The Construction of Imaginaries of the Public as a Threat to Synthetic Biology

References

• Anonymous (2014) Milestones in synthetic (micro)biology, Nature Reviews Microbiology, 12(5), pp. 309–309. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmer, A., Bulpin, K., Calvert, J., Kearnes, M., Mackenzie, A., Marris, C., Martin, P., Molyneux-Hodgson, S. and Schyfter, P. (2012) Towards a Manifesto for Experimental Collaborations Between Social and Natural Scientists. Available at http://experimentalcollaborations.wordpress.com. (accessed 20 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• BBSRC (2010) New Report Reveals Public's Views on Synthetic Biology (Swindon: BBSRC). Available at http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/web/FILES/Reviews/1006-synthetic-biology-dialogue.pdf (accessed 20 November 2014)
   Google Scholar
• Bhattachary, D., Pascall Calitz, J. and Hunter, A. (2010) Synthetic Biology Dialogue (London: TNS-BMRB). Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/249268/synthetic_biology_infographic.pdf (accessed 20 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• BIS (2013) Eight Great Technologies: Synthetic Biology—Harnessing the Power of Biology to Fuel Us and Heal Us, (London: UK Government Department of Business, Innovation and Skills.)
   Google Scholar
• Calvert, J. and Martin, P. (2009) The role of social scientists in synthetic biology, EMBO Reports, 10(3), pp. 201–204. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos, L. (2009) That was the synthetic biology that was, in: M. Schmidt, A. Kelle, A. Ganguli-Mitra and H. de Vriend (Eds) Synthetic Biology: The Technoscience and Its Societal Consequences, pp. 5–21. (London: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. (2014) 'Mapping the Influences on Patient Groups’ Attitudes Towards and Engagement with the Scientific Regulation of New Anti-cancer Drugs in the US, the UK and the EU' End of Award Report to the Wellcome Trust. Available at http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/newsevents/pubs/materials-mechanical-medical-engineering-programme/ (accessed 20 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• EPSRC (2009) EPSRC Landscape Document: Materials Mechanical & Medical Engineering Programme (Swindon: EPSRC).
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. and Durant, J. (1995) The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain, Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), pp. 57–74. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, J. and Miller, S. A. (1998) Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility (New York: Basic Books). Available at http://www.synbioproject.org/site/assets/files/1280/hart_final_re8706b.pdf (accessed 20 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Hart Research Associates (2008) Awareness of and Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology and Synthetic Biology: A Report of Findings Based on a National Survey among Adults (Washington, DC: Hart Research Associates). Available at http://www.synbioproject.org/publications/6655/ (accessed 20 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Hart Research Associates (2013) Awareness and Impressions of Synthetic Biology. A Report of Findings Based on a National Survey of Results (Washington, DC: Heart Research Associates). Available at http://www.synbioproject.org/site/assets/files/1061/synbiosurvey2013.pdf (accessed 20 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• iGEM2014 Freiburgh Team. (2014) LINK-IT—gaining acceptance by overcoming fears. Available at http://2014.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/PolicyAndPractices/PolicyAndPractices (accessed 17 October 2014).
   Google Scholar
• IRGC (2010) Guidelines for the Appropriate Risk Governance of Synthetic Biology: Policy Brief, (Geneva: International Risk Governance Council).
   Google Scholar
• Lezaun, J. and Soneryd, L. (2007) Consulting citizens: technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics, Public Understanding of Science, 16(3), pp. 279–297. doi: 10.1177/0963662507079371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, N. J. (2009) Public Understanding of Genetics: The Deficit Model. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (Chichester: John Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Marris, C. (1999) GMOs: Analysing the risks, Biofutur, 1999(195), pp. 44–47. Available at http://www.scidev.net/global/biotechnology/opinion/synthetic-biology-s-malaria-promises-could-backfire.html (accessed 20 November 2014). doi: 10.1016/S0294-3506(00)87176-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marris, C. (2013) Synthetic biology's malaria promises could backfire, SciDev.Net. Avilable at http://csec.lancs.ac.uk/archive/pabe/ (accessed 20 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Marris, C., Wynne, B., Simmons, P. and Weldon, S. (2001) Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe Report of the PABE project funded by the European Commission, DG Research (contract N°FAIR CT98–3844).
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, A. (2007) If and then: A critique of speculative nanoethics, NanoEthics, 1(1), pp. 31–46. doi: 10.1007/s11569-007-0007-6
   Google Scholar
• Osbourne, G. (2012) Speech by the chancellor of the exchequer, Rt Hon George Osborne MP, to the Royal Society, November 9, London, Royal Society. Available at http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/salt-sugar-and-malaria-pills-how-the-affordable-medicine-facilitymalaria-endang-249615 (accessed 20 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Oxfam (2012) Salt, Sugar, and Malaria Pills: How the Affordable Medicine Facility-Malaria Endangers Public Health Oxfam Briefing Paper No. 163, Oxford, Oxfam GB.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. and Bennett, G. (2012) Designing Human Practices: An Experiment with Synthetic Biology (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A. (2006) Folk theories of nanotechnologies, Science as Culture, 15(4), pp. 349–365. doi: 10.1080/09505430601022676
   Google Scholar
• Royal Academy of Engineering (2009) Synthetic Biology: Scope, Applications and Implications (London: Royal Academy of Engineering). Available at http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/publications/list/reports/Synthetic_biology.pdf (accessed 20 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2012) Opening up the politics of knowledge and power in bioscience, PLoS Biology, 10(1), p. e1001233. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Synberc. (2014) Engaging the public about synthetic biology. Available at http://synberc.org/engagement (accessed 5 October 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Tait, J. (2001) More Faust than Frankenstein: The European debate about the precautionary principle and risk regulation for genetically modified crops, Journal of Risk Research, 4(2), pp. 175–189. doi: 10.1080/13669870010027640
   Google Scholar
• Tait, J. (2012) Adaptive governance of synthetic biology, EMBO Report, 13(7), p. 579. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait, J. (2013) Beyond ELSI: Smart Adaptive Governance of Synthetic Biology TSB SynBio- SIG: Consortia-building Workshops, Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• ter Meulen, V. (2014) Time to settle the synthetic controversy, Nature, 509(7499), p. 135. Available at http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/web/FILES/Reviews/1006-synthetic-biology-dialogue-methodology.pdf (accessed 20 November 2014). doi: 10.1038/509135a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TNS-BMRB (2010) BBSRC and EPSRC Synthetic Biology Public Dialogues: TNS-BMRB Methodology (London: TNS-BMRB).
   Google Scholar
• UK Synthetic Biology Roadmap Coordination Group (2012) A Synthetic Biology Roadmap for the UK (Swindon: Technology Strategy Board).
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, I. and Wynne, B. (2013). Science, scientism and imaginaries of publics in the UK: Passive objects, incipient threats, Science as Culture, 22(4), pp. 540–566. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2013.764072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1992) Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science, Public Understanding of Science, 1(3), pp. 281–304. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (2001) Creating public alienation: Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs, Science as Culture, 10(4), pp. 445–481. doi: 10.1080/09505430120093586
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wynne, B. (2006) Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science—hitting the notes, but missing the music? Community Genetics, 9(3), 211–220. doi: 10.1159/000092659
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, J. Y. (2011) The ‘National/’and the ‘Cosmos’: The emergence of synthetic biology in China, EMBO Report, 12(4), pp. 302–306. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar