References
- Abell, J., 2010. Google’s ‘don’t be evil’ mantra is ‘bullshit,’ Adobe is lazy: Apple’s Steve Jobs (Update 2). Wired, 30 Jan. Available from: https://www.wired.com/2010/01/googles-dont-be-evil-mantra-is-bullshit-adobe-is-lazy-apples-steve-jobs/ [Accessed 7 December 2020].
- ACM, 2018. ACM code of ethics and professional conduct [online]. ACM. Available from: https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics [Accessed 2 December 2020].
- Andrejevic, M., 2020. Automated media. New York: Taylor and Francis.
- Askitopoulou, H. and Vgontzas, A.N., 2018. The relevance of the Hippocratic oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part I: the Hippocratic oath from antiquity to modern times. European spine journal, 27, 1481–1490.
- Australian Medical Association, 2006. AMA adopts WMA declaration of Geneva. Available from: https://ama.com.au/media/ama-adopts-wma-declaration-geneva [Accessed 16 March 2021].
- Bagley, A.W., 2011. Don’t be evil: the fourth amendment in the age of Google, national security, and digital papers and effects. Albany law journal of science and technology, 21, 153–191.
- Bloomberg Government, 2018. Transcript of Mark Zuckerberg’s Senate hearing. The Washington Post, 10 April. Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/04/10/transcript-of-mark-zuckerbergs-senate-hearing/ [Accessed 1 December 2020].
- Buttarelli, G., 2018. Values and shifts in the digital age. Speech delivered at: 11th International Computers, Privacy, and Data Protection Conference, 6 Nov. Available from: https://edps.europa.eu/sites/edp/files/publication/18-01-25_values_and_shifts_in_the_digital_age_cpdp_en.pdf [Accessed 4 March 2021].
- Cadwalladr, C. and Graham-Harrison, E., 2018. Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. The Guardian, 17 March. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election [Accessed 1 December 2020].
- Carney, T., 2019. Robo-debt illegality: the seven veils of failed guarantees of the rule of law? Alternative law journal, 44 (1), 4–10.
- Data4Democracy, n.d. Ethics resources. GitHub. Available from: https://github.com/Data4Democracy/ethics-resources [Accessed 2 December 2020].
- Edelstein, L., 1967. Ancient medicine: selected papers of Ludwig Edelstein. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
- Etzioni, O. 2018. A Hippocratic oath for artificial intelligence practitioners. TechCrunch, 14 March. Available from: https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/14/a-hippocratic-oath-for-artificial-intelligence-practitioners/ [Accessed 29 November 2020].
- Eubanks, V., 2018. Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
- Eva, K.W., 2014. Trending in 2014: Hippocrates. Medical education, 48, 1–3.
- Fang, L., 2018. Google is quietly providing AI technology for drone strike targeting project. The Intercept. 7 March. Available from: https://theintercept.com/2018/03/06/google-is-quietly-providing-ai-technology-for-drone-strike-targeting-project/ [Accessed 7 December 2020].
- Federal Trade Commission, 2011. Facebook settles FTC charges that it deceived consumers by failing to keep privacy promises [online], 29 November. Available from: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2011/11/facebook-settles-ftc-charges-it-deceived-consumers-failing-keep [Accessed 1 December 2020].
- Fiesler, C., Garrett, N., and Beard, N., 2020. What do we teach when we teach tech ethics? A syllabi analysis. In: Proceedings of the 51st ACM technical symposium on computer science education. ACM, 289–295.
- Fordyce, R. and Jethani, S., 2021. Critical data provenance as a methodology for studying how language conceals data ethics. Continuum, 35 (5), 775–787.
- Foroohar, R., 2019. Don’t be evil: how big tech betrayed its founding principles—and all of us. New York: Currency.
- Frenkel, S., et al., 2020. Facebook employees stage virtual walkout to protest Trump posts. The New York Times. 1 June. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/01/technology/facebook-employee-protest-trump.html [Accessed 16 March 2021].
- Garvey, G., et al., 2004. Is there an aboriginal bioethic? Journal of medical ethics, 30, 570–575.
- Gillespie, T., 2010. The politics of ‘platforms’. New media and society, 12 (3), 347–364.
- Googlers Against Transphobia, 2019. Googlers against transphobia and hate. Available from: https://medium.com/@against.transphobia/googlers-against-transphobia-and-hate-b1b0a5dbf76. [Accessed 16 March, 2021].
- Green, B., 2018. Data science as political action: grounding data science in a politics of justice. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:1811.03435.
- Grosz, B.J., et al., 2019. Embedded EthiCS: integrating ethics across CS education. Communications of the ACM, 62 (8), 54–61.
- Hall, K., 2020. Public penitence: Facebook and the performance of apology. Social media + society, 6 (2), 1–10.
- Henry, T.A., 2018. AMA to Supreme Court: Doctor participation in executions unethical. American Medical Association. Available from: https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/ama-supreme-court-doctor-participation-executions-unethical [Accessed 16 March 2021].
- Hippocrates of Cos, 1923. The oath. Loeb classical library, 147, 298–299. doi:10.4159/DLCL.hippocrates_cos-oath.1923.
- ICLR, n.d. ICLR code of ethics [online]. Available from: https://iclr.cc/public/CodeOfEthics [Accessed 1 December 2020].
- Jarvis, J., 2013. The technologists Hippocratic oath [online]. BuzzMachine. Available from: https://buzzmachine.com/2013/12/09/16431/ [Accessed 1 December 2020].
- Johnson, M., 2019. Why we need community-driven tech ethics: two years of the Global Data Ethics Project [online]. TechChatBloomberg, 15 Sep. Available from: https://www.techatbloomberg.com/blog/why-we-need-community-driven-tech-ethics-two-years-of-the-global-data-ethics-project/ [Accessed 1 December 2020].
- Jourová, V., 2018. Commissioner Jourová press speaking points on democracy at the digital age – 2018 Lisbon Web Summit [online]. Europa, 6 Nov. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_18_6309 [Accessed 4 March 2021].
- Kuhn, T., 1962/1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Loukides, M., Mason, H., and Patil, D.J., 2018. Ethics and data science. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
- Markham, A.N., 2018. Afterword: ethics as impact—moving from error-avoidance and concept-driven models to a future-oriented approach [online]. Social media + society. doi:10.1177/2056305118784504.
- Markham, A. and Buchanan, E., 2012. Ethical decision-making and internet research: recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). Available from: https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf [Accessed 2 December, 2020].
- Markham, A. and Buchanan, E., 2017. Research ethics in context. In: K. Van Es and M. T. Schäfer, eds. The datafied society: studying culture through data. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 201–209.
- Metcalf, J., Moss, E., and boyd, d., 2019. Owning ethics: corporate logics, Silicon Valley, and the institutionalization of ethics. Social research, 86 (2), 449–476.
- Metz, C., 2010. Steve Jobs dubs Google’s ‘don’t be evil’ motto ‘bulls**t’ The Register. 1 Feb. Available from: https://www.theregister.com/2010/02/01/steve_jobs_on_google/ [Accessed 7 December 2020].
- Morozov, E., 2011. Don’t be evil. The New Republic. 13 July. Available from: https://newrepublic.com/article/91916/google-schmidt-obama-gates-technocrats [Accessed 7 December 2020].
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2018. Data science for undergraduates: Opportunities and options. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Newton, C., 2020. The withering email that got an ethical AI researcher fired at Google. Platformer. 4 December. Available from: https://www.platformer.news/p/the-withering-email-that-got-an-ethical [Accessed 16 March 2021].
- Noyes, K., 2019. Code of ethics can guide responsible data use. Deloitte-Wall Street Journal, 15 Sep. Available from: https://deloitte.wsj.com/cio/2019/09/15/a-code-of-ethics-can-guide-responsible-data-use/ [Accessed 2 December 2020].
- O’Neil, C., 2016. Weapons of math destruction: how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Portland, OR: Broadway Books.
- Patil, D.J., 2018. A code of ethics for data science [online]. Available from: https://medium.com/@dpatil/a-code-of-ethics-for-data-science-cda27d1fac1 [Accessed 2 December 2020].
- Parikka, J., 2014. Cultural techniques of cognitive capitalism metaprogramming and the labour of code. Cultural studies review, 20 (1), 29–51.
- Paul, K., 2021. Two Google engineers quit over company’s treatment of AI researcher. The Guardian. 5 February. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/feb/04/google-timnit-gebru-ai-engineers-quit [Accessed 16 March 2021].
- Popper, K., 1971. The moral responsibility of the scientist. Bulletin of peace proposals, 2 (3), 279–283. doi:10.1177/096701067100200311.
- Pow, S. and Stahnisch, F.W., 2014. Ludwig Edelstein (1902–1965): a German historian of medicine in North American exile and the emergence of the modern Hippocratic oath. Journal of medical biography, 24 (4), 527–537.
- Raj, R.K., et al., 2019. An empirical approach to understanding data science and engineering education. In: Proceedings of the working group reports on innovation and technology in computer science education. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 73–87. doi:10.1145/3344429.3372503.
- Redden, J., Brand, J., and Terzieva, V., 2020. Data harm record (updated), Data Justice Lab. Available from: https://datajusticelab.org/data-harm-record/ [Accessed 6 December 2020].
- Roose, K., Kang, C., and Frenkel, S., 2018. Zuckerberg gets a crash course in charm. Will Congress care? The New York Times. 8 April. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/08/technology/zuckerberg-gets-a-crash-course-in-charm-will-congress-care.html [Accessed 16 March, 2021].
- Sample, I., 2019. Maths and tech specialists need Hippocratic oath, says academic. The Guardian, 17 Aug. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/aug/16/mathematicians-need-doctor-style-hippocratic-oath-says-academic-hannah-fry [Accessed 1 December 2020].
- Schiffer, Z., 2020. Google fires prominent AI ethicist Timnit Gebru. The Verge. 3 December. Available from: https://www.theverge.com/2020/12/3/22150355/google-fires-timnit-gebru-facial-recognition-ai-ethicist [Accessed 16 March 2021].
- Schiffer, Z., 2021. GitHub reportedly fired a Jewish employee who warned co-workers to stay safe from Nazis. The Verge. 12 January. Available from: https://www.theverge.com/2021/1/12/22227487/github-microsoft-fired-jewish-employee-warned-nazis-us-capitol-breach [Accessed 16 March 2021].
- Schmidt, E. and Cohen, J., 2013. The new digital age: reshaping the future of people, nations, and business. New York: Alfred A Knopf. [Ebook].
- Securities and Exchange Commission, 2004. Form S-1 Registration Statement, Google Inc. 29 April. Available from: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000119312504073639/ds1.htm [Accessed 7 December 2020].
- Sherer, L., 2018. Data scientists, take a Hippocratic oath. Forbes, 13 June. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/baininsights/2018/06/13/data-scientists-take-a-hippocratic-oath/?sh=114509bd1bcb [Accessed 1 December 2020].
- Simonite, T., 2018. Should Data Scientists adhere to a Hippocratic Oath? Wired, 2 Aug. Available from: https://www.wired.com/story/should-data-scientists-adhere-to-a-hippocratic-oath/ [Accessed 1 December 2020].
- Simonyi, C., 1977. Meta-programming: a software production method. Palo Alto: Xerox Palo Alto Research Lab.
- Smith, B. and Shum, H., 2018. Foreword: the future computed. In: The future computed: artificial intelligence and its role in society. Redmond: Microsoft Corporation. Available from: https://blogs.microsoft.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/The-Future-Computed_2.8.18.pdf [Accessed 1 December 2020].
- Spencer, G. 2018. Technology, ethics and the law: grappling with our AI-powered future [online]. Microsoft, 9 April. Available from: https://news.microsoft.com/apac/features/technology-ethics-and-the-law-grappling-with-our-ai-powered-future/ [Accessed 1 December 2020].
- Stolton, S., 2018. Eurobarometer survey: Jourová rings ‘alarm bells’ ahead of EU Elections [online]. Euractiv, 8 Nov. Available from:https://www.euractiv.com/section/data-protection/news/eurobarometer-survey-jourova-rings-alarm-bells-ahead-of-eu-elections/ [Accessed 1 December 2020].
- Tiku, N., 2020. Google hired Timnit Gebru to be an outspoken critic of unethical AI. Then she was fired for it. Washington Post. 24 December. Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/12/23/google-timnit-gebru-ai-ethics/ [Accessed 16 March, 2020].
- Vaidhyanathan, S., 2011. The googlization of everything (and why we should worry). Berkley: University of California Press.
- Vaidhyanathan, S., 2018. Antisocial media: how Facebook disconnects us and undermines democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Wayback Machine, 2020. Google code of conduct – 21 April 2018. Wayback Machine. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20180421105327/https://abc.xyz/investor/other/google-code-of-conduct.html [Accessed 7 December 2020].
- World Medical Association, 2017. WMA declaration of Geneva. WMA.net. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-geneva/ [Accessed 16 March, 2021].
- Yorkshire Post, 2018. Trust in the time of technology. Yorkshire Post, 2 Oct. Available from: https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/business/trust-time-technology-247718.
- Zuboff, S., 2019. The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. London: Profile Books.