References
- AEquitasResource (2018) April 16. Available at https://twitter.com/hashtag/backlogchat (accessed 16 April 2018).
- Anonymous (1972) The rape corroboration requirement: Repeal not reform, The Yale Law Journal, 81(7), pp. 1365–1391.
- Aronson, J. (2007) Genetic Witness: Science, law, and Controversy in the Making of DNA Profiling (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).
- Berlant, L. (2011) Cruel Optimism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).
- Bevacqua, M. (2000) Rape on the Public Agenda: Feminism and the Politics of Sexual Assault (Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press).
- Brand, N. (2018) Rape kit backlog has advocates worried about how many sex offenders are still on the streets, KREM2. April 27. Available at https://www.krem.com/article/news/investigations/rape-kit-backlog-has-advocates-worried-about-how-many-sex-offenders-are-still-on-the-streets/293-546730410 (accessed 12 May 2018).
- Brown, B., Burman, M. and Jamieson, L. (1993) Sex Crimes on Trial: The use of Sexual Evidence in Scottish Courts (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).
- CA lawmakers urge legislation to address thousands of untested rape kits (2018) SFGate, May 15. Available at https://www.sfgate.com/news/bayarea/article/Chiu-Levya-untested-rape-kits-California-bill-12917119.php (accessed 18 May 2018).
- Campbell, R., Feeney, H., Fehler-Cabral, G., Shaw, J. and Horsford, S. (2017) The national problem of untested sexual assault kits (SAKs): Scope, causes, and future directions for research, policy, and practice, Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 18(4), pp. 363–376.
- Contrera, J. (2018) Decades worth of rape kits are finally being tested. No one can agree on what to do next, The Washington Post, February 20. Available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/style/wp/2018/02/20/feature/decades-worth-of-rape-kits-are-finally-being-tested-no-one-can-agree-on-what-to-do-next/?utm_term=.2c927febaa3b (accessed 2 April 2018).
- Corrigan, R. (2013) Up Against a Wall: Rape Reform and the Failure of Success (New York: New York University Press).
- Cuyahoga County Office of the Prosecutor (2015) Cuyahoga County Sexual Assault Kit Task Force. Available at http://prosecutor.cuyahogacounty.us/en-US/DNA-cold-case-task-force.aspx (accessed 26 May 2015).
- Davis, A. (2003) Are Prisons Obsolete? (New York: Seven Stories Press).
- Doe, J. (2012) Who benefits from the sexual assault evidence kit?, in: E Sheehy (Ed) Sexual Assault Law in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women’s Activism, pp. 355–388 (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press).
- Du Mont, J., McGregor, M. J., Myhr, T. L. and Miller, K.-L. (2000) Predicting legal outcomes from medicolegal findings: An examination of sexual assault in two jurisdictions, Journal of Women’s Health and Law, 1(3), pp. 219–233.
- Du Mont, J., Miller, K.-L. and Myhr, T. (2003) The role of ‘real rape’ and ‘real victim’ stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women, Violence Against Women, 9(4), pp. 466–486.
- Du Mont, J. and White, D. (2007) The Uses and Impacts of Medico-Legal Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases: A Global Review. Sexual Violence Research Initiative. Available at http://www.svri.org/medico.pdf (accessed 1 June 2012).
- Du Mont, J., White, D. and McGregor, M. (2009) Investigating the medical forensic examination from the perspectives of sexually assaulted women, Social Science and Medicine, 68, pp. 774–780.
- Endthebacklog (2018a) Test Rape Kits. Stop Serial Rapists. Available at http://www.endthebacklog.org/backlog-why-rape-kit-testing-important/test-rape-kits-stop-serial-rapists (accessed 24 April 2018).
- Endthebacklog (2018b) Survivor’s Story: Natasha. Available at http://www.endthebacklog.org/first-person/survivor’s-story-natasha (accessed 22 April 2018).
- Endthebacklog (2018c) Federal Funding for Reform. Available at http://www.endthebacklog.org/ending-backlog-government-responses/federal-responses (accessed 22 April 2018).
- Endthebacklog (2018d) Victim Notification. Available at http://www.endthebacklog.org/information-survivors/victim-notification (accessed 22 April 2018).
- Fahrney, P. (1974) Sexual assault package: A refinement of a previous idea, Emergency Methods and Techniques, 4(4), pp. 340–341.
- Forensic Technology Center of Excellence (2014) Strengthening Forensic Science Services Through the DNA Capacity Enhancement and Backlog Reduction Program and Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grants, Final Report, Document No: 248540. Available at https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/248540.pdf (accessed 12 March 2018).
- Hilgartner, S. (2015) Capturing the imaginary: Vanguards, visions, and the synthetic biology revolution, in: S. Hilgartner, C. Miller, and R Hagendijk (Eds) Science and Democracy: Making Knowledge and Making Power in the Biosciences and Beyond, pp. 33–55 (New York: Routledge).
- Human Rights Watch (2009) Testing Justice: The Rape Kit Backlog in Los Angeles City and County (New York: Human Rights Watch).
- Human Rights Watch (2010) I Used to Think the Law Would Protect Me: Illinois’s Failure to Test Rape Kits (New York, NY: Human Rights Watch).
- I am evidence (2018) Directed by Trish Adlesic and Geeta Gandbhir [Film]. New York: HBO Documentary Films.
- Jasanoff, S. (2015a) Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity, in: S. Jasanoff and K Sang-Hyun (Eds) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, pp. 1–33 (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
- Jasanoff, S. (2015b) Imagined and invented worlds, in: S. Jasanoff and K Sang-Hyun (Eds) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, pp. 321–341 (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
- Johnson, D., Peterson, J., Sommers, I. and Baskin, D. (2012) Use of forensic science in investigating crimes of sexual violence: Contrasting its theoretical potential with empirical realities, Violence Against Women, 18(2), pp. 193–222.
- Joyful Heart Foundation (2018) What is the rape kit backlog. Available at http://www.endthebacklog.org/backlog/what-rape-kit-backlog (accessed 1 May 2018).
- Kelly, L., Temkin, J. and Griffiths, S. (2006) Section 41: An Evaluation of New Legislation Limiting Sexual History Evidence in Rape Trials. Available at http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs06/rdsolr2006.pdf (accessed 12 May 2012).
- Knecht, I. (2013) Guest Blog Ilse Knecht: How do we get justice for rape victims? Cleveland.com, August 8. Available at http://www.cleveland.com/rape-kits/index.ssf/2013/08/guest_blog_ilse_knecht_how_do.html (accessed 26 May 2015).
- Leyva, C. (2018) Leyva introduces legislation to require testing of rape kits [Press Release]. February 20. Available at http://sd20.senate.ca.gov/news/2018-02-20-leyva-introduces-legislation-require-testing-rape-kits (accessed: 28 March 2018).
- Leyva, C. (2019) Leyva Bill requiring prompt rape kit testing passes senate public safety committee. [Press Release]. March 26. Available at https://sd20.senate.ca.gov/news/2019-03-26-leyva-bill-requiring-prompt-rape-kit-testing-passes-senate-public-safety-committee.
- Ludwig, F. (1970) The case for repeal of the sex corroboration requirement in New York, Brooklyn Law Review, 36, pp. 1365–1378.
- Lynch, M., Cole, S., McNally, R. and Jordan, K. (2008) Truth Machine: The Contentious History of DNA Fingerprinting (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
- Maloney, C. (2003a) Rape in NYC stopped by DNA [Press Release]. May 14. Available at https://maloney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rape-nyc-stopped-dna (accessed 14 May 2015).
- Maloney, C. (2003b) The Debbie Smith Act will [Press Release]. March 4. Available at https://maloney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/debbie-smith-act-will (accessed 12 May 2015).
- Maloney, C. (2014) Rep. Maloney announces effort to reduce dangerous national rape kit backlog [Press Release]. January 11. Available at http://maloney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-maloney-announces-effort-to-reduce-dangerous-national-rape-kit (accessed 1 May 2017).
- Maloney, C. (2017) Maloney on passage of SAFER Act of 2017. Available at https://maloney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/maloney-on-passage-of-safer-act-of-2017 (accessed 2 May 2018).
- Mariska Hargitay hits the table (2018) The View, Series 21, episode 76 ABC, April.
- Morgan, R. and Kena, G. (2017) Criminal Victimization, 2016 (NCJ 251150), U.S. Department of Justice.
- Mulla, S. (2014) The Violence of Care: Rape Victims, Forensic Nurses, and Sexual Assault Intervention (New York: New York University Press).
- Natasha’s Justice Project (2018a) April 16. Available at https://twitter.com/hashtag/backlogchat (accessed 16 April 2018).
- Natasha’s Justice Project (2018b) Natasha’s story. Available at https://natashasjusticeproject.org/natasha/ (accessed 16 April 2018).
- National Alliance to End Sexual Violence (2014) 2014 Rape Crisis Centre Survey. Available at http://endsexualviolence.org/files/NAESV2014RapeCrisisCenter SurveyFinal.pdf (accessed 16 May 2017).
- National Center for Victims of Crime (2011) About backlogs and untested kits. Available at https://members.victimsofcrime.org/our-programs/past-programs/dna-resource-center/untested-sexual-assault-kits/about-backlogs-and-untested-kits (accessed 12 April 2018).
- National Center for Victims of Crime (2012) Sexual assault kit backlogs: Survivor perspectives. Available at https://victimsofcrime.org/our-programs/dna-resource-center/untested-sexual-assault-kits/backlog-resources (accessed 16 May 2017).
- National Center for Victims of Crime (2014) Serial offending and the testing of rape kits. Available at http://victimsofcrime.org/top-links/events/2014/01/14/default-calendar/serial-offending-and-the-testing-of-rape-kits (accessed 16 May 2017).
- National Institute of Justice (2011) Report to the Attorney General on Delays in Forensic DNA Analysis (Report No. NCJ 199425) (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice).
- National Institute of Justice (2018) Sexual Assault Kits: Using Science to Find Solutions. Available at https://nij.gov/unsubmitted-kits/Pages/default.aspx (accessed 12 April 2018).
- New York County District Attorney's Office (2015) District Attorney Vance launches formal application process for $35 million rape kit testing initiative [Press release]. April 1. Available at http://manhattanda.org/press-release/district-attorney-vance-launches-formal-application-process-35-million-rape-kit-testin (accessed 12 May 2017).
- Patterson, D. and Campbell, R. (2012) The problem of untested sexual assault kits: Why are some kits never submitted to the crime laboratory?, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(11), pp. 2259–2275.
- Price, J., Gifford, J. and Summers, H. (2010) Forensic sexual abuse examination, Pediatrics and Child Health, 20(12), pp. 549–555.
- Quinlan, A. (2017) The Technoscientific Witness of Rape: Contentious Histories of Law, Feminism, and Forensic Science (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).
- Quinlan, A. (2019) Visions of public safety, justice and healing: The making of the rape kit backlog in the United States, Social & Legal Studies, 29(2), pp. 225–245.
- RAINN (2018) April 16. Available at https://twitter.com/hashtag/backlogchat (accessed 16 April 2018).
- Rawlings, N. (2011) Inside the sex-crimes unit prosecuting DSK, Time, June 22. Available at http://content.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,2079068,00.html (accessed 26 June 2015).
- Rees, G. (2010) ‘It is not for me to say whether consent was given or not’: Forensic medical examiners’ construction of ‘neutral reports’ in rape cases, Social & Legal, 19(3), pp. 371–386.
- Simon, S. (2018) How law and order: SVU inspired Mariska Hargitay to get justice for rape victims in real life, In Style, April 16. Available at http://www.instyle.com/celebrity/mariska-hargitay-sexual-assault-law-and-order-svu (accessed 1 May 2018).
- Strom, K., Ropero-Miller, J., Jones, S., Sikes, N., Pope, M. and Horstmann, N. (2009) The 2007 survey of law enforcement forensic evidence processing. Report prepared for U.S. Department of Justice. Report no. 228415. Available at https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/228415.pdf (accessed 1 May 2017).
- Strom, K. and Hickman, M. (2016) Untested sexual assault kits: Searching for an empirical foundation to guide forensic case processing decisions, Criminology & Public Policy, 15(2), pp. 593–601.
- Temkin, J. (1998) Medical evidence in rape cases: A continuing problem for criminal justice, Modern Law Review, 61, pp. 821–848.
- Temkin, J. (2005) Rape and the Legal Process (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
- Tofte, S. (2018) Interview with Linda Fairstein: Part 2. Available at http://www.endthebacklog.org/blog/interview-linda-fairstein-part-2 (accessed 26 April 2018).
- United States Department of Justice (2016) FY 2016 Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence-Inventory, Tracking, and Reporting Program (SAFE-ITR). Available at https://nij.gov/funding/Documents/solicitations/NIJ-2016-9088.pdf (accessed 6 April 2018).
- United States Government Accountability Office (2013) Justice Grant Programs: DOJ Could Improve Decision-Making Documentation and Better Assess Results of DNA Backlog Reduction Program Funds (Report GAO-13-605). Available at https://www.gao.gov/assets/660/656454.pdf (accessed 16 May 2015).
- Wein, L. (2018) The rape kit backlog: A problem we can’t afford to ignore (opinion), CNN, March 2. Available at https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/22/opinions/rape-kits-should-be-tested-says-research-wein/index.html (accessed 2 April 2018).
- White, D. and Du Mont, J. (2009) Visualizing sexual assault: An exploration of the use of optical technologies in the medico-legal context, Social Science and Medicine, 68, pp. 1–8.
- Wickenheiser, R. A. (2004) The business case for using forensic DNA technology to solve and prevent crime, Journal of Biolaw and Business, 7(3), pp. 34–50.
- Younger, I. (1971) The requirement of corroboration in prosecutions for sex offenses in New York, Fordham Law Review, 40(2), pp. 263–278.
- Yung, C. R. (2017) Rap law gatekeeping, Boston College Law Review, 58, pp. 206–256.