Advanced search
Publication Cover
Language and Education Volume 38, 2024 - Issue 4: What is the Future of Young People’s Volitional Reading? Exploring Diverse Perspectives
Submit an article Journal homepage
328
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

What Makes adolescents want to read? Examining adolescents’ contemporary print and new media (fiction) leisure reading through mobile ethnography

Chin Ee LohNational Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, SingaporeCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2997-9326View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 596-616 | Received 11 Jul 2023, Accepted 22 Feb 2024, Published online: 15 Mar 2024

References

  • Alexander PA, Fox E. 2019. Reading research and practice over the decades: a historical analysis. In: Alvermann DE, Unrau NJ, Sailors M, Ruddell RB, editors. Theoretical models and processes of literacy. 7th ed. NY: Routledge; p. 34-64.
  • Allen K, Ingulsrud JE. 2005. Reading manga: patterns of personal literacies among adolescents. Lang Educ. 19(4):265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780508668681.
  • Barshay J. 2021, May 17. Why reading comprehension is deteriorating: scholars weigh decline in reading habits and other theories. The Hechinger Report. [retrieved on 2024 March 5]. https://hechingerreport.org/proof-points-why-reading-comprehension-is-deteriorating/.
  • Bartlett R, Milligan C. 2015. What is diary method? London: Bloomsbury.
  • Black RW. 2009. Online fan fiction, global identities, and imagination. Res Teach Eng. 43(4):397–425.
  • Black RW, Alexander J, Korobkova KA. 2017. Flows of literacy across corporate and user-produced virtual worlds. Teach Coll Rec. 119(12):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711901201.
  • Carr N. 2019. The shallows: what the internet is doing to our brains. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Charmaz K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide to qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications.
  • Cheah YM. 1998. The examination culture and its impact on literacy innovations: the case of Singapore. Lang Educ. 12(3):192–209.
  • Clark C, Picton I. 2020. “It makes me feel like I’m in a different place, not stuck inside”: children and young people’s reading in 2020 before and during Covid-19 lockdown. London, United Kingdom: National Literacy Trust Research Report.
  • Csikszentmihalyi M. 2008. Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Cunningham AE, Stanovich KE. 1998. What reading does for the mind. Am Educ. 22(1-2):1–8.
  • Darnton R. 2009. The case for books. Kindle ed. New York: Public Affairs.
  • Davis R. 2021. Fanfiction community survey part 1: overview of results. Human-Centred Data Science Laboratory; [accessed 2023 June 20; retrieved on 2024 March 5]. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. https://depts.washington.edu/hdsl/2021/06/10/fanfiction-community-survey-part-1-overview-of-results-ruby-davis/.
  • Détrez C, Vanhée O. 2023. Mangaddicts: French teenagers and manga reading. Berthé F, translator. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
  • Dezuanni M, Reddan B, Rutherford L, Schoonens A. 2022. Selfies and shelfies on #bookstagram and #booktok – social media and the mediation of Australian teen reading. Learn Media Technol. 47(3):355–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2068575.
  • Driscoll B, Sedo DR. 2019. Faraway, so close: seeing the intimacy in Goodreads reviews. Qual Inq. 25(3):248–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418801375.
  • Elley WB. 2000. The potential of book floods for raising literacy levels. Int Rev Educ. 46(3/4):233–255. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004086618679.
  • Fletcher J, Grimley M, Greenwood J, Parkhill F. 2012. What are the school-wide strategies that support sustained, regular and effective instructional reading programmes for 10–13-year-old students? A New Zealand experience. Teach Teach. 18(4):399–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.696043.
  • Fuller D, Sedo DR. 2013. Reading beyond the book: the social practices of contemporary literary culture. New York: Routledge.
  • gov.sg. 2020. The 2 ways Singapore is making learning enjoyable for students: schools are moving away from an over-emphasis on grades and towards developing each child [website] [retrieved on 2024 March 5]. Singapore: Ministry of Communications & Information. https://www.gov.sg/article/the-2-ways-singapore-is-making-learning-enjoyable-for-students.
  • Gray R, Howard V. 2017. Young adult use of ebooks: an analysis of public library services and resources. Public Libr Q. 36(3):199–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2017.1316149.
  • Grubb GG. 1942. Dickens’ pattern of weekly serialization. ELH. 9(2):141–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/2871767.
  • Hall LA. 2019. “I didn’t enjoy reading until now”: how youths and adults engage with interactive digital texts. Res Teach Eng. 54(2):109–130. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201930617.
  • Ivey G. 2014. The social side of engaged reading for young adolescents. Read Teach. 68(3):165–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1268.
  • Jang W, Song JE. 2017. Webtoon as a new Korean wave in the process of glocalization. KK. 29(29):168–187. https://doi.org/10.13185/KK2017.02908.
  • Jenkins HA. 2006. Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
  • Jerrim J, Moss G. 2019. The link between fiction and teenagers’ reading skills: international evidence from the OECD PISA study. Br Educ Res J. 45(1):181–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3498.
  • Jonsson C, Muhonen A. 2014. Multilingual repertoires and the relocalization of manga in digital media. Discourse Context Media. 4-5:87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.05.002.
  • Kuzmičová A, Schilhab T, Burke M. 2018. m-reading: fiction reading from mobile phones. Convergence. 26(2):333–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856518770987.
  • Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09358129.
  • Liu Z. 2022. Reading in the age of digital distraction. JD. 78(6):1201–1212. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-07-2021-0130.
  • Livingstone S. 2002. Young people and new media: childhood and the changing media environment. London: Sage.
  • Loh CE. 2023. Reading as self-making: using mobile ethnography to examine the contemporary literate practices of middle-class adolescent girls in Singapore. In: Rosen M, editor. The ethnography of reading at thirty. London: Palgrave; p. 17–41.
  • Loh CE, Pang E. 2022. Innovating towards reading excellence in the Singapore English Language curriculum. In: Lee YJ, editor. Education in Singapore: people-making and nation-building. Singapore: Springer; p. 301–317.
  • Loh CE, Sun B. 2019. “I’d still prefer to read the hard copy”: adolescents’ print and digital reading habits. J Adolesc Adult Lit. 62(6):663–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.904.
  • Loh CE, Sun B. 2022. The impact of technology use on adolescents’ leisure reading preferences. Literacy. 56(4):327–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12282.
  • Loh CE, Sun B, Lim VF. 2023. “Because I’m always moving”: a mobile ethnography study of adolescent girls’ everyday print and digital reading practices. Learn Media Technol. 48(4):612–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2209325.
  • Long E. 1993. Textual interpretation as collective action. In: Boyarin J, editor. The ethnography of reading. Oakland, LA, California: University of California Press; p. 180–211.
  • Mackey M. 1990. Filling the gaps: the series book, and the learning reader. Lang Arts. 67(5):484–489.
  • Mackey M. 2001. Literacies across media: playing the text. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
  • Mackey M. 2020. Who reads what, in which formats, and why?. In: Moje EB, Afflerbach P, Enciso PA, Lesaux NK, editors. Handbook of reading research. Vol. V. New York: Routledge; p. 99–115.
  • Majid S, Ng HKJ, Su Y. 2017. Leisure reading preferences of bilingual female students in Singapore. LIBRES. 27(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.32655/LIBRES.2017.1.1.
  • Martens M. 2019. The forever fandom of Harry Potter: balancing fan agency and corporate control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Meo AI. 2010. Picturing students’ habitus: the advantages and limitations of photo-elicitation in a qualitative study in the city of Buenos Aires. Int J Qual Methods. 9(2):149–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691000900203.
  • Miller JN. 2022. Information-seeking behaviors of young adult readers of fiction and fan fiction. In: Keidl PD, Waysdorf AS, editors. FanLIS. Organization for Transformative Works. [retrieved on 2024 March 5]. https://journal.transformativeworks.org/index.php/twc/article/download/2245/2957?inline=1. https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2022.2245.
  • Moje EB, Overby M, Tysvaer N, Morris K. 2008. The complex world of adolescent literacy: myths, motivations, and mysteries. Harv Educ Rev. 78(1):107–154. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.54468j6204x24157.
  • Muskat M, Muskat B, Zehrer A, Johns R. 2013. Generation Y: evaluating services experiences through mobile ethnography. Tour Rev. 68(3):55–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-02-2013-0007.
  • Ng SM, Sullivan C. 2001. The Singapore Reading and English Acquisition program. Int J Educ Res. 35(2):157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(01)00013-1.
  • OECD. 2018. Equity in education: breaking down barriers to social mobility. Paris, France: OECD. [retrieved on 2024 March 4]. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/equity-in-education_9789264073234-en.
  • Paladines L, Aliagas C. 2023. Literacy and literary learning on BookTube through the lenses of Latina BookTubers. Literacy. 57(1):17–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12310.
  • Roe A. 2019. PISA 2018 results show that reading engagement in Norway is declining. Norway: University of Olso. [accessed 2023 May 25]. https://www.uv.uio.no/quint/english/news-and-events/news/2019/pisa-2018-norway.html.
  • Ross CS, McKechnie LEF, Rothbauer PM. 2018. Reading still matters: what the research reveals about reading, libraries, and the community. New York: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Rutherford L, Singleton A, Derr LA, Merga MK. 2018. Do digital devices enhance teenagers’ recreational reading engagement? issues for library policy from a recent study in two Australian states. Public Library Q. 37(3):318–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2018.1511214.
  • Santa María L, Aliagas C, Rutten K. 2022. Youth’s literary socialisation practices online: a systematic review of research. Learn Cult Soc Interact. 34:100628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100628.
  • Schleicher A. 2018. PISA 2018: insights and interpretations. Paris, France: OECD. [Retrieved on 2024 March 4]. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA%202018%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf.
  • Sellers C. 2019. ‘Fitting in’ and ‘standing out’: the peer group and young people’s development of reader identity. Br J Sociol Educ. 40(7):938–952. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2019.1622407.
  • Silver RE. 2005. The discourse of linguistic capital: language and economic policy planning in Singapore. Lang Policy. 4(1):47–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-004-6564-4.
  • Smith MW, Wilhelm JD. 2002. Reading don’t fix no chevys: literacy in the lives of young men. New York: Heinemann.
  • Spacks PM. 2011. On rereading. MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
  • Sullivan A, Brown M. 2015. Reading for pleasure and progress in vocabulary and mathematics. Br Educ Res J. 41(6):971–991. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3180.
  • Taylor JB. 2012. Producing meaning through interaction: book groups and the social context of reading. In: Lang A, editor. From codex to hypertext: reading at the turn of the twenty-first century. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press; p. 142–158.
  • Torppa M, Niemi P, Vasalampi K, Lerkkanen M-K, Tolvanen A, Poikkeus A-M. 2019. Leisure reading (but not any kind) and reading comprehension support each other - a longitudinal study across grades 1 and 9. Child Dev. 91(3):876–900. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13241.
  • Tveit K, Mangen A. 2014. A joker in the class: teenage readers’ attitudes and preferences to reading on different devices. Libr Inf Sci Res. 36(3-4):179–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.08.001.
  • Twenge JM, Martin GN, Spitzberg B. 2019. Trends in U.S. adolescents’ media use, 1976-2016: the rise of digital media, the decline of TV, and the (near) demise of print. Psychol Pop Media Cult. 8(4):329–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000203.
  • UNICEF. 2018. UNICEF guidance for the second decade: programming with and for adolescents. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).
  • van Bergen E, Vasalampi K, Torppa M. 2020. How are practice and performance related? Development of reading from age 5 to 15. Read Res Q. 56(3):415–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.309.
  • Wilhelm JD, Smith M. 2016. The power of pleasure reading: the case of dystopias. Voices Middle. 23(4):55–61. https://doi.org/10.58680/vm201628573.
  • Wolf JM, Bokhorst-Heng WD. 2008. Policies of promise and practices of limit: Singapore’s literacy education policy landscape and its impact on one school programme. Educ Res Policy Prac. 7(3):151–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-008-9048-z.
  • Zebroff D, Kaufman D. 2017. Texting, reading, and other daily habits associated with adolescents’ literacy levels. Educ Inf Technol. 22(5):2197–2216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9544-3.

List of Fiction Titles Cited*

  • Frank L, Baum FL. 1990. The Wizard of Oz. Chicago, IL: George M. Hill Company.
  • Palacio RJ. 2012. Wonder. New York (NY): Knopf Books.

List of Fiction Titles Cited (series)*

  • Cawthon S. 2019–2021. Five Nights at Freddy’s (graphic novel series). New York (NY): Scholastic.
  • Collins S. 2008–2020. The Hunger Games series. New York (NY): Scholastic.
  • Hunter E. 2004–ongoing. Warriors. New York (NY): Harper Collins.
  • Riordian R. 2005–2024. Percy Jackson series. New York (NY): Miramax Books.
  • Rowling JK. 1997–2007. Harry Potter series. London: Bloomsbury.

List of Manga Titles Cited (series)*

  • Gotouge K. 2016–2020. Demon Slayer series. San Francisco (CA): VIZ Media.
  • Horikoshi K. 2014–ongoing. My Hero Academia. San Francisco (CA): VIZ Media.
  • Isayama H. 2009–2021. Attack on Titan series. Tokyo: Kodansha USA.
  • Kasaka H, Yamamoto S. 1997–ongoing. Pokémon series. Singapore: Shogakukan Asia.
  • ONE and Maruta Y. 2013–ongoing. One Punch Man series. San Francisco (CA): VIZ Media.
  • Oda E. 1997–ongoing. One Piece series. San Francisco (CA): VIZ Media.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.