Evaluation of the optimal strength and ductility of a mild steel arc welded plate based on the weld design

References

• Sada SO, Achebo J. Optimization and prediction of the weld bead geometry of a mild steel MIG weld. Adv Mater Process Tech. 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2020.1860597
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed KH, Abdul L, Mohd J, et al. Influence of welding speed on tensile strength of welded joint in TIG welding process. Int J Appl Eng Res. 2010;1:3.
   Google Scholar
• Gadewar SP, Swaminadhan P, Harkare MG, et al. Experimental investigation of weld characteristics for a single pass TIG welding with SS304. Int J Eng Sci Technol. 2010;2(8):3676–3686.
   Google Scholar
• Ghazali FA, Salleh Z, Manurung YHP, et al. Three response optimization of spot-welded joint using taguchi design and response surface methodology techniques. In: Awang M, editor. The advances in joining technology, lecture notes in mechanical engineering; 2019. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9041-7_7.
   Google Scholar
• Benyounis KY, Olabi AG, Hashmi MS. Effect of laser welding parameters on the heat input and weld-bead profile. J Mater Process Technol. 2005;164–165C:971–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti AA, Barsoum Z, Van Dermee V, et al. Fatigue strength improvement of welded structures using new low transformation temperature filler materials. Procedia Eng. 2013;66C:192–201.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatti AA, Barsoum Z, Murakawa H, et al. Influence of thermo-mechanical material properties of different steel grades on welding residual stresses and angular distortion. J Mater Des. 2015;65:878–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsoum Z, Jonsson B. Influence of weld quality on the fatigue strength in seam welds. Eng Fail Anal. 2011;18:971–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas DJ. Analyzing the failure of welded steel components in construction systems. J Fail Anal Preven. 2018;18:304–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller Duane K. Designing welded lap joints. Weld Innovation. 2001;XVIII(3).
   Google Scholar
• Svensson LE. Consumables for welding high-strength steels. Svetsaren. 1999;54(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Widgery DJ, Karlsson L, Murugananth M, et al. Approaches to the development of high strength weld metals. 2nd Int. Symposium on High Strength Steel; Norway; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Park SH, Kwon HS, et al. Laser, tungsten inert gas, and metal active gas welding of DP780 steel: comparison of hardness, tensile properties and fatigue resistance. Mater Des. 2014;64:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juang SC, Tarng YS. Process parameters selection for optimizing the weld pool geometry in the tig welding of stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol. 2002;122:33–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhavsar AN, Patel V. Influence of process parameters of TIG welding process on mechanical properties of SS304L welded joint. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2016;3(5):977–984.
   Google Scholar
• Nnuka EE, Okonji PO. Effect of welding current and filler metal types on percent elongation of GTAW austenitic stainless steel weld joints. Eur J Mater Sci. 2015;2(1):26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Jaya RR. A simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems. Int J Ind Eng Comput. 2016;7(1):19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Chastel Y, Passemard L. Joining technologies for future automobile multi-material modules. Procedia Eng. 2014;81:2104–2110.
   Google Scholar
• Sada SO. Parametric optimization of weld reinforcements using response surface methodology optimization process. J Appl Sci Environ Manage. 2018a;22(8):1331–1335.
   Google Scholar
• Gunaraj V, Murugan N. Application of response surface methodology for predicting weld bead quality in submerged arc welding of pipes. J Mater Process Technol. 1999;88(1):266–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand K, Elangovan S. Optimizing the ultrasonic inserting parameters to achieve maximum pulleout strength using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm integration technique. Measurement. 2017;99(1):45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Correia DS, Sebastião GC, Junior SC, et al. GMAW welding optimization using genetic algorithms. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2004;XXVI:1/28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Sada SO. The use of multi-objective genetic algorithm (Moga) in optimizing and predicting weld quality. Cogent Eng. 2020;7(1):1741310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhary A, Kumar M, Unune DR. Experimental investigation and optimization of weld bead characteristics during submerged arc welding. Def Technol. 2019;15:72–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sada SO. Optimization of weld strength properties of tungsten inert gas mild steel welds using the response surface methodolo-gy. Nigeria J Technol. 2018b;37(2):407–415.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng XM, Lucas J, Fang MTC. Use of neural networks for parameter prediction and quality inspection in tungsten inert gas welding. Trans Inst Meas Control. 1993;15(2):87–95.
   Google Scholar