References
- Allison, G. (2015, September 24). The thucydides trap: Are the US and China headed for war? The Atlantic. Retrieved from www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/09/united-states-china-war-thucydidestrap/406756/
- Christensen, T. J. (2015). The China Challenge: Shaping the Choices of a Rival Power. New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company.
- Frost, E. L. (2014). Rival regionalisms and regional order: A slow crisis of legitimacy (Special Report No. 48). Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research.
- Goh, E. (2007/2008). Great powers and hierarchical order in southeast Asia. International Security, 32(3), 113–157.
- Grimes, W. W. (2011). The Asian monetary fund reborn? Implications of Chiang Mai initiative multilateralization. Asia Policy, 11(1), 79–104.
- Haftel, Y. Z. (2007). Designing for peace: Regional integration arrangements, institutional variation, and militarized interstate disputes. International Organization, 61, 217–237.
- Hemmer, C., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2002). Why is there no NATO in Asia? Collective identity, regionalism, and the origins of multilateralism. International Organization, 56(03), 575–607.
- Higgott, R. A. (2004). US foreign policy and the “Securitization” of economic globalization. International Politics, 41, 147–175.
- Ikenberry, G. J. (2009). After victory: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Krauss, E. S. (2004). The United States and Japan in APEC's EVSL negotiations: Regional multilateralism and trade. In E. S. Krauss & T. J. Pempel ( Eds.), Beyond bilateralism: US–Japan relations in the new Asia-Pacific. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great powers. New York, NY: Norton.
- Obama, B. (2016, May 2). The TPP would let the United States, not China, lead the way on global trade. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/president-obama-the-tpp-would-let-america-not-china-lead-the-way-on-global-trade/2016/05/02/680540e4-0fd0-11e6-93ae-50921721165d_story.html?utm_term=.23e43c251ce6
- Pekkanen, S. M. (2016, October 31). China and Japan vie to shape Asia's approach to outer space. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/saadiampekkanen/2016/10/31/china-and-japan-vie-to-shape-asias-approach-to-outer-space/#775152432606
- Pekkanen, S. M. (2017). Asian designs: Governance in the contemporary world order. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Pempel, T. J. (2005). Remapping East Asia: The construction of a region. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Pempel, T. J. (2010a). Soft balancing, hedging, and institutional Darwinism: The economic-security nexus and East Asian regionalism. Journal of East Asian Studies, 10(4), 209–238.
- Pempel, T. J. (2010b). More Pax, less Americana. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 10, 465–490.
- Pempel, T. J. (2016). Thucydides [clap] trap: U.S.-China relations in a changing Asia-Pacific. Global Asia, 10(4), 88–93.
- Pempel, T. J., & Tsunekawa, K. (2015). ( Eds.). Two crises, different outcomes: East Asia and global finance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Pillsbury, M. (2015). The hundred year marathon: China's secret strategy to replace America as the global superpower. New York, NY: Henry Holt & Co.
- Posen, B. R. (2003). Command of the commons: The military foundation of US hegemony. International Security, 28(1), 5–46.
- Tay, S. S. C. (2006, June 26). An East Asia community and the United States: A view from ASEAN. Paper presented at an international workshop organized by the Council on East Asian Community, Singapore.