Tuning machines: an approach to exploring how Instagram’s machine vision operates on and through digital media’s participatory visual cultures

References

• Alaimo, C., and Kallinikos, J., 2016. Encoding the everyday: The infrastructural apparatus of social data. In: C. R. Sugimoto, H. R. Ekbia, and M Mattioli, eds. Big data is not a monolith. Cambridge: MIT Press, 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M., 2019. Automated Media. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Banet-Weiser, S., 2012. AuthenticTM: The politics of ambivalence in a brand culture. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, M. 2018. The transformation of the Super Bowl ad experience. The Conversation. Available from: https://theconversation.com/amp/the-transformation-of-the-super-bowl-ad-experience-91051.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, S., 2019. Managing visibility on YouTube through algorithmic gossip. New Media & Society, 21 (11-12), 2589–2606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blier, L. 2016. A brief report of the Heuritech Deep Learning Meetup #5. Heuritech. Available from: https://heuritech.wordpress.com/2016/02/29/a-brief-report-of-the-heuritech-deep-learning-meetup-5/.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T., 2017. The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, communication & society, 20 (1), 30–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher, T., 2018. Cleavage control: stories of algorithmic culture and power in the case of the YouTube ‘Reply Girls’. In: Z Papacharissi, ed. A networked self and platforms, stories, connections. New York: Routledge, 125–143.
   Google Scholar
• Buck-Morss, S., 1991. The dialectics of seeing: Walter Benjamin and the Arcades Project. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, J., 2021. Platform studies’ (21-38). In: S. Cunningham, and D Craig, eds. Creator culture: an introduction to global social media entertainment. New York: New York University Press, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, J., et al., 2021. Critical simulation as hybrid digital method for exploring the data operations and vernacular cultures of visual social media platforms. doi:10.31235/osf.io/2cwsu.
   Google Scholar
• Carah, N., 2014. Brand value: how affective labour helps create brands. Consumption Markets & Culture, 17 (4), 346–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carah, N., and Angus, D., 2018. Algorithmic brand culture: participatory labour, machine learning and branding on social media. Media, Culture & Society, 40 (2), 178–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carah, N., and Brodmerkel, S., 2021. Alcohol marketing in the era of digital media platforms. Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 82 (1), 18–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carah, N., and Dobson, A., 2016. Algorithmic hotness: young women’s “promotion” and “reconnaissance” work via social media body images. Social Media+ Society, 2 (4), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelle, M., 2020. The social lives of generative adversarial networks. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT* ‘20), January 27–30, 2020, Barcelona, Spain. ACM, New York, NY, USA. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3373156
   Google Scholar
• Ciuksys, M. 2020. AI image recognition is changing marketing forever. SocialBakers. Available from: https://www.socialbakers.com/blog/ai-image-recognition-in-marketing.
   Google Scholar
• Cool Shit. 2018. Snoop Dogg Hot Dogs. Available from: https://coolshit.art/snoop-dogg-hot-dogs.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, K., Lingel, J., and Karppi, T., 2015. Our metrics, ourselves: A hundred years of self-tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18 (4-5), 479–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, K., and Joler, V. 2018. Anatomy of an AI System. Available from: https://anatomyof.ai/.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, K., and Paglen, T. 2019. Excavating AI: the politics of images in machine learning training sets. Available from: https://www.excavating.ai/.
   Google Scholar
• Denton, E., et al., 2021. On the genealogy of machine learning datasets: a critical history of ImageNet. Big Data & Society, 8 (2), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, A.S., 2016. Postfeminist digital cultures: femininity, social media, and self-representation. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ekbia, H.R., and Nardi, B.A., 2017. Heteromation, and other stories of computing and capitalism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Facebook. 2020. Facebook reports third quarter 2020 results. Facebook. Available from: https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2020/Facebook-Reports-Third-Quarter-2020-Results/default.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Farocki, H. 2004. Phantom images. Public, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, T., 1997. The conquest of cool: business culture, counterculture, and the rise of hip consumerism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, Y., 2018. Beyond the hashtag: circumventing content moderation on social media. New Media & Society, 20 (12), 4492–4511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, M., 2019. Counterproductive: time management in the knowledge economy. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, I., et al., 2014. Generative adversarial nets. Advances in neural information processing systems, 27, 2672–2680.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinan, B., and Striphas, T., 2016. Recommended for you: the Netflix prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New media & society, 18 (1), 117–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanpour, S., et al., 2019. Identifying substance use risk based on deep neural networks and Instagram social media data. Neuropsychopharmacology, 44 (3), 487–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawker, K., and Carah, N., 2021. Snapchat’s augmented reality brand culture: sponsored filters and lenses as digital piecework. Continuum, 35 (1), 12–29.
   Google Scholar
• Leaver, T., Highfield, T., and Abidin, C., 2020. Instagram: Visual social media cultures. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• McCosker, A., and Wilken, R., 2020. Automating vision: the social impact of the new camera consciousness. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J., Odio, S., and Garcia, D., 2015. Computer-vision content detection for sponsored stories. Meta Platforms Inc. US20150365487A1. United States Patent and Trademark Office.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, S.U., 2018. Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, J., 2013. Epistemology not ideology or why we need new Germans. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 10 (2-3), 295–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paglen, T., 2014. Machine eyes. In: L. Cornell, J. Bryan-Wilson, and O. Kholeif, eds. Trevor Paglen. London: Phaidon.
   Google Scholar
• Paglen, T. 2016. Invisible images (Your Pictures are Looking at You). The New Inquiry. December 2016. Available from: https://thenewinquiry.com/invisible-images-your-pictures-are-looking-at-you/.
   Google Scholar
• Phan, T., and Wark, S., 2021. Racial formations as data formations. Big Data & Society, 8 (2), 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preciado, P.B., 2014. Pornotopia: an essay on playboy's architecture and biopolitics. New Jersey: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Reece, A.G., and Danforth, C.M., 2017. Instagram photos reveal predictive markers of depression. EPJ Data Science, 6 (1), 1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts, S., 2019. Behind the screen. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., 2013. Digital methods. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, P., 2013. the world interior of capital: towards a philosophical theory of globalization. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, P., 2016. Foams. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and Angus, D. 2018. Instamancer. Available from https://github.com/ScriptSmith/instamancer.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, M., 2021. From automobile capitalism to platform capitalism: toyotism as a prehistory of digital platforms. Organization Studies, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Striphas, T., 2015. Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18 (4-5), 395–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Nagel, E., 2018. Networks that work too well’: intervening in algorithmic connections. Media International Australia, 168 (1), 81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Oord, A., Dieleman, S., and Schrauwen, B. 2013. Deep content-based music recommendation. Paper presented at the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, O. 2019. Snapchat is the next evolution in photography. Available from: https://onezero.medium.com/snapchat-has-created-the-next-evolution-in-photography-7f417677c80.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson-Barnao, C., 2017. How algorithmic cultural recommendation influence the marketing of cultural collections. Consumption Markets & Culture, 20 (6), 559–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwick, D., Bonsu, S., and Darmody, A., 2008. Putting consumers to work: ‘co-creation’ and new marketing govern-mentality. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8 (2), 163–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar