Conscious, Complacent, Fearful: Agri-Food Tech’s Market-Making Public Imaginaries

References

• AgFunder. 2019. Agtech investing report - 2019. Available at: https://agfunder.com/research/agfunder-agrifood-tech-investing-report-2019/. (accessed 25 August 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (2016) Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Berenstein, N. 2018. Clean label’s dirty little secret. The Counter. (accessed 10 August 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Broad, G. (2020a) Making meat, better: The metaphors of plant-based and cell-based meat innovation, Environmental Communication, 14(7), pp. 919–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broad, G. M. (2020b) Know your indoor farmer: Square roots, techno-local food, and transparency as publicity, American Behavioral Scientist, 64(11), pp. 1588–1606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, C. and Barnett, J. (2020) Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: An updated review (2018–2020), Applied Sciences, 10(15), p. 5201.
   Google Scholar
• Burri, R. V. (2015) Imaginaries of science and society: Framing nanotechnology governance in Germany and the United States, in: S Jasanoff, and S-H Kim (Eds) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, pp. 233–253 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Chiles, R. M. (2013a) If they come, we will build it: In vitro meat and the discursive struggle over future agrofood expectations, Agriculture and Human Values, 30(4), pp. 511–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiles, R. M. (2013b) Intertwined ambiguities: meat, in vitro meat, and the ideological construction of the marketplace, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12(6), pp. 472–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, E., Glaros, A., Ross, D. Z. and Nost, E. (2021) New but for whom? discourses of innovation in precision agriculture, Agriculture and Human Values, 38, pp. 1181–1199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fairbairn, M., Kish, Z. and Guthman, J. (forthcoming) Pitching agri-food tech: Performativity and non-disruptive disruption in Silicon valley, Journal of Cultural Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J. (2018) Planetary Improvement: Cleantech Entrepreneurship and the Contradictions of Green Capitalism (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Guthman, J. and Biltekoff, C. (2021) Magical disruption? Alternative protein and the promise of de-materialization, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(4), pp. 1583–1600.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, C. and Siegrist, M. (2017) Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption: A systematic review, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 61, pp. 11–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huesemann, M. and Huesemann, J. (2011) Techno-fix: Why Technology Won't Save Us or the Environment (Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2015) Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity, in: S Jasanoff, and S-H Kim (Eds) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, pp. 1–33 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, F. (2020) Eating the world: Iterative capital after silicon valley, PhD Dissertation, Department of Philosophy, New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, S. F. (2018) Alvin Weinberg and the promotion of the technological fix, Technology and Culture, 59(3), pp. 620–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, E. (2016) Benevolent technotopias and hitherto unimaginable meats: Tracing the promises of in vitro meat, Social Studies of Science, 46(5), pp. 725–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, E. (2020) On breweries and bioreactors: Probing the “present futures” of cellular agriculture, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 45(4), pp. 921–936.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, E., Linné, T. and McCrow-Young, A. (2019) Many meats and many milks? The ontological politics of a proposed post-animal revolution, Science as Culture, 28(1), pp. 70–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kite-Powell, J. 2020. The forward march of ag-tech during a pandemic. Forbes. (accessed 6 November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, P., Phillipson, J. and Lee, R. P. (2008) Socio-technical innovation for sustainable food chains: roles for social science, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 19(5), pp. 226–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marris, C. (2001) Public views on gmos: Deconstructing the myths: Stakeholders in the GMO debate often describe public opinion as irrational. But do they really understand the public?, EMBO Reports, 2(7), pp. 545–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marris, C. (2015) The construction of imaginaries of the public as a threat to synthetic biology, Science as Culture, 24(1), pp. 83–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, J. (2013) Meet shmeat: Food system ethics, biotechnology and re-worlding technoscience, Parallax , 19(1), pp. 74–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2013) To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism, and the Urge to Fix Problems That Don’t Exist (London: Penguin).
   Google Scholar
• Mouat, M. J. and Prince, R. (2018) Cultured meat and cowless milk: On making markets for animal-free food, Journal of Cultural Economy, 11(4), pp. 315–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hara, M. (2020) The Code: Silicon Valley and the Remaking of America (New York: Penguin).
   Google Scholar
• Onwezen, M. C., Bouwman, E. P., Reinders, M. J. and Dagevos, H. (2021) A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat, Appetite, 159, pp. 105058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan, K. S. (2006) Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life (Raleigh, NC: Duke University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Russell, A. L. and Vinsel, L. (2018) After innovation, turn to maintenance, Technology and Culture, 59(1), pp. 1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubarth, C. 2019. Bay Area retained venture funding dominance in 2019. Silicon Valley Business Journal. (accessed 6 November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzkopf, S. (2011) The political theology of consumer sovereignty: Towards an ontology of consumer society, Theory, Culture & Society, 28(3), pp. 106–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, H. P. (2017) Practical utopias: America as techno-fix nation, Utopian Studies, 28(2), pp. 231–246.
   Google Scholar
• Sexton, A. (2016) Alternative proteins and the (non) stuff of “meat”, Gastronomica, 16(3), pp. 66–78.
   Google Scholar
• Sexton, A. E. (2018) Eating for the post-anthropocene: Alternative proteins and the biopolitics of edibility, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 43(4), pp. 586–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton, A. E. (2020) Food as software: Place, protein, and feeding the world silicon valley–style, Economic Geography, 96(5), pp. 449–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton, A. E., Garnett, T. and Lorimer, J. (2019) Framing the future of food: The contested promises of alternative proteins, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 2(1), pp. 47–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephens, N., Di Silvio, L., Dunsford, I., Ellis, M., Glencross, A. and Sexton, A. (2018) Bringing cultured meat to market: Technical, socio-political, and regulatory challenges in cellular agriculture, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 78, pp. 155–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, N. and Ruivenkamp, M. (2016) Promise and ontological ambiguity in the in vitro meat imagescape: From laboratory myotubes to the cultured burger, Science as Culture, 25(3), pp. 327–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, P. V., Phillips, C., Campbell, H. and Murcott, A. (2016) Eating the unthinkable: The case of ento, eating insects and bioeconomic experimentation, in: Le Heron R, H Campbell, N Lewis, et al. (Eds) Biological Economies, pp. 157–169 (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Turner, F. (2006) From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism (Chicago: Chicago University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. A. (2018) Pictures of a Gone City: Tech and the Dark Side of Prosperity in the San Francisco Bay Area (Oakland, CA: PM Press).
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, I. and Wynne, B. (2013) Science, scientism and imaginaries of publics in the UK: Passive objects, incipient threats, Science as Culture, 22(4), pp. 540–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurgaft, B. (2019) Meat Planet: Artificial Flesh and the Future of Food (Oakland, CA: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1992) Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science, Public Understanding of Science, 1(3), pp. 281–304.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (2005) Risk as globalising” democratic” discourse? Framing subjects and citizens, in: M Leach, I Scoones, and B Wynne (Eds) Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement. London, pp. 66–82 (London: Zed Books).
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (2006) Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science–hitting the notes, but missing the music?, Public Health Genomics, 9(3), pp. 211–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar