Argumentative peer discussions following individual reading increase comprehension

References

• Applebee, A., J. Langer, M. Nystrand, and A. Gamoran. 2003. “Discussion-Based Approaches to Developing Understanding: Classroom Instruction and Student Performance in Middle School and High School English.” American Educational Research Journal 40 (3): 685–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asterhan, C. S. C., and B. B. Schwarz. 2009. “The Role of Argumentation and Explanation in Conceptual Change: Indications from Protocol Analyses of Peer-to-Peer Dialogue.” Cognitive Science 33 (3): 374–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., and B. Reiser. 2011. “Classroom Communities’ Adaptations of the Practice of Scientific Argumentation.” Science Education 95 (2): 191–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briker, L. A., and P. Bell. 2008. “Conceptualizations of Argumentation from Science Studies and the Learning Sciences and Their Implications for the Practice of Science Education.” Science Education 92: 473–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., and H. Str⊘ms⊘. 2009. “Effects of Task Instruction and Personal Epistemology on the Understanding of Multiple Texts about Climate Change.” Discourse Processes 47 (1): 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. 2001. Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. 2nd ed. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A., S. Blum-Kulka, V. Gr⊘ver, and E. Teubal, eds. 2014. Children’s Peer Talk: Learning from each other. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., R. C. Anderson, and M. A. Waggoner. 2001. “Pattern of Discourse in Two Kinds of Literature Discussion.” Reading Research Quarterly 36 (4): 378–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., A. M. O’donnell, and T. S. Jinks. 2000. “The Structure of Discourse in Collaborative Learning.” Journal of Experimental Education 69 (1): 77–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosson, A. C., N. K. Lesaux, and M. Martiniello. 2008. “Factors That Influence Comprehension of Connectives among Language Minority Children from Spanish-Speaking Backgrounds.” Applied Psycholinguistics 29: 603–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degand, L., and T. Sanders. 2002. “The Impact of Relational Markers on Expository Text Comprehension in L1 and L2.” Reading and Writing 15 (7/8): 739–757.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., P. Newton, and J. Osborne. 2000. “Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms.” Science Education 84 (3): 287–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., and L. Dunn. 1997. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT-III). 3rd ed. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Gamez, P. B., and N. K. Lesaux. 2015. “Early-Adolescents’ Reading Comprehension and the Stability of the Middle School Classroom-Language Environment.” Developmental Psychology 51: 447–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 2015. “Thinking Together and Alone.” Educational Researcher 44 (1): 46–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRusso, M., H. Y. Kim, R. Selman, P. Uccelli, T. Dawson, S. Jones, S. Donovan, and C. Snow. 2016. “Contributions of Academic Language, Perspective Taking, and Complex Reasoning to Deep Reading Comprehension.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 9 (2): 201–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J. F., L. Capotosto, L. Branum-Martin, C. White, and C. E. Snow. 2012. “Language Proficiency, Home-Language Status, and English Vocabulary Development: A Longitudinal Follow-up of the Word Generation Program.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15 (3): 437–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitão, S. 2000. “The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building.” Human Development 43 (6): 332–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. 1990. Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L. 2011. “Elementary Students’ Views of Explanation, Argumentation, and Evidence, and Their Abilities to Construct Arguments over the School Year.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (7): 793–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melby-Lervåg, M., and A. Lervåg. 2014. “Reading Comprehension and Its Underlying Components in Second-Language Learners: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing First-and Second-Language Learners.” Psychological Bulletin 140 (2): 409–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., L. Dawes, R. Wegerif, and C. Sams. 2004. “Reasoning as a Scientist: Ways of Helping Children to Use Language to Learn Science.” British Educational Research Journal 30: 359–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H. 2011. “Reasoning Serves Argumentation in Children.” Cognitive Development 26 (3): 177–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., I. A. G. Wilkinson, A. O. Soter, M. N. Hennessey, and J. F. Alexander. 2009. “Examining the Effects of Classroom Discussion on Students’ Comprehension of Text: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Educational Psychology 101 (3): 740–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapanta, C., M. Garcia-Mila, and S. Gilabert. 2013. “What Is Meant by Argumentative Competence? An Integrative Review of Methods of Analysis and Assessment in Education.” Review of Educational Research 83 (4): 483–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., R. C. Anderson, B. McNurlen, K. Nguyen-Jahiel, A. Archodidou, and S. Kim. 2011. “Influences of Oral Discussion on Written Argument.” Discourse Processes 32 (2): 155–175.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., L. Kuo, A. Clark, B. Miller, M. Jadallah, R. C. Anderson, and K. Nguyen-Jahiel. 2009. “Collaborative Reasoning: A Dialogic Approach to Group Discussions.” Cambridge Journal of Education 39 (1): 29–48.
   Google Scholar
• Rydland, V., V. Gr⊘ver Aukrust, and H. Fulland. 2012. “How Word Decoding, Vocabulary and Prior Topic Knowledge Predict Reading Comprehension. A Study of Language-Minority Students in Norwegian Fifth Grade Classrooms.” Reading and Writing 25 (2): 465–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., RAND Reading Study Group, 2002. Reading for Understanding Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Pittsburgh, PA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Torgersen, J., R. Wagner, and C. Rachotte. 1999. Test of Word-Reading Efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Uccelli, P., E. P. Galloway, C. D. Barr, A. Meneses, and C. L. Dobbs. 2015. “Beyond Vocabulary: Exploring Cross‐Disciplinary Academic‐Language Proficiency and Its Association with Reading Comprehension.” Reading Research Quarterly 50 (3): 337–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., L. R. Martinez, J. Wanzek, G. Roberts, E. Swanson, and A. M. Fall. 2017. “Improving Content Knowledge and Comprehension for English Language Learners: Findings from a Randomized Control Trial.” Journal of Educational Psychology 109 (1): 22–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. K., A. C. Crosson, and L. B. Resnick. 2006. Accountable Talk in Reading Comprehension Instruction. CSE Technical Report 670. Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California.
   Google Scholar