Development of Digital twin for Plug-and-Produce of a Machine tending system through ISO 21919 interface

References

• Aivaliotis, P., G. Michalos, and S. Makris. 2018. “Cooperating Robots for Fixtureless Assembly: Modelling and Simulation of Tool Exchange Process.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 31 (12): 1235–1246. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2018.1512011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akan, B., A. Ameri, B. Çürüklu, and L. Asplund. 2011. Intuitive Industrial Robot Programming Through Incremental Multimodal Language and Augmented Reality. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China, 3934–3939. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Aleotti, J., S. Caselli, and M. Reggiani. 2004. “Leveraging on a Virtual Environment for Robot Programming by Demonstration.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 47 (2–3): 153–161. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2004.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Álvares, A. J., L. E. S. D. Oliveira, and J. C. E. Ferreira. 2018. “Development of a Cyber-physical´ Framework for Monitoring and Teleoperation of a CNC Lathe Based on MTConnect and OPC Protocols.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 31 (11): 1049–1066. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2018.1493232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amidi, O., and C. E. Thorpe. 1991. Integrated mobile robot control. Proceedings of SPIE (Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineering), 4-9 November 1990, Boston, MA, United States, Vol. 1388504–523. SPIE.
   Google Scholar
• Annem, V., P. Rajendran, S. Thakar, and S. K. Gupta. 2019. Towards Remote Teleoperation of a Semi-Autonomous Mobile Manipulator System in Machine Tending Tasks. In International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Erie, Pennsylvania, United States, Vol. 58745, V001T02A027. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Arrais, R., G. Veiga, T. T. Ribeiro, D. Oliveira, R. Fernandes, A. G. S. Conceição, and P. Farias. 2019. Application of the Open Scalable Production System to Machine Tending of Additive Manufacturing Operations by a Mobile Manipulator. In EPIA Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vila Real, Portugal, pages 345–356. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger-Barrette, M. 2016. Why I Chose a Robotiq Gripper? Accessed 30 November 2021. https://blog.robotiq.com/why-did-i-chose-a-robotiq-gripper-instead-of-any-other-grippers.
   Google Scholar
• Belousov, I. R., R. Chellali, and G. J. Clapworthy. 2001. Virtual Reality Tools for Internet Robotics. InProceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No. 01CH37164), Seoul, South Korea, Vol 2, 1878–1883. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Braumann, J., and S. Brell-Cokcan. 2012. “Real-Time Robot Simulation and Control for Architecturaldesign.”
   Google Scholar
• Brogårdh, T. 2009. “Robot Control Overview: An Industrial Perspective.” Modeling, Identification and Control 30 (3): 167. doi:10.4173/mic.2009.3.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookes, J., M. Warburton, M. Alghadier, M. Mon-Williams, and F. Mushtaq. 2020. “Studying Human Behavior with Virtual Reality: The Unity Experiment Framework.” Behavior Research Methods 52 (2): 455–463. doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01242-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doosan. Machine Tending 2022. Accessed 25 September 2022. https://www.doosanrobotics.com/en/Applications.
   Google Scholar
• Elhajj, I., N. Xi, and Y. -H. Liu. 2000. Real-Time Control of Internet Based Teleoperation with Force Reflection. In Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37065), San Francisco, CA, United States, Vol 4, 3284–3289. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 21919-1. 2019. Automation Systems and Integration — Interfaces for Automated Machine Tending — Part 1: Overview and Fundamental Principles. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standard Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 21919-2. 2021. Physical Device Control — Interfaces for Automated Machine Tending — Part 2: Safety and Control Interface, Standard ISO 21919-2. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standard Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Jen, Y. H., Z. Taha, and L. J. Vui. 2008. “Vr-Based Robot Programming and Simulation System for an Industrial Robot.” International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications, and Practice 15 (3): 314–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A., N. Chan, H. Herman, D. Huber, R. Meyers, P. Rander, R. Warner, J. Ziglar, and E. Capstick. 2011. “Real-Time Photorealistic Virtualized Reality Interface for Remote Mobile Robot Control.” The International Journal of Robotics Research 30 (3): 384–404. doi:10.1177/0278364910383724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolberg, D., and D. Zühlke. 2015. “Lean Automation Enabled by Industry 4.0 Technologies.” IFACPapersOnline 48 (3): 1870–1875. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.359.
   Google Scholar
• Laaki, H., Y. Miche, and K. Tammi. 2019. “Prototyping a Digital Twin for Real Time Remote Control Over Mobile Networks: Application of Remote Surgery.” IEEE Access 7: 20325–20336. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2897018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D., and Y. Huang. 2008. A General Robot Application Platform for Machine Tending. In 2008 IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics, Chengdu, China, 1–5. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Mei, K. -J., and R. -S. Lee. 2016. “Collision Detection for Virtual Machine Tools and Virtual Robot Arms Using the Shared Triangles Extended Octrees Method.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 29 (4): 355–373. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2015.1033755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumann, M., K. Wegener, and R. D. Schraft. 2007. Control Architecture for Robot Cells to Enable Plug’n’produce. In Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Rome, Italy, 287–292. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. -K., and T. -W. Chang. “Review of Domestic Research on Smart Manufacturing Technologies.” Journal of Society for E-Business Studies 23 (2): 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, L., E. Diez, R. Usamentiaga, and D. F. García. 2019. “Industrial Robot Control and Operator Training Using Virtual Reality Interfaces.” Computers in Industry 109: 114–120. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, G., S. Hüttner, and S. Krug. 2011. Automatic Configuration of Robot Systems-Upward and Downward Integration. In International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications, Aachen, Germany, 102–111. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Renishaw. Machine Tool Apps 2022, Accessed 25 September 2022, https://www.renishaw.com/en/machine-tool-apps–42373.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha, A., G. Di Orio, J. Barata, N. Antzoulatos, E. Castro, D. Scrimieri, S. Ratchev, and L. Ribeiro. 2014. An Agent Based Framework to Support Plug and Produce. In 2014 12th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Proto Alegre, Brazil, 504–510. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Seder, M., K. Macek, and I. Petrovic. 2005. An Integrated Approach to Real-Time Mobile Robot Control in Partially Known Indoor Environments. In 31st Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2005. IECON 2005. Raleigh, NC, United States, 6. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Torus. Intelligent HMI 2022. Accessed 25 September 2022, http://www.torus.co.kr.
   Google Scholar
• Um, J., K. Fischer, T. Spieldenner, and D. Kolberg. 2017. “Development a Modular Factory with Modular Software Components.” Procedia Manufacturing 11: 922–930. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.196.
   Google Scholar
• Um, J., S. Weyer, and F. Quint. 2017. “Plug-And-Simulate Within Modular Assembly Line Enabled by Digital Twins and the Use of Automationml.” IFAC-Papersonline 50 (1): 15904–15909. Unity. WebGL: Interacting with browser scripting. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2360.
   Google Scholar
• Vorderer, M., S. Junker, A. Lechler, and A. Verl. 2016. Cesa 3 R: Highly Versatile Plug-And-Produce Assembly System. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Fort Worth, TX, United States, 745–750. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Weyer, S., T. Meyer, U. Jumyung, and G. Ohmer. 2016. Open Semantic Meta-Model as a Cornerstone for the Design, Engineering and Management of CPS-Based Factories. In 4th AutomationML User Conference, Esslingen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Weyer, S., T. Meyer, M. Ohmer, D. Gorecky, and D. Zühlke. 2016. “Future Modeling and Simulation of Cps-Based Factories: An Example from the Automotive Industry.” IFAC-Papersonline 49 (31): 97–102. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.12.168.
   Google Scholar
• Wojtynek, M., H. Oestreich, O. Beyer, and S. Wrede. 2017. Collaborative and Robot-Based Plug & Produce for Rapid Reconfiguration of Modular Production Systems. In 2017 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), Taipei, Taiwan, 1067–1073. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, J. S., I. H. Park, J. H. Sohn, and H. J. Kim. 2018. “Development of Unified Interface for multivendors’ Cnc Based on Machine State Model.” Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering 35 (2): 151–156. doi:10.7736/KSPE.2018.35.2.151.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., G. Zhang, and Q. Yan. 2019. “Digital Twin-Driven Cyber-Physical Production System Towards Smart Shop-Floor.” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 10 (11): 4439–4453. doi:10.1007/s12652-018-1125-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zühlke, D. 2010. “Smartfactory—towards a Factory-Of-Things.” Annual Reviews in Control 34 (1): 129–138. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2010.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar