1,080
Views
46
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Agential Conversations: Interviewing Postdoctoral Life Scientists and the Politics of Mundane Research Practices

&

References

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2005) Postdoctoral researchers: Roles, functions and career prospects, Higher Education Research & Development, 24(1), pp. 21–40.
  • Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).
  • Blumer, H. (1954) What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 18, pp. 3–10.
  • Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C. and Geuna, A. (2010) Universities in the new knowledge landscape: Tensions, challenges, change—an introduction, Minerva, 48(1), pp. 1–4.
  • Brown, S. (2002) Student counselling and students’ failure, in: M. T. Peelo and T. Wareham (Eds) Failing Students in Higher Education, pp. 139–150 (Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press).
  • Chamaz, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Qualitative Analysis (London: Sage Publications).
  • Clarke, A. (2005) Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn (London: Sage Publications).
  • Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (Berkeley: University of California Press).
  • Daston, L. and P. Galison. (2007) Objectivity (New York: Zone Books).
  • Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2005) Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research, in: N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., pp. 1–32 (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
  • Despret, V. (2004) The body we care for: Figures for anthropo-zoo-genesis, Body & Society, 10(2–3), pp. 111–134.
  • Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (1998) The endless transition: A ‘triple helix’ of university–industry–government relations, Minerva, 36(3), pp. 203–208.
  • Felt, U. (ed.) (2009) Knowing and Living in Academic Research. Convergence and Heterogeneity in Research Cultures in the European Context (Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic).
  • Felt, U. and Fochler, M. (Forthcoming) The reflexive peer-to-peer-interview. Developing a method to study the intertwinement of epistemic, institutional and social aspects in scientists’ biographical narratives. Manuscript in preparation, to be submitted to Qualitative Research.
  • Felt, U. Fochler, M. and Strassnig, M. (2010) Experimente partizipativer ELSA-Forschung. Eine methodenpolitische Reflexion, in: E. Grießler and H. Rohracher (Eds) Genomforschung—Politik—Gesellschaft. Perspektiven auf ethische, rechtliche und soziale Aspekte der Genomforschung. Sonderband ÖZS, pp. 33–67 (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag).
  • Finch, J. (1984) ‘It's great to have someone to talk to’: The ethics and politics of interviewing women, in: C. Bell and H. Roberts (Eds) Social Researching: Politics, Problems, Practice, pp. 70–87 (London: Routledge).
  • Finlay, L. (2002) Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice, Qualitative Research, 2(2), pp. 209–230.
  • Fochler, M., Felt, U. and Müller, R. (Forthcoming) For what it's worth. Academic lives, knowledge production and valuation practices in the life sciences. Manuscript in preparation, to be submitted to American Journal of Sociology.
  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (London: Sage).
  • Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (1983) Ethnography: Principles in Practice (London: Tavistock).
  • Haraway, D. (1992) The promise of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others, in: L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, and P. Treichler (Eds) Cultural Studies, pp. 295–337 (New York: Routledge).
  • Haraway, D. (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan©_Meets_Oncomouse™ (New York: Routledge).
  • Holstein, J. A. and Gubrium, J. F. (1997) Active interviewing. in: D. Silverman (Ed) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, pp. 113–129 (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
  • Isbell, L. A., Young, T. P. and Harcourt A. H. (2012) Stag parties linger: Continued gender bias in a female-rich scientific discipline. PLoS ONE, 7(11), e49682. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049682
  • Jacob, M. and Hellström, T. (Eds) (2000) The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy (Buckingham: Open University Press).
  • Jensen, C. B. (2007) Sorting attachments: Usefulness of STS in healthcare practice and policy, Science as Culture, 16(3), pp. 237–251.
  • Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (2005) Participatory action research, in: N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., pp. 271–330 (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
  • Kenney, M. (Forthcoming) Counting, accounting, and accountability: Helen Verran's relational empiricism. Social Studies of Science.
  • Kerr, A. and Lorenz-Meyer, D. (2009) Working together apart, in: U. Felt (Ed) Knowing and Living in Academic Research. Convergence and Heterogeneity in Research Cultures in the European Context, pp. 127–168 (Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic).
  • Krücken, G., Kosmützky, A. and Torka, M. (Eds) (2007) Towards a Multiversity? Universities between Global Trends and National Traditions (Bielefeld: transcript).
  • Latour, B. (2004) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern, Critical Inquiry, 30(2), pp. 225–248.
  • Law, J. (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research (New York: Routledge).
  • Law, J. (2009) The Greer-Bush Test: On Politics in STS, Version of December 23, 2009. Available at http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2009TheGreer-BushTest.pdf (accessed 12 July 2013).
  • Law, J. (2010) The double social life of methods. Paper prepared for the Sixth Annual CRESC conference on the Social Life of Method, 31st August—3rd September, St Hugh's College, Oxford. Available at http://www.heterogeneities.net/papers.htm (accessed 12 July 2013).
  • Macfarlane, B. (2005) The disengaged academic: The retreat from citizenship, Higher Education Quarterly, 59(4), pp. 296–312.
  • Martin, A., Myers, N. and Viseu A. (Forthcoming) Politics of care in technoscience. Special issue of Social Studies of Science.
  • Mol, A. (2008) The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice (London: Routledge).
  • Mol, A., Moser, I. and Pols, J. (2010) Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics Homes and Farms (London: Transaction Publishers).
  • Moser, Ingunn (2011) Dementia and the limits of life: Anthropological sensibilities, STS interferences, and possibilities for action in care, Science, Technology & Human Values, 36(5), pp. 704–722.
  • Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J. and Handelsman, J. (2012) Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. PNAS 109(41), pp. 16474–16479.
  • Müller, R. (2012a) On becoming a ‘distinguished’ scientist. Careers, individuality and collectivity in postdoctoral researchers’ accounts on living and working in the life sciences, Doctoral Thesis, University of Vienna, June 2012.
  • Müller, R. (2012b) Collaborating in life science research groups: The question of authorship, Higher Education Policy, 25(3), pp. 289–311.
  • Müller, R. (2014 forthcoming) Postdoctoral life scientists and supervision work in the new corporate university: A case study of changes in the cultural norms of science. Minerva.
  • Nature. (2003) Victims of success, Nature 422(6929), pp. 354–355.
  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Re-thinking Science: Knowledge in an Age of Uncertainty (Cambridge: Polity).
  • Power, M. (1997) From risk society to audit society, Soziale Systeme, 3(1), pp. 3–21.
  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2010) Ethical doings in naturecultures, Ethics, Place, and Environment, 13(2), pp. 151–169.
  • Puig, de la Bellacasa, M. (2011) Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things, Social Studies of Science, 41(1), pp. 85–106.
  • Salonius, A. (forthcoming) Social organization of work in biomedical labs in leading universities in Canada: Socio-historical dynamics and the influence of research funding. Social Studies of Science.
  • Scaffadi, A. K. and Berman J. E. (2011) A positive postdoctoral experience is related to quality supervision and career mentoring, collaborations, networking and a nurturing research environment, Higher Education, 62(6), pp. 685–698.
  • Science. (2005) Not your father's postdoc, Editorial feature, Science, 308(5722), pp. 717–718.
  • Sigl, L. (2012) Embodied anxiety. On experiences of living, working and coping with conditions of precarity in research cultures of the academic life sciences. Doctoral thesis, University of Vienna, August 2012.
  • Silverman, D. (2006) Interpreting Qualitative Data (London: Sage).
  • Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L. L. (1997) Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University (Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press).
  • Sommerlund, J. and Boutaiba, S. (2007) Borders of ‘the boundaryless career’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(4), pp. 525–538.
  • Strathern, M. (Ed.) (2000) Audit Cultures. Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy (London: Routledge).
  • The Scientist. (2006) Are we training too many scientists? Feature, The Scientist, 20(9), pp. 42–50.
  • Torka, M. (2009) Die Projektförmigkeit der Forschung. Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung 3 (Baden-Baden: Nomos).
  • Traweek, S. (1988) Beamtimes and Lifetimes. The World of High Energy Physicists (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
  • Verran, H. (2001) Science and an African Logic (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
  • Verran, H. (2007) The telling challenge of Africa's economies, African Studies Review, 50(2), pp. 163–182.
  • Vikkelsø, S. (2007) Description as intervention: Engagement and resistance in actor-network analyses, Science as Culture, 16(3), pp. 297–309.
  • Zabrodska, K., Linnell, S., Laws, C. and Davies, B. (2011) Bullying as intra-active process in neoliberal universities, Qualitative Inquiry, 17, pp. 709–719.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.