Application of response surface methodology and genetic algorithm in the prediction and optimization of the ductile properties of mild steel weld

References

• Allison A, Scudamore R. Strategic research agenda: joining: joining sub-platform. SRA; 2014. www.joining-platform.com.
   Google Scholar
• Chastel Y, Passemard L. Joining technologies for future automobile multi-material modules. 11th international conference on technology of plasticity, ICTP. Procedia Eng. 2014;81:2104–2110. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.293
   Google Scholar
• Guo ZG, Ma TJ, Yang XW, et al. Vairis, in-situ investigation on dislocation slip concentrated fracture mechanism of linear friction welded dissimilar Ti17(α + β)/Ti17(β) titanium alloy joint. Mater Sci Eng A. 2023;872:144991. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2023.144991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Z, Ma T, Yang X, et al. Multi-scale analyses of phase transformation mechanisms and hardness in linear friction welded Ti17(α + β)/Ti17(β) dissimilar titanium alloy joint. Chin J Aeronaut. 2023;(Online). doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2023.08.018
   Google Scholar
• Wahab MA. Manual metal arc welding and gas metal arc welding. In: Hashmi S, editor. Comprehensive materials processing. 1st Edition, vol. 6. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science and Technology: 2014. p. 60–63.
   Google Scholar
• Groover MP. Fundamentals of modern manufacturing: materials, processes, and systems. Third Ed. New York: Wiley, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien RL. Welding processes, vol. 2 of welding handbook. 8th Ed. Miami: American Welding Society; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Benyounis KY, Olabi AG, Hashmi MSJ. Effect of laser welding parameters on the heat input and weld bead profile. J Mater Process Tech. 2005164–165:978–985. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benyounis KY, Olabi AG. Optimization of different welding processes using statistical and numerical approaches – a reference guide. Adv Eng Softw. 2008;39(6):483–496. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2007.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giridharan PK, Murugan N. Optimization of pulsed GTA welding process parameters for the welding of AISI 304 L stainless steel sheets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2009;40(5–6):478–489. doi: 10.1007/s00170-008-1373-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang KS, Jung DH, Park C, et al. Effect of welding parameters on tensile strength on weld metal flux cored welding. Sci Tech Weld Join. 2008;13(6):508–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sada SO. Modeling performance of response surface methodology and artificial neural network. J Appl Sci Environ Manage. 2018;22(6):875–881. doi: 10.4314/jasem.v22i6.6
   Google Scholar
• Murugan N, Parmar RS. Effects of MIG process parameters on the geometry of the bead in the automatic surfacing of stainless steel. J of Material Processing Techn. 1994;41(4):381–398. doi: 10.1016/0924-0136(94)90003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu S, Xiawei Y, Dong W, et al. Controlling deformation and residual stresses in a TIG joint for invar steel molds. J Mater Res Technol. 2023;27:490–507.
   Google Scholar
• Yu S, Xiawei Y, Dong W, et al. Optimizing welding sequence of TIG cross-joint of invar steel using residual stresses and deformations. J Manuf Processes. 2023;105:232–245. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.09.047
   Google Scholar
• Talabi SI, Owolabi OB, Adebisi JA, et al. Effect of welding variable variables on mechanical properties of low carbon steel welded joint. Adv Produc Engineer Manag. 2014;9(4):181–186. doi: 10.14743/apem2014.4.186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordin MY, Venkatesh VC, Sharif S, et al. Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning A1511045 steel. J Mater Process Tech. 2004;145(1):46–58. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00861-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modenesi PJ, Avelar RC. The influence of small variations of wire characteristics on gas metal arc welding process stability. J Mater Process Tech. 1999;86(1–3):226–232. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00315-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sada SO. The use of multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) in optimizing and predicting weld quality. Cogent Eng. 2020;7(1):1741310. doi: 10.1080/23311916.2020.1741310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb K, Anand A, Joshi D. A computationally efficient evolutionary algorithm for real-parameter optimization. Evol Comput. 2002;10(4):371–395. doi: 10.1162/106365602760972767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen K, Cook GE, Karsai G, et al. Artificial neural networks applied to arc welding process modeling and control. IEEE Trans on Ind Applicat. 1990;26(5):824–830. doi: 10.1109/28.60056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chokkalingham S, Chandrasekhar N, Vasudevan M. Predicting the depth of penetration and weld bead width from the infra-red thermal image of the weld pool using artificial neural network modeling. J Intell Manuf. 2012;23(5):1995–2001. doi: 10.1007/s10845-011-0526-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanti KM, Rao PS. Prediction of bead geometry in pulsed GMA welding using back propagation neural network. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;200(1):300–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagesh D, Datta G. Genetic algorithm for optimization of welding variables for height to width ratio and application of ANN for prediction of bead geometry for TIG welding process. Appl Soft Comput. 2010;10(3):897–907. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2009.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkas N, Karayel D, Ozkan SS, et al. Modeling and analysis of the weld bead geometry in submerged arc welding by using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Math. Problems Eng. 2013;2013:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2013/473495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Mukherjee S, Chattopadhyaya S, et al. Weld bead parametric estimation of SAW process through neural network. IWJ. 2007;40(4):33. doi: 10.22486/iwj.v40i4.178436
   Google Scholar
• Li P, Fang MTC, Lucas J. Modelling of submerged arc weld beads using self-adaptive offset neutral networks. J Mater Process Tech. 1997;71(2):288–298. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00087-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohandas T, Madhusudhan RG, Naveed MA. Comparative evaluation of gas tungsten and shielded metal arc welds of a stainless steel. J Mater Process Tech. 1999;94(2–3):133–140. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00092-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim IS, Son JS, Park CE, et al. An investigation into an intelligent system for predicting bead geometry in GMA welding process. J Mat Proc Tech. 2005;159(1):113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharath P, Sridhar VG, Kumar MS. Optimization of 316 stainless steel weld joint characteristics using taguchi technique. 12th global congress on manufacturing and management, GCMM. Procedia Eng. 2014;97:881–891. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.363
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh N, Pal PK, Nandi G. Parametric optimization of MIG welding on 316L austenitic stainless steel by grey-based taguchi method. Global colloquium in recent adv. and effectual researches in eng, science and tech. Procedia Tech. 2016;25:1038–1048. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.204
   Google Scholar
• Sada SO. Optimization of weld strength properties of tungsten inert gas mild steel welds using the response surface methodology. Nig J Tech. 2018;37(2):407–415. doi: 10.4314/njt.v37i2.15
   Google Scholar
• Juang SC, Tarng YS. Process parameters selection for optimizing the weld pool geometry in the tungsten inert gas welding of stainless steel. J Mat Process Tech. 2002;122(1):33–37. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00021-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. Eighth ed. New York: Wiley; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Sada SO. Parametric optimization of weld reinforcements using response surface methodology optimization process. J Appl Sci Environ Manage. 2018;22(8):1331–1335. doi: 10.4314/jasem.v22i8.31
   Google Scholar
• Rao RV. Jaya: a simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems. Int J Ind Eng Comput. 2016;7(1):19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Sada SO, Achebo J. Optimization and prediction of the weld bead geometry of a mild steel metal inert gas weld. Adv Mater Process Technolog. 2020;8(2):1625–1634. doi: 10.1080/2374068X.2020.1860597
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Chandna P, Bhushan G. Prediction and optimization of work piece temperature during 2.5-D milling of inconel 625 using regression and genetic algorithm. Cogent Eng. 2020;7(1):1731199. doi: 10.1080/23311916.2020.1731199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Hynes NRJ. Prediction and optimization of surface roughness in thermal drilling using integrated ANFIS and GA approach. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 2020;23(1):30–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2019.04.011
   Google Scholar
• Sada SO, Achebo J, Obahiagbon K. Evaluation of the optimal strength and ductility of a mild steel arc welded plate based on the weld design. Weld Int. 2021;35(7-9):261–268. doi: 10.1080/09507116.2021.198784
   Google Scholar
• Sada SO, Achebo J. Optimization of the ductile properties of an arc welded plate based on the yield strength, elongation, and modulus of elasticity. J Optim Indust Eng. 2021;14(1):159–167.
   Google Scholar