Endangering alliance or risking proliferation?: US–Japan and US–Korea nuclear energy cooperation agreements

References

• Albright, D. (1989). Bomb potential for South America. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 45( 4), 16–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amighini, A. A., Rabellotti, R., & Sanfilippo, M. (2013). Do Chinese state-owned and private enterprises differ in their internationalization strategies? China Economic Review, 27, 312–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, A. (2008, March 27). Nuclear fuel reprocessing: U.S. policy development (CRS Report). Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
   Google Scholar
• AP. (1988, March 11). State department official defends nuclear pact with Japan. AP News Archive. Retrieved December 19, 2016, from http://www.apnewsarchive.com/1988/State-Department-Official-Defends-Nuclear-Pact-With-Japan/id-33df8a72537966db6756e49c5cde5aa5
   Google Scholar
• Choe, S.-h. (2015, April 23). U.S. and South Korea reach revised nuclear deal. New York Times. A8
   Google Scholar
• CSIS. (2013). Restoring U.S. leadership in nuclear energy: A national security imperative (Report of the CSIS Nuclear Energy Program). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Cirincione, J. (2007). Bomb scare: The history and future of nuclear weapons. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CQ. (1988). U.S.-Japan nuclear pact. In CQ Almanac (44th ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly. Retrieved August 23, 2016, from https://library.cqpress.com/cqalmanac/document.php?id=cqal88-1142515
   Google Scholar
• Department of State. (1981, March 16). Briefing paper. Digital National Security Archive: Japan and the U.S., 1977–1992 ( No. JA00836). Washington, DC: National Security Archive.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63–82). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drifte, R. (2000). Japan's quest for a permanent security council seat: A matter of pride or Justice? New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Einhorn, R. (2013, October 11). U.S.-ROK civil nuclear cooperation agreement: Overcoming the impasse. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Retrieved August 25, 2016, from http://www.brookings.edu/research/speeches/2013/10/us-south-korea-civil-nuclear-cooperation-agreement-einhorn
   Google Scholar
• Ford, G. R. (1975, December 7). Address at the University of Hawaii. Retrieved December 19, 2016, from http://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/library/speeches/750716.asp
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, M. (2008). Exporting mass destruction? The determinants of dual-use trade. Journal of Peace Research, 45(5), 633–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, M. (2009a). Spreading temptation: Proliferation and peaceful nuclear cooperation agreements. International Security, 34(1), 7–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, M. (2009b). Taking a walk on the supply side: The determinants of civilian nuclear cooperation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(2), 181–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, M. (2012). Atomic assistance: How atoms for peace programs cause nuclear insecurity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuda, T. (1977, August 26). Letter to president Carter. Digital National Security Archive: Japan and the United States, Part III. Washington, DC: National Security Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Goto, K. (2012, December). Japan's role as leader for nuclear nonproliferation. FAS Issue Brief. Washington, DC: Federation of American Scientists. Retrieved August 25, 2016, from https://fas.org/issue-brief/japans-role-leader-nuclear-nonproliferation/
   Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J., Lorenz-Orlean, S., & Kranenburg, H. v. (2008). Inter-firm technology transfer: Partnership embedded licensing or standard licensing agreements? Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(3), 529–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbs, M. (2013, April 14). Chung Mong-joon, the 123, and the state-level approach. In Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, OP-ED, Arms Control Wonk. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved August 25, 2016, from http://carnegieendowment.org/2013/04/14/chung-mong-joon-123-and-sla/fzha
   Google Scholar
• Holt, M. (2013, June 25). U.S. and South Korean cooperation in the world nuclear energy market: Major policy considerations (CRS Report). Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, L. (2007). Why Japan will not go nuclear (yet): International and domestic constraints on the nuclearization of Japan. International Security, 31(4), 67–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymans, J. E. C. (2011). Veto players, nuclear energy, and nonproliferation: Domestic institutional barriers to a Japanese Bomb. International Security, 36(2), 154–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAEA. (2005). Country nuclear fuel cycle profiles. (2nd ed.) (Technical Reports Series No. 425). Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, J., Suzuki, T., & Hayes, P. (2004, September 10). South Korea's nuclear mis-adventures (NAPSNet Special Report). Retrieved August 25, 2016, from http://nautilus.org/napsnet/napsnet-special-reports/south-koreas-nuclear-mis-adventures/
   Google Scholar
• Kaplow, J. M., & Gibbons, R. D. (2015). The days after a deal with Iran: Implications for the nuclear nonproliferation regime ( PE-135-RC). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• KEPCO. (2001). Hanguk jollyok sasipnyonsa [The history of forty years of the Korea Electrical Corporation]. Seoul: KEPCO.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, P. K., & Nikitin, M. B. D. (2015, December 3). Nuclear cooperation with other countries: A primer (CRS Report). Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Kitamura, M. (1996). Japan's plutonium program: A proliferation threat? Nonproliferation Review, 3(2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kroenig, M. (2009). Exporting the bomb: Why states provide sensitive nuclear assistance. American Political Science Review, 103(1), 113–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenig, M. (2010). Exporting the Bomb: Technology transfer and the spread of nuclear weapons. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. R., Baldwin, R. E., Bosworth, B., & Hooper, P. (1987). The persistence of the U.S. Trade deficit. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. (2005). Making a technological catch-up: Barriers and opportunities. Asian Journal of Technological Innovation, 13(2), 97–131.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Lim, C. (2001). Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy, 30(3), 459–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal, P. (1988). U.S.-Japan accord invites proliferation. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 44(4), 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman, D. S. (2012, June 6). Testimony to the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific: What's next for the US. Washington, DC: Nuclear Energy Institute. Retrieved August 25, 2016, from http://www.nei.org/Issues-Policy/Policy-Resources/Testimony/Testimony-To-The-House-Foreign-Affairs-Subcommitte
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, M. (1988, May 24). Burden-Sharing. Telegram from Ambassador in Tokyo to Secretary of State. Digital National Security Archive: Japan and the U.S., 1977–1992 (No. JA01540). Washington, DC: National Security Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Muroyama, Y. (1992). Nichibei anpotaisei [Japan-U.S. Security System] (Vol. 2). Tokyo: Yuhikaku.
   Google Scholar
• Nakano, J. (2012). Civilian nuclear energy cooperation between the United States and Japan. In Y. Tatsumi (Ed.), The new nuclear agenda: Prospects for US-Japan cooperation (pp. 41–56). Washington, DC: Stimson Center.
   Google Scholar
• National Security Archive, George Washington University. (2007). The nuclear vault: US opposed taiwanese Bomb during 1970s. Retrieved August 25, 2016, from http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb221/
   Google Scholar
• NSC. (1975, February 28). Memorandum: Development of US policy toward South Korean development of nuclear weapons. History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library, National Security Adviser Presidential Country Files for East Asia and the Pacific, Box 9, Korea (4). Retrieved May 19, 2016, from http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/114627
   Google Scholar
• NSC. (1977, May 5). Action Memorandum. Digital National Security Archive: Japan and the U.S., 1977-1992. Washington, DC: National Security Archive.
   Google Scholar
• NTI. (2012, November 27). U.S. Nuclear cooperation as nonproliferation: Reforms, or the devil you know. Washington, DC: Nuclear Threat Initiative. Retrieved August 25, 2016, from http://www.nei.org/Issues-Policy/Policy-Resources/Testimony/Testimony-To-The-House-Foreign-Affairs-Subcommitte
   Google Scholar
• Oberdorfer, D. (2003). Senator Mansfield: The Extraordinary Life of a Great American Statesman and Diplomat. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2011). Co-evolution of policy and emerging technology: Hydrogen energy policies in Iceland, the United Kingdom, and Korea. Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 26(1), 117–143.
   Google Scholar
• Price, T. (1990). Political electricity: What future for nuclear energy? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reuters. (2009, December 27). South Korea wins landmark gulf nuclear power deal. Retrieved May 19, 2016, from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-emirates-korea-nuclear-idUSLDE5BQ05O20091227
   Google Scholar
• Reuters. (2015, May 31). Westinghouse dedicates new office in United Arab Emirates. Retrieved August 25, 2016, from http://www.reuters.com/article/westinghouse-electric-idUSnBw315048a+100+BSW20150531
   Google Scholar
• Reuters. (2016). Profile: Korea electric power corp (KEP). Retrieved December 16, 2016, from http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/companyProfile?rpc=66&symbol=KEP
   Google Scholar
• Saar, J. (1977, July 1). Japanese want nuclear plant, despite Carter's objections. Washington Post. Retrieved December 16, 2016, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1977/07/01/japanese-want-nuclear-plant-despite-carters-objections/d9e349d2-9cdb-4acb-873b-3a8f5d9fc0e2/?utm_term=.b582849b4be9
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, S. D. (1996/97). Why do states build nuclear weapons? Three models in search of a bomb. International Security, 21(3), 54–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheen, S. (2011). Nuclear sovereignty versus nuclear security: Renewing the ROK-U.S. atomic energy agreement. Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 23(2), 273–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, A. (2011). The Tokai reprocessing issue: Japan's rise to elite nation status in the 1970s. Berkeley, CA: University of California. Retrieved May 20, 2016, from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/25×2×739
   Google Scholar
• Skjöldebrand, R. (1980). The international nuclear fuel cycle evaluation (INFCE). IAEA Bulletin, 22(2), 30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, E., Chang, S. Y., & Song, J. (2009). Technological catching-up and later comer strategy: A case study of the Asian shipbuilding industry. Seoul Journal of Business, 15(2), 25–57.
   Google Scholar
• Solingen, E. (2007). Nuclear logics: Constraining paths in East Asia and the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vivoda, V. (2014). Energy security in Japan: Challenges after Fukushima. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshioka, H. (2011). Genshiryoku no shakaisi [Social history of nuclear power]. Tokyo: Asahi Shimbun Shuppan.
   Google Scholar
• Zwigenberg, R. (2014). Hiroshima: The origins of global memory culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar