Towards the development of semantically enabled flexible process monitoring systems

References

• Agyapong-Kodua, K., R. Darlington, and S. Ratchev. 2013. “Towards the Derivation of an Integrated Design and Manufacturing Methodology.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 26 (6): 527–539. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2012.749528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baader, F., S. Ghilardi, and C. Lutz. 2008. “LTL over Description Logic Axioms.” In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2008), edited by G. Brewka and J. Lang, 684–694. Sydney: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batsakis, S., K. Stravoskoufos, and E. G. M. Petrakis. 2011. “Temporal Reasoning for Supporting Temporal Queries in OWL 2.0.” In Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, 558–567. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, J., J. Cortadella, and M. Kishinevsky. 2008. “A Region-Based Algorithm for Discovering Petri Nets from Event Logs.” In Business Process Management, edited by M. Dumas, M. Reichert, and M.-C. Shan, 358–373. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., and C. Nugent. 2009. “Ontology-Based Activity Recognition in Intelligent Pervasive Environments.” International Journal of Web Information Systems 5 (4): 410–430. doi:10.1108/17440080911006199.
   Google Scholar
• Chesani, F., E. Lamma, P. Mello, M. Montali, F. Riguzzi, and S. Storari. 2009. “Exploiting Inductive Logic Programming Techniques for Declarative Process Mining.” In Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency II, edited by K. Jensen and W. M. P. van der Aalst, 278–295. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• COIN. 2009. “Grant Agreement for Collaborative Project, FP7 IP 216256 – COIN Large-Scale Integrating Project.” Annex I – Description of Work.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, A. J., and A. Coles. 2011. “LPRPG-P: Relaxed Plan Heuristics for Planning with Preferences.” Twenty First International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS-11), June, 26–33. AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cortadella, J., M. Kishinevsky, L. Lavagno, and A. Yakovlev. 1998. “Deriving Petri Nets from Finite Transition Systems.” IEEE Transactions on Computers 47 (8): 859–882. doi:10.1109/12.707587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumitrache, I., S. I. Caramihai, and A. Stanescu. 2013. “From Mass Production to Intelligent Cyber-Enterprise Published in: Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS).” 2013 19th International Conference on, Bucharest, May 29–31, 399–404. ISBN: 978-1-4673-6140-8.
   Google Scholar
• Günther, C. W., A. Rozinat, and W. M. van der Aalst. 2010, January. “Activity Mining by Global Trace Segmentation.” In Business Process Management Workshops, edited by S. Rinderle-Ma, S. Sadiq, and F. Leymann, 128–139. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hepp, M., and D. Roman. 2007. “An Ontology Framework for Semantic Business Process Management.” Wirtschaftinformatik Proceedings 2007: 27.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, N., G. Englebienne, Z. Lou, and B. Kröse. 2014. “Learning Latent Structure for Activity Recognition.” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, May 31–June 7.
   Google Scholar
• Maggi, F. M., R. J. C. Bose, and W. M. van der Aalst. 2012, January. “Efficient Discovery of Understandable Declarative Process Models from Event Logs.” In Advanced Information Systems Engineering. edited by J. Ralyté, X. Franch, S. Brinkkemper, and S. Wrycza, 270–285. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Medini, K., and J. P. Bourey. 2012. “SCOR-Based Enterprise Architecture Methodology.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 25 (7): 594–607. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2011.646312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meditskos, G., S. Dasiopoulou, V. Efstathiou, and I. Kompatsiaris. 2013, March. “SP-ACT: A Hybrid Framework for Complex Activity Recognition Combining OWL and SPARQL Rules.” In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 25–30. San Diego, CA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Milea, V., F. Frasincar, U. Kaymak, and T. Noia. 2007. “An Owl-Based Approach Towards Representing Time in Web Information Systems.” In 4th International Workshop of Web Information Systems Modeling (WISM 2007), 791–802. Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moisescu, M. A., I. S. Sacala, A. M. Stanescu, and C. Serbanescu. 2012. “Towards Integration of Knowledge Extraction Form Process Interoperability in Future Internet Enterprise Systems, 2012/5/23.” Information Control Problems in Manufacturing 14 (1): 1458–1463.
   Google Scholar
• Morariu, V. I., and L. S. Davis. 2011, June. “Multi-Agent Event Recognition in Structured Scenarios.” In 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Providence, RI, June, 3289–3296. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavan, S., and R. J. Mooney. 2011. “Abductive Plan Recognition by Extending Bayesian Logic Programs.” In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, edited by D. Gunopulos, T. Hofmann, D. Malerba, and M. Vazirgiannis, 629–644. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sacala, I. S., M. A. Moisescu, and D. Repta. 2013. “Towards the Development of the Future Internet Based Enterprise in the Context of Cyber-Physical Systems.” In 2013 19th International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS), edited by I. Dumitrache and A. Florea, Bucharest, May 29–31, 405–412. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Sheikhalishahi, M. 2014. “An Integrated Simulation-Data Envelopment Analysis Approach for Maintenance Activities Planning.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 27 (9): 858–868. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2013.869832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singla, P., and R. J. Mooney. 2011, April. “Abductive Markov Logic for Plan Recognition.” Twenty-Fifth Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-11), San Francisco, CA, August 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sitek, P., S. Gusmeroli, M. Conte, K. Jansson, and I. Karvonen, eds. 2011. The COIN Book Enterprise Collaboration and Interoperability. Aachen: Verlagsgruppe Mainz GmbH Aachen. ISBN 3-86130-713-8. http://www.biba.uni-bremen.de/fileadmin/IKAP/BIBA71-TheCoinBook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stegaru, G., C. Danila, I. S. Sacala, M. A. Moisescu, and A. M. Stanescu 2014. “E-Services Quality Assessment Framework for Collaborative Networks.” Journal of Enterprise Information Systems 9 (5–6): 583–606. doi:10.1080/17517575.2013.879213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, A., C. J. Turner, and B. Majeed. 2008. “A Review of Business Process Mining: State-of-the-Art and Future Trends.” Business Process Management Journal 14 (1): 5–22. doi:10.1108/14637150810849373.
   Google Scholar
• Vail, D. L., M. M. Veloso, and J. D. Lafferty. 2007, May. “Conditional Random Fields for Activity Recognition.” In Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Honolulu, HI, May 14–18, 235. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W. 2012. “Process Mining: Overview and Opportunities.” ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS) 3 (2): 7.
   Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W. M., M. Pesic, and H. Schonenberg. 2009. “Declarative Workflows: Balancing between Flexibility and Support.” Computer Science-Research and Development 23 (2): 99–113. doi:10.1007/s00450-009-0057-9.
   Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W. M., V. Rubin, B. F. van Dongen, E. Kindler, and C. W. Günther. 2006. “Process Mining: A Two-Step Approach Using Transition Systems and Regions.” BPM Center Report BPM-06-30. BPMcenter.org. http://eblab.im.ntust.edu.tw/cht/Research%20Pro/Process%20Mining/Algorithms/%5BProcess%20Mining%5D%20A%20Two-Step%20Approach%20using%20Transition%20Systems%20and%20Regions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W. M., V. Rubin, H. M. W. Verbeek, B. F. van Dongen, E. Kindler, and C. W. Günther. 2010. “Process Mining: A Two-Step Approach to Balance between Underfitting and Overfitting.” Software & Systems Modeling 9 (1): 87–111. doi:10.1007/s10270-008-0106-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Werf, J. M. E., B. F. van Dongen, C. A. Hurkens, and A. Serebrenik. 2008. “Process Discovery Using Integer Linear Programming.” In Applications and Theory of Petri Nets, edited by K. M. van Hee and R. Valk, 368–387. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weijters, A. J., and W. M. van der Aalst. 2003. ‘Rediscovering Workflow Models from Event-Based Data Using Little Thumb.’ Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering 10 (2): 151–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar