The impact of video review on supervisory conferencing

References

• AACTE (American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education). 2013. What is edTPA? http://edtpa.aacte.org/
   Google Scholar
• Akcan, S. 2010. “Watching Teacher Candidates Watch Themselves: Reflections on a Practicum Program in Turkey.” Profile 12 (1): 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Akcan, S., and S. Tatar. 2010. “An Investigation of the Nature of Feedback Given to Pre-service English Teachers During Their Practice Teaching Experience.” Teacher Development 14 (2): 153–172.
   Google Scholar
• Arcario, P.J. 1994. “Post-observation Conferences in TESOL Teacher Education Programs.” Unpublished doctoral diss., Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Baecher, L., and B. McCormack. 2012. “Clinical Supervision as Opportunity for Self-study.” In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, edited by L. Erickson, J.R. Young, and S. Pinnegar, 164–168. Provo: Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, A.J., D. Drits, and L.A. Ramirez. 2011. “Self-Awareness and Enactment of Supervisory Stance: Influences on Responsiveness Toward Student Teacher Learning.” Teacher Education Quarterly, 69–87.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, C., and C. Kosnik. 2002. “Professors in the Practicum: Involvement of University Faculty in Preservice Practicum Supervision.” Journal of Teacher Education 53 (6): 6–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., and L. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, R. 2009 “The Use of Self-assessment to Foster Students' Learning in Teacher Education: An Experience in Teaching Practice.” Action in Teacher Education 31 (1): 49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. 2009. Modals and Quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Copland, F. 2010. “Causes of Tension in Post-observation Feedback in Pre-service Teacher Training: An Alternative View.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (3): 466–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copland, F., G. Ma, and S.J. Mann. 2009. “Reflecting in and On Post-observation Feedback in Initial Teacher Training on Certificate Courses.” English Language Teacher Education and Development 12: 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Crasborn, F., P. Hennissen, N. Brouwer, F. Korthagen, and T. Bergen. 2011. “Exploring a Two-Dimensional Model of Mentor Teacher Roles in Mentoring Dialogues.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (2): 320–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2006. Powerful Teacher Education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fanselow, J. 1988. “‘Let's see’: Contrasting Conversations About Teaching.” TESOL Quarterly 22 (1): 113–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farr, F. 2010. The Discourse of Teaching Practice Feedback: A Corpus-based Investigation of Spoken and Written Modes (Vol. 12). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fayne, H.R. 2007. “Supervision From the Student Teacher's Perspective: An Institutional Case Study.” Studying Teacher Education 3 (1): 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Fibkins, W. 2011. An Administrator's Guide to Better Teacher Mentoring. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, F.F., and B.A. Manning. 1973. “Self-confrontation Reviewed: A Conceptualization for Video Playback in Teacher Education.” Review of Educational Research 43 (4): 469–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhard, J. 1984. “Models of Supervision: Choices.” TESOL Quarterly 18 (3): 501–514.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Golombek, P. 2011. “Dynamic Assessment in Teacher Education: Using Dialogic Video Protocols to Intervene in Teacher Thinking and Activity.” In Research on Second Language Teacher Education: A Sociocultural Perspective on Professional Development, edited by K.E. Johnson and P. Golombek, 121–135. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, C. 2011. “Gumperz and Interactional Sociolinguistics.” In The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics, edited by R. Wodak, B. Johnstone, and P. Kerswill, 67–84. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Guyton, E., and D.J. McIntyre. 1990. “Student Teaching and School Experiences.” In Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, edited by R.W. Houston, 329–348. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Halter, C.P. 2006. “The Reflective Lens: The Effects of Video Analysis on Preservice Teacher Development.” ProQuest diss., University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., T. Lawson, and A. Wortley. 2005. “Facilitating the Professional Learning of New Teachers Through Critical Reflection on Practice During Mentoring Meetings.” European Journal of Teacher Education 28 (3): 267–292.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., and S. Clayman. 2010. Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, A., P. Ashby, A. Malderez, and P. Tomlinson. 2009. “Mentoring Beginning Teachers: What We Know and What We Don’t.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (1): 207–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtoglu-Hooton, N. 2008. “The Design of Post-observation Feedback and Its Impact on Student Teachers.” Professional encounters in TESOL: Discourses of teachers in teaching: 24–41.
   Google Scholar
• LaBoskey, V.K. 2004. “The Methodology of Self-study and Its Theoretical Underpinnings.” In International Handbook of Self-study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices, edited by J.J. Loughran, M.L. Hamilton, V.K. LaBoskey, and T. Russell, 817–869. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Lassonde, C.A., Galman, S., and Kosnik, C.M, eds. 2009. Self-study Research Methodologies for Teacher Educators. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Laycock, J., and P. Bunnag. 1991. “Developing Teacher Self-awareness: Feedback and the Use of Video.” ELT Journal 45 (1): 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Le, T.A.P., and C. Vásquez. 2011. “Feedback in Teacher Education: Mentor Discourse and Intern Perceptions.” Teacher Development 15 (4): 453–470.
   Google Scholar
• Lighthall, F.F. 2004. “Fundamental Features and Approaches of the S-Step Enterprise.” In International Handbook of Self-study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices, edited by J.J. Loughran, M.L. Hamilton, V.K. LaBoskey, and T. Russell, 193–245. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J., E. van Es, and R. Black. 2013. “Supervisor–Student Teacher Interactions: The Role of Conversational Frames in Developing a Vision of Ambitious Teaching.” Linguistics and Education 24 (2): 179–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. 2004. “On Predicating a Diagnosis as an Attribute of a Person.” Discourse Studies 6, 53–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, J., and L. Hoover. 2004. Teacher Supervision and Evaluation: Theory into Practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Orland-Barak, L., and S. Klein. 2005. “The Expressed and the Realized: Mentors’ Representations of a Mentoring Conversation and Its Realization in Practice.” Teaching and Teacher Education 21 (4): 379–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, P., and M.J. Hannafin. 2008. “Capturing and Assessing Evidence of Student Teacher Inquiry: A Case Study.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24 (6): 1426–1440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosaen, C.L., M. Lundeberg, M. Cooper, A. Fritzen, and M. Terpstra. 2008. “Noticing Noticing: How does Investigation of Video Records Change How Teachers Reflect on Their Experiences?” Journal of Teacher Education 59 (4): 347–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. 1996. “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, edited by Ochs, E., Schegloff, E., and Thompson, S., 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffrin, D., D. Tannen, and H.E. Hamilton. 2001. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D.A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (Vol. 5126). New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. 2008. “Learning to Talk the Talk: Conversation Analysis as a Tool for Induction of Trainee Teachers.” In Professional Encounters in TESOL: Discourses of Teachers in Teaching, edited by S. Garton and K. Richards, 42–57. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, M.G., and E.A. van Es. 2005. “Using Video to Support Teachers’ Ability to Notice Classroom Interactions.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 13 (3): 475–491.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, M.G., and E.A. van Es. 2009. “Effects of Video Club Participation on Teachers’ Professional Vision.” Journal of Teacher Education 60 (1): 20–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slick, S.K. 1997. “Assessing Versus Assisting: The Supervisor's Role in the Complex Dynamics of the Student Teaching Triad.” Teaching and Teacher Education 13 (7): 713–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, M., and W. Baron. 2004. “An Analysis of Mentoring Conversations with Beginning Teachers: Suggestions and Responses.” Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (1): 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, S.Y.F., and A.W.K. Chow. 2007. “Communicating Feedback in Teaching Practice Supervision in a Learning-Oriented Field Experience Assessment Framework.” Teaching and Teacher Education 23 (7): 1066–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripp, T., and P. Rich. 2011. “Using Video to Analyze One's Own Teaching.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (4): 678–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripp, T., and P. Rich. 2012. “The Influence of Video Analysis on the Process of Teacher Change.” Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (5): 728–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, A., F. Lopez-Real, Y. Law, R. Tang, and M. Shum. 2001. “Roles and Relationships in Tripartite Supervisory Conferencing Processes.” Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 16 (4): 322–344.
   Google Scholar
• Vásquez, C. 2004. “‘Very Carefully Managed’: Advice and Suggestions in Post-observation Meetings.” Linguistics and Education 15 (1–2): 33–58.
   Google Scholar
• Vásquez, C., and R. Reppen. 2007. “Transforming Practice: Changing Patterns of Participation in Post-observation Meetings.” Language Awareness 16 (3): 153–172.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, D. 1993. “Teachers in Conference: A Qualitative Study of Teacher–Supervisor Face-to-Face Interactions.” American Educational Research Journal 20 (4): 675–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wajnryb, R. 1994. “The Pragmatics of Feedback: A Study of Mitigation in the Supervisory Discourse of TESOL Teacher Educators.” Unpublished PhD diss., Macquarie University.
   Google Scholar