1,035
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Genealogy of “Empirical Post-structuralist” STS, Retold in Two Conjunctures: The Legacy of Hegel and Althusser

References

  • Aarons, B. (1973) Science or pseudo-science – Althusser & Marxism, Australian Left Review, 39(1), pp. 7–16.
  • Adorno, T. (1990) Negative Dialectics (London: Routledge).
  • Althusser, L. (1969) For Marx (London: Penguin Press).
  • Althusser, L. and Balibar, E. (1970) Reading Capital (Paris: Maspero).
  • Asdal, K., Brenna, B. and Moser, I. (Eds) (2007) Technoscience: The Politics of Interventions (Norway: Oslo Academic Press).
  • Bailey, L. (1996) Critical Theory and the Sociology of Knowledge (Berlin: Peter Lang).
  • Barry, A. and Slater, D. (2002) Technology, politics and the market: An interview with Michel Callon, Economy and Society, 31(2), pp. 285–306. doi: 10.1080/03085140220123171
  • Bénatouïl, T. (1999) A tale of two sociologies: The critical and the pragmatic stance in contemporary French sociology, European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), pp. 379–396. doi: 10.1177/136843199002003011
  • Birch, K. and Tyfield, D. (2013) Theorizing the bioeconomy: Biovalue, biocapital, bioeconomics or … what? Science, Technology & Human Values, 38(3), pp. 299–327. doi: 10.1177/0162243912442398
  • Blok, A. (2010) Topologies of climate change: Actor-network theory, relational-scalar analytics, and carbon-market overflows, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(5), pp. 896–912. doi: 10.1068/d0309
  • Bloor, D. (1999) Anti-Latour, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 30(1), pp. 81–112. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00038-7
  • Böhm, S. Murtola, A. and Spoelstra, S. (2012) The atmosphere business, Ephemera, 12(1–2), pp. 1–11.
  • Bowker, G. and Latour, B. (1987) A booming discipline short of discipline: (Social) studies of science in France, Social Studies of Science, 17, pp. 714–748.
  • Butler, J. (1997) Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative (New York: Routledge).
  • Callon, M. (1998) The Laws of the Market (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers).
  • Castree, N. (2002) False antitheses? Marxism, nature and actor-networks, Antipode, 34(1), pp. 111–146. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00228
  • Christofferson, S. (2004) French Intellectuals against the Left: The Antitotalitarian Moment of the 1970s (New York: Berghahn).
  • Collin, F. (2011) Science Studies as Naturalized Philosophy (London: Springer).
  • Collin, F. and Pedersen, D. (2015) The Frankfurt school, science and technology studies, and the humanities, Social Epistemology, 29(1), pp. 44–72. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2013.782588
  • Collins, H. and Yearley, S. (1992) Journey into space, in: A. Pickering (Ed) Science as Practice and Culture, pp. 369–389 (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press).
  • Cooper, M. (2008) Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era (New York: University of Washington Press).
  • Davis, C. and Abraham, J. (2010) Rethinking innovation accounting in pharmaceutical regulation: A case study in the deconstruction of therapeutic advance and theurapeutic breakthrough, Science, Technology & Human Values, 36(4), pp. 791–815.
  • Davis, R. and Zanotti, L. (2014) Introduction: Hybrid landscapes: Science, conservation and the production of nature, Anthropological Quarterly, 87(3), pp. 601–611. doi: 10.1353/anq.2014.0032
  • Deleuze, G. (1977) Questions posées à Gilles Deleuze sur les “nouveaux philosophes”. Available at http://1libertaire.free.fr/Deleuze03.html
  • Deleuze, G. (1988) Empirisme et Subjectivité: Essai sur la nature humaine selon Hume (Paris: Épiméthée).
  • Descombes, V. (1980) Modern French Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Dosse, F. (1999) The Empire of Meaning: The Humanization of the Social Sciences (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
  • Durkheim, E. (1975) Textes: Religion, morale, anomie, Vol. 2 (Paris: Les Editions de Minuit).
  • Dusek, V. (1998) Brecht and Lukács as teachers of Feyerabend and Lakatos: the Feyerabend-Lakatos debate as scientific recapitulation of the Brecht- Lukács debate, History of the Human Sciences, 11(2), pp. 25–44. doi: 10.1177/095269519801100202
  • d'Hondt, J. (1968) Hegel en son temps (Paris: Éditions Sociales).
  • Eagleton, T. (1996) The Illusions of Postmodernism (London: Blackwell Publishers).
  • Feenberg, A. (2000) Will the real post-human please stand up!: A response to elichirigoity, Social Studies of Science, 30(1), pp. 151–157. doi: 10.1177/030631200030001008
  • Feenberg, A. (2002) Transforming Technology: Critical Theory Revisited (New York: Oxford University Press).
  • Fine, B. (2003) Callonistics: A disentanglement, Economy and Society, 32(3), pp. 478–484. doi: 10.1080/03085140303128
  • Fine, B. (2005) From actor-network theory to political economy, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16(4), pp. 91–108. doi: 10.1080/10455750500376057
  • Foster, J. B. (2016) Marxism in the anthropocene: Dialectical rifts on the left, International Critical Thought, 6(3), 393–421. doi: 10.1080/21598282.2016.1197787
  • Foucault, M. (1999) Structuralism and post-structuralism, in: J. Faubion and P. Rabinow (Eds) Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, Vol. 2, pp. 433–458 (London: The New Press).
  • Fuller, S. (2002) The pride of losers: A genealogy of the philosophy of science, History and Theory, 41, pp. 392–409. doi: 10.1111/1468-2303.00213
  • Fuller, S. (2006) The New Sociological Imagination (London: Sage).
  • Gareau, B. (2005) We have never been human. Agential nature, ANT, and Marxist political ecology, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16(4), pp. 127–140. doi: 10.1080/10455750500376081
  • Garo, I. (2011) Foucault, Deleuze, Althusser & Marx: La Politique dans la Philosophie (Paris: Demopolis).
  • Gouldner, A. (1973) For Sociology: Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today (New York: Basic Books).
  • Grumely, J. (1989) History and Totality: Radical Historicism from Hegel to Foucault (London: Routledge).
  • Habermas, J. (1977) The analytical theory of science and dialectics. A post-script to the controversy between Popper and Adorno, in: G. Adey and D. Frisby (Eds) The Postivist Dispute in German Sociology, pp. 131–162 (London: Heinemann).
  • Habjan, J. and Whyte, J. (2013) (Mis)readings of Marx in Continental Philosophy (New York: Macmillan).
  • Hayles, K. (1988) Two voices, one channel: Equivocation in Michel Serres, SubStance, 17(3), pp. 3–12. doi: 10.2307/3684920
  • Hegel, G. W. F. ([1801] 1977) The Difference between Fichte’s and Schelling’s System of Philosophy (New York: University of New York Press).
  • Hornborg, A. (2014) Technology as fetish: Marx, Latour, and the cultural foundations of capitalism, Theory, Culture & Society, 31(4), pp. 119–140. doi: 10.1177/0263276413488960
  • Hume, D. (1969) A Treatise of Human Nature (London: Penguin Books).
  • Jameson, F. (2010) Valences of the Dialectic (London: Verso Books).
  • Jankovic, V. and Bowman, A. (2014) After the green gold rush: The construction of climate change as a market transition, Economy and Society, 43(2), pp. 233–259. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2013.791511
  • Jasanoff, S. (2003) Breaking the waves in science studies: Comment on H.M. Collins and Robert Evans, ‘the third wave of science studies’, Social Studies of Science, 33(3), pp. 389–400. doi: 10.1177/03063127030333004
  • Jasanoff, S. (2004) States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order (New York: Routledge).
  • Jay, M. (1984) Marxism and Totality: The Adventures of a Concept from Lukács to Habermas (Berkeley: University of California Press).
  • Kelly, M. (2013) Foucault against Marxism: Althusser beyond Althusser, in: J. Habjan and J. Whyte (Eds) (Mis)readings of Marx in Continental Philosophy, pp. 83–98 (New York: Macmillan).
  • Kleinman, D. and Suryanarayanan, S. (2013) Dying bees and the social production of ignorance, Science, Technology & Human Values, 38(4), pp. 492–517. doi: 10.1177/0162243912442575
  • Kolakowski, L. (1971) Althusser’s Marx, Socialist Register, 8, pp. 111–128.
  • Latour, B. (1987) The enlightenment without the critique: A word on Michel Serres’ philosophy, in: P. Griffiths (Ed) Contemporary French Philosophy, pp. 83–97 (Cambridge: Camebridge University Press).
  • Latour, B. (1988) The Pasteurization of France (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
  • Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
  • Latour, B. (2000) When things strike back: A possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences, British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), pp. 107–123. doi: 10.1080/000713100358453
  • Latour, B. (2004) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern, Critical Inquiry, 30(2), pp. 225–248. doi: 10.1086/421123
  • Latour, B. (2010) An attempt at writing a compositionist manifesto, New Literary History, 41, pp. 471–490.
  • Law, J. (Ed) (1991) Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (London: Routledge).
  • Law, J. (2000) On the subject of the object: Narrative, technology, and interpellation. Configurations, 8(1), pp. 1–29. doi: 10.1353/con.2000.0003
  • Law, J. (2008) On sociology and STS, The Sociological Review, 56(4), pp. 623–649. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.00808.x
  • Law, J. (2009a) Actor network theory and material semiotics, in: B. Turner (Ed) The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, pp. 141–158 (Oxford: Blackwell).
  • Law, J. (2009b) The Greer-Bush test: on politics in STS, working paper. Available at http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2009TheGreer-BushTest.pdf
  • Law, J. and Urry, J. (2004) Enacting the social, Economy and Society, 33(3), pp. 390–410. doi: 10.1080/0308514042000225716
  • Law, J. and Williams, K. (2014) A state of unlearning? Government as experience. CRESC working paper. Available at http://www.cresc.ac.uk/publications/a-state-of-unlearning-government-as-experiment
  • Locke, J. ([1690] 1999) Essay Concerning Human Understanding (Hazleton: Pennsylvania State University).
  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition (Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis).
  • Lukács, G. ([1923] 1972) History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
  • Menant, P. (1973) Lire Michel Foucault, Commentaire, 3(7), pp. 369–375.
  • Miller, D. (2002) Turning Callon the right way up, Economy and Society, 31(2), pp. 218–233. doi: 10.1080/03085140220123135
  • Mirowski, P. and Nik-Khah, E. (2007) Markets make flesh: Performativity, and a problem in science studies, augmented with consideration of the FCC auctions, in: D. McKenzie, F. Muniesa and L. Siu (Eds) Do Economists Make Markets: On the Performativity of Economics, pp. 190–224 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Munk, A. and Abrahamsson, S. (2012) Empiricist interventions: Strategy and tactics on the onto political battlefield, Science & Technology Studies, 25, pp. 52–70.
  • Muniesa, F. (2014). The Provoked Economy: Economic Reality and the Performative Turn (London: Routledge).
  • Noys, B. (2013) The discrete charm of Bruno Latour, in: J. Habjan and J. Whyte (Eds) (Mis)readings of Marx in Continental Philosophy, pp. 195–210 (New York: Macmillan).
  • Oreskes, N., Conway, E. and Shindell, M. (2008) From chicken little to Dr. Pangloss: William Nierenberg, global warming, and the social deconstruction of scientific knowledge, Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 38(1), pp. 109–152. doi: 10.1525/hsns.2008.38.1.109
  • Perkins, H. (2007) Ecologies of actor-networks and (non)social Labor within the urban political economies of nature, Geoforum, 38(6), pp. 1152–1162. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.007
  • Popper, K. (1962) The Open Society and Its Enemies: The High Tide of Prophecy: Hegel, Marx and the Aftermath, Vol. 2 (London: Routledge).
  • Rancière, J. (2011) Althusser’s Lesson (London: Continuum).
  • Rose, H. (1979) Hyper-reflexivity – A new danger for the counter-movements, in: H. Nowotny and H. Rose (Eds) Counter-movements in the Sciences (Dordrecht: Reidel).
  • Rose, G. (2009) Hegel Contra Sociology (London: Verso).
  • Rudy, A. (2005) On ANT and relational materialisms, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16(4), pp. 109–125. doi: 10.1080/10455750500376065
  • Rudy, A. and Gareau, B. (2005) Actor-network theory, Marxist economics, and Marxist political ecology, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16(4), pp. 85–90. doi: 10.1080/10455750500376032
  • Schaffer, S. (1991) The eighteenth Brumaire of Bruno Latour, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 22, pp. 174–192. doi: 10.1016/0039-3681(91)90020-S
  • Schrift, A. (2006) Twentieth Century French Philosophy: Key Themes and Thinkers (London: Blackwell Publishing).
  • Sheehan, H. (2007) Marxism and science studies: A sweep through the decades, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 21(2), pp. 197–210. doi: 10.1080/02698590701498126
  • Silva, S. (2013) Reification and fetishism: Processes of transformation, Theory, Culture & Society, 30(1), pp. 79–98. doi: 10.1177/0263276412452892
  • Simon, L. (1981) Vico and Marx: Perspectives on historical development, Journal of the History of Ideas, 42(2), pp. 317–331. doi: 10.2307/2709323
  • Söderberg, J. (2013) Determining social change: The role of technological determinism in the collective action framing of hackers, New Media & Society, 15(8), pp. 1277–1293. doi: 10.1177/1461444812470093
  • Sunder Rajan, K. (2006) Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life (New York: Duke Press).
  • Swingewood, A. (1975) Marx and Modern Social Theory (London: Macmillan).
  • Thompson, E. P. ([1978] 1995) The Poverty of Theory: Orrery of Errors (London: Merlin Press).
  • van Houdt, J. (2011) The necessity of contingency or contingent necessity: Meillassoux, Hegel, and the subject, Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 7(1), pp. 128–141.
  • Whatmore, S. (1999) Hybrid geographies: Rethinking the “human” in human geography, in: D. Massey, J. Allen and P. Sarre (Eds) Human Geography Today, pp. 22–40 (Cambridge, MA: Polity Press).
  • Whatmore, S. (2009) Mapping knowledge controversies: Science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise, Progress in Human Geography, 33(5), pp. 587–598. doi: 10.1177/0309132509339841
  • Werskey, G. (2007) The Marxist critique of capitalist science: A history in three movements? Science as Culture, 16(4), pp. 397–461. doi: 10.1080/09505430701706749
  • Wilding, A. (2010) Naturphilosophie redivivus: On Bruno Latour’s ‘political ecology’, Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 6(1), pp. 18–32.
  • Wolff, R. (1981) Science, empiricism, and Marxism: Latour and Woolgar vs. E. P. Thompson, Social Text, 4, pp. 110–113. doi: 10.2307/466279
  • Wolin, R. (2010) The Wind from the East: French Intellectuals, the Culture Revolution, and the Legacy of the 1960s (New York: Princeton University Press).
  • Woolgar, S. (1981) Interests and explanation in the social study of science, Social Studies of Science, 11(3), pp. 365–394. doi: 10.1177/030631278101100304
  • Žižek, S. (2001) Did Somebody Say Totalitarism? Five Interventions in the Misuse of a Notion (London: Verso).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.