Interesting facts: holistic interviews on children’s nonfiction engagement

References

• Alexander J, Jarman R. 2018. The pleasures of reading non‐fiction. Literacy. 52(2):78–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne K. 2005. Snowball sampling: using social networks to research non‐heterosexual women. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 8(1):47–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000081663
   Google Scholar
• Cannon M, Potter J, Burn A. 2018. Dynamic, playful and productive literacies. Chang Engl. 25(2):180–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2018.1452146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caravolas M, Lervåg A, Defior S, Seidlová Málková G, Hulme C. 2013. Different patterns, but equivalent predictors, of growth in reading in consistent and inconsistent orthographies. Psychol Sci. 24(8):1398–1407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612473122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conradi Smith K, Hiebert EH. 2022. What does research say about the texts we use in elementary school? Phi Delta Kappan. 103(8):8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217221100001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles J. 2009. Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educ Psychol. 44(2):78–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedlaenderová H, Landová H, Mazáčová P, Prázová I, Richter V. 2022. České děti a mládež jako čtenáři v době pandemie 2021 [How Czech Children and Youth Read in the Pandemic, 2021]. Brno: Host.
   Google Scholar
• Friedlaenderová H, Landová H, Prázová I, Richter V. 2018. České děti a mládež jako čtenáři 2017 [How Czech Children and Youth Read, 2017]. Brno: Host.
   Google Scholar
• Garguláková M, Mecner V. 2021. Ruka: kompletní průvodce [The hand: a complete guide]. Prague: Albatros.
   Google Scholar
• Goga N, Hoem Iversen S, Teigland A-S, editors. 2021. Verbal and visual strategies in nonfiction picturebooks. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Grilli G. 2020a. Introduction. In: Grilli G, editor. Non-fiction picturebooks: sharing knowledge as an aesthetic experience. Pisa: Edizioni ETS; p. 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Grilli G, editors. 2020b. Non-fiction picturebooks: sharing knowledge as an aesthetic experience. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt D, Sargeant J. 2012. Doing ethical research with children. Buckingham: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• [IEA] International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. 2020. Progress in international reading literacy study student questionnaire. [accessed 2023 Aug 20]. https://pirls2021.org/questionnaires/.
   Google Scholar
• Kesler T. 2012. Evoking the world of poetic nonfiction picture books. Child Lit Educ. 43(4):338–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-012-9173-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesler T. 2017. Celebrating poetic nonfiction picture books in classrooms. Read Teach. 70(5):619–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortesluoma RL, Hentinen M, Nikkonen M. 2003. Conducting a qualitative child interview: methodological considerations. J Adv Nurs. 42(5):434–441. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02643.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucirkova N, Cremin T. 2018. Personalised reading for pleasure with digital libraries: towards a pedagogy of practice and design. Cambridge J Educ. 48(5):571–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2017.1375458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzmičová A, Cremin T. 2022. Different fiction genres take children’s memories to different places. Cambridge J Educ. 52(1):37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1937523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzmičová A, Supa M, Nekola M. 2022. Children’s perspectives on being absorbed when reading fiction: a Q methodology study. Front Psychol. 13:966820. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.966820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzmičová A, Supa M, Segi Lukavská J, Novák F. 2022. Exploring children’s embodied story experiences: a toolkit for research and practice. Literacy. 56(4):288–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin-Lieffers PA. 2013. Informational books, beginning readers, and the importance of display: the role of the public library. Can J Inf Libr Sci. 37(1):24–39. https://doi.org/10.1353/ils.2013.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin-Lieffers PA. 2015. Finding informational books for beginning readers: an ecological study of a median-household-income neighbourhood. Can J Inf Libr Sci. 39(1):1–35. https://doi.org/10.1353/ils.2015.0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis M. 2009. Exploring non-fiction texts creatively. In: Cremin T, editor. Teaching English creatively. Abingdon: Routledge; p. 138–151.
   Google Scholar
• Mackey M. 2020. Who reads what, in which formats, and why?. In Birr Moje E, Afflerbach, PP, Enciso, P, Lesaux, NK, editors. Handbook of reading research. Vol. V. New York/London: Routledge; p. 99–115.
   Google Scholar
• McGeown S, Bonsall J, Andries V, Howarth D, Wilkinson K, Sabeti S. 2020. Growing up a reader: exploring children’s and adolescents’ perceptions of ‘a reader’. Educ Res. 62(2):216–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1747361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merveldt N. v. 2018. Informational picturebooks. In: Kümmerling-Meibauer B, editor. The Routledge companion to picturebooks. New York/London: Routledge; p. 231–245.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic. 2023. Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání [The primary curriculum framework]. [accessed 2023 Aug 20]. https://www.edu.cz/rvp-ramcove-vzdelavaci-programy/ramcovy-vzdelavacici-program-pro-zakladni-vzdelavani-rvp-zv/.
   Google Scholar
• Montreuil M, Bogossian A, Laberge-Perrault E, Racine EA. 2021. Review of approaches, strategies and ethical considerations in participatory research with children. Int J Qual Methods. 20:160940692098796. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920987962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss G. 1999. Texts in context: mapping out the gender differentiation of the reading curriculum. Pedagogy Cult Soc. 7(3):507–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681369900200070
   Google Scholar
• Moss G. 2001. To work or play? Junior age non‐fiction as objects of design. Reading. 35(3):106–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9345.00171
   Google Scholar
• Mullis IVS, von Davier M, Foy P, Fishbein B, Reynolds KA, Wry E. 2023. PIRLS 2021 international results in reading. Boston: Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://doi.org/10.6017/lse.tpisc.tr2103.kb5342
   Google Scholar
• Pahl K, Rowsell J. 2020. Living literacies: literacy for social change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parry B, Taylor L. 2018. Readers in the round: children’s holistic engagements with texts. Literacy. 52(2):103–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punch S. 2007. ‘I felt they were ganging up on me’: interviewing siblings at home. Child Geogr. 5(3):219–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280701445770
   Google Scholar
• Repaskey LL, Schumm J, Johnson J. 2017. First and fourth grade boys’ and girls’ preferences for and perceptions about narrative and expository text. Reading Psychology. 38(8):808–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.1344165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson PW, Eccles JS. 2007. Rewards of reading: toward the development of possible selves and identities. Int J Educ Res. 46(6):341–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2007.06.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenblatt LM. 1978. The reader, the text, the poem: the transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholes L. 2018. Boys, masculinities and reading: gender identity and literacy as social practice. New York/London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Segi Lukavská J, Kuzmičová A. 2022. Complex characters of many kinds? Gendered representation of inner states in reading anthologies for Czech primary schools. L1-ESLL. 22:1–24. https://doi.org/10.21248/l1esll.2022.22.1.406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipe LR. 2000. The construction of literary understanding by first and second graders in oral response to picture storybook read-alouds. Read Res Q. 35(2):252–275. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.2.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šlapal M. 2007. Dílna čtení v praxi [The reading workshop in practice]. Kritické Listy. Čtvrtletník Pro Kritické Myšlení ve Školách. 27:13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Smith MW. 1991. Constructing meaning from text: an analysis of ninth-grade reader responses. J Educ Res. 84(5):263–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1991.10886026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl G, Scholes L, McDonald S, Mills R, Comber B. 2023. Boys, science and literacy: place-based masculinities, reading practices and the ‘science literate boy’. Res Pap Educ. 38(3):328–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2021.1964097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart M. 2018. The five kinds of nonfiction: a look at the distinctions in informational books, with recommended titles. Sch Libr J. 64(5):12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Swartz L. 2020. Choosing and using non-fiction picturebooks in the classroom. In: Grilli G, editor. Non-fiction picturebooks: sharing knowledge as an aesthetic experience. Pisa: Edizioni ETS; p. 231–245.
   Google Scholar
• Tisdall K. 2015. Children and young people’s participation. In: Vandenhole W, Desmet E, Reynaert D, Lembrechts S, editors. Routledge international handbook of children’s rights studies. New York/London: Routledge; p. 185–200.
   Google Scholar
• University of Cambridge. 2021. Teaching pupils to ‘think like Da Vinci’ will help them to take on climate change. [accessed 2023 Aug 20]. https://tinyurl.com/2mb295p2.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm JD. 2016. Recognising the power of pleasure: what engaged adolescent readers get from their free-choice reading, and how teachers can leverage this for all. AJLL. 39(1):30–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651904
   Google Scholar
• Woodfall A, Zezulkova M. 2016. What ‘children’ experience and ‘adults’ may overlook: Phenomenological approaches to media practice, education and research. J Child Media. 10(1):98–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.1121889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar