Between People and Paper: Inhabiting Experiment in a Journal Club

References

• Alač, M. (2011) Handling Digital Brains: A Laboratory Study of Multimodal Semiotic Interaction in the Age of Computers (Cambridge: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Devezer, B., Nardin, L. G., Baumgaertner, B. and Buzbas, E. O. (2019) Scientific discovery in a model-centric framework: Reproducibility, innovation, and epistemic diversity, PloS one, 14(5), pp. e0216125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2016) Perspective: Science is still too closed, Nature, 533(7602), pp. S70–S70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M. and Livingston, E. (1981) I. 1 The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11(2), pp. 131–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golde, C. (2007) Signature pedagogies in doctoral education: Are they adaptable for the preparation of education researchers?, Educational Researcher, 36(6), pp. 344–351.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994) Professional vision, American Anthropologist, 96(3), pp. 606–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2013) The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge, Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), pp. 8–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiffenhagen, C. and Sharrock, W. (2011) Does mathematics look certain in the front, but fallible in the back?, Social Studies of Science, 41(6), pp. 839–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, O. and Martin, A. E. (2021, January) How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science, Perspectives on Psychological Science, doi:10.1177/1745691620970585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heering, P. (2008) The enlightened microscope: Re-enactment and analysis of projections with eighteenth-century solar microscopes, The British Journal for the History of Science, 41(3), pp. 345–367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heering, P. (2010) An Experimenter's Gotta do what an Experimenter's Gotta Do—But How?, Isis, 101(4), pp. 794–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J. and Heath, C. (2002) Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction, Journal of Pragmatics, 32(12), pp. 1855–1878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, J., Repp, B. and Patel, A. (2009) Top-down control of rhythm perception modulates early auditory responses, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169(1), pp. 58–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction, in: G. Lerner (Eds) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, Amsterdam, pp. 13–31 (Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company).
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, C. A., Gorodnitsky, I. F. and Kutas, M. (2004 March) Automatic removal of eye movement and blink artifacts from EEG data using blind component separation, Psychophysiology, 41(2), pp. 313–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, S. (2014) Don't blink: performing experimental time in the brain laboratory, Performance Research, 19(3), pp. 88–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1986) Visualization and cognition, Knowledge and Society, 6(1), pp. 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Beverly Hills: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, E. (1995) An Anthropology of Reading (Bloomington Indiana University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (1985) Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (2011) Harold Garfinkel (29 October 1917–21 April 2011): A remembrance and reminder, Social Studies of Science, 41(6), pp. 927–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meskus, M., Marelli, L. and D’Agostino, G. (2018) Research misconduct in the age of open science: The case of STAP stem cells, Science as Culture, 27(1), pp. 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. (2018) The future (s) of open science, Social Studies of Science, 48(2), pp. 171–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2019. Conventions for Multimodal Transcription. v 5.0.1. Last accessed at https://www.lorenzamondada.net/multimodal-transcription.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018) Open Science by Design: Realizing a Vision for 21st Century Research (Washington DC: The National Academies Press).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, N. C. (2021) Understand the real reasons reproducibility reform fails, Nature, 600(7888), pp. 191–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, N. C., Chung, J., Ichikawa, K. and Malik, M. M. (2021) Psychology exceptionalism and the multiple discovery of the replication crisis, Review of General Psychology, 26(2), pp. 184–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C. and Mellor, D. T. (2018) The preregistration revolution, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), pp. 2600–2606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., Gonzales, P. and Jacoby, S. (1996) "When I come down I'm in the domain state": Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists, Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, 13, pp. 328–369.
   Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration. (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science, Science, 349, pp. 6251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penders, B., Holbrook, J. B. and De Rijcke, S. (2019) Rinse and repeat: Understanding the value of replication across different ways of knowing, Publications, 7(3), pp. 52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, D. and Panofsky, A. (2021) Self-correction in science: The diagnostic and integrative motives for replication, Social Studies of Science, 03063127211005551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, D. and Panofsky, A. 2020. Metascience as a scientific social movement.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, P., de Haan, R., Wareham, T. and van Rooij, I. 2021. How hard is cognitive science?
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W. (2010) An anthropology of reading science texts in online media, Semiotica, 2010(182), pp. 409–442.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (1985) Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (2005) Signature pedagogies in the professions, Daedalus, 134(3), pp. 52–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazire, S. December 23, 2019. Do we want to be credible or incredible? APS observer. Available at https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/do-we-want-to-be-credible-or-incredible (accessed 18 August 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Vertesi, J. (2015) Seeing Like a Rover: How Robots, Teams and Images Craft Knowledge of Mars (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, K. and Guest, O. (2020) # bropenscience is broken science: Kirstie Whitaker and Olivia Guest ask how open ‘open science’really is, The Psychologist, 33, pp. 34–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wundt, W. (1897) Outlines of Psychology. Translated by Charles Hubbard Judd (Leipzig, London, NY: Wilhelm Englemann).
   Google Scholar