Reading for pleasure: scrutinising the evidence base – benefits, tensions and recommendations

References

• [APPLG] All-Party Parliamentary Literacy Group. 2012. Boys’ Reading Commission: The Report of the All-Party Parliamentary Literacy Group Commission. National Literacy Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson RC, Wilson PT, Fielding LG. 1988. Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Selections. 23(3):285–303. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.23.3.2
   Google Scholar
• Arizpe E, Bagelman C, Devlin AM, Farrell M, McAdam JE. 2014. Visualizing intercultural literacy: engaging critically with diversity and migration in the classroom through an image-based approach. Lang Intercul Commun. 14(3):304–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2014.903056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ACARA] Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. 2021. Foundation to year 10 curriculum: language for interaction. https://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum
   Google Scholar
• Ball SJ. 2000. Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: towards the performative society? Aust Educ Res. 27(2):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219719
   Google Scholar
• van Bergen E, Vasalampi K, Torppa M. 2020. How are practice and performance related? development of reading from age 5 to 15. Read Res Quart. 56(3):415–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett SV, Gunn AA, Peterson BJ. 2021. Access to multicultural children’s literature during COVID-19. Read Teach. 74(6):785–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BMG. 2023. National Survey to Scope School Library Provision in the UK: Research Report, Great School Libraries. BMG Success Decoded, Research Report. London. https://www.greatschoollibraries.org.uk/2023research
   Google Scholar
• Boyask R, Wall C, Harrington C, Milne J, Couch D. 2021. Reading for Pleasure: For the Collective Good of Aotearoa New Zealand. National Library of New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Boyask R, Harrington C, Milne J, Smith B. 2022. “Reading enjoyment” is ready for school: foregrounding affect and sociality in children’s reading for pleasure. NZ J Educ Stud. 58(1):169–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-022-00268-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury A, Braun A, Duncan S, Harmey S, Levy R, Moss G. 2022. Crisis policy enactment: primary school leaders’ responses to the covid-19 pandemic in england. Journal of Education Policy. 38(5):761–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2022.2097316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breakspear S. 2012. The Policy Impact of PISA: An Exploration of the Normative Effects of International Benchmarking in School System Performance. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 71. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brozo WG, Shiel G, Topping K. 2007. Engagement in reading: lessons learned from three PISA countries. J Adolescent & Adult Lit. 51(4):304–315. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.51.4.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell JR, Voelkl KE, Donahue PL. 1997. NAEP 1996 Trends in Academic Progress. Achievement of U.S. Students in Science, 1969 to 1996; Mathematics, 1973 to 1996; Reading, 1971 to 1996; Writing, 1984 to 1996. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Cheema JR. 2018. Adolescents’ enjoyment of reading as a predictor of reading achievement: new evidence from a cross-country survey. Journal Research in Reading. 41(S1):S149–S162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12257
   Google Scholar
• Clark C, Teravainen A. 2015. Teachers and Literacy: their perceptions, understanding, confidence and awareness. www.literacytrust.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• [CLPE] Centre for Literacy in Primary Education. 2021. Reading for Pleasure in 2020 Learning about literacy teaching during the pandemic. London: CLPE. https://clpe.org.uk/research/clpe-reading-pleasure-2020
   Google Scholar
• Coakley-Fields MR. 2018. Inclusive talk: weaving fiction discussions across the school day. Reading Teacher. 72(6):721–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole A, Brown A, Clark C, Picton I. 2022a. Children and young people’s reading engagement in 2022: continuing insight into the impact of the covid-19 pandemic on reading. London: National Literacy Trust. https://nlt.cdn.ngo/media/documents/Reading_trends_2022_-_Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cole A, Clark C, Picton I. 2022b. Book Ownership in 2022. London: National Literacy Trust. https://cdn.literacytrust.org.uk/media/documents/Book_ownership_in_2022_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Collins V, Dargan I, Walsh R, Merga M. 2022. Teachers’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of a whole school reading for pleasure program. Issues in Educational Research. 32(1):89–104. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.475638189744389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comber B. 2012. Mandated literacy assessment and the reorganisation of teachers’ work: federal policy, local effects. Critical Studies in Education. 53(2):119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2012.672331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comber B. 2016. Literacy, place, and pedagogies of possibility. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Compton-Lilly C. 2016. Reading students’ lives: literacy learning across time. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Conradi Smith K, Young CA, Core Yatzeck J. 2022. What are teachers reading and why? an analysis of elementary read aloud titles and the rationales underlying teachers’ selections. Liter Res Instruct. 619 (4):383–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2021.2008558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremin T, Mottram M, Bearne E, Goodwin P. 2008a. Exploring teachers’ knowledge of children’s literature. Cambridge J Educ. 38(4):449–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802482363
   Google Scholar
• Cremin T, Moss G. 2018. Reading for pleasure: supporting reader engagement. Literacy. 52(2):59–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremin T, Mottram M, Bearne E, Goodwin P. 2008b. Primary teachers as readers. Engl Educ. 42(1):8–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.2007.00001.x
   Google Scholar
• Cremin T, Mottram M, Collins FM, Powell S, Safford K. 2009. Teachers as readers: building communities of readers. Literacy. 43(1):11–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2009.00515.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremin T, Mottram M, Collins FM, Powell S, Safford K. 2014. Building communities of engaged readers: reading for pleasure. London and NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cremin T, Mukherjee SJ, Aerila J, Kauppinen M, Siipola M, Lähteelä J. 2024. Widening teachers’ reading repertoires: moving beyond a popular childhood canon. The Reading Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremin T, Swann J. 2017. School librarians as facilitators of extracurricular reading groups. In: Pihl J, Skinstad van der Kooij K and Carlsten TC, editors. Teacher and librarian partnerships in literacy education in the 21st century. Olso: Sense Publishers. p. 118–137.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham AE, Stanovich KE. 1998. What reading does for the mind. Am Educ. 22:8–15.
   Google Scholar
• De Naeghel J, Valcke M, De Meyer I, Warlop N, Van Braak J, Van Keer H. 2014. The role of teacher behavior in adolescents’ intrinsic reading motivation. Read Writ. 27(9):1547–1565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9506-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Naeghel J, Van Keer H, Vansteenkiste M, Rosseel Y. 2012. The relation between elementary students’ recreational and academic reading motivation, reading frequency, engagement, and comprehension: a self-determination theory perspective. J Educ Psychol. 104(4):1006–1021. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). 2014. The National Curriculum in England: Key stages 1 and 2. Crown Copyright, Reference: DFE-00178-2013. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/425601/PRIMARY_national_curriculum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). 2021/2023. The reading framework: teaching the foundations of literacy. London: Department for Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-reading-framework-teaching-the-foundations-of-literacy
   Google Scholar
• Dodell-Feder D, Tamir, D. 2018. Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen. 147(11):1713–1727. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar J. 2021. “I don’t really have a reason to read children’s literature”: enquiring into primary student teachers’ knowledge of children’s literature. JLE. 4(4):217–236. https://doi.org/10.7203/JLE.4.21060
   Google Scholar
• Francois C. 2013. Reading is about relating: urban youths give voice to the possibilities for school literacy. J Adolesc Adult Liter. 57(2):141–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagen-Spriggs K. 2020. An investigation into the reasons students read for pleasure. School Librar Worldwide. 26(1):110–123.
   Google Scholar
• Gilleece L, Eivers E. 2018. Characteristics associated with paper-based and online reading in Ireland: Findings from PIRLS and ePIRLS. Int J Educ Res. 91(2016):16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJER.2018.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie JT, Wigfield A. 2000. Engagement and motivation in reading. In: Kamil ML, Mosenthal PB, Pearson PD, Barr R, editors. Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. III. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. p. 403–422.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie JT, Wigfield A, Metsala JL, Cox KE. 1999. Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scient Stud Read. 3(3):231–256. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_3
   Google Scholar
• Hall LA. 2012. Rewriting identities: creating spaces for students and teachers to challenge the norms of what it means to be a reader in school. J Adolescent & Adult Lit. 55(5):368–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.00045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy I. 2015. Curriculum reform as contested: an analysis of curriculum policy enactment in Queensland, Australia. Inter J Educ Res. 74:70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves E, Quick L, Buchanan D. 2023. National curriculum and assessment in england and the continuing narrowed experiences of lower-attainers in primary schools. J Curricul Stud. 55(5):545–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2253455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempel-Jorgensen A. 2015. Working-class girls and child-centred pedagogy: what are the implications for developing socially just pedagogy? Inter Stud Sociol Educ. 25(2):132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2015.1045010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempel‐Jorgensen A, Cremin T, Harris D, Chamberlain L. 2018. Pedagogy for reading for pleasure in low socio‐economic primary schools: beyond ‘pedagogy of poverty’? Literacy. 52(2):86–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry H, Thompson S, Truby A. 2022. Reading head teachers. In: Cremin T, Hendry H, Rodriguez Leon L, and Kucirkova N, editors. Reading teachers: nurturing reading for pleasure teresa. Taylor & Francis. p. 135–149.
   Google Scholar
• Henebery B. 2022. Is Literacy Education in Australia on the Right Track? The Educator, Australia. https://www.theeducatoronline.com/k12/news/is-literacy-education-in-australia-on-the-right-track/280572.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman K, O’Grady E, Rodrigues S, Schmid M, Thomson S. 2023. Progress in reading literacy study: australia’s results from PIRLS 2021. Austr Council Educ Res. https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-693-2
   Google Scholar
• International Literacy Association. 2018. The Case for Children’s Rights to Read. https://www.literacyworldwide.org/get-resources/childrens-rights-to-read.
   Google Scholar
• Ivey G, Johnston P. 2013. Engagement with young adult literature outcomes and processes. Read Res Quart. 48(3):255–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ives ST, Parsons SA, Parsons AW, Robertson DA, Daoud N, Young C, Polk L. 2020. Elementary students’ motivation to read and genre preferences. Read Psychol. 41(7):660–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2020.1783143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon E-Y, Day RR. 2016. The effectiveness of ER on reading proficiency: a meta-analysis. Read Foreign Lang. 28(2):246–265. https://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerrim J, Lopez-Agudo LA, Marcenaro-Gutierrez OD. 2020. Does it matter what children read? new evidence using longitudinal census data from Spain. Oxford Rev Educ. 46(5):515–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1723516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerrim J, Moss G. 2019. The link between fiction and teenagers’ reading skills: international evidence from the OECD PISA study. Br Educ Res J. 45(1):181–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jouhar MR, Rupley WH. 2016. The reading–writing connection based on independent reading and writing: a systematic review. Read Writ Quart. 37(2):136–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1740632
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy E, Shiel G. 2010. Raising literacy levels with collaborative on-site professional development in an urban disadvantaged school. Read Teacher. 63(5):372–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennewell E, Curtis RG, Maher C, Luddy S, Virgara R. 2022. The relationships between school children’s wellbeing, socio-economic disadvantage and after-school activities: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 22(1):297. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03322-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd DC, Castano E. 2013. Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science. 342(6156):377–380. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch I, de Jong J, LaFontaine D, McQueen J, Mendelovits J, Monseur C. 2002. Reading for change: performance and engagement across countries—results from PISA 2000. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchner E. 2019. Sitting there—cool and reading’: results of a reading-for-pleasure programme with grade seven namibian learners. Mousaion. 36(2):27. https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-659X/5028
   Google Scholar
• Kucirkova N, Cremin, T. 2017. Personalised reading for pleasure with digital libraries: Towards a pedagogy of practice and design. Camb J Educ. 48(5): 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2017.1375458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kümmerling-Meibauer B. 2014. Picturebooks: representation and narration. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzmičová A, Cremin T. 2021. different fiction genres take children’s memories to different places. Camb J Educ. 52(1):37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1937523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Jang BG, Conradi Smith K. 2021. A systematic review of reading engagement research: what do we mean, what do we know, and where do we need to go? Read Psychol. 42(5):540–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindorff A, Stiff J, Kayton H. 2023. PIRLS 2021: National Report for England Research Report. London: Department for Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/pirls-2021-reading-literacy-performance-in-england
   Google Scholar
• Lingard B. 2010. Policy borrowing, policy learning: testing times in australian schooling. Crit Stud Educ. 51(2):129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508481003731026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locher FM, Becker S, Pfost M. 2019. The relation between students’ intrinsic reading motivation and book reading in recreational and school contexts. AERA Open. 5(2):233285841985204. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419852041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locher F, Pfost M. 2020. The relation between time spent reading and reading comprehension throughout the life course. J Res Read. 43(1):57–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh CE, Pang E. 2022. Innovating towards reading excellence in the singapore english language curriculum. In: Lee YJ, editor. Education in Singapore. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: issues, concerns and prospects. Singapore: Springer. p. 301–317.
   Google Scholar
• Lundström U. 2015. Teacher autonomy in the era of new public management. Nordic J Stud Educ Policy. 2015(2):28144. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.28144
   Google Scholar
• Lupo S, Jang BG, McKenna M. 2017. The relationship between reading achievement and attitudes toward print and digital texts in adolescent readers. Literacy Res Theory Method Pract. 66(1):264–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336917719254
   Google Scholar
• Mahasneh R, von Suchodoletz A, Larsen R, Dajani R. 2021. Reading for pleasure among Jordanian children: a community-based reading intervention. J Res Read. 44(2):360–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak HW, Fancourt D. 2020. Longitudinal associations between reading for pleasure and child maladjustment: results from a propensity score matching analysis. Soc Sci Med. 253:112971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malanchini M, Wang Z, Voronin I, Schenker VJ, Plomin R, Petrill SA, Kovas Y. 2017. Reading Self-perceived ability, enjoyment and achievement: a genetically informative study of their reciprocal links over time. Dev Psychol. 53(4):698–712. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mar RA, Oatley K. 2008. The fnction of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspect Psychol Sci. 3(3):173–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mar RA, Rain M. 2015. Narrative fiction and expository nonfiction differentially predict verbal ability. Sci Stud Read. 19(6):419–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1069296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeown S, Bonsall J, Andries V, Howarth D, Wilkinson K, Sabeti S. 2020. Growing up a Reader: exploring children’s and adolescents’ perceptions of ‘a reader. Educ Res. 62(2):216–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1747361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeown S, Osborne C, Warhurst A, Norgate R, Duncan LG. 2016. Understanding children’s reading activities: reading motivation, skill and child characteristics as predictors. J Res Read. 39(1):109–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrane J, Stiff J, Baird J-A, Lenkeit J, Hopfenbeck T. 2017. Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS): National Report for England. UK: Department for Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/pirls-2016-reading-literacy-performance-in-england
   Google Scholar
• McQuillan J. 2019. Where do we get our academic vocabulary? comparing the efficiency of direct instruction and free voluntary reading. Read Matrix Inter Online J. 19(1):129–138.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliam E. 2008. Unlearning how to teach. Innov Educ Teach Inter. 45(3):263–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290802176147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merga MK. 2017a. What would make children read for pleasure more frequently? Engl Educ. 51(2):207–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/eie.12143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merga MK. 2017b. Becoming a reader: significant social influences on avid book readers. School Library Res. 20:1–21. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1160840.
   Google Scholar
• Merga MK, Mason S. 2019. Building a school reading culture: teacher librarians’ perceptions of enabling and constraining factors. Austr J Educ. 63(2):173–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944119844544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills KA, Unsworth L, Scholes L. 2022. Literacy for digital futures: mind, body, text. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2023. Te Mātaiaho: The Refreshed New Zealand Curriculum. Draft for testing, NZ Ministry of Education. https://curriculumrefresh.education.govt.nz/english
   Google Scholar
• Miyamoto A, Pfost M, Artelt C. 2018. Reciprocal relations between intrinsic reading motivation and reading competence: a comparison between native and immigrant students in Germany. Journal Research in Reading. 41(1):176–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol SE, Bus AG. 2011. To read or not to read: a meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychol Bull. 137(2):267–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses L, Kelly LB. 2018. We’re a little loud. that’s because we like to read!’: developing positive views of reading in a diverse, urban first grade. J Early Childhood Liter. 18(3):307–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798416662513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses L, Kelly BL. 2019. Are they really reading? a descriptive study of first graders during independent reading. Read Writ Quart. 35(4):322–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1545615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss G. 2012. Literacy policy and english/literacy practice: researching the interaction between different knowledge fields. Engl Teach Pract Critiq. 11(1):104–120. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10011692/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss G. 2021. Literacies and social practice: sociological perspectives on reading research. Education 3-13. 49(1):41–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1824701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis IVS, Martin MO, Foy P, Drucker K. 2012. Progress in International Reading Literacy Study PIRLS 2011 International Results in Reading, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis I, Martin M, Foy P, Hooper M. 2017. PIRLS 2016 international results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis I, von Davier M, Foy P, Fishbein B, Reynolds KA, Wry E. 2023. PIRLS 2021 International Results in Reading. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://doi.org/10.6017/lse.tpisc.tr2103.kb5342
   Google Scholar
• Nation K, Dawson NJ, Hsiao Y. 2022. Book language and its implications for children’s language, literacy, and development. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 31(4):375–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221103264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman Susan B, Celano DC. 2012. Worlds apart: one city, two libraries, and ten years of watching inequality grow. Am Educ. 36(3):13–23. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ986677.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman SB, Moland N. 2016. Book deserts: the consequences of income segregation on children’s access to print. Urban Educ. 54(1):126–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916654525
   Google Scholar
• Ng C. 2018. Using student voice to promote reading engagement for economically disadvantaged students. J Res Read. 41(4):700–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolajeva M. 2009. Power, voice and subjectivity in literature for young readers. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2002. Reading for change: performance and engagement across countries - results from PISA 2000. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. Do Students Today Read for Pleasure?. PISA in Focus, No. 8, OECD Publishing, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. PISA 2018 results (Volume II): where all students can succeed. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021. 21st-century readers: developing literacy skills in a digital world. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pink E. 2022. Pre-service teachers’ beliefs and intended practices around the promotion of reading for pleasure among primary children. MPhil thesis, Queensland University of Technology. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/231720/.
   Google Scholar
• Reedy A, De Carvalho R. 2021. Children’s perspectives on reading, agency and their environment: what can we learn about reading for pleasure from an east london primary school? Education 3-13. 49(2):134–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2019.1701514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizvi F, Lingard B. 2010. Globalizing education policy. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson C, McMenemy D. 2020. The hollowing out of children’s public library services in england from 2010 to 2016. J Librarianship Inform Sci. 52(1):91–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618771139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogiers A, Van Keer H, Merchie E. 2020. The profile of the skilled reader: an investigation into the role of reading enjoyment and student characteristics. Inter J Educ Res. 99:101512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan S. 2018. School libraries in Australia: Reflections on ALIA’s role over the past 50 years. J Austr Library Inform Assoc. 67(2):155–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2018.1467746
   Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 55(1):68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffner E, Philipp M, Schiefele U. 2016. Reciprocal effects between intrinsic reading motivation and reading competence? a cross-lagged panel model for academic track and nonacademic track students. J Res Read. 39(1):19–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele U, Schaffner E, Möller J, Wigfield A. 2012. Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Read Res Quart. 47(4):427–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholes L. 2018. Working-class boys’ relationships with reading: contextual systems that support working-class boys’ engagement with, and enjoyment of, reading. Gender Educ. 31(3):344–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1533921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholes L. 2020. Recognition of boys as readers through a social justice lens. Br J Sociol Educ. 41(7):975–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2020.1802227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholes L. 2021a. Year 3 boys’ and girls’ enjoyment for reading across economic demographics in australia. implications for boys and students from lower SES communities. Inter J Inclusive Educ. 1(16):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1941319
   Google Scholar
• Scholes L. 2021b. Popular girls aren’t into reading: reading as a site for working-class girls’ gender and class identity work. Crit Stud Educ. 62(2):179–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1601633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholes L, Asplund S-B. 2021. The making of male reader identities across generations: assemblages of rural places in shaping life as a male reader in Australia and Sweden. Br J Sociol Educ. 42(8):1192–1209. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2021.1990016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholes L, Spina N, Comber B. 2021. Disrupting the ‘boys don’t read’ discourse: primary school boys’ stories of a love of reading fiction. Br Educ Res J. 47(1):163–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schugar HR, Dreher MJ. 2017. U.S. fourth graders’ informational text comprehension: indicators from NAEP. Inter Electronic J Elementary Educ. 9(3):523–552.
   Google Scholar
• Sénéchal M, Hill S, Malette M. 2018. Individual differences in grade 4 children’s written compositions: the role of online planning and revising, oral storytelling, and reading for pleasure. Cogn Develop. 45:92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibhekinkosi Nkomo A. 2021. The benefits of an extensive reading programme implemented in two foundation phase classrooms in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Read Writ J Liter Assoc South Africa. 12(1):290. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v12i1.290
   Google Scholar
• Simpson A, Cremin T. 2022. Responsible reading: children’s literature and social justice. Educ Sci. 12(4):264. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040264
   Google Scholar
• Spear-Swerling L, Brucker PO, Alfano MP. 2010. Relationships between sixth-graders’ reading comprehension and two different measures of print exposure. Read Writ. 23(1):73–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9152-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich KE. 1986. Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. SELECTIONS. 21(4):360–407. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan A, Brown M. 2015. Reading for pleasure and progress in vocabulary and mathematics. Br Educ Res J. 41(6):971–991. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y-J, Sahakian BJ, Langley C, Yang A, Jiang Y, Kang J, Zhao X, Li C, Cheng W, Feng J. 2023. Early-initiated childhood reading for pleasure: associations with better cognitive performance, mental well-being and brain structure in young adolescence. Psychol Med. 54(2):359–373. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291723001381
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taboada A, Tonks SM, Wigfield A, Guthrie JT. 2009. Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Read Writ. 22(1):85–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9133-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavsancil E, Yildirim O, Bilican Demir S. 2019. Direct and indirect effects of learning strategies and reading enjoyment on pisa 2009 reading performance. EJER. 19(82):1–22. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.82.9
   Google Scholar
• Tegmark M, Alatalo T, Vinterek M, Winberg M. 2022. What motivates students to read at school? student views on reading practices in middle and lower-secondary school. Journal Research in Reading. 45(1):100–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson P, Gunter H, Blackmore J. 2014. Critical studies in educational leadership, management and administration series. In Niesche R, editor. Deconstructing educational leadership: Derrida and Lyotard. Abingdon: Routledge. p. 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson S. 2021. Australia: PISA Australia—Excellence and Equity? Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Torppa M, Niemi P, Vasalampi K, Lerkkanen M-K, Tolvanen A, Poikkeus A-M. 2020. Leisure reading (but not any kind) and reading comprehension support each other—a longitudinal study across grades 1 and 9. Child Dev. 91(3):876–900. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troyer M, Kim JS, Hale E, Wantchekon KA, Armstrong C. 2019. Relations Among intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation, reading amount, and comprehension: a conceptual replication. Read Writ. 32(5):1197–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9907-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunde-Awe M. 2014. Relationship between reading attitudes and reading comprehension performance of secondary school students in Kwara state Nigeria. Rev Arts Human. 3(2):203–215.
   Google Scholar
• Twist L, Schagen I, Hodgson C. 2007. Readers and Reading: The National Report for England 2006. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research and Department for Children, Schools and Families. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/readers-and-reading-the-national-report-for-england-2006.
   Google Scholar
• Twist L, Sizmur J, Bartlett S, Lynn L. 2012. PIRLS 2011: Reading Achievement in England. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research and Department for Education, UK. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/pirls-2011-reading-achievement-in-england/.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood C. 2021. Snapshots issue 13: what do australian 15-year-olds think about reading? Snapshots. https://research.acer.edu.au/snapshots/vol13/iss13/1
   Google Scholar
• Vaknin-Nusbaum V, Nevo E, Brande S, Gambrell L. 2018. Developmental aspects of reading motivation and reading achievement among second grade low achievers and typical readers. J Res Read. 41(3):438–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Dool C, Simpson A. 2021. Reading for pleasure: exploring reading culture in an australian early years’ classroom. Literacy. 55(2):113–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villiger C, Niggli A, Wandeler C, Kutzelmann S. 2012. Does family make a difference? Mid-term effects of a school/home-based intervention program to enhance reading motivation. Learn Instr. 22(2):79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber C, Wilkinson K, Andries V, McGeown S. 2021. A reflective account of using child‐led interviews as a means to promote discussions about reading. Literacy. 56(2):120–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbrook J, Sutherland J, Oakhill J, Sullivan S. 2018. Just reading’: the impact of a faster pace of reading narratives on the comprehension of poorer adolescent readers in english classrooms. Literacy. 53(2):60–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield A, Guthrie JT. 1997. Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. J Educ Psychol. 89(3):420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm JD. 2016. “You Gotta BE the Book”: teaching engaged and reflective reading with adolescents. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wyse DL, Bradbury A. 2022. Reading wars or reading reconciliation? a critical examination of robust research evidence, curriculum policy and teachers’ practices for teaching phonics and reading. Rev Educ. 10(1):1–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar