1,035
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Research Misconduct in the Age of Open Science: The Case of STAP Stem Cells

, &

References

  • Alberts, B., Cicerone, R. J., Fienberg, S. E., et al. (2015) Self-correction in science at work, Science, 348(6242), pp. 1420–1422. doi: 10.1126/science.aab3847
  • Atkinson-Grosjean, J. and Fairley, C. (2009) Moral economies in science: From ideal to pragmatic, Minerva, 47(2), pp. 147–170. doi: 10.1007/s11024-009-9121-7
  • Bastian, H. (2014) A stronger post-publication culture is needed for better science, PLoS Medicine, 11(12), p. e1001772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001772
  • Begley, C. G. and Ellis, L. M. (2012) Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research, Nature, 483(7391), pp. 531–533. doi: 10.1038/483531a
  • Bellin, M., Marchetto, M. C., Gage, F. H., et al. (2012) Induced pluripotent stem cells: The new patient?, Nature Reviews: Molecular Cell Biology, 13(11), pp. 713–726. doi: 10.1038/nrm3448
  • Blatt, M. R. (2015) Vigilante science, editorial, Plant Physiology, 169(2), pp. 907–909. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01443
  • Collins, H. M. (1985) Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice (London: Sage).
  • Collste, G. (2015) Principles and Approaches in Ethics Assessment: Research Integrity. Annex 1.b. Stakeholders Acting Together on the Ethical Impact Assessment of Research and Innovation—SATORI, European Commission. Available at http://satoriproject.eu/ (accessed 19 April 2016).
  • Daston, L. (1995) The moral economy of science, Osiris, 10, pp. 2–24. doi: 10.1086/368740
  • De Los Angeles, A., Ferrari, F., Fujiwara, Y., et al. (2015) Failure to replicate the STAP phenomenon, Nature, 525, pp. E6–E9. doi: 10.1038/nature15513
  • Dussauge, I., Helgesson, C-F. and Lee, F. (eds) (2015) Value Practices in the Life Sciences and Medicine (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Engle, S. J. and Puppala, D. (2013) Integrating human pluripotent stem cells into drug development, Cell Stem Cell, 12(6), pp. 669–677. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.05.011
  • Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G. and Casadevall, A. (2012) Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications, PNAS, 109(42), pp. 17028–17033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212247109
  • FCCJ (2014) Social media topples a heroine: The Foreign Correspondents’ Club of Japan, by D. Normile. Available at http://www.fccj.or.jp/ (accessed 15 April 2016).
  • Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J. R. (2015) Peer review and quality control, in: J. D. Wright (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed, Vol. 17, pp. 680–684 (Oxford: Elsevier).
  • Garden, M. (2011) Defining blog: A fool’s errand or a necessary undertaking, Journalism, 13(4), pp. 483–499. doi: 10.1177/1464884911421700
  • Gurdon, J. B. (1962) The developmental capacity of nuclei taken from intestinal epithelium cells of feeding tadpoles, Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology, 10, pp. 622–640.
  • Gurdon, J. B., Laskey, R. A. and Reeves, O. R. (1975) The developmental capacity of nuclei transplanted from keratinized skin cells of adult frogs, Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology, 34(1), pp. 93–112.
  • Han, S. S., Williams, L. A. and Eggan, K. C. (2011) Constructing and deconstructing stem cell models of neurological disease, Neuron, 70(4), pp. 626–644. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.003
  • Hookway, N. (2008) ‘Entering the blogosphere’: Some strategies for using blogs in social research, Qualitative Research, 8(1), pp. 91–113. doi: 10.1177/1468794107085298
  • Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) Why most published research findings are false, PLoS Medicine, 2(8), p. e124. Available at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
  • Kitzinger, J. (2008) Questioning hype, rescuing hope? The Hwang stem cell scandal and the reassertion of hopeful horizons, Science as Culture, 17(4), pp. 417–434. doi: 10.1080/09505430802515114
  • Kohler, R. E. (1994) Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
  • Konno, D., Kasukawa, T., Hashimoto, K., et al. (2015) STAP cells are derived from ES cells, Nature, 525, pp. E4–E5. doi: 10.1038/nature15366
  • Lancaster, C. (2016) The acid test for biological science: STAP cells, trust, and replication, Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(1), pp. 147–167. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9628-2
  • Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
  • Leonelli, S., Rappet, B. and Davies, G. (2017) Data shadows: Knowledge, openness, and absence, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(2), pp. 191–202. doi: 10.1177/0162243916687039
  • Levin, N. and Leonelli, S. (2017) How does one ‘open’ science? Questions of value in biological research, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(2), pp. 280–305. doi: 10.1177/0162243916672071
  • McNutt, M. (2014) Editorial: Reproducibility, Science, 343(6168), p. 229. doi:10.1126/science.1250475.
  • Merton, R. K. (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. N. W. Storer (ed.) (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press).
  • Meskus, M. and de Miguel Beriain, I. (2013) Embryo-like features of induced pluripotent stem cells defy legal and ethical boundaries, Croatian Medical Journal, 54(6), pp. 589–591. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2013.54.589
  • Mikami, K. (2015) State-supported science and imaginary lock-in: The case of regenerative medicine in Japan, Science as Culture, 24(2), pp. 183–204. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2014.945410
  • Nature Immunology Editorial Board (2013) Editorial: Raising standards, Nature Immunology, 14(5), p. 415. doi:10.1038/ni.2603.
  • Nature News (2014a) Accusations pile up amid Japan’s stem-cell controversy, by D. Cyranoski, 7 May. doi:10.1038/nature.2014.15163.
  • Nature News (2014b) Acid-bath stem-cell study under investigation, by D. Cyranoski, 17 February. doi:10.1038/nature.2014.14738.
  • Nature News (2014c) Japanese scientist resigns as ‘STAP’ stem-cell method fails, by A. Abbott, 19 December. doi:10.1038/nature.2014.16631.
  • Nature News (2014d) Papers on ‘stress-induced’ stem cells are retracted, by D. Cyranoski, 2 July. doi:10.1038/nature.2014.15501.
  • Nature News (2014e) Research integrity: Cell-induced stress, by D. Cyranoski, 3 July. doi:10.1038/511140a.
  • Nature News (2014f) Stem-cell scientist found guilty of misconduct, by D. Cyranoski, 1 April. doi:10.1038/nature.2014.14974.
  • Nature News Blog (2014a) Acid-bath stem-cell scientist apologizes and appeals, by D. Cyranoski, 9 April. Available at http://blogs.nature.com/ (accessed 2 October 2015).
  • Nature News Blog (2014b) Investigator of controversial stem-cell study resigns, by D. Cyranoski, 25 April. Available at http://blogs.nature.com/ (accessed 2 October 2015).
  • Nobel Assembly. (2012) The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet Press Release, 10 August 2012. Available at: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2012/press.html (accessed 2 October 2015).
  • Obokata, H., Wakayama, T., Sasai, Y., et al. (2014a) Stimulus-triggered fate conversion of somatic cells into pluripotency, Nature, 505, pp. 641–647. Retracted 03 July 2014. doi: 10.1038/nature12968
  • Obokata, H., Sasai, Y., Niwa, H., et al. (2014b) Bidirectional developmental potential in reprogrammed cells with acquired pluripotency, Nature, 505, pp. 676–680. Retracted 03 July 2014. doi: 10.1038/nature12969
  • Obokata, H., Sasai, Y. and Niwa, H. (2014c) Essential technical tips for STAP cell conversion culture from somatic cells. Nature Protocol Exchange. doi:10.1038/protex.2014.008.
  • Papadopoulos, D. (2015) From publics to practitioners: Invention power and open technoscience, Science as Culture, 24(1), pp. 108–121 doi: 10.1080/09505431.2014.986322
  • Prainsack, B. (2011) Overcoming embryonic exceptionalism? Lessons from analyzing stem cell regulation in Israel, New Genetics & Society, 30(3), pp. 267–277. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2011.598049
  • Prior, L. (2008) Documents and action, in: P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman and J. Brannen (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods, pp. 479–493 (London: Sage).
  • Pulverer, B. (2014) STAP dance, Editorial, The EMBO Journal, 33(12), pp. 1285–1286.
  • Resnik, D. B. (1998) The Ethics of Science: An Introduction (London and New York: Routledge).
  • Resnik, D. B. and Steward, N. (2012) Misconduct versus honest error and scientific disagreement, Accountability in Research, 19(1), pp. 56–63. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2012.650948
  • Riesch, H. and Mendel, J. (2014) Science blogging: Networks, boundaries and limitations, Science as Culture, 23(1), pp. 51–72. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2013.801420
  • RIKEN Report (2014a) Report on STAP Cell Research Paper Investigation. 31 March. Available at http://www3.RIKEN.jp/stap/e/f1document1.pdf (accessed 2 October 2015).
  • RIKEN Report (2014b) Report on STAP Cell Research Paper Investigation. 25 December. Available at http://www3.RIKEN.jp/stap/e/c13document52.pdf (accessed 2 October 2015).
  • Saha, K. and Hurlbut, J. B. (2011) Disease modelling using pluripotent stem cells: Making sense of disease from bench to bedside, Swiss Medical Weekly, 141, p. w13144.
  • Salter, B. (2008) Governing stem cell science in China and India: Emerging economies and the global politics of innovation, New Genetics & Society, 27(2), pp. 145–159. doi: 10.1080/14636770802077090
  • Schmidt Kjaergaard, R. (2011) Stem-cell spin: Covering the Hwang affair in science and nature, Science as Culture, 20(3), pp. 349–373. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2010.549822
  • Science News (2015) PubPeer’s secret is out: Founder of controversial website reveals himself, by Jennifer Couzin-Frankel, 31 August 2015. Available at http://www.sciencemag.org/news (accessed 23 August 2016).
  • Scott, A. (2007) Peer review and the relevance of science, Futures, 39(7), pp. 827–845. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.009
  • Shapin, S. (1984) Pump and circumstance: Robert Boyle’s literary technology, Social Studies of Science, 14(4), pp. 481–520. doi: 10.1177/030631284014004001
  • Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (1985) Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
  • Silverman, D. (2011) Interpreting Qualitative Data: A Guide to the Principles of Qualitative Research, 4th ed. (London: Sage).
  • Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. and Hwang, S. (2012) Governance of stem cell research: Public participation and decision-making in China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, Social Studies of Science, 42(5), pp. 684–708. doi: 10.1177/0306312712450939
  • Smith, A. (2014) Potency unchained, Nature, 505(30), pp. 622–623. Retracted 3 July 2014. doi: 10.1038/505622a
  • Stahel, P. F. and Moore, E. E. (2014) Peer review for biomedical publications: We can improve the system, BMC Medicine, 12(1), pp. 179–182. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0179-1
  • Strasser, B. (2011) The experimenter's museum: GenBank, natural history, and the moral economies of biomedicine, Isis, 102(1), pp. 60–96. doi: 10.1086/658657
  • Sugawara, Y., Tanimoto, T., Miyagawa, S., et al. (2017) Scientific misconduct and social media: Role of Twitter in the stimulus triggered acquisition of pluripotency cells scandal, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(2), e57. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6706
  • Takahashi, K. and Yamanaka, S. (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors, Cell, 126(4), pp. 663–676. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024
  • Takahashi, K., Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M., et al. (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors, Cell, 131(5), pp. 861–872. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019
  • The Boston Globe (2014) Efforts to repeat controversial stem cell technique intensify, by C. Y. Johnson, 6 March 2014. Available at https://www.bostonglobe.com/ (accessed 2 October 2015).
  • The Japan Times (2015) RIKEN serves Obokata, others with penalties; charges could follow, by S. Murai, 10 February 2015. Available at http://www.japantimes.co.jp (accessed 2 October 2015).
  • Thompson, C. (2010) Asian regeneration? Nationalism and Internationalism in stem cell research in South Korea and Singapore, in A. Ong and N. N. Chen (eds) Asian Biotech: Ethics and Communities of Fate, pp. 95–117 (Durham and London: Duke University Press).
  • Thompson, C. (2014) Good Science: The Ethical Choreography of Stem Cell Research (Cambridge and London: The MIT Press).
  • Vacanti, C. (2014a) Refined protocol for generating STAP cells from mature somatic cells. Available at https://web.archive.org/web/20140715125509/https://research.bwhanesthesia.org/site_assets/51520d191eea6679ce000001/cterm/Refined_STAP_protocol-9a685fc86fec5ca857ad58ae75462d07.pdf (accessed 2 October 2015).
  • Vacanti, C. (2014b) Revised STAP cell protocol. Available at http://research.bwhanesthesia.org/site_assets/51520d191eea6679ce000001/cterm/Revised_STAP_protocol-28bcd7e61d02a23624eb590717e241fe.pdf (accessed 2 October 2015).
  • Yu, J. Vodyanik, M. A., Smuga-Otto, K., et al. (2007) Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells, Science, 318(5858), pp. 1917–1920. doi: 10.1126/science.1151526
  • Zang, J. Y. (2011) Scientific institutions and effective governance: A case study of Chinese stem cell research, New Genetics & Society, 30(2), pp. 193–207. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2011.574372
  • Ziman, J. (2002) Real Science: What It Is, and What It Means (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.