A Transdisciplinary digital approach for tractor’s human-centred design

References

• Abidi, M. H., A. M. El-Tamimi, A. M. Al-Ahmari, S. M. Darwish, and M. S. Rasheed. 2013. “Virtual Ergonomic Assessment of First Saudi Arabian Designed Car in a Semi-Immersive Environment.” Procedia Engineering 64: 622–631. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.137.
   Google Scholar
• Aromaa, S., and K. Väänänen. 2016. “Suitability of Virtual Prototypes to Support Human Factors/Ergonomics Evaluation during the Design.” Applied Ergonomics 56: 11–18. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, A., K. K. Chintamani, A. K. Pandya, and R. D. Ellis. 2009. “NASA TLX: Software for Assessing Subjective Mental Work-Load.” Behavior Research Methods 41 (1): 113–117. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.1.113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffin, D. B., and Nelson. C. 2001. Digital Human Modeling for Vehicle and Workplace Design. SAE International. 82–87. ISBN 0-7680-0687-2.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. H., A. C. Trappey, M. Peruzzini, J. Stiepandic, and N. Wognum. 2017. “Transdisciplinary Engineering: A Paradigm Shift, Proc. 24th ISPE Inc. International Conference on Transdisciplinary Engineering.” July 10–14, 2017, Singapore, In Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, IOS Press, The Netherlands, ISSN 2352-751X (print), ISSN 2352-7528 (online), ISBN 978-1-61499-778-8 (print), ISBN 978-1-61499-779-5 (online).
   Google Scholar
• Chryssolouris, G. 1992. Manufacturing Systems, Theory and Practice. New York: Springer. ISBN 978-1-4757-2213-0.
   Google Scholar
• Demirel, H. O., and V. G. Duffy. 2007. “Applications of Digital Human Modeling in Industry.” In Digital Human Modeling, edited by V. G. Duffy, 824–832. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73321-8_93.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, P. G. 2002. “Usability of the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation.” Ergonomics 45 (12): 817–828. doi:10.1080/00140130210159977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaziulusoy, A. I., C. Ryan, S. McGrail, P. Chandler, and P. Twomey. 2016. “Identifying and Addressing Challenges Faced by Transdisciplinary Research Teams in Climate Change Research.” Journal of Cleaner Production 123: 55–64. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S. H., M. H. Yun, K. Kim, and J. Kwahk. 2000. “Evaluation of Product Usability: Development and Validation of Usability Dimensions and Design Elements Based on Empirical Models.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 26: 477–488. doi:10.1016/S0169-8141(00)00019-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honglun, H., S. Shouqian, and P. Yunhe. 2007. “Research on Virtual Human in Ergonomic Simulation.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 53: 350–356. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2007.06.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 10075. 2004. “Ergonomic Principles Related to Mental Workload - Part 1-2-3.” International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9241-11. 2009. “Ergonomics of Human System Interaction - Part 1-11-110.” International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9241-210. 2009. “Ergonomics of Human System Interaction - Part 210: Human-Centered Design for Interactive Systems.” International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, P. W. 1998. “Human Factors for Pleasure in Product Use.” Applied Ergonomics 29 (1): 25–33. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(97)00022-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., and J. Y. Moon. 1998. “Designing Towards Emotional Usability in Customer Interfaces – Trustworthiness of Cyber-Banking System Interfaces.” Interacting with Computers 10: 1–29. doi:10.1016/S0953-5438(97)00037-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langaa Jensen, P. 2002. “Human Factors and Ergonomics in the Planning of Production.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 29: 121–131. doi:10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00056-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, R. J. 1994. “Behavioral and Emotional Usability, Thomson Consumer Electronics.” In Usability in Practice, AP Professional. M. E. Wiklund edited by. 59–82. San Diego, USA: Academic Press Professional. doi:10.1007/s00253-010-2731-z.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, M., M. Rüßmann, M. Strack, K. Lueth, and M. Bolle. 2015. “Report on Man and Machine in Industry 4.0: How Will Technology Transform the Industrial Workforce through 2025?” Accessed 15 May 2017 http://www.bcg.com.cn/en/files/publications/reports_pdf/BCG_Man_and_Machine_in_Industry_4_0_Sep_2015_ENG.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mandryk, R. L., K. M. Inkpen, and T. W. Calvert. 2005. “Using Psychophysiological Techniques to Measure User Experience with Entertainment Technologies.” Journal of Behaviour and Information Technology 25 (2): 141–158. doi:10.1080/01449290500331156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinello, F., A. Pezzuolo, and A. Simonetti. 2015. “Tractor Cabin Ergonomics Analyses by Means of Kinect Motion Capture Technology.” Contemporary Engineering Sciences 8 (28): 1339–1349. doi:10.12988/ces.2015.56188.
   Google Scholar
• Marquart, G., Cabrall, C., and de Winter, J. 2015. “Review of Eye-Related Measures of Drivers’ Mental Workload.” In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015, Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 3, pp. 2854–2861, Las Vegas, USA. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.783.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C., Cegarra, J. and Averty, P. 2011. Analysis of Mental Workload during En-Route Air Traffic Control Task Execution Based on Eye-Tracking Technique, Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. HCII 2011, LNAI 6781, pp. 592–597, Japan. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21741-8_63.
   Google Scholar
• McAtamney, L., and E. N. Corlett. 1993. “RULA: A Survey Method for Investigation of Work-Related Upper Limb Disorders.” Applied Ergonomics 24 (2): 91–99. doi:10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnicuk, V., Birrell, S., Crundall, E. and Jennings, P. 2016. “Towards Hybrid Driver State Monitoring: Review, Future Perspectives and the Role of Consumer Electronics.” In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium (IV), Gothenburg, Sweden, doi:10.1109/IVS.2016.7535572.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 2008. The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Doubleday. ISBN 978-0-465-05065-9.
   Google Scholar
• Occhipinti, E. 1998. “OCRA: A Concise Index for the Assessment of Exposure to Repetitive Movements of the Upper Limbs2.” Ergonomics 41 (9): 1290–1311. doi:10.1080/001401398186315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinko, O., A. Kun, A. Shyrokov, and P. Heeman. 2010. Estimating Cognitive Load Using Remote Eye Tracking in a Driving Simulator. In Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications, ETRA 2010, Austin, Texas, USA, March 22-24. doi:10.1145/1743666.1743701.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzini, M., F. Grandi, and M. Pellicciari. 2017a. “Benchmarking of Tools for User eXperience Analysis in Industry 4.0.” Procedia Manufacturing 11: 806–813. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.182.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzini, M., F. Grandi, M. Pellicciari, and C. E. Campanella. 2017b. “Virtual Maintenance Simulation for Socially Sustainable Serviceability.” Procedia Manufacturing 11: 1413–1420. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.271.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzini, M., and M. Pellicciari. 2017a. “A Framework to Design A Human-Centred Adaptive Manufacturing System for Aging Workers.” Advanced Engineering Informatics 33: 330–349. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2017.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruzzini, M., and M. Pellicciari. 2017b. “A Human Factors Assessment Model for Sustainable Manufacturing.” International Journal of Agile Systems and Management 10 (3/4): 206–230. doi:10.1504/IJASM.2017.088511.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzini, M., and M. Pellicciari. 2018. “User Experience Evaluation Model for Sustainable Manufacturing.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 31 (6): 494–512. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2017.1305502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pheasant, S. 1999. Body Space: Anthropometry, Ergonomics and the Design of Work. 121–123. Philadelphia:Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1177/106480460701500210.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, J. M., M. Freer, K. Case, and M. C. Bonney. 1995. “Computer Aided Ergonomics and Workspace Design.” In Evaluation of Human Work: A Practical Ergonomics Methodology, edited by J. R. Wilson and E. N. Corlett, 574–620. London: Taylor and Francis. doi:10.1016/0003-6870(91)90014-9.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. N. A., M. R. A. Rani, and M. J. Rohani. 2011. “WERA: An Observational Tool Develop to Assess the Physical Risk Factor Associated with WRMDs.” Journal of Human Ergology 40 (2): 19–36. doi:10.11183/jhe.40.19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romero, D., J. Stahre, T. Wuest, O. Noran, P. Bernus, Å. Fast-Berglund, and D. Gorecky. 2016. “Towards an Operator 4.0 Typology: A Human-Centric Perspective on the Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies.” International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering (CIE46) Proceedings, Tianjin, China, ISSN 2164-8670 CD-ROM, ISSN 2164-8689 ON-LINE.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, N., and T. Gedeon. 2012. “Objective Measures, Sensors and Computational Techniques for Stress Recognition and Classification: A Survey.” Computers Method and Programs in Biomedicine 108: 1287–1301. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stramler, J. H. 1993. The Dictionary for Human Factors/Ergonomics. Boca Raton: CRC Press. ISBN 9780849342363.
   Google Scholar
• Wognum, N., C. Bil, F. Elgh, M. Peruzzini, J. Stjepandić, and W. Verhagen. 2018. “Transdisciplinary Engineering Research Challenges.” In Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, edited by M. Peruzzini, M. Pellicciari, C. Bil, J. Stjepandić and N. Wognum, 753–762. The Netherlands: IOS Press. doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-898-3-753.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., T. Shinomiya, C. M. Goldsmith, G. Di Pasquale, and B. J. Baum 2011. “Using NASA-TLX to Evaluate the Flight Deck Design in Design Phase of Aircraft.” The 2nd International Symposium on Aircraft Airworthiness (ISAA 2011), Procedia Engineering, vol. 17, pp.77–83, China. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.10.010.
   Google Scholar