References
- Asahi Shimbun (2014) Nicchu shunō ga kaidan e zenteitoshite gōibunsho happyō irei no taiō, 7 November; accessed at http://www.asahi.com/articles/ASGC76F6NGC7UTFK01B.html, 28 November 2014.
- Batten, B. L. (2003) To the Ends of Japan: Premodern Frontiers, Boundaries, and Interactions, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
- Birchall, C. (2011) ‘Introduction to “secrecy and transparency”: the politics of opacity and openness', Theory Culture Society 28(7): 7–25.
- Bjola, C. (2013) ‘The ethics of secret diplomacy: a contextual approach’, Journal of Global Ethics 10(1): 85–100.
- Ching, F. (2013) ‘Anti-Japan propaganda has handcuffed Beijing’, The Japan Times, 28 January; accessed at http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2013/01/28/commentary/anti-japan-propaganda-has-handcuffed-beijing/#.UhL0TegzHIU, 28November 2014.
- Chung, C.-P. (2007) ‘Resolving China's Island Disputes: a two-level game analysis’, Journal of Chinese Political Science 12(1): 49–70.
- Cornago, N. (2013) Plural Diplomacies: Normative Predicaments and Functional Imperatives, Leiden: Brill.
- Downs, E. S. and Saunders, P. C. (1998–99) ‘Legitimacy and the limits of nationalism: China and the Diaoyu Islands’, International Security 23(3): 114–46.
- Drifte, R. (2014) ‘The Japan-China confrontation over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands – between “shelving” and “dispute escalation’, The Asia-Pacific Journal 12(30/3); accessed at http://japanfocus.org/-Reinhard-Drifte/4154, 12 March 2015.
- Drifte, R. (2013) ‘The Senkaku/Diaoyu islands territorial dispute between Japan and China: between the materialization of the “China threat” and Japan “reversing the outcome of world war II”?’ UNISCI Discussion Papers, Nº 32, pp. 9–62; accessed at http://international.uiowa.edu/files/international.uiowa.edu/files/file_uploads/drifte_senkaku_article_1.pdf.
- Drifte, R., (2008)‘Japanese-Chinese territorial disputes in the East China Sea – between military confrontation and economic cooperation’, Working Paper No. 24. London: Asia Research Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science.
- Fearon, J. D. (1994) ‘Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international dispute’, The American Political Science Review 88(3): 577–92.
- Goddard, S. E. (2006) ‘Uncommon ground: indivisible territory and the politics of legitimacy’, International Organization 60(1): 35–68.
- Guoxing, J. (1994) ‘The Diaoyudao (Senkaku) disputes and prospects for settlement’, Korean Journal of Defense Analysis 6(2): 285–311.
- Hall, I. (2010) ‘Review article: the transformation of diplomacy: mysteries, insurgencies and public relations’, International Affairs 86(1): 247–56.
- Hagström, L. (2012a) ‘China–Japan tensions over Senkaku purchase an orchestrated affair’, East Asia Forum, 17 September; accessed at http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/09/17/china-japan-tensions-over-senkaku-purchase-an-orchestrated-affair/
- Hagström, L. (2012b) ‘“Power Shift” in East Asia? a critical reappraisal of narratives on the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands incident in 2010’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5(3): 267–97.
- Hashimoto, M. (2010) ‘Democracy in Japan tested by the Chinese boat collision incident off the Senkaku Islands’, Yomiuri Shimbun, 29 November; accessed at http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/adv/chuo/dy/opinion/20101129.html, 22 November 2014.
- Hesselink, R. H. (2002) Prisoners from Nanbu, Reality and Make-Believe in 17th Century Japanese Diplomacy, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Press.
- Hiyama, H. (2014) ‘Japan, China envoys invoke “You Know Who” in tit-for-tat editorials’, The Japan Times, 6 January; accessed at http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/01/06/national/japan-china-envoys-invoke-you-know-who-in-tit-for-tat-editorials/#.VH7Nj8lWj2Y, 22 November 2014.
- Holsti, O. (2009) Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy, Revised Edition, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
- Hongo, J. (2012) ‘Tokyo's intentions for Senkaku islets’, The Japan Times, 19 April; accessed at: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2012/04/19/national/tokyos-intentions-for-senkaku-islets/#.VHG5JMkgz2Y, 23 November 2014.
- Horn, E. (2001) ‘Logics of political secrecy’, Theory, Culture & Society 28(7–8): 103–22.
- Iioka, N. (2013) ‘Wei Zhiyan and the subversion of the Sakoku’, in F. Kayoko, M. Shiro and A. Reid (eds). Offshore Asia: Maritime Interactions in Eastern Asia Before Steamships, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 236–58.
- Japan Times, The (2013) ‘Senkaku row shelved in 70s’. 5 June; accessed at http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/06/05/national/japan-china-agreed-to-shelve-senkaku-row-in-1970s-nonaka-says-in-beijing/#.UifU4OgzHIV, 23 August 2014.
- Japan Times, The (2013) ‘Abe accuses the Chinese of 'using force’, H.K. activists plan landing', 7 July; accessed at http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/07/07/national/abe-accuses-chinese-of-using-force/#.Uil2TOgzHIU, 23 November 2014.
- Japan Times, The (2013) ‘Most unaware of government's position on Senkakus’, 30 August; accessed at http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/08/30/national/most-unaware-of-governments-position-on-senkakus/, 23 November 2014.
- JFBA Online (2013) ‘Japan Federation of Bar Association – comments’, accessed at http://www.nichibenren.or.jp/activity/human/secret/about.html, 22 November 2014.
- Johnson, C. (1986) ‘The patterns of Japanese relations with China, 1952–1982’, Pacific Affairs 59(3): 402–28.
- Jönsson, C. and Karin, A. (2009) ‘Diplomacy and conflict resolution’, in J. Bercovitch, V. Kremenyuk and I. W. Zartman (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution, London: Sage.
- Korea Times, The (2012) ‘Presidential hopefuls clash on Dokdo’, 12 August; accessed at http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2012/08/116_117200.html, ( 07 November 2014.
- Laver, M. S. (2011) The Sakoku Edicts and the Politics of Tokugawa Hegemony, Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.
- Levy, J. S. (2012) ‘Coercive threats, audience costs, and case studies’, Security Studies 21(3): 383–90.
- Lewis, J. (2009) ‘National interest’, in C. Rumford (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of European Studies, London: Sage, pp. 110–30.
- Lippmann, W. (1955) The Public Philosophy, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
- Masuo, C. T. (2013) ‘Governing a troubled relationship: can the field of fisheries breed Sino-Japanese cooperation?’, Japanese Journal of Political Science 14(1): 51–72.
- McCormack, G. and Norimatsu, S. O. (2012) Resistant Islands: Okinawa Confronts Japan and the United States, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- Mercer, J. (2012) ‘Audience costs are toys’, Security Studies 21(3): 398–404.
- Mie, A. (2012) ‘No quick Senkakus fix, but return to status quo likely’, The Japan Times, 12 October; accessed at http://info.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20121012f1.html, 28 March. 2013.
- Mizuno, N. (2009) ‘Early Meiji policies towards the Ryukyus and the Taiwanese aboriginal territories’, Modern Asian Studies 43(3): 683–739.
- Mizuno, N. (2003) ‘China in Tokugawa foreign relations: the Tokugawa Bakufu's perception of and attitudes toward Ming-Qing China’, Sino-Japanese Studies 15:108–135; accessed at http://chinajapan.org/articles/15/mizuno15.108-144.pdf, 28 March 2013.
- Morgenthau, H. (2006) Politics Among Nations, McGrawHill.
- Morris-Suzuki, T. (2012) ‘Out with human rights, in with government-authored history: the comfort women and the Hashimoto prescription for a “New Japan”’, The Asia-Pacific Journal, Japan Focus 10(36) no. 1; 3 September; accessed at http://www.japanfocus.org/-Tessa-Morris_Suzuki/3818, 3 December 2014.
- Murakami, H. (2012) ‘World famous author Haruki Murakami's passionate essay on the dispute over the Senkaku Islands’ ( Like getting drunk on cheap sake), based on the translation by: Philipp Kendall (2012), accessed at http://en.rocketnews24.com/2012/10/02/world-famous-author-haruki-murakamis-passionate-essay-on-the-dispute-over-the-senkaku-islands/; the Japanese original appeared in: Asahi Shimbun, 28 September 2012. For an archived version see: http://kajipon.sakura.ne.jp/kt/peace-d2.html, 28 March 2013.
- O'Shea, P. (2012) ‘Sovereignty and the Senkaku/Diaoyu territorial dispute’, Working Paper 240. EIJS, Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics; accessed at http://www.hhs.se/EIJS/Research/Documents/240.pdf, 2 July 2014.
- Page, I. B. and Bouton, M. M. (2008) The Foreign Policy Disconnect: What Americans Want from Our Leaders but Don't Get, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Page, M. and Spencer, J. E. (2011) ‘Open secrets questionably arrived at: the Impact of wikileaks on diplomacy’, Defence Studies 11(2): 234–43.
- Park, I. (2012) ‘INTERVIEW: two countries need openness in resolving Takeshima dispute’, The Asahi Shinbun, 19 September; accessed at http://ajw.asahi.com/article/forum/security_and_territorial_issues/japan_south_korea/AJ201209190038z, 28 March 2014.
- Putnam, R. D. (1988) ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games’, International Organization 42(3): 427–60.
- Ramos-Mrosovsky, C. (2008) ‘International law's unhelpful role in the Senkaku islands’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 29(4): 903–46.
- Schultz, K. A. (2012) ‘Why we needed audience costs and what we need now’, Security Studies 21(3): 369–75.
- Sharp, P. (2009) Diplomatic Theories of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Snyder, J. and Borghard, E. D. (2011) ‘The cost of empty threats: a penny, not a pound’, American Political Science Review 105(3): 437–56.
- Stasavage, D. (2004) ‘Open-Door or Closed-Door? Transparency in domestic and international bargaining’, International Organization 58(4): 667–703.
- Stengers, I. (2010) ‘Including nonhumans in political theory: opening the Pandora's box?’ in B. Braun, W. Sarah and I. Stengers (eds) Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–34.
- Suganuma, U. (2000) Sovereign Rights and Territorial Space in Sino-Japanese Relations: Irredentism and the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands, (Asian Interactions and Comparisons) Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Press.
- Suzuki, S. (2013) ‘Europe at the periphery of Japanese world order’, in S. Suzuki, Y. Zhang and J. Quirk (eds) International Orders in the Early Modern World: Before the Rise of the West, London: Routledge, pp. 76–93.
- Suzuki, S. (2009) Civilization and Empire: China and Japan's Encounter with European International Society, London: Routledge.
- Talisse, R. (2005) Democracy After Liberalism: Pragmatism and Deliberative Politics, New York, NY: Routledge.
- Tam, Y.-H. (2007) ‘Who engineered the anti-Japanese protests in 2005?’ Macalester International 18; accessed at http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/macintl/vol18/iss1/25/, 3 December 2014.
- Tanaka, S. (2000) ‘Rekindling China–Japan conflict: the Senkaku/Diaoyutai Islands clash’ The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 39-3-10; 27 September 2010; accessed at: http://japanfocus.org/-Tanaka-Sakai/3418.
- Taniguchi, T. (2012) ‘Senkakushotōnitaisurunihon no shuchō’, The Journal of Island Studies (Tōshokennkyūjānaru) First issue: 18–31.
- Toby, R. P. (1984) State and Diplomacy in Early Modern Japan: Asia in the Development of the Tokugawa Bakufu, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Trachtenberg, M. (2012) ‘Audience costs: an historical analysis’, Security Studies 21(1): 3–42.
- Waldron, J. (1999) Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Wang, Z. (2008) ‘National humiliation, history education, and the politics of historical memory, International Studies Quarterly 52(4): 783–806.
- Wiegand, K. E. (2011) Enduring territorial disputes, Strategies of Bargaining, Coercive Diplomacy & Settlement, Studies in Security and International Affairs, Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
- Wiegand, K. E. (2009) ‘China's strategy in the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands dispute: issue linkage and coercive diplomacy’, Asian Security 5(2): 170–93.
- Yomiuri Shimbun (2010) Senkaku video likely leaked/YouTube footage of collisions probably authentic, 6 November; JCG say accessed at http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/T101105005027.htm, 1 May 2013.
- Zhang, Y. and Buzan, B. (2012) ‘The tributary system as international society in theory and practice’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5(2): 1–34.