Semantic rules for capability matchmaking in the context of manufacturing system design and reconfiguration

References

• Aarnio, P., V. Vyatkin, and D. Hastbacka. 2016. “Context Modeling with Situation Rules for Industrial Maintenance.” In IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, ETFA, 9. doi:10.1109/ETFA.2016.7733539.
   Google Scholar
• Ameri, F., C. Urbanovsky, and C. McArthur. 2012. “A Systematic Approach to Developing Ontologies for Manufacturing Service Modeling.” In Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology and Semantic Web for Manufacturing July 24, 2012 Graz, Austria, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ameri, F., and C. McArthur. 2014. “Semantic Rule Modelling for Intelligent Supplier Discovery.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 27 (6): 570–590. doi:10.1080/0951192x.2013.834467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apache Software Foundation. 2017. “Apache Jena - A Free and Open Source Java Framework for Building Semantic Web and Linked Data Applications.” https://jena.apache.org/
   Google Scholar
• Backhaus, J., and G. Reinhart. 2017. “Digital Description of Products, Processes and Resources for Task-Oriented Programming of Assembly Systems.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 28 (8): 1787–1800. doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1063-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassiliades, N. 2018. “SWRL2SPIN : A Tool for Transforming SWRL Rule Bases in OWL Ontologies to Object-Oriented SPIN Rules.” ArXiv ID 1801.09061, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Bengel, M. 2009. “Model-Based Configuration – A Workpiece-Centred Approach.” In ASME/IFToMM International Conference on Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots, 689–695. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5173901/
   Google Scholar
• Bortolini, M., F. Gabriele Galizia, and C. Mora. 2018. “Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems: Literature Review and Research Trend.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 49: 93–106. September. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., F. Giustozzi, C. Zanni-Merk, F. De Beuvron Bertrand, and C. Reich. 2019. “Smart Condition Monitoring for Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Processes: An Ontology-Based Approach.” Cybernetics and Systems 50 (2): 82–96. doi:10.1080/01969722.2019.1565118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CO2PE! 2010. “CO2PE! - Taxonomy.” 2010. http://www.mech.kuleuven.be/co2pe!/taxonomy.php
   Google Scholar
• Cutting-Decelle, A. F., R. I.M. Young, J. J. Michel, R. Grangel, J. Le Cardinal, and J. P. Bourey. 2007. “ISO 15531 MANDATE: A Product-Process-Resource Based Approach for Managing Modularity in Production Management.” Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications 15 (2): 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X07079329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doulaverakis, C., V. Koutkias, G. Antoniou, and I. Kompatsiaris. 2017. “Applying SPARQL-Based Inference and Ontologies for Modelling and Execution of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Case Study on Hypertension Management.” In Knowledge Representation for Health Care, edited by D. Riaño, R. Lenz, and M. Reichert. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55014-5_6.
   Google Scholar
• Efthymiou, K., K. Sipsas, D. Mourtzis, and G. Chryssolouris. 2015. “On Knowledge Reuse for Manufacturing Systems Design and Planning: A Semantic Technology Approach.” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 8: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2014.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horrocks, l., P. F. Patel-Schneider, H. Boley, S. Tabet, B. Grosof, and M. Dean. 2004. “SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML.” W3C Member Submission. https://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/
   Google Scholar
• Jardim-Goncalves, R., A. Grilo, and K. Popplewell. 2016. “Novel Strategies for Global Manufacturing Systems Interoperability.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 27 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1007/s10845-014-0948-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvenpää, E., N. Siltala, O. Hylli, and M. Lanz. 2017. “Capability Matchmaking Procedure to Support Rapid Configuration and Re-Configuration of Production Systems.” Procedia Manufacturing 11. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.216.
   Google Scholar
• Järvenpää, E., O. Hylli, N. Siltala, and M. Lanz. 2018a. “Utilizing SPIN Rules to Infer the Parameters for Combined Capabilities of Aggregated Manufacturing Resources.” IFAC-Papers Online 51 (11): 84–89. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.239.
   Google Scholar
• Järvenpää, E., N. Siltala, O. Hylli, and M. Lanz. 2018b. “Product Model Ontology and Its Use in Capability-Based Matchmaking.” Procedia CIRP 72: 1094–1099. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.211.
   Google Scholar
• Järvenpää, E., N. Siltala, and O. Hylli. 2019. “Product, Manufacturing Resource and Capability Ontologies.” http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:csc-kata20190225153111925507
   Google Scholar
• Järvenpää, E., N. Siltala, O. Hylli, and M. Lanz. 2019a. “The Development of an Ontology for Describing the Capabilities of Manufacturing Resources.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 30 (2): 959–978. doi:10.1007/s10845-018-1427-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvenpää, E., N. Siltala, O. Hylli, and M. Lanz. 2019b. “Implementation of Capability Matchmaking Software Facilitating Faster Production System Design and Reconfiguration Planning.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 53: 261–270. October. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvenpää, E., N. Siltala, O. Hylli, and M. Lanz. 2021. “Capability Matchmaking Software for Rapid Production System Design and Reconfiguration Planning.” Procedia CIRP 97: 435–440. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.264.
   Google Scholar
• Knublauch, H. 2013. “SPIN - SPARQL Syntax.” W3C Member Submission. https://spinrdf.org/sp.html
   Google Scholar
• Knublauch, H. 2016. “The TopBraid SPIN API.” http://topbraid.org/spin/api/
   Google Scholar
• Köcher, Aljosha, Constantin Hildebrandt, and Alexander Fay. 2020. “A Formal Capability and Skill Model for Use in Plug and Produce Scenarios.” In 2020 25th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA). https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA46521.2020.9211874.
   Google Scholar
• Leitão, P., A. W. Colombo, and S. Karnouskos. 2016. “Industrial Automation Based on Cyber-Physical Systems Technologies: Prototype Implementations and Challenges.” Computers in Industry 81: 11–25. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2015.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., W. M. W. Xiaowu Zhou, G. Huang, Z. Tian, and S. Huang. 2018. “An Ontology-Based Product Design Framework for Manufacturability Verification and Knowledge Reuse.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 99: 2121–2135. doi:10.1007/s00170-018-2099-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohse, N., T. Maraldo, and J. Barata. 2008. “EUPASS Std-0007: Assembling Process Ontology Specification.” EUPASS Project Specification: 38.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., H. Wang, and X. Xu. 2016. “ManuService Ontology: A Product Data Model for Service-Oriented Business Interactions in A Cloud Manufacturing Environment.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing: 1–18. doi:10.1007/s10845-016-1250-x.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., and X. Xu. 2017. “A Semantic Web-Based Framework for Service Composition in A Cloud Manufacturing Environment.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 42: 69–81. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., and X. Xu. 2018. “Resource Virtualization: A Core Technology for Developing Cyber-Physical Production Systems.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 47: 128–140. April. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., L. Zhang, F. Tao, L. Ren, Y. Liu, and Z. Zhang. 2013. “A Modeling and Description Method of Multidimensional Information for Manufacturing Capability in Cloud Manufacturing System.” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 69 (5–8): 961–975. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5076-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleki, E., F. Belkadi, N. Boli, B. Jan Van Der Zwaag, K. Alexopoulos, S. Koukas, M. Marin-perianu, and A. Bernard. 2018. “Ontology-Based Framework Enabling Smart Product-Service Systems: Application of Sensing Systems for Machine Health Monitoring.” IEEE Internet of Things Journal 5 (6): 4496–4505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meditskos, G., S. Dasiopoulou, V. Efstathiou, and I. Kompatsiaris. 2013. “SP-ACT: A Hybrid Framework for Complex Activity Recognition Combining OWL and SPARQL Rules.” In IEEE Workshop on Context Modeling and Reasoning 2013, 25–30. doi:10.1109/PerComW.2013.6529451.
   Google Scholar
• Nahavandi, S. 2019. “Industry 5.0 - A Human-Centric Solution.” Sustainability 11 (16): 4371. doi:10.3390/su11164371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The OWL Working Group. 2004. “OWL Web Ontology Language Overview.” W3C Recommendation. https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
   Google Scholar
• Pfrommer, J., D. Stogl, K. Aleksandrov, V. Schubert, and B. Hein. 2014. “Modelling and Orchestration of Service-Based Manufacturing Systems via Skills.” In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA), 1–4. doi:10.1109/ETFA.2014.7005285.
   Google Scholar
• Pintzos, G., M. Matsas, and G. Chryssolouris. 2012. “Defining Manufacturing Performance Indicators Using Semantic Ontology Representation.” Procedia CIRP 3: 8–13. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2012.07.003.
   Google Scholar
• Rampersad, H.K. 1994. Integrated and Simultaneous Design for Robotic Assembly. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd 212 0471954667.
   Google Scholar
• Siltala, N., E. Järvenpää, and M. Lanz. 2018. “Value Proposition of a Resource Description Concept in a Production Automation Domain.” Procedia CIRP 72: 1106–1111. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.154.
   Google Scholar
• Siltala, N., E. Järvenpää, and M. Lanz. 2019a. “A Method to Evaluate Interface Compatibility during Production System Design and Reconfiguration.” Procedia CIRP 81: 282–287. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.049.
   Google Scholar
• Siltala, N., E. Järvenpää, and M. Lanz. 2019b. “Creating Resource Combinations Based on Formally Described Hardware Interfaces.” IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 530: 29–39. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05931-6_3.
   Google Scholar
• Siltala, N., E. Järvenpää, and M. Lanz. 2021. “Resource Interface Matchmaking as a Part of Automatic Capability Matchmaking.” IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 51–62. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72632-4_4.
   Google Scholar
• Sirin, E., B. Parsia, B. Grau, A. Kalyanpur, and Y. Katz. 2007. “Pellet: A Practical OWL-DL Reasoner.” Journal of Web Semantics 5 (2): 51–53. doi:10.1016/j.websem.2007.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPIN Working Group. 2017. “SPIN - SPARQL Inferencing Notation.” https://spinrdf.org/
   Google Scholar
• Sun, W., Q.-Y. Ma, and T.-Y. Gao. 2009. “An Ontology-Based Manufacturing Design System.” Information Technology Journal 8 (5): 643–656. doi:10.3923/itj.2009.643.656.
   Google Scholar
• Sure, Y., S. Staab, and R. Studer. 2009. “Ontology Engineering Methodology.” In Handbook on Ontologies. 2nd ed., edited by S. Staab and R. Studer, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin. 135–152.
   Google Scholar
• Thoben, K.-D., S. Wiesner, and T. Wuest. 2017. “‘Industrie 4.0’ and Smart Manufacturing – A Review of Research Issues and Application Examples.” International Journal of Automation Technology 11 (1): 4–16. doi:10.20965/ijat.2017.p0004.
   Google Scholar
• Tolio T, Ceglarek D, ElMaraghy H, Fischer A, Hu S, Laperrière L, Newman S and Váncza J. 2010. SPECIES—Co-evolution of products, processes and production systems. CIRP Annals 59 (2): 672–693. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2010.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W3C SPARQL Working Group. 2013. “SPARQL 1.1 Query Language.” W3C Recommendation. https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, H. J., and R. D. Paul. 2018. “Collaborative Intelligence: Humans and AI are Joining Forces.” Harvard Business Review, July–August.
   Google Scholar
• Yahya, M., J. G. Breslin, and M. Intizar Ali. 2021. “Semantic Web and Knowledge Graphs for Industry 4.0.” Applied Sciences 11 (11): 5110. doi:10.3390/app11115110.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, M., K. Deng, and W. A. Chaovalitwongse. 2017. “Manufacturing Resource Modeling for Cloud Manufacturing.” International Journal of Intelligent Systems 32 (4): 414–436. doi:10.1002/int.21867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar