Critical SFL praxis in teacher education: insights from Australian SFL scholars

References

• Accurso, K, and M. Gebhard. 2020. “SFL Praxis in U.S. teacher Education: A Critical Literature Review.” Language and Education. Advance Online Publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1781880.
   Google Scholar
• Accurso, K., M. Gebhard, and S.B. Purington. 2017. “Analyzing Diverse Learners’ Writing in Mathematics: Systemic Functional Linguistics in Secondary Pre-Service Teacher Education.” International Journal for Mathematics Teaching & Learning 18 (1): 84–108.
   Google Scholar
• Athanases, S.Z., & de Oliveira, L.C. (2011). Toward Program-wide Coherence in Preparing Teachers to Teach and Advocate for English Language Learners. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Teacher Preparation for Linguistically Diverse Classrooms: A Resource for Teacher Educators (pp. 195–215). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aunurrahman, A., F.A. Hamied, and E. Emilia. 2017. “A Joint Construction Practice in an Academic Writing Course in an Indonesian University Context.” Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature 17 (1): 27–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v17i1.1137.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brisk, M.E. 2015. Engaging Students in Academic Literacies: Genre-Based Pedagogy for K-5 Classrooms. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brisk, M.E., and M.O. Parra. 2018. “Mainstream Classrooms as Engaging Spaces for Emergent Bilinguals: SFL Theory, Catalyst for Change.” In Bilingual Learners and Social Equity: Critical Approaches to Systemic Functional Linguistics, edited by R. Harman, 127–152. NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, C., R. Harman, L. Cardozo-Gaibisso, J. Lei, K. Bui, and M. Allexsaht-Snider. 2019. “Understanding Science and Language Connections: new Approaches to Assessment with Bilingual Learners.” Research in Science Education 49 (4): 977–988. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9846-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes, H., H.H. Maxim, and J.M. Norris. 2010. “Realizing Advanced Foreign Language Writing Development in Collegiate Education: Curricular Design, Pedagogy, Assessment.” The Modern Language Journal 94 (Supplement): i–ii. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01147.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cavallaro, C.J., and S.F. Sembiante. 2020. “Facilitating Culturally Sustaining, Functional Literacy Practices in a Middle School ESOL Reading Program: A Design-Based Research Study.” Language and Education. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1775244.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, P., and S. Moore. 2012. “Novice Teachers and Linguistics: Foregrounding the Functional.” TESOL Quarterly 46 (3): 589–598. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, F. 1995. “Pedagogic Discourse in the Primary School.” Linguistics and Education 7 (3): 221–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(95)90024-1.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, F. 1998. “Learning the Literacies of Primary and Secondary Schooling.” In Literacy and Schooling, edited by F. Christie & R. Misson, 47–74. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, F. 1999. “Genre Theory and ESL Teaching: A Systemic Functional Perspective.” TESOL Quarterly 33 (4): 759–763. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3587889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, F. 2004. “Systemic Functional Linguistics and a Theory of Language in Education.” A Special Edition of the Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies 46: 13–40.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, F. 2005. Language Education in the Primary Years. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, F. 2007. “Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives on Education.” In Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy, edited by F. Christie & J.R. Martin, 3–13. London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, F., and L. Unsworth. 2000. “Developing Socially Responsible Language Research.” In Researching Language in Schools and Communities, edited by L. Unsworth, 1–26. London, UK: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., and M. Kalantzis. 1993. The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Correa, D., and S. Echeverri. 2017. “Using a Systemic Functional Genre-Based Approach to Promote a Situated View of Academic Writing among EFL Pre-Service Teachers.” HOW Journal 24 (1): 44–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.19183/how.24.1.303.
   Google Scholar
• Couture, B. 1991. “Functional Theory, Scientism, and Altruism: A Critique of Functional Linguistics and Its Applications to Writing.” In Functional and Systemic Linguistics, edited by E. Ventola, 259–279. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira, L.C., and M. Avalos. 2018. “Critical SFL Praxis among Teacher Candidates: Using Systemic Functional Linguistics in K-12 Teacher Education.” In Bilingual Learners and Social Equity: Critical Approaches to Systemic Functional Linguistics, edited by R. Harman, 109–123. New York: Springer
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira, L., & Smith, S., eds. 2019. Expanding Literacy Practices across Multiple Modes and Languages for Multilingual Learners. Charlotte, NC: IAP.
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira, L., and J. Iddings. 2014. Genre Pedagogy across the Curriculum. Sheffield, UK: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Derewianka, B. 2011. A New Grammar Companion for Teachers. 2nd ed.Marrickville, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.
   Google Scholar
• Derewianka, B.M. 1990. Exploring How Texts Work. Rozelle, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.
   Google Scholar
• Derewianka, B.M. 2003. “Trends and Issues in Genre-Based Approaches.” RELC Journal 34 (2): 133–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400202.
   Google Scholar
• Derewianka, B.M. 2012. “Knowledge about Language in the Australian Curriculum: English.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 35 (2): 127–146.
   Google Scholar
• Derewianka, B.M., and P. Jones. 2016. Teaching Language in Context. 2nd ed.South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emilia, E., and F.A. Hamied. 2015. “Systemic Functional Linguistic Genre Pedagogy (SFL GP) in a Tertiary EFL Writing Context in Indonesia.” TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English 26 (2): 155–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/155-182.
   Google Scholar
• Exley, B.E., and K.A. Mills. 2012. “Parsing the Australian Curriculum English: grammar, Multimodality and Cross-Cultural Texts.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 35 (2): 192–205.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., and Y. Wei. 2010. “Improving Middle School Students’ Science Literacy through Reading Infusion.” The Journal of Educational Research 103 (4): 262–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, L. 2018. “Qualitative Interview Analysis: The Use of Systemic Functional Linguistics to Reveal Functional Meanings [62 Paragraphs].” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 19 (2). doi:https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.2.2663.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, N. 2020. “From Academic Language to Language Architecture: Challenging Raciolinguistic Ideologies in Research and Practice.” Theory into Practice 1 (59): 22–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1665411.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1986. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. (Myra Bergan Ramos, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published in 1970).
   Google Scholar
• Gebhard, M. 2019. Teaching and Researching ELLs’ Disciplinary Literacies: Systemic Functional Linguistics in Action in the Context of U.S. School Reform. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gebhard, M., and H. Graham. 2018. “Bats and Grammar: developing Critical Language Awareness in the Context of School Reform.” English Teaching: Practice & Critique 17 (4): 281–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-12-2017-0183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhard, M., and R. Harman. 2011. “Reconsidering Genre Theory in K–12 Schools: A Response to School Reforms in the United States.” Journal of Second Language Writing 20 (1): 45–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 1971. The Prison Notebooks, 1929–1935. Translated by Q. Hoare. London, England: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1993. Language in a Changing World. Canberra, ACT: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed.London, UK: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and R. Hasan. 1989. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotician Perspective. 2nd ed.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, R., and K. Burke. 2020. Culturally Sustaining Systemic Functional Linguistics: Embodied Inquiry with Multilingual Youth. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, R., and N. Khote. 2018. “Critical SFL Praxis with Bilingual Youth: Disciplinary Instruction in a Third Space.” Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 15 (1): 63–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2017.1318663.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, R., ed. 2018. Bilingual Learners and Social Equity: Critical Approaches to Systemic Functional Linguistics. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, R. 1996. “Literacy, Everyday Talk and Society.” In Literacy in Society, edited by R. Hasan & G. Williams, 377–424. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J., M. Berg, M. Siegrist, and C. Damsri. 2017. “Impact of a Functional Linguistic Approach to Teacher Development on Content Area Student Writing.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 27 (2): 331–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S. 2006. “Getting the Reader on Side’: Exploring Adolescent Online Political Discourse.” E-Learning and Digital Media 3 (2): 143–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2006.3.2.143.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S. 2017. Academic Literacies in the Middle Years: A Framework for Enhancing Teacher Knowledge and Student Achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S. 2018. “We Can Speak to the World’: Applying Meta-Linguistic Knowledge for Specialized and Reflexive Literacies.” In Bilingual Learners and Social Equity: Critical Approaches to Systemic Functional Linguistics, edited by R. Harman, 45–70. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S., and L. Macnaught. 2016. “Functional Language Instruction and the Writing Growth of English Language Learners in the Middle Years.” TESOL Quarterly 50 (4): 792–816. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P.T., and B.M. Derewianka. 2016. “A Brief History of Genre Pedagogy in Australian Curriculum and Practice.” Sprogforum 63: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Khote, N.J. 2018. “Translanguaging in Systemic Functional Linguistics: A Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy for Writing in Secondary Schools.” In Bilingual Learners and Social Equity: Critical Approaches to Systemic Functional Linguistics, edited by R. Harman, 153–178. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Khote, N., and Z. Tian. 2019. “Translanguaging in Culturally Sustaining Systemic Functional Linguistics: Developing a Heteroglossic Space with Multilingual Learners.” Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 5 (1): 5–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/ttmc.00022.kho.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 1999. “Genre and the Changing Contexts for English Language Arts.” Language Arts 76: 461–469.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J.P. 2008. “Praxis and Classroom L2 Development.” Estudios De Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada 8: 13–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J.P., and K.E. Johnson. 2007. “Extending Firth and Wagner’s (1997) Ontological Perspective to L2 Classroom Praxis and Teacher Education.” The Modern Language Journal 91: 877–892. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00675.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. 1986. “Research as Praxis.” Harvard Educational Review 56 (3): 257–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.56.3.bj2h231877069482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, F.V. 2018. “Developing a Systemic Functional Approach to Teach Multimodal Literacy.” Functional Linguistics 5 (1): 13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-018-0066-8.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. 1996. “Genres of Power? Literacy Education and the Production of Capital.” In Literacy in Society, edited by R. Hasan & G. Williams, 308–338. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A., and P. Freebody. 1997. “The Social Practices of Reading.” In Constructing Critical Literacies: Teaching and Learning Textual Practice, edited by S. Muspratt & A Luke & P. Freebody, 1–18. Allen & Unwin: St Leonards, N.S.W: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Macken-Horarik, M., K. Love, and L. Unsworth. 2011. “A Grammatics ‘Good Enough’ for School English in the 21st Century: Four Challenges in Realising the Potential.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 34 (1): 9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. 1996. “Evaluating Disruption: symbolizing Theme in Junior Secondary Narrative.” In Literacy in Society, edited by R. Hasan & G. Williams, 124–172. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J.R. 1989. Factual Writing: Exploring and Challenging Social Reality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J.R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J.R., and J. Rothery. (1980, 1981, 1986). Writing Project Report, Nos 1, 2, and 4. Sydney, Australia: Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J.R., and P. R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J.R., F. Christie, and J. Rothery. 1987. “Social Processes in Education: A Reply to Sawyer and Watson (and Others).” In The Place of Genre in Learning: Current Debates, edited by I. Reid, 58–82. Deakin, AU: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mizell, J.D. 2020. “Apprenticeship of Pre-Service Teachers through Culturally Sustaining Systemic Functional Linguistics.” Language and Education. Advance Online Publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1797770.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, Bernard, and, Tammy. Slater. 2006. “Examining the Theory/Practice Relation in a High School Science Register: A Functional Linguistic Perspective.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5 (4): 302–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.004.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, B. 1986. Language and Content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J., M. Schleppegrell, and A.S. Palincsar. 2018. “Discovering Disciplinary Linguistic Knowledge with English Learners and Their Teachers: Applying Systemic Functional Linguistics Concepts through Design-Based Research.” TESOL Quarterly 52 (4): 1022–1049. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. 2019. English Language Learners in Public Schools. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgf.asp
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K.L. 2007. “Mathematical and Scientific Forms of Knowledge: A Systemic Functional Multimodal Grammatical Approach.” In Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives, edited by F. Christie & J.R. Martin, 205–236. London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, D. & Alim, S. (2017). Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies: Teaching and Learning for Justice in a Changing World. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, K.A. 2015. “Using Genre Pedagogy to Teach Adolescent English Learners to Write Academic Persuasive Essays.” Journal of Education 195 (2): 19–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741519500205.
   Google Scholar
• Rothery, J., & Stenglin, M. (1994). Spine-chilling stories: A Unit of Work for Junior Secondary English. Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
   Google Scholar
• Rothery, J. 1996. “Making Changes: Developing an Educational Linguistics.” In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in Society, 86–123. London: Addison Wesley Longan.
   Google Scholar
• Rymes, B., N. Flores, and A. Pomerantz. 2016. “The Common Core State Standards and English Learners: Finding the Silver Lining.” Linguistic Society of America 92: 257–273.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M., & Colombi, M.C., eds. 2002. Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M., and J. Moore. 2018. “Linguistic Tools for Supporting Emergent Critical Language Awareness in the Elementary School.” In Bilingual Learners and Social Equity: Critical Approaches to Systemic Functional Linguistics, edited by R. Harman, 23–43. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, L.S. 2015. “Chinese EFL Teachers’ Cognition about the Potential of SFL Genre-Based Pedagogy for Teaching College English Writing: A Case Study at a University in China.” Doctoral dissertation., Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, A.M. 2018. “Student Use of SFL Resources on Fantasy, Canonical, and Non-Fiction Texts: Critical Literacy in the High School ELA Classroom.” In Bilingual Learners and Social Equity: Critical Approaches to Systemic Functional Linguistics, edited by R. Harman, 71–90. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Threadgold, T. 1989. “The Place of Genre in Learning: current Debates.” Southern Review 21 (3): 315–329.
   Google Scholar
• Troyan, F.J. 2014. “Leveraging Genre Theory: A Genre-Based Interactive Model for the Era of the Common Core State Standards.” Foreign Language Annals 47 (1): 5–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troyan, F.J. 2016. “Learning to Mean in Spanish Writing: A Case Study of a Genre-Based Pedagogy for Standards-Based Writing Instruction.” Foreign Language Annals 49 (2): 317–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troyan, F.J., S.F. Sembiante, and N. King. 2019. “A Case for a Functional Linguistic Knowledge Based in World Language Teacher Education.” Foreign Language Annals 52 (3): 644–669. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkan, S., L.C. De Oliveira, O. Lee, and G. Phelps. 2014. “Proposing a Knowledge Base for Teaching Academic Content to English Language Learners: Disciplinary Linguistic Knowledge.” Teachers College Record 116 (3): 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. 2010. “Towards Post‐Multiculturalism? Changing Communities, Conditions and Contexts of Diversity.” International Social Science Journal 61 (199): 83–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.2010.01749.x.
   Google Scholar
• White, P. R. R. 2002. “Appraisal— the Language of Evaluation and Stance.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, J. Blommaert, & C. Bulcaen, 1–23. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Yasuda, S. 2017. “Toward a Framework for Linking Linguistic Knowledge and Writing Expertise: Interplay between SFL-Based Genre Pedagogy and Task-Based Language Teaching.” TESOL Quarterly 51 (3): 576–606. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. 2018. “Mitigating Suburban English Writing Teachers’ Constrained Professional Development through Distance Education: One Case Study.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 19 (5): 238–254. doi:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar