How Economic Assumptions Constitute Publics as Consumers in South African Nanotechnology Governance

References

• Armingeon, K. and Schädel, L. (2015) Social inequality in political participation: The dark sides of individualization, West European Politics, 38(1), pp. 1–27. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.929341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, C., Cloke, P., Clarke, N. and Malpass, A. (2005) Consuming ethics: Articulating the subjects and spaces of ethical consumption, Antipode, 37(1), pp. 23–45. doi: 10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00472.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beumer, K. (2015) The co-production of nanotechnology and development in India, South Africa, and Kenya, in: D. M. Bowman, A. Dijkstra, C. Fautz, J. Guivant, K. Konrad, H. van Lente and S. Woll (Eds) Practices of Innovation and Responsibility. Insights from Methods, Governance and Action, pp. 85–98 (Berlin: IOS Press).
   Google Scholar
• Beumer, K. (2016) Nanotechnology and development. Styles of governance in India, South Africa, and Kenya, Doctoral dissertation, Maastricht University Press, Maastricht.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, L. (2011) Standards: Recipes for Reality (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Cherry, M. (2010) South African science: Black, white and grey, Nature, 463(7282), pp. 726–728. doi: 10.1038/463726a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cingo, N. (2008) Coordinated South African Nanotechnology Awareness Programme. Implementation Plan: Phase 1—2007/8. Available at http://www.sani.org.za/SANI_DST_Awareness_Program_Report_2007-8_v2.pdf (accessed 24 June 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, J. (2001) Naturing the nation: Aliens, apocalypse and the postcolonial state, Journal of Southern African Studies, 27(3), pp. 627–651. doi: 10.1080/13632430120074626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Science and Technology (2002) South Africa’s National Research and Development Strategy (Pretoria: Government of the Republic of South Africa).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Science and Technology (2006) The National Nanotechnology Strategy (Pretoria: Government of the Republic of South Africa).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Science and Technology (2008) Ten-Year Innovation Plan (Pretoria: Government of the Republic of South Africa).
   Google Scholar
• Dubow, S. (2006) A Commonwealth of Knowledge: Science, Sensibility and White South Africa 1820–2000 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. N. and Hecht, G. (2010) History and the technopolitics of identity: The case of Apartheid South Africa, Journal of Southern African Studies, 36(3), pp. 619–639. doi: 10.1080/03057070.2010.507568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. (2009) The uses of neoliberalism, Antipode, 41(1), pp. 166–184.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society, American Economic Review, 35(4), pp. 519–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, D. J. (2013) Neoliberalism and the history of STS theory: Toward a reflexive sociology, Social Epistemology, 27(2), pp. 177–193. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2013.793754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, E. and Dulsrud, A. (2007) Will consumers save the world? The framing of political consumerism, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 20(5), pp. 469–482. doi: 10.1007/s10806-007-9043-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klintman, M. (2006) Ambiguous framings of political consumerism: Means or end, product or process orientation? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(5), pp. 427–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00540.x
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, B. (2011) Technologies of democracy: Experiments and demonstrations, Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4), pp. 649–666. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9303-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, R., Mirowski, P. and Randalls, S. (2010) Introduction: STS and neoliberal science, Social Studies of Science, 40(5), pp. 659–675. doi: 10.1177/0306312710378549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009) Seeing like a survey, Cultural Sociology, 3(2), pp. 239–256. doi: 10.1177/1749975509105533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezaun, J. and Soneryd, L. (2007) Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics, Public Understanding of Science, 16(3), pp. 279–297. doi: 10.1177/0963662507079371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbali, C. (2011) The big issue with nanotech, Mail & Guardian, May 27. Available at http://mg.co.za/article/2011-05-27-the-big-issue-with-nanotech (accessed 24 June 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Michael, M. and Brown, N. (2005) Scientific citizenships: Self-representations of xenotransplantation’s publics, Science as Culture, 14(1), pp. 39–57. doi: 10.1080/09505430500041769
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore, K., Kleinman, D. L., Hess, D. and Frickel, S. (2011) Science and neoliberal globalization: A political sociological approach, Theory and Society, 40(5), pp. 505–532. doi: 10.1007/s11186-011-9147-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narsiah, S. (2002). Neoliberalism and privatisation in South Africa, GeoJournal, 57(1), pp. 3–13. doi: 10.1023/A:1026022903276
   Google Scholar
• Neilson, L. A. (2010) Boycott or boycott? Understanding political consumerism, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(3), pp. 214–227. doi: 10.1002/cb.313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2012). Planning Guide for Public Engagement and Outreach in Nanotechnology (Paris: OECD). Available at https://www.oecd.org/sti/biotech/49961768.pdf (accessed 9 April 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Rogers-Hayden, T. and Pidgeon, N. (2007) Moving engagement upstream? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering’s inquiry, Public Understanding of Science, 16(3), pp. 345–364 doi: 10.1177/0963662506076141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SANi (2013) About Us. Available at http://www.sani.org.za/about_us.php (accessed 24 June 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (2009) The microshape tweakers, Mail & Guardian, August 7–13. Available at http://www.npep.co.za/pdfs/articles-and-factsheets/Energy/article4.pdf (accessed 19 April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Stolle, D. and Micheletti, M. (2013) Political Consumerism. Global Responsibility in Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2009) South Africa Contribution. Nanotechnology Development in South Africa, November 9–11. Available at http://unctad.org/sections/dite_dir/docs/panel2009_SouthAfricad03_en.pdf (accessed 24 June 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., Nie, N. H. and Kim, J.-O. (1978) Participation and Political Equality. A Seven-Nation Comparison (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press).
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (2014) World Development Indicators: Distribution of Income or Consumption. Available at http://wdi.worldbank.org/table/2.9 (accessed 26 December 2016).
   Google Scholar