomena. Paper presented at the Proceeding of American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, 12–16 April.
   Google Scholar
• Grotzer, T. A., & Basca, B. B. (2003). How does grasping the underlying causal structures of ecosystems impact students’ understanding? Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, A., Grapin, S. E., Wendel, D., Llosa, L., & Lee, O. (2020). How fifth-grade English learners engage in systems thinking using computational models. Systems, 8(4), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems8040047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, C., Stott, K., Lamb, K. J., & Hurst, G. A. (2020). “Making every second count”: Utilizing TikTok and systems thinking to facilitate scientific public engagement and contextualization of chemistry at home. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3858–3866. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701413401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrin, T. N., Milenković, D. D., Segedinac, M. D., & Horvat, S. (2016). Enhancement and assessment of students’ systems thinking skills by application of systemic synthesis questions in the organic chemistry course. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 81(12), 1455–1471. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC160811097H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. J. (2001). Problem solving, cognition, and complex systems: Differences between experts and novices. Complexity, 6(3), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.1027
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., Boon, H., & Dinan Thompson, M. (2022). Cognitive demands of the reformed Queensland physics, chemistry and biology syllabus: An analysis framed by the new taxonomy of educational objectives. Research in Science Education, 52(5), 1603–1622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-09988-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucuk, Z. D., & Saysel, A. K. (2018). Developing seventh grade students’ understanding of complex environmental problems with systems tools and representations: A quasi-experimental study. Research in Science Education, 48(2), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9620-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laozi. (ca. 400 BC). Tao Te Ching (J. H. McDonald, Trans.). http://www.taoism.net/ttc/complete.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M., Wu, Y., & Tsai, C. (2009). Research trends in science education from 2003 to 2007: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 1999–2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802314876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahler, D., Großschedl, J., & Harms, U. (2017). Using doubly latent multilevel analysis to elucidate relationships between science teachers’ professional knowledge and students’ performance. International Journal of Science Education, 39(2), 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1276641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mambrey, S., Schreiber, N., & Schmiemann, P. (2022). Young students’ reasoning about ecosystems: The role of systems thinking, knowledge, conceptions, and representation. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09917-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mambrey, S., Timm, J., Landskron, J. J., & Schmiemann, P. (2020). The impact of system specifics on systems thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(10), 1632–1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, A. E., & Brady, C. E. (2020). Expanding opportunities for systems thinking, conceptual learning, and participation through embodied and computational modeling. Systems, 8(4), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems8040048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig, B., & Uskola, A. (2021). Understanding pandemics such as covid-19 through the lenses of the “one health” approach. Sustainability, 13(23), 13389. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratinen, I. J. (2013). Primary student-teachers’ conceptual understanding of the greenhouse effect: A mixed method study. International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 929–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.587845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rounder Sense of Purpose. (2019). Educator competences in learning for sustainability. https://aroundersenseofpurpose.eu/wp-content/themes/rmwrk/documents/RSP_Competences.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Roychoudhury, A., Shepardson, D. P., Hirsch, A., Niyogi, D., Mehta, J., & Top, S. (2017). The need to introduce system thinking in teaching climate change. Science Educator, 25(2), 73–81.
   Google Scholar
• Sajjadi, P., Bagher, M. M., Myrick, J., Guerriero, J. G., White, T. S., Klippel, A., & Swim, J. K. (2022). Promoting systems thinking and pro-environmental policy support through serious games. Frontiers in Environmental Science, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.957204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Broadway Business.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, C., & Lücken, M. (2012). System competence – Are elementary students able to deal with a biological system? Nordic Studies in Science Education, 6(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.255
   Google Scholar
• Spellman, K. V., Deutsch, A., Mulder, C. P. H., & Carsten-Conner, L. D. (2016). Metacognitive learning in the ecology classroom: A tool for preparing problem solvers in a time of rapid change? Ecosphere (washington, D C), 7(8), https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stave, K. A., Hopper, M. (2007). What constitutes systems thinking? A proposed taxonomy. 25th international Conference of the System Dynamics Society, July 29–August 2, 2007, Boston. Retrieved November, 2013, from: http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2007/proceed/papers/STAVE210.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. G. (1991). Heraclitus’ and wittgenstein's river images : Stepping twice into the same river: Heraclitu. The Monist, 74(4), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist199174434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, L. L., Whitehead, C., & Singhal, A. (2022). Cultivating cooperative relationships: Identifying learning gaps when teaching students systems thinking biomimicry. Biomimetics, 7(4), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7040184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strapasson, A., Ferreira, M., Cruz-Cano, D., Woods, J., do Nascimento Maia Soares, M. P., & da Silva Filho, O. L. (2022). The use of system dynamics for energy and environmental education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00309-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolppanen, S., & Kärkkäinen, S. (2021). The blame-game: Pre-service teachers views on who is responsible and what needs to be done to mitigate climate change. International Journal of Science Education, 43(14), 2402–2425. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1965239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNECE. (2012). Learning for the future: Competences in education for sustainable development. UNECE. https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/esd/ESD_Publications/Competences_Publication.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Uskola, A., & Puig, B. (2022). Exploring primary preservice teachers’ agency and systems thinking in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.869643
   Google Scholar
• Vachliotis, T., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2014). Meaningful understanding and systems thinking in organic chemistry: validating measurement and exploring relationships. Research in Science Education, 44(2), 239–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9382-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeff, R. P., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2008). Systems modelling and the development of coherent understanding of cell biology. International Journal of Science Education, 30(4), 543–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701237780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, P. A. (2000). Naive analysis of food web dynamics: A study of causal judgment about complex physical systems. Cognitive Science, 24(4), 605–650. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2404_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009421303064
   Google Scholar
• Wilson-Lopez, A., Mejia, J. A., Hasbún, I. M., & Kasun, G. S. (2016). Latina/o adolescents’ funds of knowledge related to engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 278–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zidny, R., & Eilks, I. (2022). Learning about pesticide Use adapted from ethnoscience as a contribution to green and sustainable chemistry education. Education Sciences, 12(4), 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoller, U. (2015). Research-based transformative science/STEM/STES/STESEP education for “sustainability thinking”: From teaching to “know” to learning to “think”. Sustainability, 7(4), 4474–4491. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7044474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar