5,177
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
FORUM INTRODUCTION

Techno-economic Assumptions

References

  • Beamish, T. (2007) Economic sociology in the next decade and beyond, American Behavioral Scientist, 50(8), pp. 993–1014. doi: 10.1177/0002764207299350
  • Beckert, J. (2011) Imagined futures: Fictional expectations in the economy, Theory and Society, 42, pp. 219–240. doi: 10.1007/s11186-013-9191-2
  • Beumer, K. (2017) How economic assumptions constitute publics as consumers in South African nanotechnology governance, Science as Culture, 26(4).
  • Birch, K. (2013) The political economy of technoscience: An emerging research agenda, Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science, 7(1), pp. 49–61.
  • Birch, K. (2017) Rethinking value in the bio-economy: Finance, assetization and the management of value, Science, Technology and Human Values, 42(3), pp. 460–490. doi: 10.1177/0162243916661633
  • Birch, K., Levidow, L. and Papaioannou, T. (2014) Self-fulfilling prophecies of the European knowledge-based bio-economy: The discursive shaping of institutional and policy frameworks in the bio-pharmaceuticals sector, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(1), pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s13132-012-0117-4
  • Birch, K., Tyfield, D. and Chiapetta, M. (forthcoming) From neoliberalizing research to researching neoliberalism: STS, rentiership and the emergence of commons 2.0, in: D. Cahill, M. Konings and M. Cooper (Eds) The SAGE Handbook of Neoliberalism (London: Sage).
  • Birkbak, A. (2017) When financial concerns shape traffic policy: How economic assumptions muted the Copenhagen payment zone issue, Science as Culture, 26(4).
  • Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K. and van Lente, H. (2006) The sociology of expectations in science and technology, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 18(3/4), pp. 285–298. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777002
  • Brown, N. (2003) Hope against hype—accountability in biopasts, presents and Futures, Science Studies, 16(2), pp. 3–21.
  • Brown, N. and Michael, M. (2003) A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15(1), pp. 3–18. doi: 10.1080/0953732032000046024
  • Brown, N., Rappert, B. and Webster, A. (2000) Introducing contested futures: From looking into the future to looking at the future, in: N. Brown, B. Rappert and A. Webster (Eds) Contested Futures, pp. 3–20 (Aldershot: Ashgate).
  • Callon, M. (Ed.) (1998) The Laws of the Markets (Oxford: Blackwell).
  • Cañibano, C. (2017) Scientific mobility and economic assumptions: From the allocation of scientists to the socioeconomics of network transformation, Science as Culture, 26(4).
  • Chiapello, E. (2015) Financialisation of valuation, Human Studies, 38(1), pp. 13–35. doi: 10.1007/s10746-014-9337-x
  • Coleman, R. and Tutton, R. (2017) Introduction to futures in question: Theories, methods, practices, The Sociological Review, 65(3), pp. 440–447.
  • Collard, R-C. and Dempsey, J. (2013) Life for sale? The politics of lively commodities, Environment and Planning A, 45(11), pp. 2682–2699. doi: 10.1068/a45692
  • de Saille, S. (2015) Dis-inviting the unruly public, Science as Culture, 24(1), pp. 99–107. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2014.986323
  • de Saille, S. and Medvecky, F. (2016) Innovation for a steady state: A case for responsible stagnation, Economy and Society, 45(1), pp. 1–23. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2016.1143727
  • Fuchs, M. and Schalljo, M. (2017) Global encounters challenge western rationality assumptions, Science as Culture, 26(4)
  • Fuller, S. (2016) Academic Caesar (London: Sage).
  • Geiger, R. and Sa, C. (2009) Tapping the Riches of Science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
  • Glabau, D. (2017) Conflicting assumptions: The meaning of price in the pharmaceutical economy, Science as Culture, 26(4).
  • Godin, B. (2006) The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework, Science, Technology, and Human Value, 31(6), pp. 639–667. doi: 10.1177/0162243906291865
  • Hackett, E. (1990) Science as a vocation in the 1990s: The changing organizational culture of academic science, Journal of Higher Education, 61(3), pp. 241–279.
  • Hackett, E. (2014) Editorial: Academic capitalism, Science Technology, and Human Values, 39(5), pp. 635–638. doi: 10.1177/0162243914540219
  • Harvie, D., Lightfoot, G., Lilley, S. and Weir, K. (2014) Publisher, be damned! From price gouging to the open road, Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, 31(3), pp. 229–239. doi: 10.1080/08109028.2014.891710
  • Hedgecoe, A. and Martin, P. (2003) The drugs don’t work: Expectations and the shaping of pharmacogenetics, Social Studies of Science, 33(3), pp. 327–364. doi: 10.1177/03063127030333002
  • Helgesson, C.-F. and Lee, F. (2017) Valuations as mediators between science and the market: How economic assumptions shape pharmaceutical trial designs, Science as Culture, 26(4).
  • Hess, D. (2010) Declarations of independents: On local knowledge and localist knowledge, Anthropological Quarterly, 83(1), pp. 153–176. doi: 10.1353/anq.0.0107
  • HM Treasury. (2014) Our Plan for Growth: Science and Innovation (London: HM Treasury and Department for Business, Innovation, and Skills).
  • Keen, A. (2015) The Internet is Not the Answer (New York: Atlantic Monthly Press).
  • Kleinman D. and Vallas S. (2001) Science, capitalism, and the rise of the “knowledge worker”: The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States, Theory and Society, 30, pp. 451–492. doi: 10.1023/A:1011815518959
  • Lave, R., Mirowski, P. and Randalls, S. (2010) Introduction: STS and neoliberal science, Social Studies of Science, 40(5), pp. 659–675. doi: 10.1177/0306312710378549
  • Levidow, L., Birch, K. and Papaioannou, T. (2012) Eu agri-innovation policy: Two contending visions of the knowledge-based bio-economy, Critical Policy Studies, 16(1), pp. 40–66. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2012.659881
  • Levidow, L., Papaioannou, T. and Borda-Rodriguez, A. (2013) Innovation priorities for UK bioenergy: Technological expectations within path dependence, Science & Technology Studies, 26(3), pp. 14–36.
  • Lyotard, J-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
  • MacKenzie, D. (2006) Is economics performative? Option theory and the construction of derivatives markets, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28(1), pp. 29–55. doi: 10.1080/10427710500509722
  • Mirowski, P. (2004) The scientific dimensions of social knowledge and their distant echoes in 20th-century American philosophy of science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35, pp. 283–326. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2003.11.002
  • Mirowski, P. (2011) ScienceMart (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
  • Mitchell, T. (2011) Carbon Democracy (London: Verso).
  • Morozov, E. (2013) To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism (New York: PublicAffairs).
  • Muniesa, F. (2012) A flank movement in the understanding of valuation, The Sociological Review, 59(s2), pp. 24–38.
  • Muniesa, F. (2014) The Provoked Economy (London: Routledge).
  • Muniesa, F. (2017) On the political vernaculars of value creation, Science as Culture, 26(4).
  • Oudshoorn, N. and Pinch, T. (2003) How Users Matter (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Pellizzoni, L. and Ylönen, M., (Eds) (2012) Neoliberalism and Technoscience: Critical Assessments (Farnham: Ashgate).
  • Roy, V. and King, L. (2016) Betting on hepatitis C: how financial speculation in drug development influences access to medicines, BMJ; i3718. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3718
  • Scoville, C. (2017) “We need social scientists!” The allure and assumptions of economic optimization in applied environmental science, Science as Culture, 26(4).
  • Selin, C. (2008) Sociology of the future: Tracing stories of technology and time, Sociology Compass, 2(6), pp. 1878–1895. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00147.x
  • Slaughter, S. and Rhoades, G. (2004) Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
  • Sunder Rajan, K. (2006) Biocaptial (Durham: Duke University Press).
  • Sunder Rajan, K. (Ed.) (2012) Lively Capital (Durham NC: Duke University Press).
  • Tyfield, D. (2012) The Economics of Science: A Critical Realist Overview, Volume 1 and 2, (London: Routledge).
  • Tyfield, D. (2018) Liberalism 2.0 and the Rise of China (London: Routledge).
  • Tyfield, D., Lave, R., Randalls, S. and Thorpe, C. (Eds) (2017) The Routledge Handbook of the Political Economy of Science (London: Routledge).
  • Valiverronen, E. (2004) Stories of the “medicine cow”: Representations of future promises in media discourse, Public Understanding of Science, 13, pp. 363–377. doi: 10.1177/0963662504046635
  • van Lente, H. (1993) Promising Technology—The Dynamics of Expectations in Technological Developments (Delft: Eburon).
  • van Lente, H. and Rip, A. (1998) The rise of membrane technology: From rhetorics to social reality, Social Studies of Science, 28(2), pp. 221–254. doi: 10.1177/030631298028002002
  • Welsh, I. and Wynne, B. (2013) Science, scientism and imaginaries of publics in the UK: Passive objects, incipient threats, Science as Culture, 22(4), pp. 540–566. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2013.764072
  • Wynne, B. (1988) Unruly technology: Practical rules, impractical discourses and public understanding, Social Studies of Science, 18, pp. 147–167. doi: 10.1177/030631288018001006

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.